Application Filed Without All Pages of Specification
FederalAgency guidance
Ask Donna
How this section applies to your facts.
USPTO MPEP › Chapter 0600 - Parts, Form, and Content of Application › MPEP § 601.01(d)
Text
The Office of Patent Application Processing (OPAP) reviews
application papers to determine whether all of the pages of specification are present
in the application. For an application filed under
37 CFR 1.53(b) or
(c)
prior to December 18, 2013 or a design application, if the
application is filed without all of the page(s) of the specification, but containing
something that can be construed as a written description, at least one drawing
figure, if necessary under
35 U.S.C. 113
(first sentence),
and, in a nonprovisional application, at least one claim, an OPAP notice (e.g., a
“Notice of Omitted Items”) will be sent indicating that the application papers so
deposited have been accorded a filing date, but are lacking some page(s) of the
specification. For an application other than a design application filed under
37 CFR
1.53(b)
or (c) on or after December 18, 2013, if the
application is filed without all of the page(s) of the specification, but contains
something that can be construed as a specification, with or without claims, an OPAP
notice (e.g., a “Notice of Omitted Items”) will be sent indicating that the
application papers so deposited have been accorded a filing date, but are lacking
some page(s) of the specification.
If the application does
not
contain anything
that can be construed as a written description, OPAP will mail a Notice of Incomplete
Application indicating that the application lacks the specification required by
35 U.S.C.
112
and
no
filing date is granted.
I.
APPLICATION ENTITLED TO FILING DATE
The procedure for handling nonprovisional application papers
having omitted items was revised in “Change in Procedure for Handling
Nonprovisional Applications Having Omitted Items,” 1315 OG 103 (February 20,
2007). Under the revised procedure, the mailing of an OPAP notice regarding a
missing page(s) of specification in a nonprovisional application will permit the
applicant to:
(A) promptly establish prior receipt in the USPTO of the page(s)
at issue
papers
having omitted items was revised in “Change in Procedure for Handling
Nonprovisional Applications Having Omitted Items,” 1315 OG 103 (February 20,
2007). Under the revised procedure, the mailing of an OPAP notice regarding a
missing page(s) of specification in a nonprovisional application will permit the
applicant to:
(A) promptly establish prior receipt in the USPTO of the page(s)
at issue. An applicant asserting that the page(s) was in fact received by
the USPTO with the application papers must, within two months from the date
of the OPAP notice, file a petition under
37 CFR
1.53(e)
with the petition fee set forth in
37 CFR 1.17(f)
, along
with evidence of such deposit. The petition fee will be refunded if it is
determined that the page(s) was in fact received by the USPTO with the
application papers deposited on filing. The two-month period is extendable
under
37
CFR 1.136
;
(B) promptly submit the omitted page(s) in a nonprovisional
application and accept the date of such submission as the application filing
date. An applicant desiring to submit the omitted page(s) in a
nonprovisional application and accept the date of such submission as the
application filing date must, within two months from the date of the OPAP
notice, file any omitted page(s) and a petition under
37 CFR
1.182
with the petition fee set forth in
37 CFR 1.17(f)
,
requesting the later filing date. The two-month period is extendable under
37 CFR
1.136
. For applications filed before September 16,
2012, an oath or declaration in compliance with
pre-AIA 37 CFR 1.63
and
pre-AIA 37 CFR 1.64
must be filed with the omitted page(s) and refer to such page(s); or
(C) accept the application as deposited in the USPTO by filing
an appropriate amendment. Applicant may accept the application as deposited
in the USPTO by either:
extendable under
37 CFR
1.136
. For applications filed before September 16,
2012, an oath or declaration in compliance with
pre-AIA 37 CFR 1.63
and
pre-AIA 37 CFR 1.64
must be filed with the omitted page(s) and refer to such page(s); or
(C) accept the application as deposited in the USPTO by filing
an appropriate amendment. Applicant may accept the application as deposited
in the USPTO by either:
(1) filing a substitute specification (including claims)
that amends the specification to renumber the pages consecutively and
cancels any incomplete sentences, in compliance with
37 CFR
1.121(b)(3)
and
1.125
, without adding the subject matter that
was in the omitted page(s) and without adding any new matter (see
35 U.S.C. 132(a)
). For a missing page of the
claim listing only, applicant is required to submit a replacement
claim listing with the claims renumbered consecutively, or, if
amendment to the claims is also necessary, then a complete claim
listing in compliance with
37 CFR 1.121(c)
.
