SSR 65-62: SECTIONS 216(i), 222(c), and 223. -- DISABILITY -- CESSATION FOLLOWING TRIAL WORK PERIOD
FederalRulings
Ask Donna
How this section applies to your facts.
Social Security Rulings › DI › Substantial Gainful Activity › SSR 65-62
Text
20 CFR 404.1536, 404.1539
SSR 65-62
The worker, R, was injured November 19, 1961, at age 35 in an accident
which resulted in amputation of one leg above the knee, permanent hip
deformity, and other serious impairments. After filing of necessary
applications in September 1962, R was found to be under a disability
beginning November 19, 1961. A period of disability beginning that day was
established for R, and he was awarded disability insurance benefits
beginning June 1962, the first month after a 6-month "waiting period".
(See SSR 62-41, C.B. 1962, p. 105, concerning the "waiting period"
requirement.) His wife and three minor children were awarded wife's and
child's insurance benefits, respectively, on his earnings record, also
effective June 1962.
After 18 months of hospitalization, which included intensive orthopedic
treatment, R was able to stand and walk (with the help of an artificial
leg) for short periods, and to sit for extended periods without pain. His
impairments continue to be severe. R engaged in no remunerative activity
until April 1964, when the company for which he had been working at the
time of his accident rehired him on a trial basis as a production clerk
(he could no longer perform the duties of his former job as a machine
operator). When contacted in January 1965, R had been working regularly
and satisfactorily on his new job, since mid-April of 1964, receiving
wages of $80 for a 40-hour work week.
The question presented by these facts is what effect, if any, R's work
and earnings will have upon the benefits previously awarded to him, his
wife, and his children.
the duties of his former job as a machine
operator). When contacted in January 1965, R had been working regularly
and satisfactorily on his new job, since mid-April of 1964, receiving
wages of $80 for a 40-hour work week.
The question presented by these facts is what effect, if any, R's work
and earnings will have upon the benefits previously awarded to him, his
wife, and his children.
If, despite the handicap of severe impairments, the beneficiary
demonstrates by his work and earnings that he has regained the ability to
engage in substantial gainful activity, his disability will be found to
have ceased. Cessation of the beneficiary's disability requires
termination of his entitlement to disability insurance benefits and
(subject to an exception for blindness, not applicable here) of his period
of disability, effective with the end of the second month after the month
in which his disability ceased. Upon such termination of his disability
insurance benefits, any other benefits awarded on his earnings record must
be terminated simultaneously. Thus, a finding that R's disability has
ceased by reason of his demonstrated ability to work would require
termination of his period of disability, his disability insurance
benefits, and the benefits of his wife and children, effective with the
end of the second month after the month in which the disability ceased.
As an incentive to rehabilitation, section 222(c) permits a disability
beneficiary who returns to work despite his impairments, to continue to
receive his benefits during a designated period even though his work
otherwise is of a nature to constitute substantial gainful activity. After
a "trial work period," which may not exceed 9 months, it may be found that
he is able to engage in substantial work and no longer under a disability,
that is, his disability has ceased
y who returns to work despite his impairments, to continue to
receive his benefits during a designated period even though his work
otherwise is of a nature to constitute substantial gainful activity. After
a "trial work period," which may not exceed 9 months, it may be found that
he is able to engage in substantial work and no longer under a disability,
that is, his disability has ceased. This "trial work period" permits
beneficiaries who have not medically recovered from their impairments to
attempt work without the fear of losing their right to benefits before
they have demonstrated their ability to work for a significant period of
time. Under section 223, the beneficiary will receive his benefits for the
month in which his disability ceases and for the following 2 months.
A trial work period ends with whichever is earlier: the ninth month in
which the beneficiary works (the 9 months need not be consecutive), or the
month in which his condition has so improved as to justify a finding that
his disability has ceased. In the present case, there has been no such
improvement in R's impairments. R thus qualifies for the protection of a
trial work period. R did not begin work until April 1964, which is
accordingly the first of the 9 months of trial work. Since he worked in
each of the 8 months thereafter, his trial period ends with December
1964.
Therefore, it is held , that since R had regained his ability to
work, was working full time as a production clerk at substantial wages
despite his severe impairment, and is no longer entitled to a period of
trial work, he is now able to engage in substantial gainful activity. It
is further held that his disability ceased in January 1965, the
first month after the end of his trial work period
fore, it is held , that since R had regained his ability to
work, was working full time as a production clerk at substantial wages
despite his severe impairment, and is no longer entitled to a period of
trial work, he is now able to engage in substantial gainful activity. It
is further held that his disability ceased in January 1965, the
first month after the end of his trial work period. Accordingly, his
period of disability and his entitlement to disability insurance benefits,
and the entitlement of his wife and children to benefits of his earnings
record, terminate as of March 31, 1965, the end of the second month after
the month in which his disability ceased.
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.