37 CFR 1.53(b) and 37 CFR 1.63(d) Divisional-Continuation Procedure
FederalAgency guidance
Ask Donna
How this section applies to your facts.
USPTO MPEP › Chapter 0200 - Types and Status of Application; Benefit and Priority Claims › MPEP § 201.06(c)
Text
37 CFR 1.53 Application number, filing date, and
completion of application.
[Editor Note: Applicable to patent applications
filed under
35 U.S.C. 111
on or after
December 18, 2013.]
*****
(b)
Application filing requirements— Nonprovisional
application.
The filing date of an application for patent filed
under this section, other than an application for a design patent or a
provisional application under paragraph (c) of this section, is the date on
which a specification, with or without claims, is received in the Office.
The filing date of an application for a design patent filed under this
section, except for a continued prosecution application under paragraph (d)
of this section, is the date on which the specification as prescribed by
35
U.S.C. 112
, including at least one claim, and any
required drawings are received in the Office. No new matter may be
introduced into an application after its filing date. A continuing
application, which may be a continuation, divisional, or
continuation-in-part application, may be filed under the conditions
specified in
35 U.S.C. 120
,
121
,
365(c)
, or
386(c)
and §
1.78
.
(1) A continuation or divisional application
that names as inventors the same or fewer than all of the inventors
named in the prior application may be filed under this paragraph or
paragraph (d) of this section.
(2) A continuation-in-part application (which
may disclose and claim subject matter not disclosed in the prior
application) or a continuation or divisional application naming an
inventor not named in the prior application must be filed under this
paragraph.
*****
37 CFR 1.53 (pre-PLT) Application number, filing date, and
completion of application.
[Editor Note: Applicable to patent applications filed under
35
U.S.C. 111 (pre-PLT)
before December 18, 2013.]
*****
im subject matter not disclosed in the prior
application) or a continuation or divisional application naming an
inventor not named in the prior application must be filed under this
paragraph.
*****
37 CFR 1.53 (pre-PLT) Application number, filing date, and
completion of application.
[Editor Note: Applicable to patent applications filed under
35
U.S.C. 111 (pre-PLT)
before December 18, 2013.]
*****
(b)
Application filing requirements - Nonprovisional
application.
The filing date of an application for patent filed
under this section, except for a provisional application under paragraph (c)
of this section or a continued prosecution application under paragraph (d)
of this section, is the date on which a specification as prescribed by
35
U.S.C. 112
containing a description pursuant to §
1.71
and at least one claim pursuant to §
1.75
, and any drawing required by §
1.81(a)
are filed in the Patent and Trademark Office.
No new matter may be introduced into an application after its filing date. A
continuing application, which may be a continuation, divisional, or
continuation-in-part application, may be filed under the conditions
specified in
35 U.S.C. 120
,
121
or
365(c)
and §
1.78(c)
and
(d)
.
(1) A continuation or divisional application
that names as inventors the same or fewer than all of the inventors
named in the prior application may be filed under this paragraph or
paragraph (d) of this section.
(2) A continuation-in-part application
(which may disclose and claim subject matter not disclosed in the
prior application) or a continuation or divisional application naming
an inventor not named in the prior application must be filed under
this paragraph.
*****
I.
IN GENERAL
37 CFR
1.53(b)
is the section under which all applications are
filed EXCEPT: (A) an application resulting from entry of an international
application into the national stage under
35 U.S.C. 371
and
37 CFR
1.495
; (B) a provisional application under
35 U.S.C
nuation or divisional application naming
an inventor not named in the prior application must be filed under
this paragraph.
*****
I.
IN GENERAL
37 CFR
1.53(b)
is the section under which all applications are
filed EXCEPT: (A) an application resulting from entry of an international
application into the national stage under
35 U.S.C. 371
and
37 CFR
1.495
; (B) a provisional application under
35 U.S.C.
111(b)
and
37 CFR 1.53(c)
; (C) a
continued prosecution application (CPA) of a design application under
37 CFR
1.53(d)
; or (D) a nonprovisional international design
application. Applications submitted under
37 CFR 1.53(b)
, as well as
CPAs submitted under
37 CFR 1.53(d)
, are
applications filed under
35 U.S.C. 111(a)
. An
application filed under
37 CFR 1.53(b)
may be an
original or a reissue, a continuation, a divisional, a continuation-in-part, or a
substitute. (See
MPEP
§ 201.02
for substitute application.) The application
may be for a utility patent under
35 U.S.C. 101
, a design patent
under
35 U.S.C.
171
, a plant patent under
35 U.S.C.
161
, or a reissue under
35 U.S.C.
251
. An application will be treated as one filed under
37 CFR
1.53(b)
unless otherwise designated.
For applications filed on or after December 18,
2013, the filing date of a nonprovisional application filed under
35
U.S.C. 111(a)
, other than a design patent application, is
the date on which a specification, with or without claims, is received in the
Office. Effective December 18, 2013, utility and plant patent applications filed
under
35
U.S.C. 111(a)
are no longer required to include at least one
claim or any drawings in order to receive a filing date for the application. See
MPEP §
601.01(a)
, subsection I. The filing date of an
application for a design patent is the date on which the Office receives the
specification including at least one claim and any required drawings.
35
U.S.C. 171(c)
. In addition, as provided in
35 U.S.C.
111(c)
, a nonprovisional application filed under
35
U.S.C
e
claim or any drawings in order to receive a filing date for the application. See
MPEP §
601.01(a)
, subsection I. The filing date of an
application for a design patent is the date on which the Office receives the
specification including at least one claim and any required drawings.
35
U.S.C. 171(c)
. In addition, as provided in
35 U.S.C.
111(c)
, a nonprovisional application filed under
35
U.S.C. 111(a)
on or after December 18, 2013, may be filed by
a reference to a previously filed application (foreign, international,
provisional, or nonprovisional) indicating that the specification and any drawings
of the application are replaced by the reference to the previously filed
application. See
MPEP § 601.01(a)
, subsection III.
