Federal Family Education Loan Program and William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan Program
FederalRegulations
Ask Donna
How this section applies to your facts.
Federal Register › Vol. 64 › 64 FR 43428
Text
Part II
Department of Education
_______________________________________________________________________
34 CFR Parts 682 and 685
Federal Family Education Loan Program and William D. Ford Federal
Direct Loan Program; Proposed Rule
Proposed Rules
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
34 CFR parts 682 and 685
RIN 1845-AA00
Federal Family Education Loan Program and William D. Ford Federal
Direct Loan Program
AGENCY: Department of Education.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Secretary proposes to amend the Federal Family Education
Loan (FFEL) Program regulations and the William D. Ford Federal Direct
Loan (Direct Loan) Program regulations. These proposed regulations are
needed to implement recently enacted changes to the Higher Education
Act of 1965 made by the Higher Education Amendments of 1998. The
proposed regulations deal with provisions of the Higher Education
Amendments of 1998 that affect FFEL borrowers, schools, lenders, and
guaranty agencies and Direct Loan borrowers and schools. These proposed
regulations seek to improve the efficiency of Federal student aid
programs, and, by so doing, to improve their capacity to enhance
opportunities for postsecondary education.
DATES: We must receive your comments on or before September 15, 1999.
ADDRESSES: Address all comments concerning these proposed regulations
to Ms. Patsy Beavan and Ms. Nicki Meoli, U.S. Department of Education,
PO Box 23272, Washington, DC 20026-3272. If you prefer to send your
comments through the Internet, use the following address:
[email protected]
If you want to comment on the information collection requirements,
you must send your comments to the Office of Management and Budget at
the address listed in the Paperwork Reduction Act section of this
preamble. You may also send a copy of these comments to the Department
representatives named in this section.
your
comments through the Internet, use the following address:
[email protected]
If you want to comment on the information collection requirements,
you must send your comments to the Office of Management and Budget at
the address listed in the Paperwork Reduction Act section of this
preamble. You may also send a copy of these comments to the Department
representatives named in this section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For the FFEL Program, Ms. Patsy
Beavan, or for the Direct Loan Program, Ms. Nicki Meoli, U.S.
Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., Room 3045, Regional
Office Building 3, Washington, DC 20202-5346. Telephone: (202) 708-
8242. If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), you
may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-
8339.
Individuals with disabilities may obtain this document in an
alternate format (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, or computer
diskette) on request to one of the contact persons listed in the
preceding paragraph.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Invitation To Comment
We invite you to submit comments regarding these proposed
regulations. To ensure that your comments have maximum effect in
developing the final regulations, we urge you to identify clearly the
specific section or sections of the proposed regulations that each of
your comments addresses and to arrange your comments in the same order
as the proposed regulations.
We invite you to assist us in complying with the specific
requirements of Executive Order 12866 and its overall requirement of
reducing regulatory burden that might result from these proposed
regulations. Please let us know of any further opportunities we should
take to reduce potential costs or increase potential benefits while
preserving the effective and efficient administration of the program
nvite you to assist us in complying with the specific
requirements of Executive Order 12866 and its overall requirement of
reducing regulatory burden that might result from these proposed
regulations. Please let us know of any further opportunities we should
take to reduce potential costs or increase potential benefits while
preserving the effective and efficient administration of the program.
During and after the comment period, you may inspect all public
comments about these proposed regulations in Room 3045, Regional Office
Building 3, 7th and D Streets, SW., Washington, DC, between the hours
of 8:30 a.m. and 4 p.m., Eastern time, Monday through Friday of each
week except Federal holidays.
Assistance to Individuals With Disabilities in Reviewing the
Rulemaking Record
On request, we will supply an appropriate aid, such as a reader or
print magnifier, to an individual with a disability who needs
assistance to review the comments or other documents in the public
rulemaking docket for these proposed regulations. If you want to
schedule an appointment for this type of aid, you may call (202) 205-
8113 or (202) 260-9895. If you use a TDD, you may call the FIRS at 1-
800-877-8339.
General
Background
On October 7, 1998, President Clinton signed into law the Higher
Education Amendments of 1998 (Pub. L. 105-244)(1998 Amendments) to
amend the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended (HEA). The 1998
Amendments contained a number of changes to the Title IV programs. This
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) addresses many of the changes that
affect the FFEL and Direct Loan programs.
Negotiated Rulemaking
, 1998, President Clinton signed into law the Higher
Education Amendments of 1998 (Pub. L. 105-244)(1998 Amendments) to
amend the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended (HEA). The 1998
Amendments contained a number of changes to the Title IV programs. This
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) addresses many of the changes that
affect the FFEL and Direct Loan programs.
Negotiated Rulemaking
Section 492 of the HEA requires that, before publishing any
proposed regulations to implement programs under Title IV of the HEA,
the Secretary obtain public involvement in the development of the
proposed regulations. After obtaining advice and recommendations, the
Secretary must conduct a negotiated rulemaking process to develop the
proposed regulations. All published proposed regulations must conform
to agreements resulting from the negotiated rulemaking process unless
the Secretary reopens the negotiated rulemaking process or provides a
written explanation to the participants in that process why the
Secretary has decided to depart from the agreements.
To obtain public involvement in the development of the proposed
regulations, we published a notice in the Federal Register (63 FR
59922, November 6, 1998) requesting advice and recommendations from
interested parties concerning what regulations were necessary to
implement Title IV of the HEA. We also invited advice and
recommendations concerning which regulated issues should be subjected
to a negotiated rulemaking process. We further requested advice and
recommendations concerning ways to prioritize the numerous issues in
Title IV, in order to meet statutory deadlines. Additionally, we
requested advice and recommendations concerning how to conduct the
negotiated rulemaking process, given the time available and the number
of regulations that needed to be developed
e subjected
to a negotiated rulemaking process. We further requested advice and
recommendations concerning ways to prioritize the numerous issues in
Title IV, in order to meet statutory deadlines. Additionally, we
requested advice and recommendations concerning how to conduct the
negotiated rulemaking process, given the time available and the number
of regulations that needed to be developed.
In addition to soliciting written comments, we held three public
hearings and several informal meetings to give interested parties an
opportunity to share advice and recommendations with the Department.
The hearings were held in Washington, DC, Chicago, and Los Angeles, and
we posted transcripts of those hearings to the Department's Information
for Financial Aid Professionals' website (http://ifap.ed.gov).
We then published a second notice in the Federal Register (63 FR
71206, December 23, 1998) to announce the Department's intention to
establish four negotiated rulemaking committees to draft proposed
regulations implementing Title IV of the HEA. The notice announced the
organizations or groups believed to represent the interests that should
participate in the negotiated rulemaking process and announced that the
Department would select participants for the process from nominees of
those organizations or groups. We requested nominations for additional
participants from anyone who believed that the organizations or groups
listed did not adequately represent the list of interests outlined in
section 492 of the HEA. Once the four
committees were established, they met to develop proposed regulations
over the course of several months, beginning in January.
The proposed regulations contained in this NPRM reflect the final
consensus of Negotiating Committee II (committee), which was made up of
the following members:
isted did not adequately represent the list of interests outlined in
section 492 of the HEA. Once the four
committees were established, they met to develop proposed regulations
over the course of several months, beginning in January.
The proposed regulations contained in this NPRM reflect the final
consensus of Negotiating Committee II (committee), which was made up of
the following members:
American Association of Community Colleges.
American Association of Cosmetology Schools.
American Association of State Colleges and Universities.
American Council on Education.
Career College Association.
Coalition of Associations of Schools of the Health
Professions.
Coalition of Higher Education Assistance Organizations.
Consumer Bankers Association.
Education Finance Council.
Education Loan Management Resources.
Legal Services Counsel (a coalition).
National Association of College and University Business
Officers.
National Association for Equal Opportunity in Higher
Education.
National Association of Graduate/Professional Students.
National Association of Independent Colleges and
Universities.
National Association of State Student Grant and Aid
Programs.
National Association of State Universities and Land-Grant
Colleges.
National Association of Student Financial Aid
Administrators.
National Association of Student Loan Administrators.
National Council of Higher Education Loan Programs.
National Direct Student Loan Coalition.
Sallie Mae, Inc.
Student Loan Servicing Alliance.
The College Board.
The College Fund/United Negro College Fund.
United States Department of Education.
United States Student Association.
US Public Interest Research Group.
As stated in the committee protocols, consensus means that there
must be no dissent by any member in order for the committee to be
considered to have reached agreement. Consensus was reached on all of
the proposed regulations in this document.
Proposed Regulatory Changes
lege Fund.
United States Department of Education.
United States Student Association.
US Public Interest Research Group.
As stated in the committee protocols, consensus means that there
must be no dissent by any member in order for the committee to be
considered to have reached agreement. Consensus was reached on all of
the proposed regulations in this document.
Proposed Regulatory Changes
These proposed regulations include, in addition to the changes made
to the HEA by the 1998 Amendments, conforming changes and minor
technical changes.
The proposed regulations address changes that are specific to the
FFEL Program and changes that are common to both the FFEL and Direct
Loan programs. The following discussion of the proposed regulations
begins with changes that affect only the FFEL Program, followed by
changes that affect both the FFEL and Direct Loan programs.
Federal Family Education Loan Program Changes
Section 682.102--Obtaining and Repaying a Loan
The proposed regulations would modify this section to reflect the
change made by the 1998 Amendments to section 432(m)(1)(C) of the HEA,
to require the use of the Free Application for Federal Student Aid
(FAFSA) as the application for FFEL subsidized and unsubsidized
Stafford loans beginning in academic year 1999-2000. These proposed
regulations also include language to reflect the use of a Master
Promissory Note (MPN) that would allow borrowers to receive, in
addition to an initial loan, additional loans for the same or
subsequent periods.
The proposed regulations also would revise this section to reflect
the change made by the 1998 Amendments to allow a borrower with
multiple FFEL holders to secure an FFEL Consolidation loan from any
eligible FFEL lender.
Section 682.200--Definitions
omissory Note (MPN) that would allow borrowers to receive, in
addition to an initial loan, additional loans for the same or
subsequent periods.
The proposed regulations also would revise this section to reflect
the change made by the 1998 Amendments to allow a borrower with
multiple FFEL holders to secure an FFEL Consolidation loan from any
eligible FFEL lender.
Section 682.200--Definitions
The proposed regulations would implement changes made by the 1998
Amendments to the definition of an eligible lender in section 435(d)(5)
of the HEA. Specifically, the 1998 Amendments created an exception to
the long-standing provision that prohibits a lender from providing
inducements to schools to secure loan applications. The exception added
by the 1998 Amendments provides that, notwithstanding the general
prohibition on inducements, a lender may provide a school with
assistance ``that is comparable to the kinds of assistance that is
provided by the Department of Education.''
The Department expressed its view that the purpose of the new
exception was to allow lenders to provide assistance to schools similar
to that provided by the Department to schools in the Direct Loan
Program and therefore suggested that the proposed regulations be
limited to the assistance provided by the Department for the Direct
Loan Program. The committee agreed to proposed regulatory language that
permits lenders to provide assistance ``comparable to the kinds of
assistance provided by the Secretary under, or in furtherance of the
Federal Direct Loan Program.'' This proposed language would reflect
congressional intent to broaden the types of assistance that lenders
may provide to a school while retaining meaning for the prohibition
against lenders providing inducements to schools.
The 1998 Amendments did not change the general prohibition that
lenders cannot provide services, at less than market value, to a school
in order to secure applications
'' This proposed language would reflect
congressional intent to broaden the types of assistance that lenders
may provide to a school while retaining meaning for the prohibition
against lenders providing inducements to schools.
The 1998 Amendments did not change the general prohibition that
lenders cannot provide services, at less than market value, to a school
in order to secure applications. In general, we believe that most goods
and services that a lender provides to a school at less than their fair
market value are, by definition, an inducement. If those goods and
services are provided by the lender to secure applicants for loans, the
inducement would be prohibited. This is especially true with regard to
goods and services provided by a lender that are used by the school to
meet its Title IV program responsibilities under the law and the
regulations. The Secretary believes that it is not necessary for the
lender to specifically tie the goods and services to loan applications
for certain activities to be considered improper inducements.
Prior to the 1998 Amendments, certain activities by lenders could
have constituted a prohibited inducement. In light of the new law,
these proposed regulations broaden the types of assistance that lenders
may provide to schools. Accordingly, the following are examples of
activities that would not jeopardize a lender's status as an eligible
lender:
Counseling: A lender may support schools in meeting their
responsibilities to provide borrowers with initial counseling, exit
counseling, and general debt counseling. In providing this support,
lenders may:
Assist in the development, production, and distribution of
materials used by schools in counseling activities.
Develop, and offer to schools, electronic products and
services, including web-based processes, that can be used to meet
counseling requirements
schools in support of their FFEL Program processes. This training may
be provided in person, either on or off campus, or through the use of
technology. A lender may not provide school staff additional services
or goods (other than items of nominal value) in connection with the
training, and it may not pay expenses incurred by school staff for the
training.
Section 682.201--Eligible Borrowers
The proposed regulations would implement a change made by the 1998
Amendments to section 428C(a)(3)(A) of the HEA that prohibits a
borrower from receiving an FFEL Consolidation loan if the borrower is
subject to a judgment secured through litigation or to an
administrative wage garnishment order on a loan made under the HEA. The
committee agreed to apply this restriction only to the loans the
borrower wishes to consolidate. Therefore, a borrower against whom an
administrative wage garnishment order or a judgment has been issued may
receive an FFEL Consolidation loan, but may not include loans subject
to litigation or administrative wage garnishment in the FFEL
Consolidation loan. The committee also agreed that these loans should
be ineligible for consolidation only until the judgment has been
vacated or the administrative wage garnishment order has been lifted.
The proposed regulations also would reflect the changes made by the
1998 Amendments to section 428C(a)(3)(B) of the HEA to expand the
universe of loans that may be included in an FFEL Consolidation loan.
Under the 1998 Amendments, loans received prior to the borrower's
receipt of an FFEL Consolidation loan may be added to the FFEL
Consolidation loan during the 180-day period following the making of
the FFEL Consolidation loan. Loans received by the borrower during the
180-day period following the making of the FFEL Consolidation loan may
also be added during that period. Finally, loans received prior to the
date of a borrower's first FFEL Consolidation loan may be added to any
subsequent FFEL Consolidation loan the borrower obtains
loan during the 180-day period following the making of
the FFEL Consolidation loan. Loans received by the borrower during the
180-day period following the making of the FFEL Consolidation loan may
also be added during that period. Finally, loans received prior to the
date of a borrower's first FFEL Consolidation loan may be added to any
subsequent FFEL Consolidation loan the borrower obtains. However, the
proposed regulations would clarify that a single FFEL Consolidation
loan may not be reconsolidated without the borrower having another
eligible loan to consolidate.
Prior to enactment of the 1998 Amendments, a borrower's eligibility
to receive an FFEL Consolidation loan terminated upon receipt of an
FFEL Consolidation loan, except that the borrower could add loans
received prior to the date of the FFEL Consolidation loan during the
180-day period after the FFEL Consolidation loan was made. Loans made
prior to, but not included in, the FFEL Consolidation loan were
permanently ineligible for consolidation. The new statutory provisions
that are reflected in these proposed regulations would provide more
opportunities for borrowers to add loans to existing FFEL Consolidation
loans.
The proposed regulations also would reflect the change made by the
1998 Amendments to section 428C(b)(1)(A)(i) of the HEA that permits a
borrower who has multiple FFEL Program holders to apply to any eligible
FFEL lender for an FFEL Consolidation loan. Prior to this change, a
borrower had to request an FFEL Consolidation loan from the holders of
all of his or her existing loans before requesting a loan from a
different lender. Under the proposed rules, a borrower with a single
holder may apply to another eligible FFEL lender only if the borrower
is either unable to receive an FFEL Consolidation loan from the holder
or is unable to receive an FFEL Consolidation loan with income-
sensitive repayment terms.
