Rule 10. Temporary Custody Hearing
AlaskaCourt rules
Ask Donna
How this section applies to your facts.
Alaska Rules of Court › Alaska Child in Need of Aid Rules › Alaska CINA R. 10
Text
(a) Time of Hearing.
(1) At the request of the petitioner, the court shall
schedule a temporary custody hearing:
(A) within 48 hours, including weekends and holidays, of
when the court is notified by the filing of a petition that
emergency custody was taken pursuant to CINA Rule 6; or
(B) no later than five business days following the filing
of a petition when emergency custody has not been taken.
(2) The court may continue a temporary custody hearing
at the request of a parent or guardian upon a showing of good
cause for why the parent or guardian is not prepared to respond
to the petition. A continuance must be requested before or at
the outset of the hearing.
(b) Conduct of Hearing.
(1) Opening Address. The court shall first determine
whether the persons specified in CINA Rule 7(b) have
received notice of the hearing. The court shall then determine
whether all parties have received copies of the petition and
understand its contents and shall advise the parties of the
nature of the proceedings and possible disposition. In addition,
the court shall advise the parties of the possibility of a
temporary custody or supervision order pending adjudication
and final disposition, and that the parents may be liable for
child support payments if the child is placed outside the home
at any time during the proceeding.
(2) Advice of Rights. The court shall advise the parties of
their right to counsel, including the right to court-appointed
counsel if applicable; the child’s right to a guardian ad litem;
their right to a hearing at which the state is required to present
evidence to prove the allegations in its petition; their right to
confront and cross-examine witnesses at such a hearing, to
present witnesses on their own behalf, and to compulsory
process to compel these witnesses to attend; and their privilege
against self-incrimination. In cases involving an Indian child,
the court shall also advise the parties of an Indian custodian’s
or tribe’s right to intervene
prove the allegations in its petition; their right to
confront and cross-examine witnesses at such a hearing, to
present witnesses on their own behalf, and to compulsory
process to compel these witnesses to attend; and their privilege
against self-incrimination. In cases involving an Indian child,
the court shall also advise the parties of an Indian custodian’s
or tribe’s right to intervene. If the hearing is being held
because emergency custody was taken pursuant to CINA Rule
6(a) or (b), the court shall also advise the child’s parents or
guardian, if they are present at the hearing, that they each have
the right to request a continuance of the hearing if they are not
prepared to respond to the allegation that the child is a child in
need of aid.
(3) The court may admit hearsay evidence which would
be otherwise inadmissible under the Evidence Rules if the
hearsay is probative of a material fact, has circumstantial
guarantees of trustworthiness, and the appearing parties are
given a fair opportunity to meet it.
(c) Findings of Fact and Order.
(1) The court shall order the child returned to the home
and dismiss the petition if the court does not find probable
cause to believe that the child is a child in need of aid under
AS 47.10.011.
(2) The court shall order the child placed in the
temporary custody of the Department or order the child
returned to the home with supervision by the Department if the
court finds probable cause to believe that the child is a child in
need of aid under AS 47.10.011.
he petition if the court does not find probable
cause to believe that the child is a child in need of aid under
AS 47.10.011.
(2) The court shall order the child placed in the
temporary custody of the Department or order the child
returned to the home with supervision by the Department if the
court finds probable cause to believe that the child is a child in
need of aid under AS 47.10.011.
(3) The court may approve the removal of the child from
the child’s home only if the court finds that continued
placement in the home is contrary to the welfare of the child;
and, in cases involving an Indian child, either: (A) that
removal from the child’s parent or Indian custodian is
necessary to prevent imminent physical damage or harm to the
child; or (B) that there is clear and convincing evidence,
including testimony of qualified expert witnesses, that the
child is likely to suffer serious emotional or physical damage if
left in the custody of the parent or Indian custodian.
(4) In any case in which the court has approved the
removal of the child pursuant to the preceding subparagraph,
the court shall make the inquiry and findings required by
CINA Rule 10.1.
(d) Subsequent Proceedings. If the court orders the
child placed in the temporary custody of the Department or
orders the child returned to the home with supervision by the
Department, the court must set the time for the adjudication
hearing and for the pretrial conference and meeting of parties
required by CINA Rule 13. The court may also set the time to
file motions, complete discovery, exchange witness and exhibit
lists, and file pretrial briefs. The court may schedule a
disposition hearing in conjunction with the adjudication
hearing. In such cases, the order setting the time for
adjudication and disposition must also set the time to submit
reports in aid of disposition.
rties
required by CINA Rule 13. The court may also set the time to
file motions, complete discovery, exchange witness and exhibit
lists, and file pretrial briefs. The court may schedule a
disposition hearing in conjunction with the adjudication
hearing. In such cases, the order setting the time for
adjudication and disposition must also set the time to submit
reports in aid of disposition.
(e) Review.
(1) If circumstances relating to the child’s placement
change pending adjudication or disposition, any party may
request that the court review the temporary custody or
supervision order.
(2) When a party seeks the return of a child to the child’s
home pending adjudication or disposition, if the party makes a
prima facie showing that removal is no longer necessary, the
burden of proof shifts to the Department as described below:
(A) in cases involving a non-Indian child, the court shall
return the child to the home unless the Department proves by a
preponderance of the evidence that return to the home is
contrary to the welfare of the child;
(B) in cases involving an Indian child, the court shall
restore the child to the child’s parent or Indian custodian unless
the Department proves (i) by a preponderance of the evidence
that removal from the parent or Indian custodian is still
necessary to prevent imminent physical damage or harm to the
child; or (ii) by clear and convincing evidence, including the
testimony of qualified expert witnesses, that the child is likely
to suffer serious emotional or physical damage if returned to
the custody of the parent or Indian custodian.
) by a preponderance of the evidence
that removal from the parent or Indian custodian is still
necessary to prevent imminent physical damage or harm to the
child; or (ii) by clear and convincing evidence, including the
testimony of qualified expert witnesses, that the child is likely
to suffer serious emotional or physical damage if returned to
the custody of the parent or Indian custodian.
(3) A party may seek review of other issues related to
temporary custody or supervision under CINA Rule 19.1(d).
Note:
Ch. 43, SLA 2001, amends AS 47.10.030, AS
47.10.070(a), and AS 47.10.080(f) to add provisions
concerning notice to and participation by grandparents.
According to §6 of the Act, these provisions have the effect of
amending Child in Need of Aid Rules 3, 7, 10, 15, 17, and 19
by requiring that grandparents be given notice of and an
opportunity to be heard at certain child-in-need-of-aid
proceedings.
Cross References
CROSS REFERENCE: AS 47.10.142(d) and (e); 25 U.S.C. §
1912(a); 25 U.S.C. § 1913(a); 25 U.S.C. § 1922; 42 U.S.C. § 672(a)(1).
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.