In order to be complete for filing date purposes,
all applications filed under
37 CFR 1.53(b)
before December
18, 2013, must include a specification as prescribed by
35 U.S.C.
112
containing a description pursuant to
37 CFR 1.71
and at least one claim pursuant to
37 CFR 1.75
, and any drawing
required by
37 CFR 1.81(a)
.
For applications filed on or after September 16,
2012, the basic filing fee, search fee, examination fee and application size fee,
and the inventor’s oath or declaration in compliance with
37 CFR
1.63
(and
37 CFR 1.64
(for a substitute
statement),
37 CFR 1.175
(for a reissue) or
37 CFR
1.162
(for a plant patent)) are also required by
37 CFR
1.51(b)
for a complete application. However, the filing of
the basic filing fee, search fee, examination fee, application size fee and
inventor’s oath or declaration may be filed after the application filing date upon
payment of the surcharge set forth in
37 CFR 1.16(f)
.64
(for a substitute
statement),
37 CFR 1.175
(for a reissue) or
37 CFR
1.162
(for a plant patent)) are also required by
37 CFR
1.51(b)
for a complete application. However, the filing of
the basic filing fee, search fee, examination fee, application size fee and
inventor’s oath or declaration may be filed after the application filing date upon
payment of the surcharge set forth in
37 CFR 1.16(f)
. Additionally,
the filing of the inventor’s oath or declaration may be postponed until payment of
the issue fee where the application contains an application data sheet under
37 CFR
1.76
identifying each inventor by the inventor's legal name,
and a mailing address where each inventor customarily receives mail, and
residence, if the inventor lives at a location which is different from where the
inventor customarily receives mail.
For applications filed prior to September 16, 2012,
the statutory filing fee and an oath or declaration in compliance with
37 CFR
1.63
(and
37 CFR 1.175
(if a reissue) or
37 CFR
1.162
(if for a plant patent)) are also required by
37 CFR
1.51(b)
for a complete application, but the filing fee and
oath or declaration may be filed after the application filing date upon payment of
the surcharge set forth in
37 CFR 1.16(f)
. See
37 CFR
1.53(f)
and
MPEP § 607
.
Unless an application is submitted with a statement
that the application is a continuation or divisional application, see
37
CFR 1.78(d)(2)
, the Office will process the application as a
new non-continuing application
the filing fee and
oath or declaration may be filed after the application filing date upon payment of
the surcharge set forth in
37 CFR 1.16(f)
. See
37 CFR
1.53(f)
and
MPEP § 607
.
Unless an application is submitted with a statement
that the application is a continuation or divisional application, see
37
CFR 1.78(d)(2)
, the Office will process the application as a
new non-continuing application. Applicants are advised to clearly designate any
continuation, divisional, or continuation-in-part application as such by
submitting a reference to the prior-filed application with the appropriate
relationship (i.e., continuation, divisional, or continuation-in-part) in
compliance with
37 CFR 1.78(d)(2)
(i.e., in an
application data sheet for an application filed on or after September 16, 2012, or
in the first sentence(s) of the specification or in an application data sheet for
an application filed prior to September 16, 2012) to avoid the need for a petition
to accept an unintentionally delayed claim under
37 CFR
1.78(e)
and the petition fee set forth in
37 CFR
1.17(m)
, and the issuance of a filing receipt that does not
indicate that the application is a continuation, divisional, or
continuation-in-part. See
MPEP § 211
et seq.
II.
OATH/DECLARATION
37 CFR 1.63 Oath or Declaration.
[Editor Note: Applicable only to patent applications filed under
35 U.S.C. 111
,
363
, or
385
on or after
September 16, 2012.]
*****
(d)
(1) A newly executed oath or declaration
under §
1.63
, or
substitute statement under §
1.64
, is not required under §§
1.51(b)(2)
and
1.53(f)
, or
under §§
1.497
and
1.1021(d)
, for
an inventor in a continuing application that claims the benefit
under
35 U.S.C
.
[Editor Note: Applicable only to patent applications filed under
35 U.S.C. 111
,
363
, or
385
on or after
September 16, 2012.]
*****
(d)
(1) A newly executed oath or declaration
under §
1.63
, or
substitute statement under §
1.64
, is not required under §§
1.51(b)(2)
and
1.53(f)
, or
under §§
1.497
and
1.1021(d)
, for
an inventor in a continuing application that claims the benefit
under
35 U.S.C. 120
,
121
,
365(c)
, or
386(c)
in
compliance with §
1.78
of an
earlier-filed application, provided that an oath or declaration in
compliance with this section, or substitute statement under §
1.64
, was
executed by or with respect to such inventor and was filed in the
earlier-filed application, and a copy of such oath, declaration, or
substitute statement showing the signature or an indication thereon
that it was executed, is submitted in the continuing
application.
(2) The inventorship of a continuing
application filed under
35 U.S.C.
111(a)
is the inventor or joint inventors
specified in the application data sheet filed before or
concurrently with the copy of the inventor's oath or declaration
from the earlier-filed application. If an application data sheet is
not filed before or concurrently with the copy of the inventor's
oath or declaration from the earlier-filed application, the
inventorship is the inventorship set forth in the copy of the
inventor's oath or declaration from the earlier-filed application,
unless it is accompanied by a statement signed pursuant to §
1.33(b)
stating
the name of each inventor in the continuing application.
(3) Any new joint inventor named in the
continuing application must provide an oath or declaration in
compliance with this section, except as provided for in §
1.64
.
*****
37 CFR 1.63 (pre-AIA) Oath or Declaration.
[Editor Note: Not applicable to patent applications filed under
35 U.S.C. 111
,
363
, or
385
on or after
September 16, 2012.]
g
the name of each inventor in the continuing application.