Section 682.202--Permissible Charges by Lenders to Borrowers
Capitalization of Interest
rom a
different lender. Under the proposed rules, a borrower with a single
holder may apply to another eligible FFEL lender only if the borrower
is either unable to receive an FFEL Consolidation loan from the holder
or is unable to receive an FFEL Consolidation loan with income-
sensitive repayment terms.
Section 682.202--Permissible Charges by Lenders to Borrowers
Capitalization of Interest
Interest Rates
The proposed regulations would reflect the changes made by the 1998
Amendments to the interest rate formulas for FFEL Program loans in
section 427A of the HEA. The 1998 Amendments made permanent the
temporary interest rate formulas that were added to the HEA by the
Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century, Pub. L. 105-178 (TEA),
enacted June 9, 1998. TEA created interest rate formulas for new
student and parent loans first disbursed on or after July 1, 1998, and
before October 1, 1998. The 1998 Amendments applied these same formulas
to loans first disbursed on or after October 1, 1998, and before July
1, 2003. Accordingly, the proposed regulations reflect the different
formulas for interest rates on FFEL Program loans.
As provided by the HEA and reflected in these proposed regulations,
the interest rate on Stafford loans during the repayment period is
calculated based on the bond equivalent rate of the 91-day Treasury
bills auctioned at the final auction prior to the June 1 immediately
preceding the July 1-June 30 period plus 2.3 percent and during the in-
school and grace periods as the 91-day Treasury bills plus 1.7 percent,
with a cap during these periods of 8.25 percent. The formula for PLUS
loan interest rates is the 91-day Treasury bills plus 3.1 percent not
to exceed 9 percent
of the 91-day Treasury
bills auctioned at the final auction prior to the June 1 immediately
preceding the July 1-June 30 period plus 2.3 percent and during the in-
school and grace periods as the 91-day Treasury bills plus 1.7 percent,
with a cap during these periods of 8.25 percent. The formula for PLUS
loan interest rates is the 91-day Treasury bills plus 3.1 percent not
to exceed 9 percent. In addition, the proposed regulations reflect the
statutory formula for the interest rate on FFEL Consolidation loans for
which the application is received by the lender on or after October 1,
1998, as the lesser of the weighted average of the interest rates on
the loans consolidated rounded upward to the nearest one-eighth of one
percent, or 8.25 percent.
Capitalization of Interest
The proposed regulations also would implement the changes made by
the 1998 Amendments to the rules for capitalization of interest on
unsubsidized Stafford loans. The 1998 Amendments modified the rules
governing the frequency of capitalization during certain periods in
which the borrower is not making payments on the principal of an
unsubsidized Stafford loan. Under these new rules, a lender would be
able to add accrued interest to the principal only when the loan enters
repayment, at the expiration of a period of authorized deferment, at
the expiration of a period of authorized forbearance, and when the
borrower defaults.
The committee engaged in lengthy discussions as to how interest
that accrues during a period of forbearance should be treated. There
was also lengthy discussion as to whether these changes covered
subsidized Stafford loans during periods of forbearance as well as
unsubsidized Stafford loans during all periods in which payments of
principal are not being made
and when the
borrower defaults.
The committee engaged in lengthy discussions as to how interest
that accrues during a period of forbearance should be treated. There
was also lengthy discussion as to whether these changes covered
subsidized Stafford loans during periods of forbearance as well as
unsubsidized Stafford loans during all periods in which payments of
principal are not being made. (The only issue on subsidized Stafford
loans was the treatment of periods of forbearance because the
Department does not pay interest on the borrower's behalf during these
periods.) The committee also engaged in lengthy discussions as to
whether, if there were consecutive periods covered by these new
requirements (for example, a deferment period immediately followed by a
forbearance period), the capitalization of the accrued interest should
take place at the end of each period or the end of the consecutive
covered periods.
After much discussion, the committee reached consensus on these
draft regulations. Under these proposed rules, for loans first
disbursed on or after July 1, 2000 (the effective date of these
proposed regulations), periods of forbearance on both subsidized and
unsubsidized Stafford loans would be covered by the new capitalization
rules. Further, the committee agreed to propose that the capitalization
could take place at the expiration of each covered period rather than
at the end of a series of consecutive covered periods. For unsubsidized
Stafford loans disbursed on or after the date of enactment of the 1998
Amendments (October 7, 1998) and prior to July 1, 2000, the lender must
capitalize interest pursuant to section 428H(e)(2) of the HEA.
The committee believed that the proposed regulations would maximize
borrower benefits by reducing the costs of capitalization. The
Secretary believes that the proposed regulations would maintain the
historic regulatory approach of treating periods of deferment and
forbearance similarly in the area of capitalization
he lender must
capitalize interest pursuant to section 428H(e)(2) of the HEA.
The committee believed that the proposed regulations would maximize
borrower benefits by reducing the costs of capitalization. The
Secretary believes that the proposed regulations would maintain the
historic regulatory approach of treating periods of deferment and
forbearance similarly in the area of capitalization.
Origination Fees
The proposed regulations would also implement changes to the rules
governing origination fees made to section 438(c) of the HEA by the
1998 Amendments. The 1998 Amendments require any lender who charges
student borrowers an origination fee to charge the same fee to all
student borrowers. The law also permits a lender to assess a lower
origination fee to a borrower demonstrating ``greater financial need,''
as determined by the borrower's adjusted gross income. The 1998
Amendments, for the first time, establish provisions governing a
lender's decision to offer a reduced origination fee on subsidized and
unsubsidized Stafford loans. Prior to these amendments, a lender had
discretion to waive or lower the fee charged to a particular subsidized
Stafford loan borrower. The 1998 Amendments limit the lender's
discretion and make a lower fee a term or condition of the loan if the
lender chooses to charge a reduced fee to any borrower.
The committee engaged in extensive discussions regarding the
appropriate standard for determining ``greater financial need'' for
this purpose. The committee discussed a number of different possible
standards including: an expected family contribution (EFC) of ``O,'' an
EFC that makes students eligible for a Federal Pell Grant, and
eligibility for a subsidized Stafford loan. In addition, since each
lender must apply its origination fee policies to all borrowers, there
were also extensive discussions as to what constitutes a lender for
purposes of this provision
ber of different possible
standards including: an expected family contribution (EFC) of ``O,'' an
EFC that makes students eligible for a Federal Pell Grant, and
eligibility for a subsidized Stafford loan. In addition, since each
lender must apply its origination fee policies to all borrowers, there
were also extensive discussions as to what constitutes a lender for
purposes of this provision. Some negotiators inquired about how trust
relationships would be evaluated under this regulation.
Ultimately, the committee reached consensus on both of these
issues. On the issue of the standard for ``greater financial need,''
the committee agreed to propose that a lender would be permitted to use
two standards to determine whether a borrower demonstrates greater
financial need to allow lenders operational and financial flexibility.
Under the proposed regulations, a lender could consider a borrower as
demonstrating greater financial need if--
The borrower's EFC used to determine eligibility for the
loan is equal to or less than the maximum qualifying EFC for a Federal
Pell Grant at the time the loan is certified; or
The borrower qualifies for a subsidized Stafford loan.
To allow for situations in which a lender wants to use a comparable
alternative, the committee also agreed to propose that a lender, with
the approval of the Secretary, would be able to use some other standard
to determine whether a borrower demonstrates greater financial need.
The proposed regulations would specify that a lender that charges a
borrower a lower origination fee on the borrower's unsubsidized
Stafford loan must charge the same lower fee on the borrower's
subsidized Stafford loan. This requirement will ensure that borrowers
who demonstrate greater financial need will receive the benefit of
lower origination fees on both loan types for which they may be
eligible
ed regulations would specify that a lender that charges a
borrower a lower origination fee on the borrower's unsubsidized
Stafford loan must charge the same lower fee on the borrower's
subsidized Stafford loan. This requirement will ensure that borrowers
who demonstrate greater financial need will receive the benefit of
lower origination fees on both loan types for which they may be
eligible.
The proposed regulations also would provide that all lenders under
common ownership, including ownership by a common holding company,
constitute a single lender for purposes of this section. The proposed
regulations further would provide that any beneficial owner of loans
that provides funds to an eligible lender trustee to make loans on the
beneficial owner's behalf is considered the lender. We believe that
this definition will ensure that all borrowers who have loans from a
particular lender will be treated equitably.
Section 682.206--Due Diligence in Making a Loan
The proposed regulations include changes in this section to conform
these rules to proposed changes made in Sec. 682.603 of the regulations
related to loan certification of borrower eligibility by the school,
and in Sec. 682.401 of the regulations related to the use of the MPN.
Section 682.207--Due Diligence in Disbursing a Loan
Section 682.207 of the proposed regulations would add a new
provision to require lenders to disburse loans in a single installment
(rather than in multiple installments as generally required) if so
directed by a school that meets certain criteria specified in the 1998
Amendments. The criteria, contained in Sec
elated to the use of the MPN.
Section 682.207--Due Diligence in Disbursing a Loan
Section 682.207 of the proposed regulations would add a new
provision to require lenders to disburse loans in a single installment
(rather than in multiple installments as generally required) if so
directed by a school that meets certain criteria specified in the 1998
Amendments. The criteria, contained in Sec. 682.604 of the proposed
regulations, specify that the exemption applies to two groups of
schools: (1) Those certifying loans for a single term, with FFEL cohort
default rates, Direct Loan Program cohort rates, or weighted average
cohort rates of less than ten percent for each of the three most recent
years for which rates have been calculated and; (2) those certifying
loans for students in study abroad programs when the school certifying
the loan has an FFEL cohort default rate, Direct Loan Program cohort
rate, or weighted average cohort rate of less than five percent for the
most recent year for which rates have been calculated. Consistent with
the current practice, the committee agreed to propose that lenders
would be permitted to rely upon the disbursement schedule provided by
the school in making single installment loans.
Section 682.209--Repayment of a Loan
The proposed regulations would implement the addition made by the
1998 Amendments of section 428(b)(9)(A)(iv) of the HEA that requires a
lender to offer FFEL borrowers, including FFEL Consolidation loan
borrowers, an extended repayment plan with fixed or graduated repayment
amounts to be paid over a period not to exceed 25 years. The extended
repayment plan is available to a new borrower (one with no outstanding
balance on an FFEL Program loan as of October 7, 1998), whose total
outstanding FFEL loans exceed $30,000.
The proposed regulations in this section also would reflect the new
statutory provision allowing borrowers to change repayment plans
annually.
nt
amounts to be paid over a period not to exceed 25 years. The extended
repayment plan is available to a new borrower (one with no outstanding
balance on an FFEL Program loan as of October 7, 1998), whose total
outstanding FFEL loans exceed $30,000.
The proposed regulations in this section also would reflect the new
statutory provision allowing borrowers to change repayment plans
annually.
Section 682.300--Payments of Interest Benefits on Stafford and
Consolidation Loans
The proposed regulations include a change in this section to
conform these rules to a proposed change in Sec. 682.301 of the
regulations related to the interest subsidy payment on the portion of
an FFEL Consolidation loan that repaid a subsidized FFEL or Direct Loan
program loan during a period of authorized deferment.
Section 682.301--Eligibility of Borrowers for Interest Benefits on
Stafford and Consolidation Loans
The proposed regulations would reflect changes made by the 1998
Amendments to section 428C(b) of the HEA that extended the authority
for payment of interest subsidy on the portion of an FFEL Consolidation
loan that repaid a subsidized FFEL or Direct Loan program loan during a
period of authorized deferment. This provision does not apply to the
portion of the loan that does not represent Health Education Assistance
Loans (HEAL). This borrower benefit was originally included in the
Emergency Student Loan Consolidation Act of 1997 and was extended by
the 1998 Amendments.
Section 682.301 also includes provisions necessary to conform to
the changes in Sec. 682.603 of the proposed regulations related to loan
certification by a school.
Section 682.402--Death, Disability, Closed School, False Certification,
Unpaid Refunds, and Bankruptcy Payments
originally included in the
Emergency Student Loan Consolidation Act of 1997 and was extended by
the 1998 Amendments.
Section 682.301 also includes provisions necessary to conform to
the changes in Sec. 682.603 of the proposed regulations related to loan
certification by a school.
Section 682.402--Death, Disability, Closed School, False Certification,
Unpaid Refunds, and Bankruptcy Payments
The proposed regulations would modify this section to reflect
amendments to section 523(a)(8) of Title 11 of the United States Code
(the Bankruptcy Code) included in the 1998 Amendments that eliminate
the seven-year repayment provision for discharge of FFEL Program loans
for bankruptcy petitions filed on or after October 8, 1998. The
Bankruptcy Code now permits discharge of an FFEL Program loan after
that date only on the grounds of undue hardship. The proposed
regulations reflect the change in the criteria for bankruptcy petitions
filed on or after October 8, 1998, and revise lender and guaranty
agency claim filing procedures related to these loans.
Section 682.402 of the proposed regulations also includes
conforming changes necessary for the implementation and use of the MPN.
In particular, the proposed regulations would provide that a lack of
evidence of a borrower's confirmation for subsequent loans made under
an MPN will not lead to a denial of claim payment to the lender unless
the loan is found to be unenforceable. However, if a court rules that
the loan is not enforceable solely because of the lack of evidence of
the confirmation process or processes, the lender and the guaranty
agency must repay any insurance and reinsurance payments received on
the loan.
Section 682.406--Conditions of Reinsurance Coverage
The proposed regulations would include conforming changes necessary
to implement and use the MPN.
Section 682.409--Mandatory Assignment by Guaranty Agencies of Defaulted
Loans to the Secretary
the confirmation process or processes, the lender and the guaranty
agency must repay any insurance and reinsurance payments received on
the loan.
Section 682.406--Conditions of Reinsurance Coverage
The proposed regulations would include conforming changes necessary
to implement and use the MPN.
Section 682.409--Mandatory Assignment by Guaranty Agencies of Defaulted
Loans to the Secretary
The proposed regulations contain a conforming change relating to
the MPN. The proposed regulations would clarify the rules governing
assignment of defaulted loans to the Secretary by specifying that
mandatory assignment of one loan made under an MPN does not constitute
assignment of all loans made under the MPN.
Section 682.414--Records, Reports, and Inspection Requirements for
Guaranty Agency Programs
The proposed regulations would make conforming changes to this
section which are necessary to implement the MPN. In particular, this
section would require lenders to maintain documentation of the
confirmation processes the lender and the school used for subsequent
loans under an MPN and specify that a lender or guaranty agency may, to
accommodate the MPN process, retain a true and exact copy of the
promissory note rather than the original note.
Section 682.603--Certification by a Participating School in Connection
with a Loan Application
The proposed regulations would reflect changes made by the 1998
Amendments to section 428(a)(2) of the HEA that reduce the types of
information a school is required to provide to a lender in certifying a
Stafford loan. To reflect the statute, the proposed regulations would
require the school to certify only the loan amount for which the
borrower is eligible and to provide a disbursement schedule. The
proposed regulations would require the school to maintain documentation
of the determination of the borrower's need (based on the cost of
attendance, estimated financial assistance, and, if applicable, EFC)
an. To reflect the statute, the proposed regulations would
require the school to certify only the loan amount for which the
borrower is eligible and to provide a disbursement schedule. The
proposed regulations would require the school to maintain documentation
of the determination of the borrower's need (based on the cost of
attendance, estimated financial assistance, and, if applicable, EFC).
The proposed regulations in this section also would specify that
schools that qualify for exemption from the multiple disbursement
requirement or the requirement for delayed delivery of loan funds for
first-time borrowers-- due to their low FFEL cohort default rates,
Direct Loan Program cohort rates, or weighted average cohort rates--
must cease certifying loans based on those criteria no later than 30
days after the school is notified that it no longer meets the
qualifications. The committee agreed that this 30-day period after
notification was necessary to allow the school sufficient time to
advise students of this change in the school's status and to make
necessary system and procedural changes.
