Requests for Nonpublication
FederalAgency guidance
Ask Donna
How this section applies to your facts.
USPTO MPEP › Chapter 1100 - Statutory Invention Registration (SIR); Pre-Grant Publication (PGPub) and Preissuance Submissions › MPEP § 1122
Text
35 U.S.C. 122
Confidential status of applications; publication of patent
applications.
*****
(b) PUBLICATION.—
*****
(2) EXCEPTIONS.—
*****
(B)
(i) If an applicant makes a request upon filing,
certifying that the invention disclosed in the application has
not and will not be the subject of an application filed in
another country, or under a multilateral international
agreement, that requires publication of applications 18 months
after filing, the application shall not be published as provided
in paragraph (1).
*****
37 CFR 1.213 Nonpublication request.
(a) If the invention disclosed in an application has not been and
will not be the subject of an application filed in another country, or under a
multilateral international agreement, that requires publication of applications
eighteen months after filing, the application will not be published under
35 U.S.C.
122(b)
and
§ 1.211
provided:
(1) A request (nonpublication request) is submitted with the
application upon filing;
(2) The request states in a conspicuous manner that the
application is not to be published under
35 U.S.C. 122(b)
;
(3) The request contains a certification that the invention
disclosed in the application has not been and will not be the subject of an
application filed in another country, or under a multilateral international
agreement, that requires publication at eighteen months after filing; and
(4) The request is signed in compliance with
§
1.33(b)
.
*****
If the invention disclosed in an application filed under
35 U.S.C.
111(a)
has not been and will not be the subject of a foreign or
international application filed in another country, or under a multilateral international
agreement, that requires publication of applications eighteen months after filing (e.g., a
counterpart PCT application), applicants may request that the application filed under
35 U.S.C.
111(a)
not be published by filing a nonpublication request under
37 CFR
1.213(a)
. The Office will not publish an application filed under
35 U.S.C
on filed in another country, or under a multilateral international
agreement, that requires publication of applications eighteen months after filing (e.g., a
counterpart PCT application), applicants may request that the application filed under
35 U.S.C.
111(a)
not be published by filing a nonpublication request under
37 CFR
1.213(a)
. The Office will not publish an application filed under
35 U.S.C.
111(a)
with a nonpublication request in compliance with the
following:
(A) The request for nonpublication under
37 CFR 1.213(a)
must be submitted with the application
upon filing
(this is a statutory requirement and cannot be waived);
(B) The request for nonpublication must state in a
conspicuous
manner that the application is not to be published under
35 U.S.C.
122(b)
(see Form PTO/SB/35 in
MPEP § 1135
);
(C) The request must contain a certification that the invention
disclosed in the application
has not been and will not
be the subject of
an application filed in another country, or under a multilateral international
agreement, that requires eighteen-month publication. Before making the certification,
the person who signs the certification must make an
actual inquiry
to determine whether the certification under
35 U.S.C.
122(b)(2)(B)(i)
and
37 CFR 1.213(a)(3)
can be
appropriately made (see I. REQUIREMENTS PRIOR TO FILING A NONPUBLICATION REQUEST,
below); and
(D) The request is signed in compliance with
37 CFR
1.33(b)
.
If applicant filed a nonpublication request and later decides to file a
counterpart foreign or international application in another country, or under a
multilateral agreement, that requires eighteen-month publication, applicant must either:
be
appropriately made (see I. REQUIREMENTS PRIOR TO FILING A NONPUBLICATION REQUEST,
below); and
(D) The request is signed in compliance with
37 CFR
1.33(b)
.
If applicant filed a nonpublication request and later decides to file a
counterpart foreign or international application in another country, or under a
multilateral agreement, that requires eighteen-month publication, applicant must either:
(1) rescind the nonpublication request before filing such foreign or international
application; or (2) notify the Office of such filing no later than 45 days after the filing
date of the counterpart foreign or international application. See
MPEP §§ 1123
and
1124
.
I.
REQUIREMENTS PRIOR TO FILING A NONPUBLICATION REQUEST
A nonpublication request is not appropriate unless the person who is
signing the nonpublication request has made an actual inquiry consistent with the
requirements of
37 CFR
11.18(b)
to determine that:
(A) The application under
35 U.S.C. 111(a)
has not been
the subject of a foreign or international application
filed in another country, or under a multilateral international agreement, that
requires publication of applications at eighteen months after filing
(
e.g.,
a counterpart PCT application); and
(B) The applicant’s intent at the time the nonpublication request is
being filed is that the application under
35 U.S.C.
111(a)
will not be
the subject of a foreign or international application
filed in another country, or under a multilateral international agreement, that
requires publication of applications at eighteen months after filing.