(3) Any new joint inventor named in the
continuing application must provide an oath or declaration in
compliance with this section, except as provided for in §
1.64
.
*****
37 CFR 1.63 (pre-AIA) Oath or Declaration.
[Editor Note: Not applicable to patent applications filed under
35 U.S.C. 111
,
363
, or
385
on or after
September 16, 2012.]
(d)
(1) A newly executed oath or declaration
is not required under §
1.51(b)(2)
and
§
1.53(f)
in a
continuation or divisional application, provided that:
(i) The prior nonprovisional
application contained an oath or declaration as prescribed by
paragraphs (a) through (c) of this section;
(ii) The continuation or divisional
application was filed by all or by fewer than all of the
inventors named in the prior application;
(iii) The specification and drawings
filed in the continuation or divisional application contain
no matter that would have been new matter in the prior
application; and
(iv) A copy of the executed oath or
declaration filed in the prior application, showing the
signature or an indication thereon that it was signed, is
submitted for the continuation or divisional application.
(2) The copy of the executed oath or
declaration submitted under this paragraph for a continuation or
divisional application must be accompanied by a statement
requesting the deletion of the name or names of the person or
persons who are not inventors in the continuation or divisional
application.
(3) Where the executed oath or
declaration of which a copy is submitted for a continuation or
divisional application was originally filed in a prior application
accorded status under §
1.47
, the copy
of the executed oath or declaration for such prior application must
be accompanied by:
the name or names of the person or
persons who are not inventors in the continuation or divisional
application.
(3) Where the executed oath or
declaration of which a copy is submitted for a continuation or
divisional application was originally filed in a prior application
accorded status under §
1.47
, the copy
of the executed oath or declaration for such prior application must
be accompanied by:
(i) A copy of the decision granting
a petition to accord §
1.47
status to the prior application,
unless all inventors or legal representatives have filed an
oath or declaration to join in an application accorded status
under §
1.47
of
which the continuation or divisional application claims a
benefit under
35 U.S.C.
120
,
121
, or
365(c)
; and
(ii) If one or more inventor(s) or
legal representative(s) who refused to join in the prior
application or could not be found or reached has subsequently
joined in the prior application or another application of
which the continuation or divisional application claims a
benefit under
35 U.S.C.
120
,
121
, or
365(c)
, a copy of the subsequently
executed oath(s) or declaration(s) filed by the inventor or
legal representative to join in the application.
(4) Where the power of attorney or
correspondence address was changed during the prosecution of the
prior application, the change in power of attorney or
correspondence address must be identified in the continuation or
divisional application. Otherwise, the Office may not recognize in
the continuation or divisional application the change of power of
attorney or correspondence address during the prosecution of the
prior application.
correspondence address was changed during the prosecution of the
prior application, the change in power of attorney or
correspondence address must be identified in the continuation or
divisional application. Otherwise, the Office may not recognize in
the continuation or divisional application the change of power of
attorney or correspondence address during the prosecution of the
prior application.
(5) A newly executed oath or declaration
must be filed in a continuation or divisional application naming an
inventor not named in the prior application.
*****
A copy of an oath or declaration from a prior
application may be submitted with a continuation or divisional application, or
with a continuation-in-part application filed on or after September 16, 2012, even
if the oath or declaration identifies the application number of the prior
application. However, if such a copy of the oath or declaration is filed after the
filing date of the continuation or divisional application and an application
number has been assigned to the continuation or divisional application (see
37 CFR
1.5(a)
), the cover letter accompanying the oath or
declaration should identify the application number of the continuation or
divisional application. The cover letter should also indicate that the oath or
declaration submitted is a copy of the oath or declaration from a prior
application to avoid the oath or declaration being incorrectly matched with the
prior application file. Furthermore, applicant should also label the copy of the
oath or declaration with the application number of the continuation or divisional
application in the event that the cover letter is separated from the copy of the
oath or declaration
mitted is a copy of the oath or declaration from a prior
application to avoid the oath or declaration being incorrectly matched with the
prior application file. Furthermore, applicant should also label the copy of the
oath or declaration with the application number of the continuation or divisional
application in the event that the cover letter is separated from the copy of the
oath or declaration.
A copy of the oath or declaration from a prior
nonprovisional application may be filed in a continuation or divisional
application even if the specification for the continuation or divisional
application is different from that of the prior application, in that revisions
have been made to clarify the text to incorporate amendments made in the prior
application, or to make other changes provided the changes do not constitute new
matter relative to the prior application. If the examiner determines that the
continuation or divisional application contains new matter relative to the prior
application, the examiner should so notify the applicant in the next Office action
and indicate that the application should be redesignated as a
continuation-in-part.
For applications filed on or after September 16,
2012, a continuing application, including a continuation-in-part application, may
be filed with a copy of an oath or declaration or substitute statement from the
prior nonprovisional application, provided that the oath or declaration is in
compliance with
37 CFR 1.63
or the substitute
statement is in compliance with
37 CFR 1.64
. See
37 CFR
1.63(d)(1)
. It should be noted that a copy of the inventor’s
oath or declaration submitted in a continuing application filed on or after
September 16, 2012 must comply with requirements of
35 U.S.C.
115
and
37 CFR 1.63
or
1.64
in effect for applications filed on or after September
16, 2012
is in
compliance with
37 CFR 1.63
or the substitute
statement is in compliance with
37 CFR 1.64
. See
37 CFR
1.63(d)(1)
. It should be noted that a copy of the inventor’s
oath or declaration submitted in a continuing application filed on or after
September 16, 2012 must comply with requirements of
35 U.S.C.
115
and
37 CFR 1.63
or
1.64
in effect for applications filed on or after September
16, 2012. For example, the inventor’s oath or declaration must include a statement
that the inventor is an original inventor of the claimed application and a
statement that the application was made or was authorized to be made by the person
executing the oath or declaration. Accordingly, a new inventor’s oath or
declaration may need to be filed in a continuing application filed on or after
September 16, 2012, where the prior application was filed before September 16,
2012, in order to meet the requirements of
35 U.S.C. 115
and
37 CFR
1.63
(or
1.64
) in effect for
applications filed on or after September 16, 2012. See
MPEP §
602.05(a)
for additional details regarding oaths or
declarations in continuing applications filed on or after September 16, 2012.