Section 682.610--Administrative and Fiscal Requirements for
Participating Schools
The proposed regulations would make conforming changes to this
section that are necessary to implement and use the MPN and to reflect
the modified loan certification requirements of the school in 682.603
of the proposed regulations.
FFEL and Direct Loan Program Changes
Sections 682.102 and 685.201--Master Promissory Note
The proposed regulations in these sections would make conforming
changes necessary to reflect the implementation of the MPN in the FFEL
and Direct Loan programs. A more detailed discussion of the MPN is
provided in the discussion of changes to Secs. 682.401 and 685.402 in
this preamble.
Sections 682.200 and 685.102--Definitions of Default, Estimated
Financial Assistance, and Master Promissory Note
oposed regulations in these sections would make conforming
changes necessary to reflect the implementation of the MPN in the FFEL
and Direct Loan programs. A more detailed discussion of the MPN is
provided in the discussion of changes to Secs. 682.401 and 685.402 in
this preamble.
Sections 682.200 and 685.102--Definitions of Default, Estimated
Financial Assistance, and Master Promissory Note
The proposed regulations would revise the FFEL and Direct Loan
program definitions of ``Default'' and ``Estimated financial
assistance'' to reflect changes made to sections 435(l) and
428(a)(2)(C) of the HEA by the 1998 Amendments. The proposed
regulations also would add the term ``Master promissory note'' to the
definition sections in the FFEL and Direct Loan program regulations, as
part of the implementation of the MPN as provided in section
432(m)(1)(D) of the HEA.
Default
The 1998 Amendments extended the length of time a borrower is
delinquent before a default occurs on an FFEL or Direct Loan program
loan from--
180 days to 270 days for FFEL and Direct Loan program
loans repayable in monthly installments; and
240 days to 330 days for FFEL Program loans repayable less
frequently than monthly installments.
The proposed regulations would modify the existing definition of
default to reflect this statutory change.
Estimated Financial Assistance
Before enactment of the 1998 Amendments, schools were required to
include veterans' educational benefits paid under Chapter 30 of Title
38 of the United States Code as ``estimated financial assistance'' for
the purpose of determining a borrower's eligibility for FFEL and Direct
Loan program loans. The 1998 Amendments changed this requirement for
the purpose of determining eligibility for subsidized FFEL and Direct
Loan program loans
chools were required to
include veterans' educational benefits paid under Chapter 30 of Title
38 of the United States Code as ``estimated financial assistance'' for
the purpose of determining a borrower's eligibility for FFEL and Direct
Loan program loans. The 1998 Amendments changed this requirement for
the purpose of determining eligibility for subsidized FFEL and Direct
Loan program loans. Schools no longer are required to include the
specified veterans' educational benefits paid in the calculation of
estimated financial assistance when determining eligibility for
subsidized FFEL and Direct Loan program loans.
The 1998 Amendments also now require schools to include national
service education awards or post-service benefits under Title I of the
National and Community Service Act of 1990 (Americorps) as estimated
financial assistance for the purpose of determining a borrower's
eligibility for unsubsidized FFEL and Direct Loan program loans.
However, schools are not required to include these benefits when
determining a borrower's eligibility for subsidized FFEL and Direct
Loan program loans.
The proposed regulations reflect these statutory changes affecting
the treatment of veterans' educational and Americorps benefits in
determining estimated financial assistance.
Master Promissory Note
The proposed regulations include a definition of the term ``Master
promissory note'' (MPN). An MPN is a promissory note under which a
borrower may receive loans for a single academic year or multiple
academic years. The 1998 Amendments direct us to develop and require
the use of an MPN for periods of enrollment beginning not later than
July 1, 2000. Initially, not all borrowers will be permitted to receive
multiple loans under the MPN. To receive multiple loans under an MPN,
the borrower must attend a school that is authorized for multi-year use
of the MPN. However, some schools that are authorized for multi-year
use of the MPN may choose not to exercise this option
an MPN for periods of enrollment beginning not later than
July 1, 2000. Initially, not all borrowers will be permitted to receive
multiple loans under the MPN. To receive multiple loans under an MPN,
the borrower must attend a school that is authorized for multi-year use
of the MPN. However, some schools that are authorized for multi-year
use of the MPN may choose not to exercise this option. Further, a
borrower who attends a school exercising the multi-year option may
choose to receive and sign an MPN for each loan that he or she
receives.
A more detailed discussion of the MPN is covered in
Sec. Sec. 682.401 and 685.402. Other conforming changes appear
throughout the regulations.
Sections 682.204 and 685.203--Loan Limits
The proposed regulations would implement changes made by the 1998
Amendments to sections 428(b) and 428H(d) of the HEA that specify the
annual loan limits for an academic year. The proposed regulations would
reflect these changes and modify the method for calculating the reduced
annual loan limits that apply to FFEL and Direct Loan borrowers
enrolled in programs of study or remaining balances of programs of
study that are less than an academic year in length. The proposed
regulations also specify annual loan limits for non-degree preparatory
and teaching credential coursework. The 1998 Amendments simplified the
proration calculation but did not change the conditions under which
proration would be required.
Reduced Loan Limits
s
enrolled in programs of study or remaining balances of programs of
study that are less than an academic year in length. The proposed
regulations also specify annual loan limits for non-degree preparatory
and teaching credential coursework. The 1998 Amendments simplified the
proration calculation but did not change the conditions under which
proration would be required.
Reduced Loan Limits
The proposed regulations would implement changes in the HEA that
altered the method of calculating statutorily mandated reduced annual
loan limits for borrowers enrolled in a program of undergraduate
education that is less than one academic year. Prior to enactment of
the 1998 Amendments, the HEA included specific loan limits that applied
to these borrowers. The 1998 Amendments eliminated these specified loan
amounts and replaced them with a calculation that reduces the loan
amount proportionally based on the relationship of the program length
to the length of the academic year. The HEA now provides that the
maximum amount that a borrower enrolled in a program of undergraduate
education that is less than one academic year may receive is the amount
that bears the same ratio to the statutory annual maximum ($2,625 for
subsidized and unsubsidized, and $4,000 for additional unsubsidized) as
the program of study in which the borrower is enrolled bears to one
academic year.
The 1998 Amendments also clarified that annual loan limits are
authorized for an academic year as that term is defined in section
481(a)(2) of the HEA, which contains a minimum standard of
instructional time and academic coursework. The committee agreed that
students enrolled in a program that does not meet one or both of the
statutory minimum standards for an academic year not receive a full
annual loan amount
also clarified that annual loan limits are
authorized for an academic year as that term is defined in section
481(a)(2) of the HEA, which contains a minimum standard of
instructional time and academic coursework. The committee agreed that
students enrolled in a program that does not meet one or both of the
statutory minimum standards for an academic year not receive a full
annual loan amount. After some discussion, the committee agreed that
the draft regulations should propose that the calculation of the
proportional loan amount for a program of study that is less than a
full academic year should use the ratio that is the lesser of the ratio
of academic credit or number of weeks to the academic year.
For prorating loan limits for remaining balances of programs that
are equal to or greater than an academic year in length, the committee
agreed that a proportional loan amount calculated as simply a ratio of
the academic credit to the academic year could be used. This is because
these programs already meet the two standards (instructional weeks or
academic credit) for an academic year.
Preparatory Coursework
The proposed regulations would reflect the change made by the 1998
Amendments to specify the annual loan amount in the FFEL and Direct
Loan programs that a borrower may receive if he or she is enrolled in
preparatory coursework required for admission into an undergraduate
degree or certificate program or for enrollment in a graduate or
professional degree or certificate program. The loan limits specified
in the statute are the same as the limits previously specified in the
Department's guidance for loans made to these borrowers. The proposed
regulations provide that the maximum loan amount that such a borrower
may receive for coursework necessary for admission into an
undergraduate program is $2,625 in subsidized and unsubsidized loans
and, for independent students and certain dependent students, an
additional $4,000 in unsubsidized loans
usly specified in the
Department's guidance for loans made to these borrowers. The proposed
regulations provide that the maximum loan amount that such a borrower
may receive for coursework necessary for admission into an
undergraduate program is $2,625 in subsidized and unsubsidized loans
and, for independent students and certain dependent students, an
additional $4,000 in unsubsidized loans. In the case of a borrower who
has obtained a baccalaureate degree, the proposed regulations provide
that the maximum amount a borrower may receive for coursework necessary
for admission into a graduate or professional program is $5,500 in
subsidized and unsubsidized loans and $10,500 (less any subsidized
amount borrowed) in additional unsubsidized loans.
Teaching Credentials
The proposed regulations would reflect the change made by the 1998
Amendments to specify the annual loan amount that a borrower may
receive for enrollment in postbaccalaureate coursework necessary for a
professional credential or teacher certification by a State for
teaching in elementary or secondary schools. The HEA specifies that
such a borrower may receive an annual limit of up to $5,500 in
subsidized and unsubsidized loans and
$5,000 in additional unsubsidized loans for such coursework. The loan
limits specified in the statute are the same limits as those previously
specified in the Department's guidance for loans made to these
borrowers following enactment of section 484(b)(4) of the HEA in 1992,
which made these borrowers eligible for loans.
Sections 682.207, 682.604, 685.301, and 685.303--Disbursement
Exemptions
The proposed regulations would implement changes made to section
428G(a)(3), (b)(1), and (e) of the HEA by the 1998 Amendments that
authorize exemptions to the requirements for disbursing loan proceeds
to FFEL and Direct Loan program borrowers. These exemptions apply to
FFEL and Direct Loan program schools that meet specific criteria.
Multiple Disbursement Exemption
Disbursement
Exemptions
The proposed regulations would implement changes made to section
428G(a)(3), (b)(1), and (e) of the HEA by the 1998 Amendments that
authorize exemptions to the requirements for disbursing loan proceeds
to FFEL and Direct Loan program borrowers. These exemptions apply to
FFEL and Direct Loan program schools that meet specific criteria.
Multiple Disbursement Exemption
Generally, an FFEL or Direct Loan program loan must be disbursed in
more than one installment. As a result of the 1998 Amendments, loan
proceeds may now be disbursed to the borrower in one installment if--
The loan period is equal to or shorter than one semester,
one trimester, one quarter, or four months; and
The school has an FFEL cohort default rate, Direct Loan
Program cohort rate, or weighted average cohort rate of less than 10
percent for each of the three most recent fiscal years for which data
are available.
Loan proceeds to cover the cost of attendance in a study abroad
program also may be disbursed in one installment if the school has an
FFEL cohort default rate, Direct Loan Program cohort rate, or weighted
average cohort rate of less than five percent for the single most
recent fiscal year for which data are available.
Delayed Delivery/Disbursement Exemption for First-Year, First-Time
Borrowers
In general, FFEL and Direct Loan program schools must delay
delivery or disbursement of an installment of loan proceeds to first-
year, first-time borrowers until 30 days after the first day of the
student's program of study. First-year, first-time borrowers are
students who are enrolled in their first year of an undergraduate
program of study and who have not previously received an FFEL
Subsidized Stafford, FFEL Unsubsidized Stafford, Federal Supplemental
Loans for Students (SLS), Direct Subsidized, or Direct Unsubsidized
loan
st-time borrowers until 30 days after the first day of the
student's program of study. First-year, first-time borrowers are
students who are enrolled in their first year of an undergraduate
program of study and who have not previously received an FFEL
Subsidized Stafford, FFEL Unsubsidized Stafford, Federal Supplemental
Loans for Students (SLS), Direct Subsidized, or Direct Unsubsidized
loan.
Under the proposed regulations and in accordance with the statute,
an FFEL or Direct Loan program school may deliver or disburse loan
proceeds to first-year, first-time borrowers without the 30-day delay
if the school--
Has an FFEL cohort default rate, Direct Loan Program
cohort rate, or weighted average cohort rate of less than 10 percent
for each of the three most recent fiscal years for which data are
available or
Is an eligible postsecondary home school certifying or
originating a loan to cover the cost of attendance in a study abroad
program; and
Has an FFEL cohort default rate, Direct Loan Program
cohort rate, or weighted average cohort rate of less than five percent
for the single most recent fiscal year for which data are available.
A school's eligibility for these exemptions is based on the
school's published FFEL cohort default rate, Direct Loan Program cohort
rate, or weighted average cohort rate. To be eligible, the school must
have a published rate calculated for each of the required number of
years. For example, a new school that has only one published FFEL
cohort default rate, Direct Loan Program cohort rate, or weighted
average cohort rate of less than 10 percent and wants to disburse a
one-semester loan in a single installment would not qualify for the
multiple disbursement exemption.
Annually, the Secretary notifies schools of their published FFEL
cohort default rates, Direct Loan Program cohort rates, or weighted
average cohort rates
FFEL
cohort default rate, Direct Loan Program cohort rate, or weighted
average cohort rate of less than 10 percent and wants to disburse a
one-semester loan in a single installment would not qualify for the
multiple disbursement exemption.
Annually, the Secretary notifies schools of their published FFEL
cohort default rates, Direct Loan Program cohort rates, or weighted
average cohort rates. Under the proposed regulations, schools that no
longer qualify for the exemptions would have to cease certifying or
originating loans based on the exemptions beginning 30 days after the
school received the Department's notice that it no longer qualifies for
the exemptions. A school would be responsible for certifying or
originating loans in accordance with the applicable regulations and its
default rate, and FFEL lenders and guaranty agencies would be able to
rely upon the school certifications.
Sections 682.209 and 685.207--Grace Period for Military Service
The proposed regulations would implement changes made by the 1998
Amendments to section 428(b)(7)(D) of the HEA that authorize the
exclusion of certain periods of service in the Armed Forces from the
six-month grace period for FFEL and Direct Loan program borrowers. To
qualify, a borrower must be--
A member of a reserve component of the Armed Forces named
in section 10101 of Title 10 of the United States Code; and
Called or ordered to active duty for a period of more than
30 days.
For borrowers who qualify, the following periods would be excluded
from the six-month grace period for the borrower's subsidized and
unsubsidized student loans:
Periods during which a borrower serves in the Armed
Forces; and
The period necessary for a borrower to resume enrollment
at the next available regular enrollment period when the borrower
returns from service.
The committee discussed the incidence of a borrower serving more
than one period of active duty
he six-month grace period for the borrower's subsidized and
unsubsidized student loans:
Periods during which a borrower serves in the Armed
Forces; and
The period necessary for a borrower to resume enrollment
at the next available regular enrollment period when the borrower
returns from service.
The committee discussed the incidence of a borrower serving more
than one period of active duty. To ensure that borrowers receive the
benefit each time they serve, the committee agreed that the proposed
regulations should provide that each period that coincides with the
borrower's loans being in an in-school or grace status is subject to
the three-year limit.
The committee also discussed the fact that the time period in which
a borrower needs to re-enroll in the ``next available regular
enrollment period'' after returning from service in the Armed Forces
may need to be longer for some borrowers than others, especially if the
borrower is pursuing a non-traditional academic program. As a result of
these discussions, the committee agreed that the proposed regulations
should require that all borrowers must re-enroll within 12 months of
their return from active duty service. Borrowers would not be required
to re-enroll in the same program in which they were enrolled at the
time they were called or ordered to active duty.
The proposed regulations also would provide that borrowers who were
in their grace period when called or ordered to active duty receive a
full six-month grace period when they return from service in the Armed
Forces. The committee believed that this provision would be in the best
interest of borrowers--many of whom must secure jobs upon their return.
Sections 682.210 and 685.204--Deferment
The proposed regulations would implement changes made by the 1998
Amendments to requirements for deferments in section 428(b)(1) of the
HEA. These changes affect the qualifications for the in-school and
unemployment deferments.
In-School Deferment
s provision would be in the best
interest of borrowers--many of whom must secure jobs upon their return.
Sections 682.210 and 685.204--Deferment
The proposed regulations would implement changes made by the 1998
Amendments to requirements for deferments in section 428(b)(1) of the
HEA. These changes affect the qualifications for the in-school and
unemployment deferments.
