After considering the request of MIAX Futures and related facts and circumstances, the Division believes that temporary no-action positions are warranted to provide participants in the HRSW Options market with a means...

FederalAgency guidance

Ask Donna

How this section applies to your facts.

CFTC Staff Letters (2008-present) › After considering the request of MIAX Futures and related facts and circumstances, the Division believes that temporary no-action positions are warranted to provide participants in the HRSW Options market with a means...

This text was captured on Aug 14, 2026. It is a snapshot, not a live feed, so check the official code before relying on it.

Text

Summary: After considering the request of MIAX Futures and related facts and circumstances, the Division believes that temporary no-action positions are warranted to provide participants in the HRSW Options market with a means to trade out of or offset their open positions in the September 2025 and December 2025 expirations when electronic trading is no longer available. Accordingly, the Division will not recommend that the Commission take an enforcement action against MIAX Futures in connection with the implementation of the Temporary HRSW Options Block Trading Protocol under DCM Core Principle 9 and Commission regulation 1.38.

Further, the Division will not recommend that the Commission take an enforcement action against MIAX Futures under CEA section 5c(c) of the Act and associated Commission regulations under Part 40 if MIAX Futures amends its rulebook to implement the Temporary HRSW Options Block Trading Protocol before June 30, 2025, when an electronic trading system will no longer be available for the HRSW Options.

CFTC LETTER NO. 25-17 NO-ACTION JUNE 25, 2025

Rahul Varma

Acting Director

Re:

MIAX Futures Exchange, LLC – Time-Limited No-Action Position with Respect to

the Trading of Minneapolis Hard Red Spring Wheat Options on Futures

The Division of Market Oversight (“Division”) of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission

(the “Commission” or “CFTC”) is issuing this letter in response to a request dated June 23, 2025

from MIAX Futures Exchange, LLC (“MIAX Futures”)1 pursuant to Commission Regulation

140.99.2

MIAX Futures requested that the Division issue a letter stating that the Division will not

recommend that the Commission commence an enforcement action against MIAX Futures for

temporarily providing for the trading of MIAX Futures’ Minneapolis Hard Red Spring Wheat

(“HRSW”) options on futures (“HRSW Options”) exclusively through block trades, due to the

lack of availability of an electronic tra

IAX Futures requested that the Division issue a letter stating that the Division will not

recommend that the Commission commence an enforcement action against MIAX Futures for

temporarily providing for the trading of MIAX Futures’ Minneapolis Hard Red Spring Wheat

(“HRSW”) options on futures (“HRSW Options”) exclusively through block trades, due to the

lack of availability of an electronic trading system for the HRSW Options and to provide market

participants with the opportunity to trade out of or offset open positions.

I.

Background

MIAX Futures currently lists for trading HRSW futures contracts and HRSW Options. MIAX

Futures’ HRSW futures contracts and HRSW Options currently trade on the CME Globex

electronic trading platform, under a services agreement between MIAX Futures and the Chicago

Mercantile Exchange Inc. (“CME”). Market participants may also trade the HRSW futures and

HRSW Options via block trades pursuant to MIAX Futures’ rules. Among other things, the MIAX

Futures rulebook sets the block trade threshold for HRSW Options at 15 contracts and permits

only eligible contract participants (“ECPs”), as defined in section 1a(18) of the Commodity

Exchange Act (“CEA”), to engage in block trades.3

The HRSW Options market currently has open positions in the September 2025 and December

2025 expirations. Certain open positions are held by market participants who are not ECPs.

On June 29, 2025 (for trade date June 30, 2025), the MIAX Futures HRSW futures will migrate

from the CME Globex platform to a new MIAX Futures electronic trading platform (“Onyx”). At

the time of this migration, electronic trading of HRSW Options on Onyx will not be available;

1 MIAX Futures operates as a designated contract market (“DCM”).

2 17 C.F.R. § 140.99.

3 MIAX Futures Rulebook, Rule 51.16 (Block Trades)

Division of

Market Oversight

Globex platform to a new MIAX Futures electronic trading platform (“Onyx”). At

the time of this migration, electronic trading of HRSW Options on Onyx will not be available;

1 MIAX Futures operates as a designated contract market (“DCM”).

2 17 C.F.R. § 140.99.

3 MIAX Futures Rulebook, Rule 51.16 (Block Trades)

Division of

Market Oversight

2

MIAX Futures continues to develop and build functionality for options electronic trading on Onyx.

MIAX Futures is seeking to provide for the continued trading of HRSW Options exclusively via

block trades, until August 29, 2025, in order to provide any position holders, including those that

are not ECPs, with the opportunity to trade out of or offset their open positions in the September

2025 and December 2025 expirations.

II.

