Acting in a Representative Capacity
FederalAgency guidance
Ask Donna
How this section applies to your facts.
USPTO MPEP › Chapter 0400 - Representative of Applicant or Owner › MPEP § 402.04
Text
37 CFR 1.34 Acting in a representative
capacity
When a patent practitioner acting in a representative
capacity appears in person or signs a paper in practice before the United States
Patent and Trademark Office in a patent case, his or her personal appearance or
signature shall constitute a representation to the United States Patent and Trademark
Office that under the provisions of this subchapter and the law, he or she is
authorized to represent the particular party on whose behalf he or she acts. In
filing such a paper, the patent practitioner must set forth his or her registration
number, his or her name and signature. Further proof of authority to act in a
representative capacity may be required.
In accordance with
37 CFR 1.34
, a paper filed by a
registered patent attorney or agent in an application in which they are not of record
must include their name, registration number, and signature. Acceptance of papers filed
in patent applications and reexamination proceedings by registered attorneys and agents
upon a representation that the attorney or agent is authorized to act in a
representative capacity is for the purpose of facilitating replies on behalf of
applicants in patent applications and, further, to obviate the need for filing powers of
attorney in individual applications or patents when there has been a change in
composition of law firms or corporate patent staffs. It is noted that design patent
practitioners acting in a representative capacity may only do so in design patent
matters. See
MPEP § 1502.02
.
When a patent practitioner acts in a representative
capacity by filing a paper in an application filed on or after September 16, 2012, they
must be submitting the paper on behalf of all parties identified as the applicant. The
provisions of
37 CFR
1.34
in no way convey authority for a patent practitioner to
submit papers in an application only on behalf of some of the parties identified as the
applicant
patent practitioner acts in a representative
capacity by filing a paper in an application filed on or after September 16, 2012, they
must be submitting the paper on behalf of all parties identified as the applicant. The
provisions of
37 CFR
1.34
in no way convey authority for a patent practitioner to
submit papers in an application only on behalf of some of the parties identified as the
applicant. For example, where the applicant is three joint inventors who do not agree
about how to proceed in the application, a patent practitioner who only represents one
of the joint inventors may not file papers in the application to the exclusion of the
other joint inventors. Likewise, where there are multiple assignees identified as the
applicant, a patent practitioner may not file papers only on behalf of some of the
parties.
Powers of attorney by less than all applicants or owners
are not accepted by the Office unless a petition under
37 CFR 1.36(a)
or
37 CFR
1.183
is granted in the application, and the granted petition
results in more than one attorney, agent, applicant or owner prosecuting the application
at the same time and signing correspondence. See
MPEP § 402.10
. Acting in a
representative capacity under
37 CFR 1.34
is not a means of
prosecuting an application only on behalf of some of the applicant parties.
For an application filed before September 16, 2012, a
patent practitioner may act in a representative capacity on behalf of the applicant or
the assignee of the entire right who has properly established its right to take action
under
37 CFR
3.71
and
3.73
.
See
MPEP § 405
for information concerning
interviews with a patent practitioner not of record
only on behalf of some of the applicant parties.
For an application filed before September 16, 2012, a
patent practitioner may act in a representative capacity on behalf of the applicant or
the assignee of the entire right who has properly established its right to take action
under
37 CFR
3.71
and
3.73
.
See
MPEP § 405
for information concerning
interviews with a patent practitioner not of record.
Except as noted below, a person acting in a representative
capacity may not sign (A) a power of attorney (
37 CFR 1.32
), (B) a document
granting access to an application, (C) a change of correspondence address), (D) a
terminal disclaimer (
37 CFR 1.321(b)(1)
), or (E) a
request for an express abandonment without filing a continuing application
(
37 CFR
1.138(b)
). In an application filed on or after September 16, 2012,
a person acting in a representative capacity may sign a document granting access to an
application or a change of correspondence address if (1) a power of attorney has not
been appointed under
37 CFR 1.32(b)
and (2) the patent
practitioner was named in the application transmittal papers. See
37 CFR 1.14(c)
and
1.33(a)
. In an application filed before September 16, 2012, a
person acting in a representative capacity may sign a document granting access to an
application or a change of correspondence address if (1) an executed oath or declaration
under
pre-AIA 37 CFR
1.63
has not been filed and (2) the patent practitioner was named
in the application transmittal papers. See
pre-AIA 37 CFR 1.14(c)
and
pre-AIA 37 CFR
1.33(a)
.
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.