In-School Deferment
Prior to enactment of the 1998 Amendments, certain FFEL Program
borrowers who were enrolled less than full time had to borrow a loan
for the
same period of enrollment for which the borrower was seeking an in-
school deferment in order to qualify for the deferment. These ``new
borrowers'' are defined for deferment purposes, as those who did not
have an outstanding balance on an FFEL loan made prior to July 1, 1987
and who received an FFEL loan on or prior to June 30, 1993. The 1998
Amendments eliminated the requirement that the borrower take out a loan
to qualify for the deferment. The proposed regulations would provide
these FFEL borrowers enrolled at least half time at an eligible school
may qualify for an in-school deferment.
The 1998 Amendments also changed the HEA to specify three methods
by which FFEL lenders and the Secretary will determine a borrower's
eligibility for an in-school deferment. The proposed regulations would
provide that a borrower may be determined eligible for an in-school
deferment when--
The borrower submits a request for deferment along with
documentation verifying the borrower's eligibility for the deferment to
the borrower's FFEL lender or the Secretary for a Direct Loan;
The borrower's FFEL lender or the Secretary for a Direct
Loan receives either a newly completed loan application or, as part of
the MPN process, information from the borrower's school indicating that
the borrower is eligible to receive a new loan; or
The borrower's FFEL lender, or the Secretary for a Direct
Loan, receives student status information from the borrower's school,
either directly or ind
rower's FFEL lender or the Secretary for a Direct
Loan receives either a newly completed loan application or, as part of
the MPN process, information from the borrower's school indicating that
the borrower is eligible to receive a new loan; or
The borrower's FFEL lender, or the Secretary for a Direct
Loan, receives student status information from the borrower's school,
either directly or indirectly, indicating that the borrower is enrolled
on at least a half-time basis.
Before the 1998 Amendments, a borrower could only receive an in-
school deferment by submitting a request and the required verification
of eligibility to the borrower's FFEL lender or the Secretary for a
Direct Loan. The Department's current regulations allow FFEL lenders to
determine a borrower's eligibility for an in-school deferment when they
received new loan eligibility information from a borrower's school.
The statute requires an FFEL lender, or the Secretary for a Direct
Loan, to notify a borrower when granting an in-school deferment based
on new loan eligibility or student status information. The committee
agreed that to provide borrowers with the opportunity to make an
informed choice, the proposed regulations would provide that this
notice must inform the borrower of the option to make interest payments
on an unsubsidized loan during the deferment period and of the
opportunity to cancel the deferment and continue paying on the loan.
The proposed regulations also provide that, in the case of a borrower
who chooses to cancel the deferment and continue paying on the loan,
the borrower may exercise his or her option to avoid capitalization of
unpaid interest by making the principal and interest payments that were
deferred.
Unemployment Deferment
nd of the
opportunity to cancel the deferment and continue paying on the loan.
The proposed regulations also provide that, in the case of a borrower
who chooses to cancel the deferment and continue paying on the loan,
the borrower may exercise his or her option to avoid capitalization of
unpaid interest by making the principal and interest payments that were
deferred.
Unemployment Deferment
Prior to the 1998 Amendments, to qualify for additional periods of
an unemployment deferment after an initial six months, FFEL and Direct
Loan program borrowers were required to submit a written certification
that described the borrower's conscientious search for full-time
employment. Alternatively, a borrower could provide comparable
documentation the borrower had used to meet the requirements of the
Unemployment Insurance Service.
The 1998 Amendments modified the HEA to permit borrowers who are
eligible for unemployment insurance benefits to submit evidence of
their eligibility for the benefits to their FFEL lender, or to the
Secretary for a Direct Loan, to qualify for initial and subsequent
periods of an unemployment deferment. The proposed regulations reflect
this change in the HEA. However, borrowers who are not eligible for
unemployment insurance benefits may continue to provide written
certifications to their FFEL lender or the Secretary.
As part of the discussions of this statutory change, the committee
agreed that borrowers who are eligible for unemployment insurance
benefits should not have to receive those benefits to qualify for an
unemployment deferment. The proposed regulations reflect this standard
of eligibility. The committee believed that the statute's goal was to
reduce the burden on the borrower. Therefore, the committee agreed that
a borrower should simply submit documentation proving that he or she is
eligible to receive the unemployment insurance benefits for the period
during which the borrower is requesting an unemployment deferment
e proposed regulations reflect this standard
of eligibility. The committee believed that the statute's goal was to
reduce the burden on the borrower. Therefore, the committee agreed that
a borrower should simply submit documentation proving that he or she is
eligible to receive the unemployment insurance benefits for the period
during which the borrower is requesting an unemployment deferment.
The committee also discussed the minimum documentation that a
borrower should be required to provide. Some negotiators suggested that
the documentation should include, at a minimum--
The borrower's personal identifying information (i.e.,
name, address, and social security number); and
The effective dates of the borrower's eligibility to
receive unemployment insurance benefits.
However, following these discussions, the committee did not include
these requirements in the proposed regulations. The Secretary invites
comment as to whether these items should be included in the final
regulations.
Sections 682.211 and 685.205--Forbearance
The proposed regulations would implement changes to sections
428(c)(3) and 428H(e) of the HEA made by the 1998 Amendments. These
changes remove the requirement that forbearance requests be in writing
and add a new basis for granting a forbearance.
Under new sections 428(c)(3)(D) and 428H(e)(7) of the HEA, an FFEL
lender, and the Secretary for a Direct Loan, may grant a forbearance to
a borrower for a period not to exceed 60 days after the borrower
requests a deferment, a forbearance, a change in repayment plan, or a
consolidation loan. The purpose of this forbearance period is to allow
time for FFEL lenders and the Secretary to collect and process
documentation supporting these requests. Lenders and the Secretary may
not capitalize interest that accrues during this forbearance period.
Sections 682.401 and 685.402--Multi-Year Use of the Master Promissory
Note
forbearance, a change in repayment plan, or a
consolidation loan. The purpose of this forbearance period is to allow
time for FFEL lenders and the Secretary to collect and process
documentation supporting these requests. Lenders and the Secretary may
not capitalize interest that accrues during this forbearance period.
Sections 682.401 and 685.402--Multi-Year Use of the Master Promissory
Note
The proposed regulations would modify Secs. 682.401 and 685.402 to
reflect the adoption of an MPN in the FFEL and Direct Loan Programs.
Even before enactment of the 1998 Amendments, the Department, in
consultation with the financial aid community, developed an MPN and a
process for multi-year use of the MPN for FFEL and Direct Stafford
loans. The Department's adoption of an MPN was confirmed by changes
made to section 432(m)(1)(D) of the HEA by the 1998 Amendments. The
proposed regulations would further this process by stating the
requirements that a school must meet to be authorized for multi-year
use of the MPN.
Under the proposed regulations, a school would have to be
authorized by the Secretary to use a single MPN as the basis for
multiple loans obtained by a particular borrower. A borrower attending
a school that is not authorized by the Secretary for multi-year use of
the MPN would have to complete a new MPN for each subsequent loan.
Under the proposed regulations, to be eligible for multi-year use
of the MPN, a school would have to be a four-year or graduate/
professional school, or meet criteria or be otherwise designated at the
sole discretion of the Secretary. The school also would have to meet
the following requirements:
Not be subject to an emergency action or a proposed or
final limitation,
r each subsequent loan.
Under the proposed regulations, to be eligible for multi-year use
of the MPN, a school would have to be a four-year or graduate/
professional school, or meet criteria or be otherwise designated at the
sole discretion of the Secretary. The school also would have to meet
the following requirements:
Not be subject to an emergency action or a proposed or
final limitation,
suspension, or termination action under sections 428(b)(1)(T), 432(h),
or 487(c) of the HEA; and
Meet other performance criteria determined by the
Secretary.
The proposed regulations provide that the Secretary may designate
additional institutions to use the multi-year feature of the MPN, in
his sole discretion. It is our current intention to allow schools
(other than four-year and graduate/professional schools) to request
approval for use of the multi-year feature of the MPN at any time after
the publication of the final regulations. Any such requests will be
considered at the Secretary's sole discretion. At some point after
final regulations are published, it is also our intention to establish
and announce criteria and a process that will be used by the Department
for consideration of requests for approval of the use of the multi-year
feature of the MPN by schools other than four-year and graduate/
professional schools.
We believe the proposed regulations would give the Secretary
adequate flexibility to implement multi-year use of the MPN.
The adoption of the MPN for multi-year use will require significant
changes to the systems and procedures currently in place for lenders,
schools, servicers, and the Department. It will also require increased
efforts by all parties to ensure that borrowers understand their
obligations and rights under the new note. In light of these changes,
the Secretary believes it is appropriate to phase in the multi-year use
of the MPN
i-year use will require significant
changes to the systems and procedures currently in place for lenders,
schools, servicers, and the Department. It will also require increased
efforts by all parties to ensure that borrowers understand their
obligations and rights under the new note. In light of these changes,
the Secretary believes it is appropriate to phase in the multi-year use
of the MPN. Accordingly, at this time, the Secretary will authorize
multi-year use of the MPN only for four-year or graduate/professional
schools that are not subject to an emergency action or a proposed or
final limitation, suspension, or termination action. However, it is the
Secretary's ultimate goal to allow multi-year use of the MPN by all
schools that meet the eligibility requirements.
Consistent with the statutory requirements, the proposed
regulations would require schools that are authorized for multi-year
use of the MPN to develop and document a confirmation process or
processes along with the FFEL lender, or the Secretary for Direct
Loans, to ensure that the borrower wants subsequent loans.
The negotiators agreed that a confirmation process is required now
and that schools and lenders may follow the guidance in the
Department's Dear Colleague Letters--GEN-98-25, November 1998 and GEN-
99-08, February 1999--in developing and documenting that confirmation
process. As technology develops and different methods of confirmation
are tested, the Secretary will continue to issue guidance regarding
confirmation methods. Any guidelines will be issued in accordance with
applicable requirements of the Administrative Procedures Act.
Ultimately, after evaluating various confirmation processes, the
Secretary plans to develop regulations governing the confirmation
process.
It is the Secretary's goal to maintain and enhance a borrower's
control over the lending process
ssue guidance regarding
confirmation methods. Any guidelines will be issued in accordance with
applicable requirements of the Administrative Procedures Act.
Ultimately, after evaluating various confirmation processes, the
Secretary plans to develop regulations governing the confirmation
process.
It is the Secretary's goal to maintain and enhance a borrower's
control over the lending process. To that end, the Secretary intends to
work with students, schools, lenders, guaranty agencies, and other
interested parties to develop improved technologies and processes that
will enable borrowers to further control the lending process. These
efforts will include the development of borrower-control mechanisms
such as the--
Use of electronic signatures to confirm acceptance of
loans;
Use of PIN numbers to access and confirm loan records and
amounts; and
Adoption of on-line or other initial counseling that
includes acknowledgment of the loan.
Sections 682.402, 685.212, and 685.215--Unpaid Refund Discharge
The proposed regulations would implement changes made to section
437(c)(1) of the HEA by the 1998 Amendments. These changes provide for
the discharge of the amount of a borrower's FFEL or Direct Loan program
loan that should have been refunded by the borrower's school. This
discharge is available for loans disbursed on or after January 1, 1986.
Under the proposed regulations, the loan discharge would be available
to any borrower whose school failed to refund loan proceeds to an FFEL
lender or the Secretary on behalf of a borrower who was entitled to a
refund. While technically the return of Title IV loan proceeds that
have been applied to the account of a borrower who never attended a
school does not meet the definition of a Title IV refund, the committee
agreed to be fair to borrowers in this situation, and propose to make
these borrowers eligible for the unpaid refund discharge
the Secretary on behalf of a borrower who was entitled to a
refund. While technically the return of Title IV loan proceeds that
have been applied to the account of a borrower who never attended a
school does not meet the definition of a Title IV refund, the committee
agreed to be fair to borrowers in this situation, and propose to make
these borrowers eligible for the unpaid refund discharge.
The rules proposed by the committee for unpaid refund discharges
are generally consistent with the rules governing application for
closed school and false certification discharges. The committee
believed that adopting consistent rules would help assure consistent
administration and fair treatment for borrowers. The proposed
regulations therefore would require FFEL and Direct Loan program
borrowers to submit a complete application for an unpaid refund
discharge. However, the committee agreed that an application should not
be required in all cases. The proposed regulations would allow the
Secretary or the guaranty agency, with the approval of the Secretary,
to discharge a loan based on information in his/its possession that
shows that the borrower is eligible for a discharge. Under the proposed
regulations, collection efforts on the loan would cease from the time
the borrower submits the application until such time as a determination
is made as to the borrower's eligibility for the discharge.
Under the proposed regulations, the borrower would have to agree to
provide, upon request, any additional documentation reasonably
available to the borrower but not submitted with the application, to
demonstrate that the borrower meets the qualifications for the
discharge. Examples of documentation reasonably available to the
borrower include copies of the tuition bill, the enrollment contract,
the school's catalog or other documents stating the school's refund
policy, and any correspondence from the school specifying the
borrower's withdrawal date or the amount of the refund owed
on, to
demonstrate that the borrower meets the qualifications for the
discharge. Examples of documentation reasonably available to the
borrower include copies of the tuition bill, the enrollment contract,
the school's catalog or other documents stating the school's refund
policy, and any correspondence from the school specifying the
borrower's withdrawal date or the amount of the refund owed.
Unpaid refund discharge requests will involve both schools that
have closed and schools that are open. However, the issues presented by
those situations differ. Accordingly, the proposed regulations provide
different procedures for closed and open school situations.
Closed School Situations
Under the proposed regulations, if the school has closed, the
guaranty agency or the Secretary would discharge the amount of the loan
equal to the unpaid refund and any associated accrued interest and
other charges based on a complete application from the borrower or,
under limited circumstances, information otherwise available to the
guaranty agency or to the Secretary.
Open School Situations
Under the proposed regulations, if the school is open, the guaranty
agency or the Secretary would discharge the amount of the loan equal to
the unpaid refund and any associated accrued interest and other charges
if--
The borrower no longer attends the school that owes the
refund;
The borrower has been unable to resolve the unpaid refund
with the school; and
The guaranty agency or the Secretary has been unable to
resolve the unpaid refund with the school within 120 days from the date
the borrower
he amount of the loan equal to
the unpaid refund and any associated accrued interest and other charges
if--
The borrower no longer attends the school that owes the
refund;
The borrower has been unable to resolve the unpaid refund
with the school; and
The guaranty agency or the Secretary has been unable to
resolve the unpaid refund with the school within 120 days from the date
the borrower
submits a complete application for the unpaid refund discharge.
Under the proposed regulations, the guaranty agency or the
Secretary would notify the school of the receipt of an unpaid refund
discharge application. Within 60 days of the date of this notice, the
school would have to submit documentation demonstrating that the school
either made the refund, or is not required to make the refund.
In both closed and open school situations, the proposed regulations
would provide that the guaranty agency or the Secretary would determine
the amount eligible for discharge based on information showing the
refund amount that was not made or by applying the appropriate refund
formula to data that the borrower provides or that is otherwise
available to the guaranty agency or to the Secretary. If this
information is not available, the guaranty agency or the Secretary
would use one of two formulas to determine the amount eligible for
discharge. Two formulas must be considered because of changes made to
the HEA by the 1998 Amendments that modify the calculation of Title IV
refunds. The effective date for the new refund calculation is October
7, 2000 and that date will be used to determine which of the following
formulas applies.
For Students Who Fail To Attend, Withdraw, or Are Terminated Before
October 7, 2000
gible for
discharge. Two formulas must be considered because of changes made to
the HEA by the 1998 Amendments that modify the calculation of Title IV
refunds. The effective date for the new refund calculation is October
7, 2000 and that date will be used to determine which of the following
formulas applies.