The application will maintain the filing date as of the date of
deposit of the application papers in the USPTO, and the original
application papers (i.e., the original disclosure of the invention)
will include only those application papers present in the USPTO on the
date of deposit , or
(2) filing a substitute specification
(excluding claims), in compliance with
37 CFR
1.121(b)(3)
and
1.125
, to add the subject matter in the omitted
page(s) by relying on an incorporation by reference under
37 CFR 1.57(b)
or
other portions of the original disclosure, without any adding new
matter (see
35 U.S.C. 132(a)
). For a
missing page of the claim listing, applicant is required to submit a
complete claim listing in compliance with
37 CFR
1.121(c)
, in compliance with
37 CFR
1.121(b)(3)
and
1.125
, to add the subject matter in the omitted
page(s) by relying on an incorporation by reference under
37 CFR 1.57(b)
or
other portions of the original disclosure, without any adding new
matter (see
35 U.S.C. 132(a)
). For a
missing page of the claim listing, applicant is required to submit a
complete claim listing in compliance with
37 CFR
1.121(c)
. If an application was filed on or
after September 21, 2004, and contains a claim under
37 CFR
1.55
for priority of a prior-filed foreign
application, or a claim under
37 CFR 1.78
for
the benefit of a prior-filed provisional, nonprovisional, or
international application that was present on the filing date of the
application, and the omitted portion of the specification was
inadvertently omitted from the application and is completely contained
in the prior-filed application, applicant may submit an amendment to
include the inadvertently omitted portion of the specification
pursuant to
37 CFR 1.57(b)
.
The amendment should be identified as an amendment pursuant to
37 CFR 1.57(b)
and
must comply with the requirements of
37 CFR
1.57(b)
and
37 CFR 1.121
. See
MPEP § 217
. The
application will maintain the filing date as of the date of deposit of
the original application papers in the USPTO. The original application
papers (i.e., the original disclosure of the invention) will include
only those application papers present in the USPTO on the original
date of deposit. The two-month period is extendable under
37 CFR 1.136
.
The submission of omitted page(s) in a nonprovisional application
and acceptance of the date of such submission as the application filing date is
tantamount to simply filing a new application. Thus, applicants should consider
filing a new application as an alternative to submitting a petition under
37 CFR
1.182
(with the petition fee under
37 CFR
1.17(f)
) with any omitted page(s), which is a cost effective
alternative in instances in which a nonprovisional application is deposited
without filing fees
ssion as the application filing date is
tantamount to simply filing a new application. Thus, applicants should consider
filing a new application as an alternative to submitting a petition under
37 CFR
1.182
(with the petition fee under
37 CFR
1.17(f)
) with any omitted page(s), which is a cost effective
alternative in instances in which a nonprovisional application is deposited
without filing fees. Likewise, in view of the relatively low filing fee for
provisional applications, and the USPTO’s desire to minimize the processing of
provisional applications, the USPTO will not grant petitions under
37 CFR
1.182
to accept omitted page(s) and accord an application
filing date as of the date of such submission in provisional applications. The
applicant should simply file a new completed provisional application. The mailing
of an OPAP notice regarding omitted page(s) in a provisional application will
permit the applicant to either: (1) promptly establish prior receipt of the
page(s) at issue by filing of a petition under
37 CFR
1.53(e)
with the petition fee set forth in
37 CFR
1.17(f)
, along with evidence of such deposit; or (2) accept
the application as deposited by failing to file a petition within a two-month
non-extendable time period. Applications in which an OPAP notice regarding omitted
items has been mailed will be retained in OPAP to await a reply to the notice.
