Rule 27. Cross Petitions

ArizonaCourt rules

Ask Donna

How this section applies to your facts.

Arizona Court Rules › Arizona Rules of Protective Order Procedure › Part V. Issuance of Protective Orders › Rule 27

This text was captured on Aug 14, 2026. It is a snapshot, not a live feed, so check the official code before relying on it.

Text

(a) Separate Orders. Where each party has separately petitioned a court for a protective order, a judicial officer may grant separate protective orders upon finding that each petitioning party is entitled to protection and has requested appropriate relief. The judicial officer should make reasonable effort to ensure that no conflicting relief is granted. (b) Hearing on Separate Petitions. If opposing parties file separate petitions for protective orders, the judicial officer may: (1) hear each petition at separate ex parte hearings, or (2) set a joint hearing on both cases. (c) Case Numbers. The cross petition may be assigned a new case number or a case number associated with a pending family law case in superior court. But if a court assigns the same number to a family law and a protective order case, the court cannot allow remote electronic access to any case information regarding the registration, filing of a petition for, or issuance of the protective order, if such publication would be likely to reveal to the general public the identity or location of the party protected by the order. See Rule 123(g)(1)(E)(ii) and (iii), Rules of the Supreme Court . See also 18 U.S.C. § 2265(d)(3).

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.