Proposed Amendment of Class E Airspace; Bridgeport, CT
FederalRegulations
Ask Donna
How this section applies to your facts.
Federal Register › Vol. 79 › 79 FR 18482
Text
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 71 [Docket No. FAA-2014-0076; Airspace Docket No. 14-ANE-4] Proposed Amendment of Class E Airspace; Bridgeport, CT AGENCY:
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION:
Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM), withdrawal.
SUMMARY:
A Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) published in the Federal Register on March 18, 2014 amending Class E airspace at Igor I. Sikorsky Memorial Airport is being withdrawn. Upon review, the FAA found that the Bridgeport VOR has not been decommissioned, and therefore airspace reconfiguration is not required.
DATES:
Effective 0901 UTC. As of April 2, 2014 the proposed rule published March 18, 2014, at 79 FR 15064, is withdrawn.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
John Fornito, Operations Support Group,
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
History
On March 18, 2014, the FAA published in the Federal Register a NPRM to amend Class E airspace at Bridgeport, CT (79 FR 15064) Docket No. FAA-2014-0076. Subsequent to publication the FAA found that the Bridgeport VOR navigation aid has not been decommissioned and airspace redesign is not necessary. This proposed rule is being withdrawn.
Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).
The Withdrawal
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the notice of proposed rulemaking, as published in the Federal Register on March 18, 2014 (79 FR 15064) (FR Doc. 2014-05889), is hereby withdrawn.
Authority:
49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.
Issued in College Park, Georgia, on March 25, 2014. Eric Fox, Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern Service Center, Air Traffic Organization.
[FR Doc. 2014-07291 Filed 4-1-14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.