For Students Who Fail To Attend, Withdraw, or Are Terminated Before
October 7, 2000
To determine unpaid refund discharges for borrowers in this group,
the guaranty agency or the Secretary would calculate and discharge the
lesser of the institutional charges unearned by the school or the loan
amount. The amount of institutional charges unearned equals--
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP10AU99.000
For Students Who Fail To Attend, Withdraw, or Are Terminated On or
After October 7, 2000
To determine unpaid refund discharges for borrowers in this group,
a guaranty agency or the Secretary would calculate and discharge the
loan amount unearned by the school. The loan amount unearned equals--
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP10AU99.001
The refund resulting from the above calculation may never exceed the
loan amount, including accrued interest and other charges.
Sections 682.604 and 685.304--Counseling Borrowers
The proposed regulations would reflect changes made to section
485(b)(2)(C) of the HEA by the 1998 Amendments clarifying that schools
may use electronic means to provide exit counseling to FFEL and Direct
Stafford loan borrowers. The statutory change addresses only exit
counseling because initial counseling is not required by the HEA.
However, because electronic counseling gives flexibility to both
borrowers and schools, the committee agreed that the proposed
regulations should also permit schools to use electronic means to
provide initial counseling to borrowers
counseling to FFEL and Direct
Stafford loan borrowers. The statutory change addresses only exit
counseling because initial counseling is not required by the HEA.
However, because electronic counseling gives flexibility to both
borrowers and schools, the committee agreed that the proposed
regulations should also permit schools to use electronic means to
provide initial counseling to borrowers. This change also would conform
to the guidance issued by the Department before enactment of the 1998
Amendments, which permitted schools to use electronic means to provide
initial and exit counseling to FFEL and Direct Loan program borrowers.
The proposed regulations also would update the counseling elements to
require schools to include information about two new statutory
initiatives--the MPN and the availability of the Department's Student
Loan Ombudsman's office.
Use of Electronic Means To Provide Counseling
The proposed regulations make changes based on the statutory
authorization for schools to use electronic means to provide counseling
to borrowers. Under the proposed regulations, FFEL and Direct Loan
program schools would be authorized to provide initial and exit
counseling to borrowers--
In person;
By audiovisual presentation; or
By interactive electronic means.
In any case, schools would continue to be required to ensure that
an individual with knowledge of Title IV programs is reasonably
available shortly after the counseling to answer borrowers' questions.
The proposed regulations would also continue to allow schools to
provide written counseling materials to borrowers who are enrolled in a
correspondence program or a study abroad program approved for credit at
a postsecondary home school
equired to ensure that
an individual with knowledge of Title IV programs is reasonably
available shortly after the counseling to answer borrowers' questions.
The proposed regulations would also continue to allow schools to
provide written counseling materials to borrowers who are enrolled in a
correspondence program or a study abroad program approved for credit at
a postsecondary home school. In the case of a borrower who withdraws
from school without the school's prior knowledge or who fails to
complete the exit counseling as required, the proposed regulations
would now require a school to provide exit counseling through
interactive electronic means or by mailing written counseling materials
to the borrower within 30 days after the school learns that the
borrower has withdrawn from school or failed to complete the exit
counseling as required.
The committee members pointed out that there are different
electronic means by which schools may provide initial and exit
counseling to FFEL and Direct Loan borrowers. Moreover, new and
improved electronic means are continually becoming available. At the
same time, the committee agreed that it was important to ensure that
the quality of the counseling that schools provide to borrowers is
enhanced rather than diminished by advancing technology. For these
reasons, the proposed regulations would not prescribe specific
electronic means by which schools may provide initial and exit
counseling. Rather, the proposed regulations would specify that the
electronic means the school uses must be interactive, which at a
minimum, requires schools to take reasonable steps to ensure that each
borrower receives the counseling
advancing technology. For these
reasons, the proposed regulations would not prescribe specific
electronic means by which schools may provide initial and exit
counseling. Rather, the proposed regulations would specify that the
electronic means the school uses must be interactive, which at a
minimum, requires schools to take reasonable steps to ensure that each
borrower receives the counseling
materials and participates in and completes the counseling. For
example, simply ensuring that the student received and ``opened'' an
electronic message that contained loan counseling information would not
be sufficient.
The proposed regulations would continue to require schools to
maintain documentation substantiating their compliance with the initial
and exit counseling requirements for each borrower. However, in
recognition of the unique features of electronic counseling, the
proposed regulations would eliminate the requirement that a school
maintain the documentation in a borrower's file. For schools that send
initial and exit counseling materials by e-mail or other electronic
means, the school's documentation would have to include proof that the
borrower received the materials. This does not mean that the school
must receive a personal response from the borrower, rather the school
can accept an electronic ``receipt'', or other comparable response,
that is a feature of most electronic mail systems. Proof of receipt
would not be required if schools send the materials via U.S. mail.
New Counseling Elements
ave to include proof that the
borrower received the materials. This does not mean that the school
must receive a personal response from the borrower, rather the school
can accept an electronic ``receipt'', or other comparable response,
that is a feature of most electronic mail systems. Proof of receipt
would not be required if schools send the materials via U.S. mail.
New Counseling Elements
The proposed regulations also would require that, as part of
initial and exit counseling, schools include information about two new
initiatives authorized by the 1998 Amendments. The committee believed
that these statutory initiatives are important for borrowers to be
informed of during the appropriate counseling session. Under the
proposed regulations, schools would have to--
Explain the use of an MPN during the initial counseling;
and
Review information on the availability of the Department's
Student Loan Ombudsman's office during the exit counseling.
The committee also agreed that borrowers should be informed of the
availability of the Department's Student Loan Ombudsman's office by
FFEL lenders and guaranty agencies at specific points in the life of
the loan. The agreed-upon points at which information on the
Ombudsman's services would be provided are included and discussed in
the NPRM of Committee I.
Section 685.300--Choice of Loan Programs
The 1998 Amendments modified section 498(b) of the HEA to require
that the application for schools to participate in the Title IV
programs provide schools the option to participate in one or more of
the loan programs under the FFEL and Direct Loan programs. As a result
of this change, a school may choose to participate in either the
subsidized or the unsubsidized Stafford loan programs, or both. A
school also has the option to choose whether or not to participate in
the PLUS loan program. The proposed Direct Loan Program regulations
contain a conforming change in 685.300 to reflect this statutory
change
under the FFEL and Direct Loan programs. As a result
of this change, a school may choose to participate in either the
subsidized or the unsubsidized Stafford loan programs, or both. A
school also has the option to choose whether or not to participate in
the PLUS loan program. The proposed Direct Loan Program regulations
contain a conforming change in 685.300 to reflect this statutory
change. The prior FFEL Program regulations that provided for agreements
between an eligible school and the Secretary for participation in the
FFEL Program were removed and reserved in regulations published on July
1, 1995. Therefore, a comparable conforming change is not proposed for
those regulations. Notwithstanding that fact, FFEL schools also have
the option to decide in which FFEL loan programs they wish to
participate.
The committee considered whether a student attending a school that
chose not to participate in the PLUS loan program would be
automatically eligible to borrow additional unsubsidized FFEL or Direct
Loan program funds as the law provides for dependent students whose
parents are unable to borrow under the PLUS loan program. After much
discussion, the committee agreed that the proposed regulations should
not permit a dependent student attending such a school to be eligible
to receive additional unsubsidized FFEL or Direct Loan program funds
based on the school's decision not to participate in the PLUS loan
program. Some negotiators agreed with the Department's belief that this
went beyond the scope of the intent of the law.
Executive Order 12866
1. Potential Costs and Benefits
ations should
not permit a dependent student attending such a school to be eligible
to receive additional unsubsidized FFEL or Direct Loan program funds
based on the school's decision not to participate in the PLUS loan
program. Some negotiators agreed with the Department's belief that this
went beyond the scope of the intent of the law.
Executive Order 12866
1. Potential Costs and Benefits
Under Executive Order 12866, we have assessed the potential costs
and benefits of this regulatory action.
The potential costs associated with the proposed regulations are
those resulting from statutory requirements and those we have
determined as necessary for administering these programs effectively
and efficiently.
In assessing the potential costs and benefits--both quantitative
and qualitative--of this regulatory action, we have determined that the
benefits would justify the costs.
We have also determined that this regulatory action would not
unduly interfere with State, local, and tribal governments in the
exercise of their governmental functions.
We note that, as these proposed regulations were subject to
negotiated rulemaking, the costs and benefits of the various
requirements were discussed thoroughly by the negotiators. The
resultant consensus reached on a particular requirement generally
reflected agreement on the best possible approach to that requirement
in terms of cost and benefit.
Summary of Potential Costs and Benefits
The following is an analysis of the costs and benefits of the most
significant provisions of the proposed regulations, all of which
reflect statutory changes included in the 1998 Amendments. There are
additional proposed changes including conforming and minor technical
changes intended to further improve the administration of the FFEL and
Direct Loan programs, which are discussed elsewhere in this preamble
under the heading Proposed Regulatory Changes. The Department does not
consider there to be significant costs associated with those
provisions.
ncluded in the 1998 Amendments. There are
additional proposed changes including conforming and minor technical
changes intended to further improve the administration of the FFEL and
Direct Loan programs, which are discussed elsewhere in this preamble
under the heading Proposed Regulatory Changes. The Department does not
consider there to be significant costs associated with those
provisions.
Interest Rates
The 1998 Amendments changed the basis for calculating borrower
interest rates on new Stafford and unsubsidized Stafford loans from a
security of comparable maturity plus 1 percent for both in-school and
repayment periods, to the 91-day T-bill interest rate plus 1.7 percent
for in-school, grace, and deferment periods, and the 91-day T-bill
interest rate plus 2.3 percent for repayment periods. These changes are
incorporated in proposed 682.202. At the time the 1998 Amendments
passed, the 91-day T-bill interest rate plus 2.3 percent was roughly
equal to the 10-20 year bond interest rate plus 1 percent; as a result
this change had no financial impact for loans in repayment. The lower
in-school costs of unsubsidized Stafford loans result in significant
student benefits. The cost to loan holders is estimated to be $56
million for loans originated in FY 2000.
The interest rate on FFEL Consolidation loans with applications
received by the lender on or after October 1, 1998, was changed to the
lesser of the weighted average of interest rates on the loans
consolidated, rounded to the nearest higher 1/8th of 1 percent, or 8.25
percent. The cost to loan holders for the lower borrower interest rate
is estimated to total $52 million for FFEL Consolidation loans
originated in FY 2000.
Capitalization
Section 682.202 also reflects the changes made to the HEA that
govern the frequency with which FFEL loan holders may capitalize
accrued interest. In addition, they clarify that these frequency of
capitalization rules apply
rcent. The cost to loan holders for the lower borrower interest rate
is estimated to total $52 million for FFEL Consolidation loans
originated in FY 2000.
Capitalization
Section 682.202 also reflects the changes made to the HEA that
govern the frequency with which FFEL loan holders may capitalize
accrued interest. In addition, they clarify that these frequency of
capitalization rules apply
to subsidized loans as well as to unsubsidized loans. In accordance
with the 1998 Amendments, a loan holder may only add accrued interest
to the principal when a borrower enters repayment, at the expiration of
a period of authorized deferment, at the expiration of a period of
authorized forbearance, and when the borrower defaults. This provision
would benefit borrowers and would result in an estimated cost to loan
holders of $45 million for loans originated in FY 2000. Of this amount,
$354,000 is the cost of including subsidized loans.
FFEL Extended Repayment Plan
Section 682.209 incorporates the new FFEL extended repayment plan
for new borrowers with outstanding FFEL Program loans exceeding $30,000
which would allow those borrowers to repay their loans, including FFEL
Consolidation loans, over a period not to exceed 25 years with fixed or
graduated repayment amounts. Assuming the same proportion of FFEL
borrowers take advantage of these provisions as in the Direct Loan
Program, lender's interest receipts may increase by as much as $55
million over the 30-year life of a loan. This increased revenue should
more than offset any additional administrative costs lenders may incur.
Further, it is likely that many or most small lenders will sell loans
in the extended repayment plan to larger loan holders in the secondary
markets.
Bankruptcy Discharge
Direct Loan
Program, lender's interest receipts may increase by as much as $55
million over the 30-year life of a loan. This increased revenue should
more than offset any additional administrative costs lenders may incur.
Further, it is likely that many or most small lenders will sell loans
in the extended repayment plan to larger loan holders in the secondary
markets.
Bankruptcy Discharge
Section 682.402 reflects changes made to the Bankruptcy Code by the
1998 Amendments that eliminates the seven-year repayment provision for
discharge of FFEL Program loans for bankruptcy petitions filed on or
after October 8, 1998. This change limits the FFEL Program loans that
may be discharged in bankruptcy to those that qualify on grounds of
undue hardship. The discharge of fewer loans would save the Federal
Government an estimated $66 million for loans originated in FY 2000.
Overall, these regulations would result in savings to borrowers and
the Federal Government, and would have a cost to loan holders in the
FFEL Program as shown in the table below. These costs are a direct
result of changes made to the HEA by the 1998 Amendments and have been
implemented prior to the development of these proposed regulations.
FY 2000 Costs
[In millions of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Federal FFEL loan
Provision government All Borrowers holders
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interest Rate Reduction......................................... .............. -108 108
Capitalization Upon Repayment................................... .............. -45 45
Limit Bankruptcy Discharge...................................... -66 66
-----------------------------------------------
Total......................................................
------------------------------------------
Interest Rate Reduction......................................... .............. -108 108
Capitalization Upon Repayment................................... .............. -45 45
Limit Bankruptcy Discharge...................................... -66 66
-----------------------------------------------
Total....................................................... -66 - 87 153
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Clarity of the Regulations
Executive Order 12866 and the President's Memorandum of June 1,
1998 on ``Plain Language in Government Writing'' require each agency to
write regulations that are easy to understand.
The Secretary invites comments on how to make these proposed
regulations easier to understand, including answers to questions such
as the following:
Are the requirements in the proposed regulations clearly
stated?
Do the proposed regulations contain technical terms or
other wording that interferes with their clarity?
Does the format of the proposed regulations (grouping and
order of sections, use of headings, paragraphing, etc.) aid or reduce
their clarity?
Would the proposed regulations be easier to understand if
we divided them into more (but shorter) sections? (A ``section'' is
preceded by the symbol ``Sec. '' and a numbered heading; for example,
Sec. 682.202 Permissible charges by lenders to borrowers.)
Could the description of the proposed regulations in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this preamble be more helpful in
making the proposed regulations easier to understand? If so, how?
What else could we do to make the proposed regulations
easier to understand?
Send any comments that concern how the Department could make these
proposed regulations easier to understand to the persons listed in the
ADDRESSES section of the preamble.
Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification
of this preamble be more helpful in
making the proposed regulations easier to understand? If so, how?
What else could we do to make the proposed regulations
easier to understand?
Send any comments that concern how the Department could make these
proposed regulations easier to understand to the persons listed in the
ADDRESSES section of the preamble.
Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification
The Secretary certifies that these proposed regulations would not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
Entities affected by these regulations are institutions of higher
education and loan holders that participate in the Title IV, HEA
programs, and individual FFEL and Direct Loan borrowers. Institutions
would experience positive impacts from these proposed regulations.
Individuals are not considered small entities for this purpose. Nearly
all of the roughly 4,800 participating FFEL loan holders would be
defined as small entities under U.S. Small Business Administration
(SBA) guidelines. (Student loans are originated by lenders and are
often sold in packages to larger secondary market participants.) Small
lenders originate only 16 percent of new loans. The economic impact for
loans originated in FY 2000 would be $24 million or approximately
$5,000 per average lender.
The Secretary invites comments on this determination, and welcomes
proposals on any significant alternatives that would satisfy the same
legal and policy objectives of these proposals while minimizing the
economic impact on small entities.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
ans. The economic impact for
loans originated in FY 2000 would be $24 million or approximately
$5,000 per average lender.