Failure to timely reply to the OPAP notice in a nonprovisional application will
result in abandonment of the application. Nonprovisional applications that are
timely completed will then be forwarded to the appropriate Technology Center for
examination of the application. For provisional applications in which applicant
accepts the application as deposited by failing to timely file a petition in
response to an OPAP notice regarding omitted items, if the provisional application
is complete under
37 CFR 1.51(c)
, it will be
held in the Office’s Image File Wrapper (IFW) system and automatically abandoned
at the end of its pendency period
examination of the application. For provisional applications in which applicant
accepts the application as deposited by failing to timely file a petition in
response to an OPAP notice regarding omitted items, if the provisional application
is complete under
37 CFR 1.51(c)
, it will be
held in the Office’s Image File Wrapper (IFW) system and automatically abandoned
at the end of its pendency period. See
MPEP § 601.01(a)
for treatment of
nonprovisional applications that are not complete under
37 CFR
1.51(b)
and
MPEP § 601.01(b)
for treatment of
provisional applications that are not complete under
37 CFR
1.51(c)
).
II.
APPLICATION NOT ENTITLED TO FILING DATE
If the application does
not
contain
anything that can be construed as a written description, OPAP will mail a Notice
of Incomplete Application indicating that the application lacks the specification
required by
35
U.S.C. 112
. Applicant may:
(A) file a petition under
37 CFR 1.53(e)
with the
petition fee set forth in
37 CFR 1.17(f)
,
asserting that (1) the missing specification was submitted, or (2) the
application papers as deposited contain an adequate written description
under
35
U.S.C. 112
. The petition under
37 CFR
1.53(e)
must be accompanied by sufficient evidence
(
37 CFR
1.181(b)
) to establish applicant’s entitlement to the
requested filing date (
e.g.,
a date-stamped postcard
receipt (
MPEP § 503
) to establish
prior receipt in the USPTO of the missing specification);
(B) submit the omitted specification, including at least one
claim if the application is a nonprovisional application filed under
35 U.S.C. 111(a)
prior to December 18, 2013 or a
design application, and accept the date of such submission as the
application filing date. For applications filed before September 16, 2012,
the omitted specification should be accompanied by an oath or declaration in
compliance with
pre-AIA 37 CFR 1.63
and
pre-AIA
37 CFR 1.64
referring to the specification being
submitted; or
(C) submit an amendment under
37 CFR
1.57(b)
in a nonprovisional application
n application, and accept the date of such submission as the
application filing date. For applications filed before September 16, 2012,
the omitted specification should be accompanied by an oath or declaration in
compliance with
pre-AIA 37 CFR 1.63
and
pre-AIA
37 CFR 1.64
referring to the specification being
submitted; or
(C) submit an amendment under
37 CFR
1.57(b)
in a nonprovisional application. If a
nonprovisional application was filed on or after September 21, 2004, and
contains a claim under
37 CFR 1.55
for priority
of a prior-filed foreign application, or a claim under
37 CFR
1.78
for the benefit of a prior-filed provisional,
nonprovisional, or international application that was present on the filing
date of the application, and the specification was inadvertently omitted
from the application and is completely contained in the prior-filed
application, applicant may submit an amendment to include the inadvertently
omitted specification pursuant to
37 CFR
1.57(b)
. The amendment must be accompanied by a
petition under
37 CFR 1.53(e)
along
with the petition fee set forth in
37 CFR
1.17(f)
. See
MPEP §
217
. The amendment should be identified as an
amendment pursuant to
37 CFR 1.57(b)
and must
comply with the requirements of
37 CFR
1.57(b)
and
37 CFR 1.121
. The
two-month period is extendable under
37 CFR 1.136
.
Applications in which a “Notice of Incomplete Application” has
been mailed will be retained in OPAP to await action by the applicant since
further action by the applicant is necessary for the application to be accorded a
filing date. Unless applicant completes the application or files a petition under
37 CFR
1.53(e)
with the petition fee set forth in
37 CFR
1.17(f)
, within the period set in the “Notice of Incomplete
Application,” the application will be processed as an incomplete application under
37 CFR
1.53(e)
.