Requested No-Action Position

To allow for HRSW Options to temporarily continue trading once electronic trading is no longer

available, in order to provide market participants with the opportunity to trade out of or offset their

open positions in the September 2025 and December 2025 expirations, MIAX Futures seeks to

amend its rulebook to:

(i)

Provide for block trades without a centralized market for the trading of HRSW Options;

(ii)

Lower the block trade threshold for HRSW Options from 15 contracts to one contract;

and

(iii)

Permit non-ECPs to engage in block trades in HRSW Options ((i)-(iii) collectively

referred to herein as the “Temporary HRSW Options Block Trading Protocol”)

Futures seeks to

amend its rulebook to:

(i)

Provide for block trades without a centralized market for the trading of HRSW Options;

(ii)

Lower the block trade threshold for HRSW Options from 15 contracts to one contract;

and

(iii)

Permit non-ECPs to engage in block trades in HRSW Options ((i)-(iii) collectively

referred to herein as the “Temporary HRSW Options Block Trading Protocol”).

In connection with the Temporary HRSW Options Block Trading Protocol, MIAX Futures

requests a no-action position, until after the close of trade on August 29, 2025, with respect to the

requirements of DCM Core Principle 9,4 and Commission regulation 1.38.5

Further, in order to enable MIAX Futures to amend its rulebook to implement the Temporary

HRSW Options Block Trading Protocol before June 30, 2025, when an electronic trading system

will no longer be available for HRSW Options, MIAX Futures requests a no-action position with

respect to exchange rule submission requirements in CEA section 5c(c) and associated

Commission regulations under Part 40.6

4 CEA section 5(d)(9), 7 U.S.C. 7(d)(9). DCM Core Principle 9 generally provides that a DCM must provide a

competitive, open, and efficient market and mechanism for executing transactions that protects the price discovery

process of trading in the centralized market of the DCM. DCM Core Principle 9 further specifies particular types of

transactions that a DCM may authorize for bona fide business purposes. See also 17 CFR § 38.500.

5 17 CFR § 1.38

le 9 generally provides that a DCM must provide a

competitive, open, and efficient market and mechanism for executing transactions that protects the price discovery

process of trading in the centralized market of the DCM. DCM Core Principle 9 further specifies particular types of

transactions that a DCM may authorize for bona fide business purposes. See also 17 CFR § 38.500.

5 17 CFR § 1.38. Commission regulation 1.38(a) generally provides that purchases and sales of any commodity for

future delivery, and any commodity option on or subject to the rules of a contract market, must be executed openly

and competitively, provided that this requirement will not apply to transactions executed non-competitively in

accordance with written rules of the contract market that have been submitted to and approved by the Commission

specifically providing for non-competitive execution.

6 CEA section 5c(c), 7 U.S.C. 7a-2(c); and 17 CFR part 40. Among other things, CEA section 5c(c)(2) provides that

rule amendments that are (and are eligible to be) certified by a DCM pursuant to CEA section 5c(c)(1) will become

effective on the date that is 10 business days after the date on which the Commission receives the certification (or

such shorter period as determined by the Commission by rule or regulation) unless the Commission notifies the

DCM within such time that it is staying the certification as provided in CEA sections 5c(c)(2)-(3). See also

Commission regulation 40.6. CEA section 5(c)(4) provides that a DCM must submit to the Commission for prior

approval (and, therefore, cannot certify pursuant to CEA section 5c(c)(1)) each rule amendment that materially

changes the terms and conditions, as determined by the Commission, of a futures contract in an agricultural

commodity enumerated in CEA section 1a(9) (or any option thereon) traded through the DCM’s facilities if the rule

amendment applies to contracts and delivery months which have already been listed for trading and have open

interest

CEA section 5c(c)(1)) each rule amendment that materially

changes the terms and conditions, as determined by the Commission, of a futures contract in an agricultural

commodity enumerated in CEA section 1a(9) (or any option thereon) traded through the DCM’s facilities if the rule

amendment applies to contracts and delivery months which have already been listed for trading and have open

interest. See also Commission regulation 40.4. Minneapolis Hard Red Spring Wheat is an enumerated agricultural

commodity under CEA section 1a(9). CEA section 5c(c)(4) and Commission regulation 40.5 set forth the timeframe

3

MIAX Futures has represented that, during the temporary period of blocks-only trading that would

be implemented pursuant to the Temporary HRSW Options Block Trading Protocol, MIAX

Futures will continue to monitor and surveil trading in HRSW Options to prevent manipulation

and price distortions in compliance with Commission regulations.7

III.

No-Action Position

After considering the request of MIAX Futures and related facts and circumstances, the Division

believes that temporary no-action positions are warranted to provide participants in the HRSW

Options market with a means to trade out of or offset their open positions in the September 2025

and December 2025 expirations when electronic trading is no longer available. Accordingly, the

Division will not recommend that the Commission take an enforcement action against MIAX

Futures in connection with the implementation of the Temporary HRSW Options Block Trading

Protocol under DCM Core Principle 9 and Commission regulation 1.38.

