Part IV—Items of General Interest Update on Jurisdictions Treated as If They Have an IGA in Effect

FederalIRS announcements

Ask Donna

How this section applies to your facts.

Internal Revenue Bulletin › IRB 2016 › Announcement › Announcement 2016-27

This text was captured on Aug 14, 2026. It is a snapshot, not a live feed, so check the official code before relying on it.

Text

1

Part IV—Items of General Interest

Update on Jurisdictions Treated as If They Have an IGA in Effect

Announcement 2016-27

I. BACKGROUND

In 2012, the U.S. Department of the Treasury (Treasury) released Model 1 and

Model 2 intergovernmental agreements (IGAs) to facilitate implementation of the

Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA). Notice 2013-43 (2013-31 I.R.B.113)

provides that a jurisdiction that has signed but not yet brought into force an IGA is

treated as if it has an IGA in effect as long as the jurisdiction is taking the steps

necessary to bring the IGA into force within a reasonable period of time.

Announcement 2014-17 (2014-18 I.R.B. 1001) and Announcement 2014-38 (2014-51

I.R.B. 951) provide that jurisdictions treated as if they have an IGA in effect also include

jurisdictions that, before November 30, 2014, had reached an agreement in substance

with the United States on the terms of an IGA as long as the jurisdiction continues to

demonstrate firm resolve to sign the IGA as soon as possible. Notice 2015-66 (2015-41

I.R.B. 541) announced that foreign financial institutions (FFIs) in partner jurisdictions

2

with a signed or “agreed in substance” Model 1 IGA that had not entered into force as

of September 30, 2015, would continue to be treated as complying with, and not subject

to withholding under, FATCA so long as the partner jurisdiction continues to

demonstrate firm resolve to bring the IGA into force and any information that would

have been reportable under the IGA on September 30, 2015, is exchanged by

September 30, 2016, together with any information that is reportable under the IGA on

September 30, 2016.

An FFI that is resident in, or organized under the laws of, a jurisdiction that is

treated as if it has an IGA in effect is permitted to register on the FATCA registration

website and to certify to a withholding agent its status as an FFI covered by an IGA

ber 30, 2015, is exchanged by

September 30, 2016, together with any information that is reportable under the IGA on

September 30, 2016.

An FFI that is resident in, or organized under the laws of, a jurisdiction that is

treated as if it has an IGA in effect is permitted to register on the FATCA registration

website and to certify to a withholding agent its status as an FFI covered by an IGA.

Jurisdictions that are treated as if they have an IGA in effect, even though the IGA is not

yet signed, are treated as if they have in effect the relevant model provisions.

The list of jurisdictions treated as if they have an IGA in effect (the “IGA List”)

may be found at https://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/tax-

policy/treaties/Pages/FATCA.aspx. As of the date of publication of this Announcement,

the United States has signed IGAs with 83 jurisdictions; of those IGAs, 61 are in force.

The United States has also reached agreements in substance with 30 jurisdictions.

II. EVALUATION OF JURISDICTIONS TREATED AS IF THEY HAVE AN IGA IN

EFFECT

This Announcement provides that, on January 1, 2017, Treasury will begin

updating the IGA List to provide that certain jurisdictions that have not brought their IGA

into force will no longer be treated as if they have an IGA in effect. Each jurisdiction

with an IGA that is not yet in force and that wishes to continue to be treated as having

3

an IGA in effect must provide to Treasury by December 31, 2016, a detailed explanation

of why the jurisdiction has not yet brought the IGA into force and a step-by-step plan

that the jurisdiction intends to follow in order to sign the IGA (if it has not yet been

signed) and bring the IGA into force, including expected dates for achieving each step

ishes to continue to be treated as having

3

an IGA in effect must provide to Treasury by December 31, 2016, a detailed explanation

of why the jurisdiction has not yet brought the IGA into force and a step-by-step plan

that the jurisdiction intends to follow in order to sign the IGA (if it has not yet been

signed) and bring the IGA into force, including expected dates for achieving each step.

In evaluating whether a jurisdiction will continue to be treated as if it has an IGA in

effect, Treasury will consider whether: (1) the jurisdiction has submitted the explanation

and plan (with dates) described above; and (2) that explanation and plan, as well as the

jurisdiction’s prior course of conduct in connection with IGA discussions, show that the

jurisdiction continues to demonstrate firm resolve to bring its IGA into force. With

respect to the timing of the exchange of prior year information upon entry into force of a

Model 1 IGA, Treasury does not intend to find FFIs to be in significant non-compliance

with the IGA as long as any information for prior years is exchanged before the next

September 30th after the obligation under the IGA to exchange information has taken

effect.

Jurisdictions that are initially determined to have demonstrated firm resolve to

bring an IGA into force will not retain that status indefinitely. For example, failure to

adhere to the expected timeline set out in the jurisdiction’s explanation could result in a

determination that the jurisdiction is no longer demonstrating firm resolve to bring its

IGA into force and therefore will no longer be treated as if it has an IGA in effect.

In order to provide notice to FFIs, a jurisdiction will not cease to be treated as

having an IGA in effect until at least 60 days after the jurisdiction’s status on the IGA

List is updated

explanation could result in a

determination that the jurisdiction is no longer demonstrating firm resolve to bring its

IGA into force and therefore will no longer be treated as if it has an IGA in effect.

In order to provide notice to FFIs, a jurisdiction will not cease to be treated as

having an IGA in effect until at least 60 days after the jurisdiction’s status on the IGA

List is updated. FFIs in a jurisdiction that ceases to be treated as if it has an IGA in

effect will no longer be able to rely on the IGA to be treated as complying with, and

4

exempt from withholding under, FATCA. Unless they qualify for an exemption under the

FATCA regulations, such FFIs generally will have to enter into FFI Agreements (see

https://www.irs.gov/businesses/corporations/fatca-foreign-financial-institution-

registration-tool) in order to comply with their FATCA obligations, including reporting

information to the IRS and withholding pursuant to the terms of the FFI Agreement.

III. DRAFTING INFORMATION

The principal author of this notice is Michael Kaercher of the Office of Associate

Chief Counsel (International). For further information regarding this notice, contact Mr.

Kaercher at (202) 317-6942 (not a toll-free call).

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.

Part IV—Items of General Interest Update on Jurisdictions Treated as If They Have an IGA in Effect · Announcement 2016-27 | Frix