For applications filed prior to September 16, 2012,
a newly executed oath or declaration is required in a continuation or divisional
application filed under
37 CFR 1.53(b)
naming an
inventor not named in the prior application, and in a continuation-in-part
application. See
MPEP § 602.05(b)
for additional
details regarding oaths or declarations in continuing applications filed before
September 16, 2012.
III.
SPECIFICATION AND DRAWINGS
A continuation or divisional application may be
filed under
35 U.S.C
continuation or divisional
application filed under
37 CFR 1.53(b)
naming an
inventor not named in the prior application, and in a continuation-in-part
application. See
MPEP § 602.05(b)
for additional
details regarding oaths or declarations in continuing applications filed before
September 16, 2012.
III.
SPECIFICATION AND DRAWINGS
A continuation or divisional application may be
filed under
35 U.S.C. 111(a)
using the
procedures set forth in
37 CFR 1.53(b)
, by providing:
(A) a new specification and drawings and a copy of the signed oath or declaration
as filed in the prior application provided the new specification and drawings do
not contain any subject matter that would have been new matter in the prior
application; or (B) a new specification and drawings and a newly executed oath or
declaration provided the new specification and drawings do not contain any subject
matter that would have been new matter in the prior application. For continuing
applications filed on or after September 16, 2012, claiming the benefit of an
application filed before September 16, 2012, a copy of the inventor’s oath or
declaration filed in the earlier-filed application can only be submitted in the
continuing application if the oath or declaration complies with the requirements
of
35 U.S.C.
115
as revised effective September 16, 2012. For
applications filed on or after September 16, 2012, to claim the benefit of a prior
application under
35 U.S.C. 120
,
121
,
365(c)
, or
386(c)
applicant must include a reference to the prior
application in compliance with
37 CFR 1.78(d)(2)
in an
application data sheet. For applications filed prior to September 16, 2012, the
reference to the prior application must be in the first sentence(s) of the
specification or in an application data sheet. See
MPEP §
211
et seq
fit of a prior
application under
35 U.S.C. 120
,
121
,
365(c)
, or
386(c)
applicant must include a reference to the prior
application in compliance with
37 CFR 1.78(d)(2)
in an
application data sheet. For applications filed prior to September 16, 2012, the
reference to the prior application must be in the first sentence(s) of the
specification or in an application data sheet. See
MPEP §
211
et seq.
The new specification and drawings of a
continuation or divisional application filed under
37 CFR
1.53(b)
may include changes to the specification and
drawings originally filed in the prior application in the manner that an applicant
may file a substitute specification, see
37 CFR 1.125
, or amend the
drawings of an application so long as it does not result in the introduction of
new matter. Applicant should file a new set of claims as the original claims of
the continuing application instead of filing a copy of the claims from the prior
application and a preliminary amendment to those claims. It is the applicant’s
responsibility to review any new specification or drawings submitted for a
continuation or divisional application under
37 CFR
1.53(b)
to determine that it contains no new matter. For
applications filed before September 16, 2012, an applicant is advised to simply
file a continuing application with a newly executed oath or declaration when it is
questionable as to whether the continuing application adds material that would
have been new matter if presented in the prior application. In addition, for
applications filed prior to September 16, 2012, if one or more claims are allowed
in the continuation or divisional application which are directed to matter shown
and described in the prior nonprovisional application but not claimed in the prior
application, the applicant should be required to file a supplemental oath or
declaration under
pre-AIA 37 CFR 1.67(b)
. For
applications filed on or after September 16, 2012, pursuant to
37 CFR
1.67(b)
, no supplemental oath or declaration will be
required
or divisional application which are directed to matter shown
and described in the prior nonprovisional application but not claimed in the prior
application, the applicant should be required to file a supplemental oath or
declaration under
pre-AIA 37 CFR 1.67(b)
. For
applications filed on or after September 16, 2012, pursuant to
37 CFR
1.67(b)
, no supplemental oath or declaration will be
required.
If a continuation or divisional application as filed
contains subject matter that would have been new matter in the prior application,
the applicant is required to delete the benefit claim or change the relationship
(continuation or divisional application) to continuation-in-part. Form paragraph
2.10.01
may be used to require the applicant to
correct the relationship of the applications. See
MPEP §
211
et seq.