The Secretary invites comments on this determination, and welcomes
proposals on any significant alternatives that would satisfy the same
legal and policy objectives of these proposals while minimizing the
economic impact on small entities.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
Sections 682.102, 682.200, 682.402, 682.604, 682.610, 685.215, and
685.304 contain information collection requirements and require OMB
approval. Sections 682.210(h), 682.301(b), 682.401(b)(5), 685.204(b)
and 685.205 are affected by the NPRM and require continued approval by
OMB. Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507(d)), the
Department has submitted a copy of these sections to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for its review.
Collection of Information: Federal Family Education Loan Program
and William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan Program.
Section 682.102--Obtaining and Repaying a Loan
We are proposing to require the use of the Free Application for
Federal Student
Aid (FAFSA), beginning in academic year 1999-2000, as the application
for subsidized and unsubsidized Stafford loans, as required by the 1998
Amendments. Borrowers would no longer be required to complete a
separate loan application. This provision would reduce the burden hours
required for a lender's processing of the loan application. The
Department currently has the burden hours for this provision accounted
for under 682.401(b)(4) and approved under OMB control numbers 1840-
0742 and 1840-0717. We will submit a change request to reflect the
reduction in burden hours to OMB.
Section 682.200--Definitions
oan application. This provision would reduce the burden hours
required for a lender's processing of the loan application. The
Department currently has the burden hours for this provision accounted
for under 682.401(b)(4) and approved under OMB control numbers 1840-
0742 and 1840-0717. We will submit a change request to reflect the
reduction in burden hours to OMB.
Section 682.200--Definitions
We are proposing to change the definition of ``Default'' by
increasing the number of days a borrower may be delinquent before an
FFEL Program Loan becomes defaulted from 180 days to 270 days for loans
repayable in monthly installments, and from 240 days to 330 days for
loans repayable less frequently than monthly installments. We
anticipate no change in burden hours as a result of this change.
Section 682.402--Death, Disability, Closed School, False Certification,
Unpaid Refunds, and Bankruptcy Payments
We are proposing changes that would provide for the discharge of
all or a portion of a borrower's FFEL Program loan if a school failed
to refund loan proceeds to the lender on behalf of a borrower who
withdrew or was terminated from the school within a timeframe that
entitled the borrower to a Title IV refund. This proposed statutory
change would be retroactive to loans disbursed on or after January 1,
1986. The proposed unpaid refund discharge would involve both schools
that have closed and schools that are open. Annual reporting burden
hours for this collection of information for processing unpaid refund
discharge payments is estimated to average one hour per response for
500 borrowers, equaling a total of 500 new burden hours. This figure is
based on unpaid refund discharge payments for an estimated 400
borrowers in closed school situations and an estimated 100 borrowers in
open school situations.
Section 682.604--Processing the Borrower's Loan Proceeds and Counseling
Borrowers
paid refund
discharge payments is estimated to average one hour per response for
500 borrowers, equaling a total of 500 new burden hours. This figure is
based on unpaid refund discharge payments for an estimated 400
borrowers in closed school situations and an estimated 100 borrowers in
open school situations.
Section 682.604--Processing the Borrower's Loan Proceeds and Counseling
Borrowers
We are proposing to change the regulations to clarify that schools
are not restricted to providing in-person exit counseling to borrowers,
but may use interactive electronic means to conduct entrance and exit
counseling for borrowers. Our recalculation of burden hours also
reflects the streamlining of an in-person counseling since the
inception of the process in 1989. Annual public reporting burden for
the collection of information for initial counseling is estimated to
average 0.25 hour per response for 5,899 FFEL Program schools times
eight sessions per school for a total of 11,798 burden hours. This
equals a decrease of 4,514 burden hours. Annual public reporting burden
for the collection of information for exit counseling is estimated to
average 0.25 hour per response for 836,124 students for a total of
209,031 burden hours. This equals an increase of 77,814 burden hours
over the current inventory. The large increase results from the large
increase of respondents since the last calculation of these numbers.
Section 682.610--Administrative and Fiscal Requirements for
Participating Schools
n for exit counseling is estimated to
average 0.25 hour per response for 836,124 students for a total of
209,031 burden hours. This equals an increase of 77,814 burden hours
over the current inventory. The large increase results from the large
increase of respondents since the last calculation of these numbers.
Section 682.610--Administrative and Fiscal Requirements for
Participating Schools
This provision would require a school to maintain documentation of
any confirmation process or processes the school may have used for
borrowers who use the multi-year feature of the Master Promissory Note.
This provision has information collection requirements that affect
schools. Annual reporting burden for this collection of information is
estimated to average 20 minutes to prepare a document describing the
school's confirmation process or processes for MPN multi-year
borrowers. There are 5,899 FFELP schools. This equals a total of 1,947
new burden hours.
Section 685.215--Unpaid Refund Discharge
This proposed provision would allow a borrower to have all or a
portion of the borrower's loan discharged if a school failed to make a
refund. The provision has information collection requirements that
would affect borrowers and schools. In the majority of cases, borrowers
would be required to complete a form to apply for an unpaid refund
discharge. This form will be developed following publication of the
final regulations and, when cleared, will account for the burden to
borrowers. In cases in which a borrower applies for an unpaid refund
discharge based on the actions of a school that is open, schools would
need to respond to an inquiry by the Department as to the unpaid refund
allegation. The Department estimates that 100 Direct Loan borrowers
will submit unpaid refund discharge applications and that 25% of those
applications would require schools that are open to spend one hour to
respond to the allegations for an estimated total of 25 new burden
hours.
Section 685.304--Counseling Borrowers
need to respond to an inquiry by the Department as to the unpaid refund
allegation. The Department estimates that 100 Direct Loan borrowers
will submit unpaid refund discharge applications and that 25% of those
applications would require schools that are open to spend one hour to
respond to the allegations for an estimated total of 25 new burden
hours.
Section 685.304--Counseling Borrowers
This proposed provision would revise existing regulations to allow
schools to provide initial and exit counseling to borrowers by one of
three methods: in person, by audiovisual presentation, or by
interactive electronic means. Schools would continue to be affected by
the information collection requirements in the existing regulations--
they would have to collect and maintain documentation substantiating
their compliance with the initial and exit counseling requirements for
each borrower. However, with the authorization for providing initial
and exit counseling through electronic means, the time required for
schools to collect and maintain the information would be reduced. For
initial counseling, the Department estimates that 1,230 Direct Loan
schools will conduct an average of eight counseling sessions and spend
.25 hour per session collecting and maintaining the required
documentation for a total of 2,460 burden hours. For exit counseling,
the Department estimates that Direct Loan schools will spend .25 hour
collecting and maintaining the required documentation for each of
836,124 borrowers who must complete exit counseling for a total of
209,301 burden hours. The combined burden hours for the information
collection requirements associated with initial and exit counseling
equal 211,491. While this is an increase of 182,097 burden hours to the
29,394 burden hours reported in the Department's most recent inventory,
the increase is due to the growth of the Direct Loan Program
owers who must complete exit counseling for a total of
209,301 burden hours. The combined burden hours for the information
collection requirements associated with initial and exit counseling
equal 211,491. While this is an increase of 182,097 burden hours to the
29,394 burden hours reported in the Department's most recent inventory,
the increase is due to the growth of the Direct Loan Program.
If you want to comment on the information collection requirements,
please send your comments to the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, OMB, room 10235, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC
20503; Attention: Desk Officer for U.S. Department of Education. You
may also send a copy of these comments to the Department
representatives named in the ADDRESSES section of this preamble.
We consider your comments in these proposed collections of
information in--
Deciding whether the proposed collections are necessary
for the proper performance of our functions, including whether the
information will have practical use;
Evaluating the accuracy of our estimate of the burden of
the proposed collections, including the validity of our methodology and
assumptions;
Enhancing the quality, usefulness, and clarity of the
information we collect; and
Minimizing the burden on those who must respond. This
includes exploring the use of appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms
of information technology; e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
OMB is required to make a decision concerning the collections of
information contained in these proposed regulations between 30 and 60
days after publication of this document in the Federal Register.
Therefore, to ensure that OMB gives your comments full consideration,
it is important that OMB receives the comments within 30 days of
publication. This does not affect the deadline for your comments to us
on the proposed regulations.
Assessment of Educational Impact
ion contained in these proposed regulations between 30 and 60
days after publication of this document in the Federal Register.
Therefore, to ensure that OMB gives your comments full consideration,
it is important that OMB receives the comments within 30 days of
publication. This does not affect the deadline for your comments to us
on the proposed regulations.
Assessment of Educational Impact
The Secretary particularly requests comments on whether these
proposed regulations would require transmission of information that any
other agency or authority of the United States gathers or makes
available.
Electronic Access to This Document
You may view this document in text or Adobe Portable Document
Format (PDF) on the Internet at the following sites:
http://ocfo.ed.gov/fedreg.htm
http://ifap.ed.gov/csb__html/fedlreg.htm
http://www.ed.gov/legislation/HEA/rulemaking/
To use the PDF you must have the Adobe Acrobat Reader Program with
Search, which is available free at the first of the previous sites. If
you have questions about using the PDF, call the U.S. Government
Printing Office (GPO), toll free, at 1-888-293-6498; or in the
Washington, DC, area at (202) 512-1530.
Note: The official version of this document is the document
published in the Federal Register. Free Internet access to the
official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of Federal
Regulations is available on GPO Access at: http://
www.access.gpo.gov/nara/index.html
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 84.032 Federal
Family Education Loan Program, and 84.268 William D. Ford Federal
Direct Loan Program)
List of Subjects in 34 CFR Parts 682 and 685
Administrative practice and procedure, Colleges and universities,
Education, Loan programs-education, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Student aid, Vocational education.
Dated: July 22, 1999.
Richard W. Riley,
Secretary of Education.
s 84.032 Federal
Family Education Loan Program, and 84.268 William D. Ford Federal
Direct Loan Program)
List of Subjects in 34 CFR Parts 682 and 685
Administrative practice and procedure, Colleges and universities,
Education, Loan programs-education, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Student aid, Vocational education.
Dated: July 22, 1999.
Richard W. Riley,
Secretary of Education.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Secretary proposes to
amend title 34 of the Code of Federal Regulations by revising parts 682
and 685 as follows:
PART--682 FEDERAL FAMILY EDUCATION LOAN (FFEL) PROGRAM
1. The authority citation for part 682 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1071 to 1087-2, unless otherwise noted.
2. Section 682.100 paragraph (a)(4) is amended by removing ``other
loans, including,''; and by adding ``Loans for Disadvantaged Students
(LDS)'', after ``(HPSL)''.
3. Section 682.102, paragraph (a), is revised; paragraph (b) is
removed and reserved; and paragraph (d) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 682.102 Obtaining and repaying a loan.
(a) Stafford loan application. Generally, to obtain a Stafford
loan, a student requests a loan by completing the Free Application for
Federal Student Aid (FAFSA), or contacting the school, lender or
guarantor. The school determines and certifies the student's
eligibility for the loan. Prior to loan disbursement, the lender
obtains a loan guarantee from a guaranty agency or the Secretary and
the student completes a promissory note, unless the student has
previously completed a Master Promissory Note (MPN) that the lender may
use for the new loan.
(b) [Reserved]
* * * * *
hool, lender or
guarantor. The school determines and certifies the student's
eligibility for the loan. Prior to loan disbursement, the lender
obtains a loan guarantee from a guaranty agency or the Secretary and
the student completes a promissory note, unless the student has
previously completed a Master Promissory Note (MPN) that the lender may
use for the new loan.
(b) [Reserved]
* * * * *
(d) Consolidation loan application. To obtain a Consolidation loan,
a borrower completes an application and submits it to the lender
holding the borrower's FFEL Program loan. If the borrower has multiple
holders of FFEL Program loans, or if the borrower's single loan holder
declines to make a Consolidation loan, or declines to make one with
income-sensitive repayment, the borrower may submit the application to
any lender participating in the Consolidation Loan Program. In the case
of a married couple seeking a Consolidation loan, only the holders for
one of the applicants must be contacted for consolidation. If a lender
decides to make the loan, the lender obtains a loan guarantee from a
guaranty agency or the Secretary.
* * * * *
4. Section 682.200(b) is amended as follows:
A. By amending the definitions of Default by revising paragraphs
(1) and (2), Estimated financial assistance by revising paragraphs
(1)(i) (2)(i)(B) and (C), (2)(ii), and by adding (2)(iii).
B. By revising the definition of Holder.
C. In the definition of ``Lender,'' by revising paragraph (5)(i)
and by renumbering the second paragraph (5) as paragraph (6).
D. By adding a new definition ``Master promissory note (MPN)'' in
alphabetical order.
E. In the definition of ``Repayment period,'' in paragraph (1), by
adding ``or 25 years under an extended repayment schedule,'', after
``10 years''; in paragraph (2), by adding ``or 25 years under an
extended repayment schedule,'', after ``10 years''.
Sec. 682.200 Definitions.
* * * * *
Default.
* * * * *
(1) 270 days for a loan repayable in monthly installments; or
in
alphabetical order.
E. In the definition of ``Repayment period,'' in paragraph (1), by
adding ``or 25 years under an extended repayment schedule,'', after
``10 years''; in paragraph (2), by adding ``or 25 years under an
extended repayment schedule,'', after ``10 years''.
Sec. 682.200 Definitions.
* * * * *
Default.
* * * * *
(1) 270 days for a loan repayable in monthly installments; or
(2) 330 days for a loan repayable in less frequent installments.
* * * * *
Estimated financial assistance.
(1) * * *
(i) Except as provided in paragraph (2)(iii) of this definition,
national service education awards or post-service benefits under title
I of the National and Community Service Act of 1990 and veterans'
educational benefits paid under chapters 30, 31, 32, and 35 of title 38
of the United States Code;
* * * * *
(2) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) * * *
(B) PLUS loan amounts; or
(C) Private and state-sponsored loan programs; and
(ii) Federal Perkins loan and Federal Work-Study funds that the
school determines the student has declined; and
(iii) For the purpose of determining eligibility for a subsidized
Stafford loan, veterans' educational benefits paid under chapter 30 of
title 38 of the United States Code and national service education
awards or post-service benefits under title I of the National and
Community Service Act of 1990.
* * * * *
Holder. An eligible lender owning an FFEL Program loan including a
Federal or State agency or an organization or corporation acting on
behalf of such an agency and acting as a conservator, liquidator, or
receiver of an eligible lender.
* * * * *
Lender.
* * * * *
(5) * * *
education
awards or post-service benefits under title I of the National and
Community Service Act of 1990.
* * * * *
Holder. An eligible lender owning an FFEL Program loan including a
Federal or State agency or an organization or corporation acting on
behalf of such an agency and acting as a conservator, liquidator, or
receiver of an eligible lender.
* * * * *
Lender.
* * * * *
(5) * * *
(i) Offered, directly or indirectly, points, premiums, payments, or
other inducements, to any school or other party to secure applicants
for FFEL loans, except that a lender is not prohibited from providing
assistance to schools comparable to the kinds of assistance provided by
the Secretary to schools under, or in furtherance of, the Federal
Direct Loan Program.
* * * * *
Master promissory note (MPN). A promissory note under which the
borrower may receive loans for a single period of enrollment or
multiple periods of enrollment.
* * * * *
5. Section 682.201 is amended as follows:
A. By revising paragraph (a)(2).
B. By revising paragraph (c)(1); in paragraph (c)(2)(iii) by
removing ``(c)(1)(vi)'', and by adding in its place, ``(c)(1)(iv)'';
and by removing paragraphs (c)(3) and (c)(4).
C. By adding a new paragraph (d).
D. By adding a new paragraph (e).
Sec. 682.201 Eligible borrowers.
