Rule 106. Precedential Effect of Certain Supreme Court Decisions

AlaskaCourt rules

Ask Donna

How this section applies to your facts.

Alaska Rules of Court › Alaska Rules of Appellate Procedure › Alaska R. App. P. 106

This text was captured on Aug 14, 2026. It is a snapshot, not a live feed, so check the official code before relying on it.

Text

(a) Equally Divided Court. In an appeal to the supreme

court, any issue or point on appeal on which the justices are

equally divided is affirmed in that appeal, but the issue or point

decided by an equally divided court shall not have precedential

effect.

(b) Two-to-One Vote in Supreme Court. In an appeal

that is decided with only three of five supreme court justices

participating, any issue or point on appeal that the court

decides by a two-to-one vote is decided only for purposes of

that appeal, and shall not have precedential effect.

PART II. PROCEDURE ON APPEALS

AS OF RIGHT

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.