Further, the Division will not recommend that the Commission take an enforcement action against

MIAX Futures under CEA section 5c(c) of the Act and associated Commission regulations under

Part 40 if MIAX Futures amends its rulebook to implement the Temporary HRSW Options Block

Trading Protocol before June 30, 2025, when an electronic trading system will no longer be

available for the HRSW Options

ther, the Division will not recommend that the Commission take an enforcement action against

MIAX Futures under CEA section 5c(c) of the Act and associated Commission regulations under

Part 40 if MIAX Futures amends its rulebook to implement the Temporary HRSW Options Block

Trading Protocol before June 30, 2025, when an electronic trading system will no longer be

available for the HRSW Options.

These temporary no-action positions are subject to the following conditions:8

(i)

The no-action positions apply only to the trading of HRSW Options in the September

2025 and December 2025 expirations.

(ii)

MIAX Futures will promptly file with the Division Director and post on the MIAX

Futures website all rule amendments implementing the Temporary HRSW Options

Block Trading Protocol.

(iii)

MIAX Futures will, in its rulebook, identify all rule amendments implementing the

Temporary HRSW Options Block Trading Protocol as being adopted and

implemented pursuant to these no-action positions and as being effective only until

the expiration of these no-action positions.

and procedures for Commission approval of a rule amendment submitted by a DCM and, generally, contemplate a

Commission review period of at least 45 days.

7 MIAX Futures represents that its review of block trades submitted pursuant to the Temporary HRSW Options

Block Trading Protocol will include evaluating whether block trade prices are fair and reasonable at the time of

execution. To determine whether the price is fair and reasonable, the MIAX Futures Market Regulation Department

(“Market Regulation”) will review each block reported by analyzing other comparable block trade prices, the

previous day’s settlement prices, the current price of the HRSW futures contract, and high/low ranges. Market

Regulation may also request further information from the parties involved, including negotiation details

ice is fair and reasonable, the MIAX Futures Market Regulation Department

(“Market Regulation”) will review each block reported by analyzing other comparable block trade prices, the

previous day’s settlement prices, the current price of the HRSW futures contract, and high/low ranges. Market

Regulation may also request further information from the parties involved, including negotiation details.

Additionally, Market Regulation will utilize a proprietary application for options analysis and pricing application to

monitor HRSW Options block transactions based on volatility levels.

8 Some of these conditions regarding no-action positions may constitute a collection of information, as that term is

defined in the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. §§ 3501 et. seq. The Office of Management and Budget

(“OMB”)—in accordance with 44 U.S.C. § 3507(d) and 5 C.F.R. §§ 1320.8 and 1320.10—has approved collection

3038-0049, entitled “Procedural requirements for requests for interpretative, no-action and exemptive letters,” for

such purposes. This collection would encompass collections made as part of exemptive or no-action relief from the

CFTC. The public is not required to respond to a collection of information that does not have a valid OMB control

number.

4

(iv)

MIAX Futures will promptly respond to Division or Commission requests for any

additional information related to the trading of HRSW Options pursuant to the

Temporary HRSW Options Block Trading Protocol.

made as part of exemptive or no-action relief from the

CFTC. The public is not required to respond to a collection of information that does not have a valid OMB control

number.

4

(iv)

MIAX Futures will promptly respond to Division or Commission requests for any

additional information related to the trading of HRSW Options pursuant to the

Temporary HRSW Options Block Trading Protocol.

(v)

MIAX Futures will provide the Division with reasonable advance notice of plans to

make HRSW Options available for trading on Onyx.

These temporary no-action positions will be effective from June 29, 2025 until August 29, 2025.

IV.

Conclusion

This letter, and the positions taken herein, represent only the views of the Division, and do not

necessarily represent the positions or views of the Commission or of any other office or division

of the Commission. This letter and the no-action positions taken herein are not binding on the

Commission or other Commission staff. The positions provided in this letter do not excuse persons

relying on it from compliance with any other applicable requirements contained in the Act,

Commission regulations, or any other applicable laws (i.e., securities laws). Further, this letter,

and the positions taken herein, are based upon the facts and circumstances presented to Division

staff. Any different, changed, or omitted material facts or circumstances might render this letter

void.

Finally, as with all staff letters, the Division retains the authority to condition further, modify,

suspend, terminate, or otherwise restrict the terms provided herein, in its discretion.

If you have any questions concerning this correspondence, please contact Roger Smith, Associate

Chief Counsel, Division of Market Oversight, at (202) 418-5344 or rsmith@cftc.gov, or Andrew

Stein, Assistant Chief Counsel, Division of Market Oversight, at (202) 418-6054 or

astein@cftc.gov

further, modify,

suspend, terminate, or otherwise restrict the terms provided herein, in its discretion.

If you have any questions concerning this correspondence, please contact Roger Smith, Associate

Chief Counsel, Division of Market Oversight, at (202) 418-5344 or rsmith@cftc.gov, or Andrew

Stein, Assistant Chief Counsel, Division of Market Oversight, at (202) 418-6054 or

astein@cftc.gov.

Sincerely,

____________________

Rahul Varma

Acting Director

Division of Market Oversight

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.