Rule 17. Plaintiff and Defendant; Capacity

District of ColumbiaCourt rules

Ask Donna

How this section applies to your facts.

District of Columbia Court Rules › Family Court › Superior Court Rules Governing Domestic Relations Proceedings › Super. Ct. Dom. Rel. R. 17

This text was captured on Aug 14, 2026. It is a snapshot, not a live feed, so check the official code before relying on it.

Text

(a) REAL PARTY IN INTEREST.

(1) Designation in General. An action must be brought in the name of the real party in

interest. The following may sue in their own names without joining the person for whose

benefit the action is brought:

(A) a personal representative;

(B) a guardian;

(C) a trustee;

(D) a party with whom or in whose name a contract has been made for another’s

benefit; and

(E) a party authorized by statute.

(2) Action in the Name of the United States or the District of Columbia for Another’s

Use or Benefit. When an applicable statute so provides, an action for another’s use or

benefit must be brought in the name of the United States or the District of Columbia.

(3) Curing Defect. The court may not dismiss an action for failure to bring in the name

of the real party in interest until, after an objection, a reasonable time has been allowed

for curing the defect. After revision, the action proceeds as if it had been originally

commenced by the real party in interest.

(b) CAPACITY TO SUE OR BE SUED. Capacity to sue or be sued is determined as

follows:

(1) for an individual who is not acting in a representative capacity, by the law of the

individual's domicile;

(2) for a corporation, by the law under which it was organized; and

(3) for all other parties, by the law of the District of Columbia, except that

(A) a partnership or other unincorporated association with no such capacity under

the District of Columbia’s laws may sue or be sued in its common name to enforce a

substantive right existing under the United States Constitution or laws; and

(B) 28 U.S.C. §§ 754 and 959 (a) govern the capacity of a receiver appointed by a

United States court to sue or be sued.

strict of Columbia, except that

(A) a partnership or other unincorporated association with no such capacity under

the District of Columbia’s laws may sue or be sued in its common name to enforce a

substantive right existing under the United States Constitution or laws; and

(B) 28 U.S.C. §§ 754 and 959 (a) govern the capacity of a receiver appointed by a

United States court to sue or be sued.

(c) MINOR OR INCOMPETENT PERSON.

(1) With a Representative. The following representatives may sue or defend on behalf

of a minor or an incompetent person:

(A) a general guardian;

(B) a committee;

(C) a conservator; or

(D) a like fiduciary.

(2) Without a Representative. Unless otherwise permitted by law, a minor or

incompetent person who does not have a duly appointed representative may sue by a

next friend or by a guardian ad litem. The court must appoint a guardian ad litem—or

issue another appropriate order—to protect a minor or incompetent person who is

unrepresented in an action. If a substantial question of incompetency is raised, the court

must give the parties an opportunity to be heard, and the court may appoint a guardian

ad litem—or issue another appropriate order—to protect the person who is

unrepresented.

This rule has been modified to more closely conform to the civil rule while

maintaining practices and procedures distinct to domestic relations actions. For

instance, Rule 17(c)(2) allows a minor to sue without a next friend or guardian ad litem

where permitted by law. D.C. Code § 16-914 (a-3) (2018 Supp.) permits a parent who

is under 18 years of age to initiate a custody proceeding; it also permits initiation of a

custody proceeding by the parent, guardian, or other legal representative of a minor

parent. The amendment makes appointment of a guardian ad litem discretionary if a

substantial question of incompetency is raised about a party who does not have a

representative

4 (a-3) (2018 Supp.) permits a parent who

is under 18 years of age to initiate a custody proceeding; it also permits initiation of a

custody proceeding by the parent, guardian, or other legal representative of a minor

parent. The amendment makes appointment of a guardian ad litem discretionary if a

substantial question of incompetency is raised about a party who does not have a

representative. Rule 17(c)(2) requires appointment of a guardian for a minor or

incompetent person only when the minor or incompetent person is a party.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.

Rule 17. Plaintiff and Defendant; Capacity · Super. Ct. Dom. Rel. R. 17 | Frix