Any utility or plant patent application, including
any continuing application, that will be published pursuant to
35 U.S.C.
122(b)
should be filed under
37 CFR
1.53(b)
with a specification that includes any claim(s) and
drawings that the applicant would like to have published. This is important
because under
35
U.S.C. 154(d)
, a patentee may obtain provisional rights if
the invention claimed in a patent is substantially identical to the invention
claimed in the patent application publication and the Office will generally
publish the specification (including the claims) and drawings as filed. Filing a
continuing application under
37 CFR 1.53(b)
with a
preliminary amendment (which makes all the desired changes to the specification,
including adding, deleting or amending claims) is NOT recommended. For
applications filed on or after September 21, 2004, a preliminary amendment that is
present on the filing date of the application is part of the original disclosure
of the application
iled. Filing a
continuing application under
37 CFR 1.53(b)
with a
preliminary amendment (which makes all the desired changes to the specification,
including adding, deleting or amending claims) is NOT recommended. For
applications filed on or after September 21, 2004, a preliminary amendment that is
present on the filing date of the application is part of the original disclosure
of the application. If a preliminary amendment is filed in a format that cannot be
included in the publication, the Office of Patent Application Processing (OPAP)
will issue a notice to the applicant requiring the applicant to submit the
amendment in a format usable for publication purposes. See
37 CFR
1.115(a)(1)
and
1.215
. The only format for an
amendment to the specification (other than the claims) that is usable for
publication is a substitute specification in compliance with
37 CFR
1.121(b)(3)
and
1.125
. As noted above, a
continuation or divisional application filed under
37 CFR
1.53(b)
may be filed with a new specification and corrected
drawings, along with a copy of an oath or declaration from a prior (parent)
application, provided the new specification and drawings do not contain any
subject matter that would have been new matter in the prior application. Thus, the
new specification and corrected drawings may include some or all of the amendments
entered during the prosecution of the prior application(s), as well as additional
amendments submitted for clarity or contextual purposes, and a new set of claims.
In order to have a patent application publication of a continuation or divisional
application contain only a desired set of claims, rather than the set of claims in
the prior application, it is strongly recommended that the continuation or
divisional application be filed under
37 CFR 1.53(b)
with a new
specification containing only the desired set of claims.
See subsection II, above and
MPEP §
602.05
et seq
o have a patent application publication of a continuation or divisional
application contain only a desired set of claims, rather than the set of claims in
the prior application, it is strongly recommended that the continuation or
divisional application be filed under
37 CFR 1.53(b)
with a new
specification containing only the desired set of claims.
See subsection II, above and
MPEP §
602.05
et seq.
for requirements pertaining to filing a copy of an oath
or declaration from a prior application in a continuing application.
IV.
INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE
An applicant may incorporate by reference the prior
application by including, in the continuing application-as-filed, an explicit
statement that such specifically enumerated prior application or applications are
“hereby incorporated by reference.” The statement must appear in the
specification. See
37 CFR 1.57(c)
and
MPEP §
608.01(p)
. The inclusion of this incorporation by
reference statement will permit an applicant to amend the continuing application
to include subject matter from the prior application(s), without the need for a
petition provided the continuing application is entitled to a filing date
notwithstanding the incorporation by reference. For applications filed prior to
September 21, 2004, the incorporation by reference statement may appear in the
transmittal letter or in the specification. Note that for applications filed prior
to September 21, 2004, if applicants used a former version of the transmittal
letter form provided by the USPTO, the incorporation by reference statement could
only be relied upon to add inadvertently omitted material to the continuation or
divisional application.
For applications filed on or after September 21,
2004, a claim under
35 U.S.C
the specification. Note that for applications filed prior
to September 21, 2004, if applicants used a former version of the transmittal
letter form provided by the USPTO, the incorporation by reference statement could
only be relied upon to add inadvertently omitted material to the continuation or
divisional application.
For applications filed on or after September 21,
2004, a claim under
35 U.S.C. 120
,
121
,
365(c)
, or
386(c)
and
37 CFR 1.78(d)
for benefit of
a prior-filed nonprovisional application, international application designating
the United States, or international design application designating the United
States that was present on the filing date of the continuing application is
considered an incorporation by reference of the prior-filed application as to
inadvertently omitted material, subject to the conditions and requirements of
37
CFR 1.57(b)
. Note that pursuant to
37 CFR
1.57(b)(4)
, any amendment to an international design
application pursuant to
37 CFR 1.57(b)(1)
is effective
only as to the United States and will only be acted upon after the international
design application becomes a nonprovisional application.
Effective December 18, 2013,
37 CFR
1.57(b)
was amended to contain the provisions of former
37 CFR
1.57(a)
. The purpose of
37 CFR
1.57(b)
is to provide a safeguard for applicants when all or
a portion of the specification and/or drawing(s) is (are) inadvertently omitted
from an application. For applications filed on or after September 21, 2004,
applicants are encouraged to provide an explicit incorporation by reference
statement to the prior-filed application(s) for which benefit is claimed under
35 U.S.C.
120
if applicants do not wish the incorporation by reference
to be limited to inadvertently omitted material pursuant to
37 CFR
1.57(b)
. See
37 CFR 1.57(c)
and
MPEP §
608.01(p)
for discussion regarding explicit
incorporation by reference. See
MPEP §
217
for more detailed information pertaining to
incorporation by reference pursuant to
37 CFR
1.57(b)
) for which benefit is claimed under
35 U.S.C.
120
if applicants do not wish the incorporation by reference
to be limited to inadvertently omitted material pursuant to
37 CFR
1.57(b)
. See
37 CFR 1.57(c)
and
MPEP §
608.01(p)
for discussion regarding explicit
incorporation by reference. See
MPEP §
217
for more detailed information pertaining to
incorporation by reference pursuant to
37 CFR
1.57(b)
.
An incorporation by reference statement added after
an application’s filing date is not effective because no new matter can be added
to an application after its filing date (see
35 U.S.C. 132(a)
). If an
incorporation by reference statement is included in an amendment to the
specification to add a benefit claim under
35 U.S.C. 120
after the filing
date of the application, the amendment would not be proper. When a benefit claim
under
35
U.S.C. 120
is submitted after the filing of an application,
the reference to the prior application cannot include an incorporation by
reference statement of the prior application. See
Dart Indus. v.
Banner,
636 F.2d 684, 207 USPQ 273 (C.A.D.C. 1980).
Mere reference to another application, patent, or
publication is not an incorporation of anything therein into the application
containing such reference for the purpose of the disclosure required by
35
U.S.C. 112(a)
.
In re de Seversky,
474
F.2d 671, 177 USPQ 144 (CCPA 1973). See
MPEP § 608.01(p)
. As noted above,
however, for applications filed on or after September 21, 2004,
37 CFR
1.57(b)
provides that a claim for the benefit of a
prior-filed application under
37 CFR 1.78
is considered an
incorporation by reference as to inadvertently omitted material. See
MPEP § 217
.
