Section 10. Minimum Requirements For Local Legislation
New MexicoRegulations
Ask Donna
How this section applies to your facts.
NMAC › Title 4 (CULTURAL RESOURCES) › Chapter 10 (CULTURAL PROPERTIES AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION) › Part 10 (CERTIFIED LOCAL GOVERNMENT PROGRAM) › Section 10
Text
Each CLG shall enact a local preservation ordinance which shall contain, at a minimum, the following provisions for the designation and protection of cultural properties by CLGs in New Mexico: A. an authorizing statement citing Sections 3-22-1 through 3-22-5 NMSA 1978 of the Historic District and Landmark Act; B. statement of purpose; C. definitions; D. membership and duties of a historic preservation review commission; E. designation and protection procedures for local landmarks and districts pursuant to Section 3-22-3 NMSA 1978 and the National Historic Preservation Act; F. criteria for designation of local landmarks and districts pursuant to Section 3-22-3 NMSA 1978 and the National Historic Preservation Act; G. provisions for holding a public hearing on proposed designations of local landmarks and districts and adequate public notification of such hearing; H. mandatory review of alterations, demolitions or new construction to listed landmarks and cultural properties within listed historic districts; I. specific guidelines to be used by the historic preservation review commission including as appropriate the secretary’s standards for rehabilitation in 36 CFR 67and the secretary's standards and guidelines for archaeology and historic preservation, available on the the national park service website at http://www.nps.gov/history/local-law/arch_stnds_0.htm; J. specific timeframes for reviews and for consideration of alternatives; K. penalties for noncompliance; and L. criteria to enforce appropriate state or local legislation related to the preservation of cultural properties of historic and prehistoric significance
and historic preservation, available on the the national park service website at http://www.nps.gov/history/local-law/arch_stnds_0.htm; J. specific timeframes for reviews and for consideration of alternatives; K. penalties for noncompliance; and L. criteria to enforce appropriate state or local legislation related to the preservation of cultural properties of historic and prehistoric significance. [4.10.10.10 NMAC - Rp, 4 NMAC 10.10.10, 1/1/08] [Additional information on standards for the treatment of historic properties with guidelines for preserving, rehabilitating, restoring and reconstructing buildings is available from the national park service web page at http://www.nps.gov/history/hps/tps/standguide/.] 4.10.10.11 MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS AND DUTIES OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION REVIEW COMMISSIONS A. The minimum membership and procedural requirements for historic preservation review commissions for CLGs in New Mexico are detailed below. (1) The commission shall have at least five members, all of whom have a demonstrated positive interest, competence or knowledge in the professions of architecture, historic architecture, architectural history, archaeology, anthropology, history, historic preservation, planning, real estate, design, building trades, landscape architecture, conservation, law, finance or related disciplines to the extent that these professionals are available in the community. The chief elected local official shall appoint all commission members. (2) The commission is encouraged to appoint two historic preservation review commission members who meet the professional qualifications standards in appendix A of 36 CFR 61
ng trades, landscape architecture, conservation, law, finance or related disciplines to the extent that these professionals are available in the community. The chief elected local official shall appoint all commission members. (2) The commission is encouraged to appoint two historic preservation review commission members who meet the professional qualifications standards in appendix A of 36 CFR 61. (3) Terms of office for commission members shall be no less than two years and shall be staggered; (4) Rules of procedure shall be established and made public; (5) The commission shall meet as often as necessary to complete commission responsibilities in a timely fashion, holding no less than four meetings per year, and the meetings shall be held at regular intervals, in a public place, advertised in advance and open to the public; notices of each public meeting shall be mailed to the HPD in advance. 4.10.10 NMAC 4 (6) Commission decisions shall be made in a public forum and applicants shall be notified of meetings and advised of decisions. (7) Written minutes, detailing, at a minimum, the actions and decisions of the commission, and reasons for such actions or decisions, shall be made available for public inspection except when confidentiality of site location is required pursuant to Section 18-6-11 NMSA 1978 and the Archaeological Resources Protection Act, 16 U.S.C. 470hh. (8) An annual report of its activities shall be provided to the SHPO as detailed at Section 4.10.10.16 NMAC below. (9) Vacancies on the commission shall be filled within 90 calendar days, unless an extension is requested. B
blic inspection except when confidentiality of site location is required pursuant to Section 18-6-11 NMSA 1978 and the Archaeological Resources Protection Act, 16 U.S.C. 470hh. (8) An annual report of its activities shall be provided to the SHPO as detailed at Section 4.10.10.16 NMAC below. (9) Vacancies on the commission shall be filled within 90 calendar days, unless an extension is requested. B. Duties of the historic preservation review commissions shall include, at a minimum, the following: (1) conducting or causing to be conducted a continuing survey of cultural properties in the community according to guidelines established by the HPD; (2) making recommendations for designation of local landmarks and historic districts to the appropriate local governing body; (3) establishing and using written guidelines for the conservation of designated local landmarks and historic districts and cultural properties of historic and prehistoric significance in decisions on requests for permits for alterations, demolition or additions to listed landmarks and buildings within historic districts; (4) acting in an advisory role to other officials and departments of local government regarding the protection of local cultural properties; (5) acting as a liaison on behalf of the local government to individuals and organizations concerned with historic preservation; and (6) working toward the continuing education of citizens within the CLG’s jurisdiction regarding historic preservation issues and concerns. C. Each commission is required to set aside at least one regular meeting for informational or educational purposes per year, to be attended by HPD staff, pertaining to the work and functions of the commission or to historic preservation. D. The CLG historic preservation review commission, in addition to the above stated duties, reviews all proposed national register nominations for properties within the boundaries of the CLG’s jurisdiction
at least one regular meeting for informational or educational purposes per year, to be attended by HPD staff, pertaining to the work and functions of the commission or to historic preservation. D. The CLG historic preservation review commission, in addition to the above stated duties, reviews all proposed national register nominations for properties within the boundaries of the CLG’s jurisdiction. When a commission reviews a nomination or other action that will impact properties within the boundaries and such reviews are normally evaluated by a professional in a specific discipline which is not represented on the commission, the commission shall seek expertise in this area before rendering its decision. E. Pursuant to chapter 3 of the grants manual, historic preservation review commission members shall not engage in activities that would appear to conflict with the fair, impartial and objective performance of commission responsibilities.
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.