Rule 1.2. Disciplinary Authority

WashingtonCourt rules

Ask Donna

How this section applies to your facts.

Washington Court Rules › Rules of General Application › Rules for Enforcement of Lawyer Conduct › ELC 1.2

This text was captured on Aug 14, 2026. It is a snapshot, not a live feed, so check the official code before relying on it.

Text

ELC 1.2

DISCIPLINARY AUTHORITY

Except as provided in RPC 8.5(c), any lawyer admitted to practice in this jurisdiction is

subject to the disciplinary authority of this jurisdiction and these Rules for Enforcement of

Lawyer Conduct, regardless of where the lawyer’s conduct occurs. A lawyer not admitted to

practice in this jurisdiction is also subject to the disciplinary authority of this jurisdiction and

these rules if the lawyer provides or offers to provide any legal services in this jurisdiction.

Disciplinary authority exists regardless of the lawyer’s residency or authority to practice law in

this state. A lawyer may be subject to the disciplinary authority of both this jurisdiction and

another jurisdiction for the same conduct.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.

Rule 1.2. Disciplinary Authority · ELC 1.2 | Frix