Only when both conditions are satisfied, can applicants file a
nonpublication request under
37 CFR 1.213(a)
. A nonpublication
request is not appropriate if applicants have already filed a counterpart foreign or
international application in another country, or under a multilateral international
agreement, that requires publication of applications at eighteen months after filing
onths after filing.
Only when both conditions are satisfied, can applicants file a
nonpublication request under
37 CFR 1.213(a)
. A nonpublication
request is not appropriate if applicants have already filed a counterpart foreign or
international application in another country, or under a multilateral international
agreement, that requires publication of applications at eighteen months after filing. A
nonpublication request is not proper even if the foreign or international application is
abandoned before the foreign or international application is published.
A nonpublication request also is not appropriate if the applicant has
not yet decided whether to file a counterpart application in a foreign country, or under
a multilateral international agreement, that requires publication of applications at
eighteen months after filing. A certification under
37 CFR 1.213(a)(3)
cannot be made
based on a lack of knowledge of the applicant’s plans concerning the filing of any
counterpart application that would be subject to eighteen-month publication or the
applicant’s past practices or tendencies with respect to the filing of foreign
counterpart applications. The fact that a particular applicant has filed counterpart
applications for fewer than fifty percent of its U.S. applications is not alone an
adequate basis for filing all or any of the U.S. applications with a nonpublication
request. The applicant must have an affirmative intent not to file a counterpart
application, and not just the absence of any intent or plan concerning the filing of any
counterpart application in a foreign country, or under a multilateral international
agreement, that requires publication of applications at eighteen months after filing. A
nonpublication request is only appropriate if the applicant’s intent at the time the
nonpublication request is being filed is not to file a counterpart application in a
foreign country, or under a multilateral international agreement, that requires
publication of applications at eighteen months after filing.
II
agreement, that requires publication of applications at eighteen months after filing. A
nonpublication request is only appropriate if the applicant’s intent at the time the
nonpublication request is being filed is not to file a counterpart application in a
foreign country, or under a multilateral international agreement, that requires
publication of applications at eighteen months after filing.
II.
FILING A NONPUBLICATION REQUEST
Applicants should use the format set forth in form PTO/SB/35,
Nonpublication Request under
35 U.S.C. 122(b)(2)(B)(i)
, to ensure
that the certification includes the proper language required by the statute and the
request is stated in a conspicuous manner. Form PTO/SB/35 is available from the USPTO
website (
www.uspto.gov
), and
is reproduced in
MPEP
§ 1135
. A nonpublication request that does not include the
language required by
35 U.S.C. 122(b)(2)(B)(i)
(i.e., certifying that the “invention
disclosed in the application has not and will not be the subject of an application filed
in another country, or under a multilateral international agreement, that requires
publication of applications 18 months after filing”) will
not
be
accepted. A request for nonpublication may not be recognized unless it is conspicuous.
See
37 CFR
1.213(a)(2)
. Providing text as one paragraph among numerous other
paragraphs with no highlighting of the request for nonpublication is not conspicuous,
and thus the Office’s assignment of a publication date would be appropriate.
A nonpublication request must be filed upon the filing of the
application. This is a statutory requirement and cannot be waived. For example, a
nonpublication request filed with a request under
37 CFR
1.53(c)(3)
to convert a provisional application to a
nonprovisional application will not be accepted as timely filed because the
nonprovisional application would be accorded the original filing date of the provisional
application if the request to convert is granted. The nonpublication request must also
be included with the application papers
onpublication request filed with a request under
37 CFR
1.53(c)(3)
to convert a provisional application to a
nonprovisional application will not be accepted as timely filed because the
nonprovisional application would be accorded the original filing date of the provisional
application if the request to convert is granted. The nonpublication request must also
be included with the application papers. The nonpublication request cannot be filed
separately on the same date as the filing date of the application (e.g., the
nonpublication request is filed in a different Priority Mail
Express
®
package than the package that contains the
application). If the Office mistakenly accepts an improper nonpublication request,
applicants should rescind the request immediately. In addition to rescinding the
improper nonpublication request, applicants may contact the Application Assistance Unit.
See
MPEP §
1730
for contact information.
When the Office recognizes the nonpublication request, the filing
receipt will
not
include a projected publication date. If
applicant includes a nonpublication request as specified by
35 U.S.C.
122(b)(2)(B)(i)
and the filing receipt reflects a projected
publication date, applicant should promptly contact the Office and determine whether the
nonpublication request was overlooked.