A.
Application NOT Entitled to a Filing Date
Material needed to accord an application a filing
date may not be incorporated by reference unless an appropriate petition under
37 CFR
1.53(e)
or under
37 CFR 1.182
is granted.
Until such a petition has been granted, the application will
not
be entitled to a filing date
n
incorporation by reference as to inadvertently omitted material. See
MPEP § 217
.
A.
Application NOT Entitled to a Filing Date
Material needed to accord an application a filing
date may not be incorporated by reference unless an appropriate petition under
37 CFR
1.53(e)
or under
37 CFR 1.182
is granted.
Until such a petition has been granted, the application will
not
be entitled to a filing date.
For an application filed on or after September
21, 2004, if the material needed for a filing date is completely contained
within a prior-filed application to which benefit is claimed, applicant may
file a petition under
37 CFR 1.53(e)
along with
the fee set forth in
37 CFR 1.17(f)
and an
amendment with the inadvertently omitted material requesting that the amendment
be entered and the application be accorded a filing date as of the original
date of deposit of the application papers. See
37 CFR
1.57(b)(3)
and
MPEP §
217
.
In an application containing an explicit
incorporation by reference statement in the specification or in a transmittal
letter (if the transmittal letter was filed prior to September 21, 2004), a
petition for the granting of a filing date may be made under
37 CFR
1.182
. A petition under
37 CFR
1.182
and the required petition fee, including an
amendment submitting the necessary omitted material, requesting that the
necessary omitted material contained in the prior application and submitted in
the amendment, be included in the continuation or divisional application based
upon the incorporation by reference statement, is required in order to accord
the application a filing date as of the date of deposit of the continuing
application. An amendment submitting the omitted material and relying upon the
incorporation by reference will not be entered in the continuing application
unless a decision granting the petition states that the application is accorded
a filing date and that the amendment will be entered.
B
nt, is required in order to accord
the application a filing date as of the date of deposit of the continuing
application. An amendment submitting the omitted material and relying upon the
incorporation by reference will not be entered in the continuing application
unless a decision granting the petition states that the application is accorded
a filing date and that the amendment will be entered.
B.
Application Entitled to a Filing Date
If a continuing application as originally filed on
or after September 21, 2004 does not include an explicit incorporation by
reference statement and is entitled to a filing date despite the inadvertent
omission of a portion of the prior application(s), applicant may be permitted
to add the omitted material by way of an amendment under
37 CFR
1.57(b)
. Such an amendment must be made within any time
period set by the Office. See
37 CFR 1.57(b)(1)
.
If an application as originally filed included a
proper explicit incorporation by reference statement (or an explicit
incorporation by reference statement that has been made effective under
37 CFR
1.57(h)
), the omitted specification page(s) and/or
drawing figure(s) may be added by amendment provided the omitted item(s)
contains only subject matter in common with a document that has been properly
incorporated by reference. If the Office identified the omitted item(s) in a
“Notice of Omitted Item(s),” applicant must respond to the “Notice of Omitted
Item(s)” by filing an appropriate amendment. See
MPEP §§
601.01(d)
and
601.01(g)
.
V.
INVENTORSHIP IN A CONTINUING APPLICATION
A
amendment provided the omitted item(s)
contains only subject matter in common with a document that has been properly
incorporated by reference. If the Office identified the omitted item(s) in a
“Notice of Omitted Item(s),” applicant must respond to the “Notice of Omitted
Item(s)” by filing an appropriate amendment. See
MPEP §§
601.01(d)
and
601.01(g)
.
V.
INVENTORSHIP IN A CONTINUING APPLICATION
A.
Applications Filed On or After September 16, 2012
For applications filed on or after September 16,
2012, the filing of a continuing application by all or by fewer than all of the
inventors named in a prior application without a newly executed oath or
declaration is permitted provided that an oath or declaration in compliance
with
37
CFR 1.63
, or a substitute statement under
37 CFR
1.64
, was executed by or with respect to such inventor
and was filed in the earlier-filed application, and a copy of such oath,
declaration, or substitute statement showing the signature or an indication
thereon that it was executed, is submitted in the continuing application. Note,
in order to submit a copy of the inventor’s oath or declaration from the
earlier-filed application into a continuation or divisional application filed
on or after September 16, 2012, the oath or declaration from the earlier-filed
application must comply with the requirements of
35 U.S.C.
115
as revised effective September 16, 2012.
Specifically, the inventor’s oath or declaration must state that the inventor
submit a copy of the inventor’s oath or declaration from the
earlier-filed application into a continuation or divisional application filed
on or after September 16, 2012, the oath or declaration from the earlier-filed
application must comply with the requirements of
35 U.S.C.
115
as revised effective September 16, 2012.
Specifically, the inventor’s oath or declaration must state that the inventor
(1) is an original inventor of the claimed invention; and (2) authorized the
filing of the patent application for the claimed invention. The inventor’s oath
or declaration also must contain an acknowledgement that any willful false
statement made in such declaration is punishable under
section
1001
of U.S. Code title 18 by fine or imprisonment of not
more than 5 years, or both.
37 CFR
1.63(d)(2)
provides that the inventorship of a continuing
application filed under
35 U.S.C. 111(a)
is the
inventor or joint inventors specified in the application data sheet filed
before or concurrently with the copy of the inventor’s oath or declaration from
the earlier-filed application. If an application data sheet is not filed before
or concurrently with the copy of the inventor’s oath or declaration from the
earlier-filed application, the inventorship is the inventorship set forth in
the copy of the inventor’s oath or declaration from the earlier-filed
application, unless the copy of the inventor’s oath or declaration is
accompanied by a statement signed pursuant to
37 CFR
1.33(b)
stating the name of each inventor in the
continuing application.
