SCR 20:3.4. Fairness to opposing party and counsel
WisconsinCourt rules
Ask Donna
How this section applies to your facts.
Wisconsin Supreme Court Rules › SCR Chapter 20B - Rules of Professional Conduct for Attorneys (20:2.1 through 20:8.5) › SCR 20:3.4
Text
Fairness to opposing party and counsel
A lawyer shall not:
(a) unlawfully obstruct another party's access to evidence or
unlawfully alter, destroy or conceal a document or other material having
potential evidentiary value. A lawyer shall not counsel or assist another
person to do any such act;
(b) falsify evidence, counsel or assist a witness to testify falsely, or
offer an inducement to a witness that is prohibited by law;
(c) knowingly disobey an obligation under the rules of a tribunal,
except for an open refusal based on an assertion that no valid obligation
exists;
(d) in pretrial procedure, make a frivolous discovery request or fail
to make reasonably diligent effort to comply with a legally proper
discovery request by an opposing party;
(e) in trial, allude to any matter that the lawyer does not reasonably
believe is relevant or that will not be supported by admissible evidence,
assert personal knowledge of facts in issue except when testifying as a
witness, or state a personal opinion as to the justness of a cause, the
credibility of a witness, the culpability of a civil litigant or the guilt or
innocence of an accused; or
(f) request a person other than a client to refrain from voluntarily
giving relevant information to another party unless:
(1) the person is a relative or an employee or other agent of a client;
and
(2) the lawyer reasonably believes that the person's interests will
not be adversely affected by refraining from giving such information.
ABA COMMENT
[1] The procedure of the adversary system contemplates that the evidence in a case is to be
marshalled competitively by the contending parties. Fair competition in the adversary system is
secured by prohibitions against destruction or concealment of evidence, improperly influencing
witnesses, obstructive tactics in discovery procedure, and the like.
[2] Documents and other items of evidence are often essential to establish a claim or defense
tes that the evidence in a case is to be
marshalled competitively by the contending parties. Fair competition in the adversary system is
secured by prohibitions against destruction or concealment of evidence, improperly influencing
witnesses, obstructive tactics in discovery procedure, and the like.
[2] Documents and other items of evidence are often essential to establish a claim or defense.
Subject to evidentiary privileges, the right of an opposing party, including the government, to obtain
evidence through discovery or subpoena is an important procedural right. The exercise of that right
can be frustrated if relevant material is altered, concealed or destroyed. Applicable law in many
jurisdictions makes it an offense to destroy material for purpose of impairing its availability in a
pending proceeding or one whose commencement can be foreseen. Falsifying evidence is also
generally a criminal offense. Paragraph (a) applies to evidentiary material generally, including
computerized information. Applicable law may permit a lawyer to take temporary possession of
physical evidence of client crimes for the purpose of conducting a limited examination that will not
alter or destroy material characteristics of the evidence. In such a case, applicable law may require the
lawyer to turn the evidence over to the police or other prosecuting authority, depending on the
circumstances.
[3] With regard to paragraph (b), it is not improper to pay a witness's expenses or to
compensate an expert witness on terms permitted by law. The common-law rule in most jurisdictions
is that it is improper to pay an occurrence witness any fee for testifying and that it is improper to pay
an expert witness a contingent fee.
[4] Paragraph (f) permits a lawyer to advise employees of a client to refrain from giving
information to another party, for the employees may identify their interests with those of the client.
See also Rule 4.2.
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.