(a) * * *
(2) In the case of any student who seeks an unsubsidized Stafford
loan for the cost of attendance at a school that participates in the
Stafford Loan Program, the student must--
(i) Receive a determination of need for a subsidized Stafford loan;
and
(ii) If the determination of need is in excess of $200, have made a
request to a lender for a subsidized Stafford loan;
* * * * *
(c) Consolidation program borrower. (1) An individual is eligible
to receive a Consolidation loan if, at the time of application for a
Consolidation loan, the individual--
the student must--
(i) Receive a determination of need for a subsidized Stafford loan;
and
(ii) If the determination of need is in excess of $200, have made a
request to a lender for a subsidized Stafford loan;
* * * * *
(c) Consolidation program borrower. (1) An individual is eligible
to receive a Consolidation loan if, at the time of application for a
Consolidation loan, the individual--
(i) Is, on the loans being consolidated--
(A) In a grace period preceding repayment;
(B) In repayment status;
(C) In a default status on a title IV loan and has either made
satisfactory repayment arrangements as defined in 682.200(b)(2) or has
agreed to repay the consolidation loan under the income-sensitive
repayment plan described in 682.209(a)(6)(viii);
(D) Not subject to a judgment secured through litigation, unless
the judgment has been vacated; or
(E) Not subject to an order for wage garnishment under section 488A
of the Act, unless the order has been lifted;
(ii) Certifies that no other application for a Consolidation loan
is pending;
(iii) Agrees to notify the holder of any changes in address; and
(iv)(A) Certifies that the lender holds the outstanding loan of the
borrower that is being consolidated; or
(B) Applies to any eligible consolidation lender if the borrower--
(1) Has multiple holders of FFEL loans; or
(2) Has been unable to receive from the holder of the borrower's
outstanding loans, a Consolidation loan or a Consolidation loan with
income-sensitive repayment.
* * * * *
and
(iv)(A) Certifies that the lender holds the outstanding loan of the
borrower that is being consolidated; or
(B) Applies to any eligible consolidation lender if the borrower--
(1) Has multiple holders of FFEL loans; or
(2) Has been unable to receive from the holder of the borrower's
outstanding loans, a Consolidation loan or a Consolidation loan with
income-sensitive repayment.
* * * * *
(d) A borrower's eligibility to receive a Consolidation loan
terminates upon receipt of a Consolidation loan except that--
(1) A borrower who receives an eligible loan after the date a
Consolidation loan is made may receive a subsequent Consolidation loan;
and
(2) Eligible loans received prior to the date a Consolidation loan
was made and loans received during the 180-day period following the
date a Consolidation loan was made, may be added to the Consolidation
loan based on the borrower's request received by the lender during the
180-day period after the date the Consolidation loan was made.
(e) A Consolidation loan borrower may consolidate an existing
Consolidation loan only if the borrower has other outstanding eligible
loans that will be consolidated.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1077, 1078, 1078-1, 1078-2, 1078-3, 1082, and
1091)
6. Section 682.202 is amended as follows:
A. In paragraph (a)(1)(i) by removing ``If'' and by adding, in its
place, ``For loans made prior to July 1, 1994, if,''.
B. In paragraph (a)(1)(ii)(B) by adding ``and prior to July 1,
1994,'' after ``October 1, 1992''.
C. In paragraph (a)(1)(iii)(A) by removing ``evidencing the loan''.
D. In paragraph (a)(1)(iv) by adding ``but before December 29,
1993,'' after ``October 1, 1992''.
E. By adding new paragraphs (a)(1)(v) through (a)(1)(viii).
F. In paragraph (a)(2)(iii), introductory text, by adding ``and
prior to July 1, 1994,'' after ``October 1, 1992''.
G. By adding new paragraphs (a)(2)(iv) and (a)(2)(v).
H
n paragraph (a)(1)(iii)(A) by removing ``evidencing the loan''.
D. In paragraph (a)(1)(iv) by adding ``but before December 29,
1993,'' after ``October 1, 1992''.
E. By adding new paragraphs (a)(1)(v) through (a)(1)(viii).
F. In paragraph (a)(2)(iii), introductory text, by adding ``and
prior to July 1, 1994,'' after ``October 1, 1992''.
G. By adding new paragraphs (a)(2)(iv) and (a)(2)(v).
H. In paragraph (a)(3)(iii), introductory text, by removing
``1992,'' and by adding, in its place, ``1992 and for loans made prior
to July 1, 1994 for a period of enrollment that began prior to July 1,
1994''.
I. In paragraph (a)(4) by adding ``(i)'' at the beginning of the
sentence before ``A Consolidation'', by adding ``made before July 1,
1994'' after ``loan'', by designating paragraph ``(i)'' as ``(A)'', by
designating paragraph ``(ii)'' as ``(B)'', by adding new paragraphs
(a)(4)(ii) through (a)(4)(v).
J. In paragraph (b)(1), by removing ``paragraph (b)(2) of''; and by
revising paragraph (b)(2).
K. In paragraph (b)(3) by removing ``, except that
capitalization'', and by adding in its place, ``. Capitalization''.
L. By removing paragraph (b)(5).
M. By redesignating paragraph (b)(4) as paragraph (b)(5); and
adding a new paragraph (b)(4).
N. By revising the newly redesignated paragraph (b)(5).
O. By revising paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2).
P. By redesignating paragraphs (c)(3) through (c)(5) as paragraphs
(c)(5) through (c)(7); and by adding new paragraphs (c)(3) and (c)(4).
Sec. 682.202 Permissible charges by lenders to borrowers.
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
g paragraph (b)(4) as paragraph (b)(5); and
adding a new paragraph (b)(4).
N. By revising the newly redesignated paragraph (b)(5).
O. By revising paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2).
P. By redesignating paragraphs (c)(3) through (c)(5) as paragraphs
(c)(5) through (c)(7); and by adding new paragraphs (c)(3) and (c)(4).
Sec. 682.202 Permissible charges by lenders to borrowers.
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
(v) For a Stafford loan for which the first disbursement is made on
or after December 20, 1993 and prior to July 1, 1994, if the borrower,
on the date the promissory note is signed, has no outstanding balance
on a Stafford loan but has an outstanding balance of principal or
interest on a PLUS, SLS, or Consolidation loan, the interest rate is
the rate provided in paragraph (a)(1)(ii)(B) of this section.
(vi) For a Stafford loan for which the first disbursement is made
on or after July 1, 1994 and prior to July 1, 1995, for a period of
enrollment that includes or begins on or after July 1, 1994, the
interest rate is a variable rate, applicable to each July 1-June 30
period, that equals the lesser of--
(A) The bond equivalent rate of the 91-day Treasury bills auctioned
at the final auction prior to the June 1 immediately preceding the July
1-June 30 period, plus 3.10; or
(B) 8.25 percent.
(vii) For a Stafford loan for which the first disbursement is made
on or after July 1, 1995 and prior to July 1, 1998 for a period of
enrollment that includes or begins on or after July 1, 1995, the
interest rate is a variable rate applicable to each July 1-June 30
period, that equals the lesser of--
(A) The bond equivalent rate of the 91-day Treasury bills auctioned
at the final auction prior to the June 1 immediately preceding the July
1-June 30 period, plus 2.5 percent during the in-school, grace and
deferment period and 3.10 percent during repayment; or
(B) 8.25 percent.
1995, the
interest rate is a variable rate applicable to each July 1-June 30
period, that equals the lesser of--
(A) The bond equivalent rate of the 91-day Treasury bills auctioned
at the final auction prior to the June 1 immediately preceding the July
1-June 30 period, plus 2.5 percent during the in-school, grace and
deferment period and 3.10 percent during repayment; or
(B) 8.25 percent.
(viii) For a Stafford loan for which the first disbursement is made
on or after
July 1, 1998, the interest rate is a variable rate, applicable to each
July 1-June 30 period, that equals the lesser of--
(A) The bond equivalent rate of the 91-day Treasury bills auctioned
at the final auction prior to the June 1 immediately preceding the July
1-June 30 period plus 1.7 percent during the in-school, grace and
deferment periods and 2.3 percent during repayment; or
(B) 8.25 percent.
* * * * *
(2) * * *
(iv) For a loan for which the first disbursement is made on or
after July 1, 1994 and prior to July 1, 1998, the interest rate is a
variable rate applicable to each July 1-June 30 period, that equals the
lesser of--
(A) The bond equivalent rate of the 52-week Treasury bills
auctioned at the final auction prior to the June 1 immediately
preceding the July 1-June 30 period, plus 3.10 percent; or
(B) 9 percent.
(v) For a loan for which the first disbursement is made on or after
July 1, 1998, the interest rate is a variable rate, applicable to each
July 1-June 30 period, that equals the lesser of--
(A) The bond equivalent rate of the 91-day Treasury bills auctioned
at the final auction prior to the June 1 immediately preceding the July
1-June 30 period, plus 3.10 percent; or
(B) 9 percent.
* * * * *
(v) For a loan for which the first disbursement is made on or after
July 1, 1998, the interest rate is a variable rate, applicable to each
July 1-June 30 period, that equals the lesser of--
(A) The bond equivalent rate of the 91-day Treasury bills auctioned
at the final auction prior to the June 1 immediately preceding the July
1-June 30 period, plus 3.10 percent; or
(B) 9 percent.
* * * * *
(4) * * *
(ii) A Consolidation loan made on or after July 1, 1994, for which
the loan application was received by the lender before November 13,
1997, bears interest at the rate that is equal to the weighted average
of interest rates on the loans consolidated, rounded upward to the
nearest whole percent.
(iii) For a Consolidation loan for which the loan application was
received by the lender on or after November 13, 1997 and before October
1, 1998, the interest rate for the portion of the loan that
consolidated loans other than HEAL loans is a variable rate, applicable
to each July 1-June 30 period, that equals the lesser of--
(A) The bond equivalent rate of the 91-day Treasury bills auctioned
at the final auction held prior to June 1 of each year plus 3.10
percent; or
(B) 8.25 percent.
(iv) For a Consolidation loan for which the application was
received by the lender on or after October 1, 1998, the interest rate
for the portion of the loan that consolidated loans other than HEAL
loans is a fixed rate that is the lesser of--
(A) The weighted average of interest rates on the loans
consolidated, rounded to the nearest higher one-eighth of one percent;
or
(B) 8.25 percent.
(iv) For a Consolidation loan for which the application was
received by the lender on or after October 1, 1998, the interest rate
for the portion of the loan that consolidated loans other than HEAL
loans is a fixed rate that is the lesser of--
(A) The weighted average of interest rates on the loans
consolidated, rounded to the nearest higher one-eighth of one percent;
or
(B) 8.25 percent.
(v) For a Consolidation loan for which the application was received
by the lender on or after November 13, 1997, the annual interest rate
applicable to the portion of each consolidation loan that repaid HEAL
loans is a variable rate adjusted annually on July 1 and must be equal
to the average of the bond equivalent rates of the 91-day Treasury
bills auctioned for the quarter ending June 30, plus 3 percent. There
is no maximum rate on this portion of the loan.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(2) Except as provided in paragraph (b)(4) of this section, a
lender may capitalize interest payable by the borrower that has
accrued--
(i) For the period from the date the first disbursement was made to
the beginning date of the in-school period;
(ii) For the in-school or grace periods, or for a period needed to
align repayment of an SLS with a Stafford loan if capitalization is
expressly authorized by the promissory note (or with the written
consent of the borrower);
(iii) For a period of authorized deferment;
(iv) For a period of authorized forbearance; or
first disbursement was made to
the beginning date of the in-school period;
(ii) For the in-school or grace periods, or for a period needed to
align repayment of an SLS with a Stafford loan if capitalization is
expressly authorized by the promissory note (or with the written
consent of the borrower);
(iii) For a period of authorized deferment;
(iv) For a period of authorized forbearance; or
(v) For the period from the date the first installment payment was
due until it was made.
* * * * *
(4)(i) For unsubsidized Stafford loans disbursed on or after
October 7, 1998 and prior to July 1, 2000, the lender may capitalize
the unpaid interest that accrues on the loan according to the
requirements of section 428H(e)(2) of the Act.
(ii) For Stafford loans first disbursed on or after July 1, 2000,
the lender may capitalize the unpaid interest--
(A) When the loan enters repayment;
(B) At the expiration of a period of authorized deferment;
(C) At the expiration of a period of authorized forbearance; and
(D) When the borrower defaults.
(5) For any borrower in an in-school or grace period or the period
needed to align repayment, deferment, or forbearance status, during
which the Secretary does not pay interest benefits and for which the
borrower has agreed to make payments of interest, the lender may
capitalize past due interest after notification to the borrower that
the borrower's failure to resolve any delinquency constitutes the
borrower's consent to capitalization of delinquent interest and all
interest that will accrue through the remainder of that period.
the Secretary does not pay interest benefits and for which the
borrower has agreed to make payments of interest, the lender may
capitalize past due interest after notification to the borrower that
the borrower's failure to resolve any delinquency constitutes the
borrower's consent to capitalization of delinquent interest and all
interest that will accrue through the remainder of that period.
(c) Fees for FFEL Program loans. A lender--
(1) May charge a borrower an origination fee on a Stafford loan not
to exceed 3 percent of the principal amount of the loan. Except as
provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section, a lender must charge all
borrowers the same origination fee.
(2)(i) May charge a lower origination fee than the amount specified
in paragraph (c)(1) of this section to a borrower whose expected family
contribution (EFC), used to determine eligibility for the loan, is
equal to or less than the minimum qualifying EFC for a Federal Pell
Grant at the time the loan is certified or to borrowers who qualify for
a subsidized Stafford loan.
(ii) If a lender charges a lower origination fee pursuant to this
subparagraph, the lender must charge all similarly situated borrowers
the same origination fee.
(iii) A lender may use a comparable standard with the approval of
the Secretary.
(3) If a lender charges a lower origination fee on unsubsidized
loans under paragraphs (c)(1) or (c)(2) of this section, the lender
must charge the same fee on subsidized loans.
lower origination fee pursuant to this
subparagraph, the lender must charge all similarly situated borrowers
the same origination fee.
(iii) A lender may use a comparable standard with the approval of
the Secretary.
(3) If a lender charges a lower origination fee on unsubsidized
loans under paragraphs (c)(1) or (c)(2) of this section, the lender
must charge the same fee on subsidized loans.
(4) For purposes of paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2) of this section,
all lenders under common ownership, including ownership by a common
holding company, constitute a single lender. Any beneficial owner of
loans, that provides funds to an eligible lender trustee to make loans
on the beneficial owner's behalf, is considered the lender for this
purpose.
* * * * *
7. Section 682.204 is amended as follows:
A. By revising paragraphs (a), (b), (c), (d), and (e).
B. In paragraph (f)(2)(i) by adding ``the following'', after
``exceed''.
C. In paragraph (f)(2)(ii) by adding ``the following'' after
``exceed''.
D. In paragraph (f)(2)(ii)(B) by removing ``and'', and by adding,
in its place, ``or''.
Sec. 682.204 Maximum loan amounts.
(a) Stafford Loan Program annual limits. (1) In the case of an
undergraduate student who has not successfully completed the first year
of a program of undergraduate education, the total amount the student
may borrow for any academic year of study under the Stafford Loan
Program in combination with the Federal Direct
Stafford/Ford Loan Program may not exceed the following:
imum loan amounts.
(a) Stafford Loan Program annual limits. (1) In the case of an
undergraduate student who has not successfully completed the first year
of a program of undergraduate education, the total amount the student
may borrow for any academic year of study under the Stafford Loan
Program in combination with the Federal Direct
Stafford/Ford Loan Program may not exceed the following:
(i) $2,625 for a program of study of at least a full academic year
in length.
(ii) For a one-year program of study with less than a full academic
year remaining, the amount that is the same ratio to $2,625 as the--
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP10AU99.002
(iii) For a program of study that is less than a full academic year
in length, the amount that is the same ratio to $2,625 as the lesser of
the--
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP10AU99.003
(2) In the case of a student who has successfully completed the
first year of an undergraduate program but has not successfully
completed the second year of an undergraduate program, the total amount
the student may borrow for any academic year of study under the
Stafford Loan Program in combination with the Federal Direct Stafford/
Ford Loan Program may not exceed the following:
(i) $3,500 for a program whose length is at least a full academic
year in length.