37 CFR 1.63(d)(3)
provides
that any new joint inventor named in the continuing application must provide an
oath or declaration in compliance with
37 CFR 1.63
, except as
provided for in
37 CFR 1.64
.
37
CFR 1.63(f)
provides that with respect to an application
naming only one inventor, any reference to the inventor's oath or declaration
in this chapter includes a substitute statement executed under
37 CFR
1.64
)(3)
provides
that any new joint inventor named in the continuing application must provide an
oath or declaration in compliance with
37 CFR 1.63
, except as
provided for in
37 CFR 1.64
.
37
CFR 1.63(f)
provides that with respect to an application
naming only one inventor, any reference to the inventor's oath or declaration
in this chapter includes a substitute statement executed under
37 CFR
1.64
. With respect to an application naming more than one
inventor, any reference to the inventor's oath or declaration in this chapter
means the oaths, declarations, or substitute statements that have been
collectively executed by or with respect to all of the joint inventors, unless
otherwise clear from the context.
See also
MPEP §
602.01(c)
regarding correction of inventorship by
filing a continuing application.
B.
Applications Filed Prior to September 16, 2012
For applications filed prior to September 16,
2012, applicant has the option of filing: (A) a newly executed oath or
declaration signed by the inventors for the continuation or divisional
application; or (B) a copy of the oath or declaration filed in the prior
application accompanied by a statement from applicant, applicant’s
representative or other authorized party requesting the deletion of the name(s)
of the person or persons who are not inventors in the continuation or
divisional application. See
pre-AIA 37 CFR 1.63(d)
(in
effect on September 15, 2012). Where the continuation or divisional application
and a copy of the oath or declaration from the prior application are filed
without a statement from an authorized party requesting deletion of the name(s)
of any person or persons named in the prior application, the continuation or
divisional application will be treated as naming as inventor(s) the person or
persons named in the copy of the executed oath or declaration from the prior
application. Accordingly, if a petition or request under
37 CFR
1.48(a)
or
ion are filed
without a statement from an authorized party requesting deletion of the name(s)
of any person or persons named in the prior application, the continuation or
divisional application will be treated as naming as inventor(s) the person or
persons named in the copy of the executed oath or declaration from the prior
application. Accordingly, if a petition or request under
37 CFR
1.48(a)
or
(c)
was granted in the
prior application, the oath or declaration filed in a continuation or
divisional application pursuant to
37 CFR 1.53(b)
and
pre-AIA 37
CFR 1.63(d)
should be a copy of the oath or declaration
executed by the added inventor(s) filed in the prior application. The statement
requesting the deletion of the name(s) of the person or persons who are not
inventors in the continuation or divisional application must be signed by
person(s) authorized pursuant to
37 CFR 1.33(b)
to sign an
amendment in the continuation or divisional application.
A newly signed oath or declaration in compliance
with
pre-AIA
37 CFR 1.63
is required where an inventor who was not
named as an inventor in the signed oath or declaration filed in the prior
application is to be named in a continuation or divisional application filed
under
37
CFR 1.53(b)
. The newly signed oath or declaration must be
signed by all the inventors.
See also
MPEP §
602.01(c)(3)
in Revision 08.2017 of the Ninth Edition
of the MPEP, published in January 2018 regarding requests for correction of
inventorship filed before September 16, 2012.
VI.
SUBSTITUTE STATEMENT AND RULE 47 ISSUES
A.
Substitute Statement
Under
37 CFR 1.63(d)(1)
a newly
executed substitute statement under
37 CFR 1.64
is not required
under
37 CFR
1.51(b)(2)
and
37 CFR 1.53(f)
or under
37 CFR
1.497
and
1.1021(d)
for an inventor
in a continuing application that claims the benefit under
35 U.S.C
g requests for correction of
inventorship filed before September 16, 2012.
VI.
SUBSTITUTE STATEMENT AND RULE 47 ISSUES
A.
Substitute Statement
Under
37 CFR 1.63(d)(1)
a newly
executed substitute statement under
37 CFR 1.64
is not required
under
37 CFR
1.51(b)(2)
and
37 CFR 1.53(f)
or under
37 CFR
1.497
and
1.1021(d)
for an inventor
in a continuing application that claims the benefit under
35 U.S.C.
120
,
121
,
365(c)
,
or
386(c)
in compliance with
37 CFR
1.78
of an earlier-filed application, provided a
substitute statement under
37 CFR 1.64
was executed by
or with respect to such inventor and was filed in the earlier-filed
application, and a copy of such substitute statement showing the signature or
an indication thereon that it was executed is submitted in the continuing
application.
B.
Pre-AIA 37 CFR 1.47 Issues
For applications filed prior to September 16,
2012,
pre-AIA
37 CFR 1.63(d)(3)
provides for the situation in which the
executed oath or declaration, of which a copy is submitted for a continuation
or divisional application, was originally filed in a prior application accorded
status under
37 CFR 1.47
.
37 CFR
1.63(d)(3)(i)
requires that the copy of the executed oath
or declaration must be accompanied by a copy of any decision granting a
petition to accord
37 CFR 1.47
status to such
application, unless all nonsigning inventor(s) or legal representative(s)
(pursuant to
37 CFR 1.42
or
1.43
) have filed an oath or
declaration to join in an application of which the continuation or divisional
application claims a benefit under
35 U.S.C. 120
,
121
or
365(c)
.
37 CFR
1.63(d)(3)(ii)
also requires that where one or more, but
not all, nonsigning inventor(s) or legal representative(s) (pursuant to
37 CFR
1.42
or
1.43
) subsequently joins in
any application of which the continuation or divisional application claims a
benefit under
35 U.S.C
n application of which the continuation or divisional
application claims a benefit under
35 U.S.C. 120
,
121
or
365(c)
.