III.
INAPPROPRIATE NONPUBLICATION REQUEST
If prior to filing a U.S. application under
35 U.S.C.
111(a)
, applicants have filed a counterpart foreign or
international application in a foreign country, or under a multilateral international
agreement, that requires publication of applications 18 months after filing, a
nonpublication request would not be appropriate in the U.S. application. If applicants
filed a nonpublication request in a U.S. application that claims the benefit to an
earlier foreign or international application, the Office will not accept the
nonpublication request and will assign a projected publication date. The applicant will
be notified that the certification is inconsistent with the priority claim
ation request would not be appropriate in the U.S. application. If applicants
filed a nonpublication request in a U.S. application that claims the benefit to an
earlier foreign or international application, the Office will not accept the
nonpublication request and will assign a projected publication date. The applicant will
be notified that the certification is inconsistent with the priority claim. The notice
will provide a non-extendable time period of 30 days from the mail date of the notice
for applicant to provide a satisfactory explanation as to how the certification
submitted is valid in light of the priority claim. If applicants fail to provide a
satisfactory explanation, the Office will publish the U.S. application.
If an applicant files a PCT application, abandons the PCT application
before the International Bureau publishes the PCT application, and thereafter files a
corresponding U.S. application under
35 U.S.C. 111(a)
with a
non-publication request under
37 CFR 1.213
, the nonpublication
request is improper. The mere filing of the PCT application precludes the proper use of
a nonpublication request, since the invention disclosed in the U.S. application was the
subject of an application that was filed under an international agreement requiring
publication at 18 months (the PCT application).
35 U.S.C. 122(b)(2)(B)(i)
states
that an application will not be published “[i]f an applicant makes a request upon
filing, certifying that the invention disclosed in the application has not and will not
be the subject of an application filed in another country, or under a multilateral
international agreement, that requires publication of applications 18 months after
filing, . . . .” The trigger in the statute is not whether the other application will be
published, but rather the trigger is the act of filing where eighteen-month publication
of patent applications is required
n has not and will not
be the subject of an application filed in another country, or under a multilateral
international agreement, that requires publication of applications 18 months after
filing, . . . .” The trigger in the statute is not whether the other application will be
published, but rather the trigger is the act of filing where eighteen-month publication
of patent applications is required. Abandonment of the foreign application, or the
application under a multilateral international agreement, prior to foreign publication
at 18-months has no bearing on the propriety of requesting nonpublication of the U.S.
application.
Where a foreign or PCT application is filed first, and a U.S.
application is filed thereafter with an (improper) nonpublication request, the Office
will not consider the U.S. application as abandoned for having made the nonpublication
request. This is because the statute only provides for an application to be regarded as
abandoned when the applicant fails to notify the Office within 45 days of a
subsequently
filed application that is directed to the same
subject as the invention of the U.S. application in another country, or under a
multilateral international agreement, that requires eighteen-month publication of
applications.
35
U.S.C. 122(b)(2)(B)(iii)
does not apply to the situation where the
applicant has made an improper certification subsequent to the foreign filing. A
petition to revive under
37 CFR 1.137(a)/(f)
is inappropriate
and not necessary in the above-noted situation because the U.S. application is pending
(unless the application is abandoned for other reasons). If a petition to revive under
37 CFR
1.137(a)/(f)
is filed, the Office will dismiss the petition as
inappropriate but retain the petition fee because the Office was required to evaluate
the merits of the petition before being able to determine that the petition was not
appropriate.
Applicants and their representatives should make sure that the
certification is proper before signing and filing it with the Office
to revive under
37 CFR
1.137(a)/(f)
is filed, the Office will dismiss the petition as
inappropriate but retain the petition fee because the Office was required to evaluate
the merits of the petition before being able to determine that the petition was not
appropriate.
Applicants and their representatives should make sure that the
certification is proper before signing and filing it with the Office. While applicants
should rescind any improper nonpublication request as soon as possible,
35 U.S.C.
122(b)(2)(B)(i)-(iv)
does not include any provision for
“correction” of an improper certification. Any applicant or applicant’s representative
who makes a false statement (e.g., an improper certification) may be in violation of
37 CFR
11.18(b)
. In addition, false statements by registered patent
practitioners may also violate other Disciplinary Rules (see 37 CFR Part 11).
While applicant cannot undo the fact that an improper certification was
made, any applicant who has made such a mistake should promptly file a rescission of the
nonpublication request and note that the original certification was improper.
[top]
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.