III
pplicant since
further action by the applicant is necessary for the application to be accorded a
filing date. Unless applicant completes the application or files a petition under
37 CFR
1.53(e)
with the petition fee set forth in
37 CFR
1.17(f)
, within the period set in the “Notice of Incomplete
Application,” the application will be processed as an incomplete application under
37 CFR
1.53(e)
.
III.
APPLICATION FORWARDED FOR EXAMINATION
If it is discovered that an application that was forwarded to a
Technology Center (TC) for examination was filed without all of the page(s) of the
specification, and a Notice of Omitted Items has
not
been
mailed by OPAP, the examiner should review the application to determine whether
the application is entitled to a filing date. An application filed under
35 U.S.C.
111(a)
prior to December 18, 2013 or a design application is
entitled to a filing date if the application contains something that can be
construed as a written description, at least one drawing figure (if necessary
under
35 U.S.C.
113
, first sentence), and at least one claim. If the
application is not a design application and was filed under
35 U.S.C.
111(a)
on or after December 18, 2013, the application is
entitled to a filing date if it is filed with a specification, with or without
claims. However, claims must be filed before the application is sent to the
TC.
A.
Application Entitled to a Filing Date
If an application filed without all of the pages of the
specification is entitled to a filing date, the examiner should notify
applicant of the omission in the next Office action and require applicant to do
one of the following:
(A) accept the application, as filed, without all of the
page(s) of the specification;
(B) file any omitted page(s) and a petition under
37
CFR 1.182
with the petition fee set forth in
37 CFR 1.17(f)
,
requesting the date of submission of the omitted page(s) as the
application filing date
d notify
applicant of the omission in the next Office action and require applicant to do
one of the following:
(A) accept the application, as filed, without all of the
page(s) of the specification;
(B) file any omitted page(s) and a petition under
37
CFR 1.182
with the petition fee set forth in
37 CFR 1.17(f)
,
requesting the date of submission of the omitted page(s) as the
application filing date. For applications filed before September 16,
2012, the omitted pages must be accompanied by an oath or declaration in
compliance with
pre-AIA 37 CFR 1.63
and
pre-AIA 37 CFR 1.64
referring to the omitted
page(s); or
(C) file a petition under
37 CFR 1.53(e)
with
the petition fee set forth in
37 CFR
1.17(f)
alleging that the page(s) indicated as
omitted was in fact deposited with the USPTO with the application papers,
including any and all evidence supporting the allegation. See
MPEP § 503
. The petition
fee will be refunded if it is determined that the page(s) was in fact
received by the USPTO with the application papers deposited on filing.
If applicant is willing to accept the application, as filed,
without all of the page(s) of the application (item A above), an amendment of
the specification is required to renumber the pages of the application
consecutively and to cancel any incomplete sentences caused by the absence of
the omitted page(s). The amendment should be submitted in response to the
Office action.
If an application was filed on or after September 21, 2004, and
contains a claim under
37 CFR 1.55
for priority of
a prior-filed foreign application, or a claim under
37 CFR
1.78
for the benefit of a prior-filed provisional,
nonprovisional, international, or international design application that was
present on the filing date of the application, and the omitted portion of the
specification was inadvertently omitted from the application and is completely
contained in the prior-filed application, applicant may submit an amendment to
include the inadvertently omitted portion of the specification pursuant to
37 CFR 1.5
l,
nonprovisional, international, or international design application that was
present on the filing date of the application, and the omitted portion of the
specification was inadvertently omitted from the application and is completely
contained in the prior-filed application, applicant may submit an amendment to
include the inadvertently omitted portion of the specification pursuant to
37 CFR 1.57(b)
. The amendment should be submitted in
response to the Office action and must comply with
37 CFR
1.57(b)
and
37 CFR 1.121
. See
MPEP § 217
.
Any petition filed in accordance with item B or C above will
be forwarded to the Office of Petitions.
B.
Application NOT Entitled to a Filing Date
If upon review of the application, the examiner determines that
the application is NOT entitled to a filing date, the examiner should forward
the application to OPAP for mailing of a “Notice of Incomplete
Application.”
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.