(ii) For a program of study with less than a full academic year
remaining, an amount that is the same ratio to $3,500 as the--
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP10AU99.004
(3) In the case of an undergraduate student who has successfully
completed the first and second years of a program of study of
undergraduate education but has not successfully completed the
remainder of the program, the total amount the student may borrow for
any academic year of study under the Stafford Loan Program in
combination with the Federal Direct Stafford/Ford Loan Program may not
exceed the following:
n undergraduate student who has successfully
completed the first and second years of a program of study of
undergraduate education but has not successfully completed the
remainder of the program, the total amount the student may borrow for
any academic year of study under the Stafford Loan Program in
combination with the Federal Direct Stafford/Ford Loan Program may not
exceed the following:
(i) $5,500 for a program whose length is at least an academic year
in length.
(ii) For a program of study with less than a full academic year
remaining, an amount that is the same ratio to $5,500 as the--
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP10AU99.005
(4) In the case of a student who has an associate or baccalaureate
degree that is required for admission into a program and who is not a
graduate or professional student, the total amount the student may
borrow for any academic year of study may not exceed the amounts in
paragraph (a)(3) of this section.
(5) In the case of a graduate or professional student, the total
amount the student may borrow for any academic year of study under the
Stafford Loan Program, in combination with any amount borrowed under
the Federal Direct Stafford/Ford Loan Program, may not exceed $8,500.
(6) In the case of a student enrolled for no longer than one
consecutive 12-month period in a course of study necessary for
enrollment in a program leading to a degree or certificate, the total
amount the student may borrow for any academic year of study under the
Stafford Loan Program in combination with the Federal Direct Stafford/
Ford Loan Program may not exceed:
m, may not exceed $8,500.
(6) In the case of a student enrolled for no longer than one
consecutive 12-month period in a course of study necessary for
enrollment in a program leading to a degree or certificate, the total
amount the student may borrow for any academic year of study under the
Stafford Loan Program in combination with the Federal Direct Stafford/
Ford Loan Program may not exceed:
(i) $2,625 for coursework necessary for enrollment in an
undergraduate degree or certificate program.
(ii) $5,500 for coursework necessary for enrollment in a graduate
or professional degree or certificate program for a student who has
obtained a baccalaureate degree.
(7) In the case of a student who has obtained a baccalaureate
degree and is enrolled or accepted for enrollment in coursework
necessary for a professional credential or certification from a State
that is required for employment as a teacher in an elementary or
secondary school in that State, the total amount the student may borrow
for any academic year of study under the Stafford Loan Program in
combination with the Federal Direct Stafford/Ford Loan Program may not
exceed $5,500.
(b) Stafford Loan Program aggregate limits. The aggregate unpaid
principal amount of all Stafford Loan Program loans in combination with
loans received by the student under the Federal Direct Stafford/Ford
Loan Program, but excluding the amount of capitalized interest may not
exceed the following:
(1) $23,000 in the case of any student who has not successfully
completed a program of study at the undergraduate level.
(2) $65,500, in the case of a graduate or professional student,
including loans for undergraduate study.
with
loans received by the student under the Federal Direct Stafford/Ford
Loan Program, but excluding the amount of capitalized interest may not
exceed the following:
(1) $23,000 in the case of any student who has not successfully
completed a program of study at the undergraduate level.
(2) $65,500, in the case of a graduate or professional student,
including loans for undergraduate study.
(c) Unsubsidized Stafford Loan Program. (1) In the case of an
undergraduate student, the total amount the student may borrow for any
period of study under the Unsubsidized Stafford Loan Program in
combination with the Federal Direct Unsubsidized Stafford/Ford Loan
Program is the same as the amount determined under paragraph (a) of
this section, less any amount received under the Stafford Loan Program
or the Federal Direct Stafford/Ford Loan Program.
(2) In the case of an independent undergraduate student, a graduate
or professional student, or certain dependent undergraduate students,
the total amount the student may borrow for any period of enrollment
under the Unsubsidized Stafford Loan and Federal Direct Unsubsidized
Stafford/Ford Loan programs may not exceed the amounts determined under
paragraph (a) of this section less any amount received under the
Federal Stafford Loan Program or the Federal Direct Stafford/Ford Loan
Program, in combination with the amounts determined under paragraph (d)
of this section.
(d) Additional eligibility under the Unsubsidized Stafford Loan
Program. In addition to any amount borrowed under paragraphs (a) and
exceed the amounts determined under
paragraph (a) of this section less any amount received under the
Federal Stafford Loan Program or the Federal Direct Stafford/Ford Loan
Program, in combination with the amounts determined under paragraph (d)
of this section.
(d) Additional eligibility under the Unsubsidized Stafford Loan
Program. In addition to any amount borrowed under paragraphs (a) and
(c) of this section, an independent undergraduate student, graduate or
professional student, and certain dependent undergraduate students may
borrow additional amounts under the Unsubsidized Stafford Loan Program.
The additional amount that such a student may borrow under the
Unsubsidized Stafford Loan Program in combination with the Federal
Direct Unsubsidized Stafford/Ford Loan Program, in addition to the
amounts allowed under paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section for any
academic year of study--
(1) In the case of a student who has not successfully completed the
first year of a program of undergraduate education, may not exceed the
following:
(i) $4,000 for a program of study of at least a full academic year.
(ii) For a one-year program of study with less than a full academic
year remaining, the amount that is the same ratio to $4,000 as the--
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP10AU99.006
(iii) For a program of study that is less than a full academic year
in length, an amount that is the same ratio to $4,000 as the lesser
of--
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP10AU99.007
(2) In the case of a student who has completed the first year of a
program of undergraduate education but has not successfully completed
the second year of a program of undergraduate education may not exceed
the following:
(A) $4,000 for a program of study of at least a full academic year
in length.
(B) For a one-year program of study with less than a full academic
year remaining, an amount that is the same ratio to $4,000 as the--
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP10AU99.008
ndergraduate education but has not successfully completed
the second year of a program of undergraduate education may not exceed
the following:
(A) $4,000 for a program of study of at least a full academic year
in length.
(B) For a one-year program of study with less than a full academic
year remaining, an amount that is the same ratio to $4,000 as the--
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP10AU99.008
(3) In the case of a student who has successfully completed the
second year of a program of undergraduate education, but has not
completed the remainder of the program, may not exceed the following:
(i) $5,000 for a program of study of at least a full academic year.
(ii) For a program of study with less than a full academic year
remaining, an amount that is the same ratio to $5,000 as the--
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP10AU99.009
(4) In the case of a student who has an associate or baccalaureate
degree which is required for admission into a program and who is not a
graduate or professional student, the total amount the student may
borrow for any academic year of study may not exceed the amounts in
paragraph (d)(3) of this section.
(5) In the case of a graduate or professional student, may not
exceed $10,000.
(6) In the case of a student enrolled for no longer than one
consecutive 12-month period in a course of study necessary for
enrollment in a program leading to a degree or a certificate may not
exceed the following:
(i) $4,000 for coursework necessary for enrollment in an
undergraduate degree or certificate program.
(ii) $5,000 for coursework necessary for enrollment in a graduate
or professional degree or certificate program for a student who has
obtained a baccalaureate degree.
(iii) In the case of a student who has obtained a baccalaureate
degree and is enrolled or accepted for enrollment in a program
necessary for a professional credential or a certification from a State
that is required for employment as a teacher in an elementary or
secondary school in that State, $5,000.
ional degree or certificate program for a student who has
obtained a baccalaureate degree.
(iii) In the case of a student who has obtained a baccalaureate
degree and is enrolled or accepted for enrollment in a program
necessary for a professional credential or a certification from a State
that is required for employment as a teacher in an elementary or
secondary school in that State, $5,000.
(e) Combined Federal Stafford, SLS and Federal Unsubsidized
Stafford Loan Program aggregate limits. The aggregate unpaid principal
amount of Stafford Loans, Federal Direct Stafford/Ford Loans,
Unsubsidized Stafford Loans, Federal Direct Unsubsidized Stafford/
Ford Loans and SLS Loans, but excluding the amount of capitalized
interest may not exceed the following:
(1) $46,000 for an undergraduate student.
(2) $138,500 for a graduate or professional student.
* * * * *
8. Section 682.206 is amended as follows:
A. By revising paragraph (a)(1);
B. By removing ``on the application form or data electronically
transmitted to the lender'' in paragraph (c)(1);
C. By revising paragraph (c)(2);
D. By removing paragraph (c)(3); and
E. By revising paragraph (d)(1).
Sec. 682.206 Due diligence in making a loan.
(a) General. (1) Loan-making duties include determining the
borrower's loan amount, approving the borrower for a loan, explaining
to the borrower his or her rights and responsibilities under the loan,
and completing and having the borrower sign the promissory note (except
with respect to multiple loans made under an MPN).
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(2) Except in the case of a Consolidation loan, in determining the
amount of the loan to be made, in no case may the loan amount exceed
the lesser of the amount the borrower requests, the amount certified by
the school under Sec. 682.603 or the loan limits under Sec. 682.204.
* * * * *
wer sign the promissory note (except
with respect to multiple loans made under an MPN).
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(2) Except in the case of a Consolidation loan, in determining the
amount of the loan to be made, in no case may the loan amount exceed
the lesser of the amount the borrower requests, the amount certified by
the school under Sec. 682.603 or the loan limits under Sec. 682.204.
* * * * *
(d)(1) The lender must ensure that each loan is supported by an
executed legally-enforceable promissory note as proof of the borrower's
indebtedness.
* * * * *
9. Section 682.207 is amended as follows:
A. By revising the introductory text of paragraph (c);
B. By removing paragraph (c)(5);
C. By redesignating paragraph (d) as paragraph (f);
D. By redesignating paragraph (c)(4) as paragraph (d);
E. By adding a new paragraph (e); and
F. By revising the newly redesignated paragraph (f).
Sec. 682.207 Due diligence in disbursing a loan.
* * * * *
(c) Except as provided in paragraph (e) of this section, a lender
must disburse any Stafford or PLUS loan in accordance with the
disbursement schedule provided by the school as follows:
* * * * *
(e) A lender must disburse the loan in one installment if the
school submits a schedule for disbursement of loan proceeds in one
installment as authorized by Sec. 682.604(c)(10).
(f)(1) A lender may disburse loan proceeds after the student has
ceased to be enrolled on at least a half-time basis only if--
n accordance with the
disbursement schedule provided by the school as follows:
* * * * *
(e) A lender must disburse the loan in one installment if the
school submits a schedule for disbursement of loan proceeds in one
installment as authorized by Sec. 682.604(c)(10).
(f)(1) A lender may disburse loan proceeds after the student has
ceased to be enrolled on at least a half-time basis only if--
(i) The school certified the borrower's loan eligibility and the
loan funds will be used to pay educational costs that the school
determines the student incurred for the period in which the student was
enrolled and eligible;
(ii) The student completed the first 30 days of his or her program
of study if the student was a first-year, first-time borrower as
described in Sec. 682.604(c)(5); and
(iii) In the case of a second or subsequent disbursement, the
student graduated or successfully completed the period of enrollment
for which the loan was intended.
(2) The lender must give notice to the school that the loan
proceeds have been disbursed in accordance with paragraph (f)(1) of
this section at the time the lender sends the loan proceeds to the
school.
10. Section 682.209 is amended as follows:
A. By revising paragraph (a)(4).
B. By redesignating paragraphs (a)(6), (a)(7), and (a)(8) as
paragraphs (a)(7), (a)(8), and (a)(9), respectively.
C. By adding a new paragraph (a)(6).
D. By revising the newly redesignated paragraph (a)(7)(iii).
E. In the newly redesignated paragraph (a)(7)(v)(A) by removing
``income-sensitive or a graduated repayment'', and adding, in its
place, ``income-sensitive, a graduated, or if applicable, an extended
repayment''.
F. By redesignating paragraph (a)(7)(ix) as paragraph (a)(7)(xi).
G. By adding new paragraphs (a)(7)(ix) and (x).
H. By revising paragraph (c)(1)(i).
I. By removing paragraph (h)(3); by redesignating paragraphs
ragraph (a)(7)(v)(A) by removing
``income-sensitive or a graduated repayment'', and adding, in its
place, ``income-sensitive, a graduated, or if applicable, an extended
repayment''.
F. By redesignating paragraph (a)(7)(ix) as paragraph (a)(7)(xi).
G. By adding new paragraphs (a)(7)(ix) and (x).
H. By revising paragraph (c)(1)(i).
I. By removing paragraph (h)(3); by redesignating paragraphs
(h)(4), (h)(5), and (h)(6), as paragraphs (h)(3), (h)(4), and (h)(5),
respectively; by revising the newly redesignated paragraph (h)(3); and
by removing redesignated paragraph (h)(4)(ii) and redesignating
paragraph (h)(4)(iii) as paragraph (h)(4)(ii).
Sec. 682.209 Repayment of a loan.
(a) * * *
(4) For a borrower of a Stafford loan who is a correspondence
student, the grace period specified in paragraph (a)(3)(i) of this
section begins on the earliest of--
(i) The day after the borrower completes the program;
(ii) The day after withdrawal as determined pursuant to 34 CFR
668.22; or
(iii) 60 days following the last day for completing the program as
established by the school.
* * * * *
(6) For purposes of establishing the beginning of the repayment
period for Stafford and SLS loans, the grace periods referenced in
paragraphs (a)(2)(iii) and (a)(3)(i) exclude any period during which a
borrower who is a member of a reserve component of the Armed Forces
named in section 10101 of title 10, United States Code is called or
ordered to active duty for a period of more than 30 days. Any single
excluded period may not exceed three years and includes the time
necessary for the borrower to resume enrollment at the next available
regular enrollment period. Any Stafford or SLS borrower who is in a
grace period when called or ordered to active duty as specified in this
paragraph is entitled to a full grace period upon completion of the
excluded period.
d of more than 30 days. Any single
excluded period may not exceed three years and includes the time
necessary for the borrower to resume enrollment at the next available
regular enrollment period. Any Stafford or SLS borrower who is in a
grace period when called or ordered to active duty as specified in this
paragraph is entitled to a full grace period upon completion of the
excluded period.
(7) * * *
(iii) Not more than six months prior to the date that the
borrower's first payment is due, the lender must offer the borrower a
choice of a standard, income-sensitive, or if applicable, an extended
repayment schedule.
* * * * *
(ix) Under an extended repayment schedule, the borrower may repay
the loan on a fixed annual repayment amount or a graduated repayment
amount for a period that may not exceed 25 years. For purposes of this
section, a ``new borrower'' is an individual who has no outstanding
principal or interest balance on an FFEL Program loan as of October 7,
1998, or on the date he or she obtains an FFEL Program loan after
October 7, 1998.
(x) A borrower may request a change in the repayment schedule on a
loan. The lender must permit the borrower to change the repayment
schedule no less frequently than annually.
* * * * *
(c) Minimum annual payment. (1)(i) Subject to paragraph (c)(1)(ii)
of this section and except as otherwise provided by a graduated,
income-sensitive, or extended repayment plan selected by the borrower,
during each year of the repayment period, a borrower's total payments
to all holders of the borrower's FFEL Program loans must total at least
$600 or the unpaid balance of all loans, including interest, whichever
amount is less.
* * * * *
(h) * * *
(3) For the purpose of paragraph (h)(2) of this section, the unpaid
balance on other student loans--
d repayment plan selected by the borrower,
during each year of the repayment period, a borrower's total payments
to all holders of the borrower's FFEL Program loans must total at least
$600 or the unpaid balance of all loans, including interest, whichever
amount is less.
* * * * *
(h) * * *
(3) For the purpose of paragraph (h)(2) of this section, the unpaid
balance on other student loans--
(i) May not exceed the amount of the Consolidation loan; and
(ii) With the exception of the defaulted title IV loans on which
the borrower has made
This text is long and has been trimmed here. Open the source document for the complete record.
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.