Rule 3. The Complaint

District of ColumbiaCourt rules

Ask Donna

How this section applies to your facts.

District of Columbia Court Rules › Criminal Division › Superior Court Rules of Criminal Procedure › Super. Ct. Crim. R. 3

This text was captured on Aug 14, 2026. It is a snapshot, not a live feed, so check the official code before relying on it.

Text

The complaint is a written statement of the essential facts constituting the offense

charged. Except as provided in Rule 4.1, it must be made under oath before a judge or

magistrate judge or any employee of the Superior Court authorized by the Chief Judge

to administer oaths.

COMMENT TO 2017 AMENDMENTS

This rule has been amended consistent with the 2011 amendments to the federal

rule. It refers to new Rule 4.1 (Complaint, Warrant, or Summons by Telephone or Other

Reliable Electronic Means), permitting complaints to be sought and approved by reliable

electronic means.

COMMENT TO 2016 AMENDMENTS

This rule has been redrafted to conform to the general restyling of the federal rules in

2002. It differs from the federal rule by substituting the term “judge or magistrate judge”

for the term “magistrate judge” and by retaining the local provision that permits any

authorized employee of the Superior Court to administer oaths.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.

Rule 3. The Complaint · Super. Ct. Crim. R. 3 | Frix