Canon 2. A judge should avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety in all his activities

Canons of Judicial Ethics

Canon 2.

A judge should avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety in all his

activities.

A.

A judge should respect and comply with the law and should conduct himself at

all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the

judiciary.

B.

A judge should at all times maintain the decorum and temperance befitting his

office and should avoid conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice which brings the

judicial office into disrepute.

C.

A judge should not allow his family, social, political, or other relationships to

influence his judicial conduct or judgment. He should not lend the prestige of his office to

advance the private interests of others; nor should he convey or permit others to convey the

impression that they are in a special position to influence him. He should not testify voluntarily

as a character witness at any hearing before any court, or judicial or governmental

commission.

[Amended 5-7-80; Amended 8-25-2004.]

Commentary to Canon 2 as Amended Effective July 1, 2019

Public confidence in the judiciary is eroded by irresponsible or improper conduct by

judges. A judge must avoid all impropriety and appearance of impropriety. Judges must expect

to be the subject of constant public scrutiny. They must, therefore, accept restrictions on their

conduct that might be viewed as burdensome by the ordinary citizen and should do so freely

and willingly.

The testimony of a judge as a character witness injects the prestige of judicial office

into the proceeding in which the judge testifies and may be misunderstood to be an official

testimonial. This Canon, however, does not exempt a judge from testifying if the judge is

officially summoned. This Canon does not per se prohibit a judge from writing a letter of

recommendation disclosing personal information of someone’s experience, character, or

ability

e prestige of judicial office

into the proceeding in which the judge testifies and may be misunderstood to be an official

testimonial. This Canon, however, does not exempt a judge from testifying if the judge is

officially summoned. This Canon does not per se prohibit a judge from writing a letter of

recommendation disclosing personal information of someone’s experience, character, or

ability. Such a letter, however, should not be written if the recipient is engaged in litigation

before the judge or it is likely that the recipient will be engaged in proceedings that would

ordinarily come before the court.

This Canon is not intended to proscribe or punish any public comment by a judge unless

such public comment is impermissible under Canon 3.A(6).

[Commentary amended 7-1-2019]

Note from the reporter of decisions: The order amending Canon 2.C., Alabama

Canons of Judicial Ethics, effective August 25, 2004, is published in that volume of Alabama

Reporter that contains Alabama cases from 879 So.2d.

Note from the reporter of decisions: The order amending the Commentary to Canon

1, the Commentary to Canon 2, Canon 3.A(6), and the Commentary to Cannon 3.A(6),

Alabama Canons of Judicial Ethics, effective July 1, 2019, is published in that volume of

Alabama Reporter that contains Alabama cases from __ So. 3d.