37 CFR
1.63(d)(3)(ii)
also requires that where one or more, but
not all, nonsigning inventor(s) or legal representative(s) (pursuant to
37 CFR
1.42
or
1.43
) subsequently joins in
any application of which the continuation or divisional application claims a
benefit under
35 U.S.C. 120
,
121
or
365(c)
, a copy of any oath
or declaration filed by the inventor or legal representative who subsequently
joined in such application must also accompany the copy of the executed oath or
declaration.
Continuation or divisional applications filed
under
37
CFR 1.53(b)
prior to September 16, 2012, which contain a
copy of an oath or declaration that is not signed by one of the inventors and a
copy of the decision according
37 CFR 1.47
status in the
prior application, should be forwarded by the Office of Patent Application
Processing (OPAP) to the Office of Petitions before being forwarded to the
Technology Center (TC). The Office of Petitions will mail applicant a letter
stating that “Rule 47” status has been accorded to the continuation or
divisional application, but will not repeat the notice to the nonsigning
inventor nor the announcement in the
Official Gazette.
See
37 CFR
1.47(c)
.
It is important to note that if the filing date
of the continuing application is on or after September 16, 2012, the oath or
declaration must comply with the requirements of
35 U.S.C.
115
as revised effective September 16, 2012, even though
the continuing application may claim the benefit of an application filed before
September 16, 2012. Specifically, the inventor’s oath or declaration in the
continuing application filed on or after September 16, 2012, must state that
the inventor (1) is an original inventor of the claimed invention; and (2)
authorized the filing of the patent application for the claimed invention
2012, even though
the continuing application may claim the benefit of an application filed before
September 16, 2012. Specifically, the inventor’s oath or declaration in the
continuing application filed on or after September 16, 2012, must state that
the inventor (1) is an original inventor of the claimed invention; and (2)
authorized the filing of the patent application for the claimed invention. The
inventor’s oath or declaration also must contain an acknowledgement that any
willful false statement made in such declaration is punishable under
section
1001
of U.S. Code title 18 by fine or imprisonment of not
more than 5 years, or both.
VII.
CHANGE OF ATTORNEY/CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS
For applications filed on or after September 16,
2012,
37 CFR 1.32(d)
provides that a power of attorney from a
prior national application for which benefit is claimed under
35 U.S.C.
120
,
121
, or
365(c)
in a
continuing application may have effect in the continuing application if a copy of
the power of attorney from the prior application is filed in the continuing
application unless:
(1) The power of attorney was granted by the
inventor; and
(2) The continuing application names an inventor
who was not named as an inventor in the prior application.
Filing a copy of the power of attorney in the
continuing application in all situations (even where a change in power of attorney
did not occur in the prior application) will make the record clear with respect to
who has power of attorney. The Office recommends that the power of attorney should
be from the assignee where one exists, but for applications filed on or after
September 16, 2012, the power of attorney may only be signed by the applicant (see
37 CFR
1.42
) or patent owner (for reissue applications)
ower of attorney
did not occur in the prior application) will make the record clear with respect to
who has power of attorney. The Office recommends that the power of attorney should
be from the assignee where one exists, but for applications filed on or after
September 16, 2012, the power of attorney may only be signed by the applicant (see
37 CFR
1.42
) or patent owner (for reissue applications).
With respect to the correspondence address for
applications filed on or after September 16, 2012,
37 CFR
1.33(f)
provides that where application papers from a prior
application are used in a continuing application and the correspondence address
was changed during the prosecution of the prior application, an application data
sheet or separate paper identifying the correspondence address to be used for the
continuing application must be submitted. Otherwise, the Office may not recognize
the change of correspondence address effected during the prosecution of the prior
application.
For applications filed prior to September 16, 2012,
pre-AIA 37
CFR 1.63(d)(4)
provides that where the power of attorney or
correspondence address was changed during the prosecution of the prior
application, the change in power of attorney or correspondence address must be
identified in the continuation or divisional application. Otherwise, the Office
may not recognize in the continuation or divisional application the change of
power of attorney or correspondence address which occurred during the prosecution
of the prior application.
VIII.
SMALL ENTITY OR MICRO ENTITY STATUS
If small entity status has been established in a
parent application and is still proper and desired in a continuation,
continuation-in-part, or divisional application filed under
37 CFR
1.53(b)
, a new assertion as to the continued entitlement to
small entity status under
37 CFR 1.27
is required. See
MPEP §
509.03
the prosecution
of the prior application.
VIII.
SMALL ENTITY OR MICRO ENTITY STATUS
If small entity status has been established in a
parent application and is still proper and desired in a continuation,
continuation-in-part, or divisional application filed under
37 CFR
1.53(b)
, a new assertion as to the continued entitlement to
small entity status under
37 CFR 1.27
is required. See
MPEP §
509.03
.
The refiling of an application under
37 CFR
1.53
as a continuation, divisional, or continuation-in-part
application (including a continued prosecution application under
37 CFR
1.53(d)
(design applications only)), requires a new
certification of entitlement to micro entity status in the continuing application.
See
37
CFR 1.29(e)
and
MPEP §
509.04
.
IX.
COPIES OF AFFIDAVITS
Affidavits or declarations, such as those submitted
under
37 CFR
1.130
,
1.131
and
1.132
filed
during the prosecution of the prior nonprovisional application do not
automatically become a part of a continuation or divisional application filed
under
37 CFR
1.53(b)
. Where it is desired to rely on an earlier filed
affidavit or declaration, the applicant should make such remarks of record in the
37 CFR
1.53(b)
application and include a copy of the original
affidavit or declaration filed in the prior nonprovisional application.
Use form paragraph
2.03
for instructions to applicant
concerning affidavits or declarations filed in the prior application.
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.