DMO will not recommend that the Commission take enforcement action against KRX with respect to the offer or sale of the Contracts to persons located within the United States while the Commission’s review of KRX’s fort...

Summary: DMO will not recommend that the Commission take enforcement action against KRX with respect to the offer or sale of the Contracts to persons located within the United States while the Commission’s review of KRX’s forthcoming request for certification of the Contracts pursuant to Commission Regulation 30.13 is pending. ( KRX No-Action Request )

CFTC LETTER NO. 21-25 NO-ACTION NOVEMBER 23, 2021

Meghan Tente

Acting Director

Mr. Hyojae Cho

President, Derivatives Market Division

Korea Exchange, Inc.

40 Munhyeongeumyung-ro

Namgu, Busan 48400

Republic of Korea

Re:

Request for No-Action Letter Under Section 2(a)(1)(C)(ii) and (iv) of the Commodity

Exchange Act and CFTC Regulation 30.13

Dear Mr. Cho,

The Division of Market Oversight (“DMO”) of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the

“Commission” or “CFTC”) is issuing this letter in response to a request received from the Korea

Exchange, Inc. (“KRX”) pursuant to Commission Regulation 140.99(a)(2).1 In the letter, KRX

requested assurance that DMO will not recommend enforcement action against KRX with respect

to the offer or sale to persons located within the United States who are Qualified Institutional

Buyers (“QIBs”)2 of Korea Composite Stock Price Index (“KOSPI”) 200 Futures contracts or Mini

KOSPI 200 Futures contracts (collectively, the “Contracts”). KRX requests that this no-action

letter take effect on December 1, 2021 and continue until the Commission certifies the Contracts

pursuant to Commission Regulation 30.13.3

I.

Background

KRX is the sole securities and derivatives exchange operating in the Republic of Korea. It also

serves as the central counterparty for the futures and securities products KRX offers as well as

1 17 C.F.R. § 140.99(a)(2) (governing requests for no-action letters).

2 As defined in Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933

s the Contracts

pursuant to Commission Regulation 30.13.3

I.

Background

KRX is the sole securities and derivatives exchange operating in the Republic of Korea. It also

serves as the central counterparty for the futures and securities products KRX offers as well as

1 17 C.F.R. § 140.99(a)(2) (governing requests for no-action letters).

2 As defined in Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933.

3 In addition, KRX requested relief for registered futures commission merchants (“FCMs”), foreign futures and

options brokers, foreign persons that have received an exemption from registration as an FCM pursuant to

Commission Regulation 30.10, and persons located within the United States who are QIBs with respect to trading by

persons located within the United States who are QIBs, of the Contracts. This letter does not address this requested

relief but rather speaks only to the status of the Contracts. See 7 U.S.C. § 2(a)(1)(C)(ii).

Division of

Market Oversight

2

certain swaps.4 KRX’s derivatives market offers twenty-five futures and options contracts,

including the Contracts. Specifications for the Contracts are attached to this letter as Appendix A.

The KOSPI 200 Index is a capitalization-weighted securities index of 200 Korean stocks trading

on KRX’s securities market.

II.

Governing Law

Commodity Exchange Act (“CEA” or “Act”) Section 2(a)(1)(C)(iv) generally prohibits any person

from offering or selling a futures contract based on a security index in the U.S., except as permitted

under CEA Section 2(a)(1)(C)(ii) or CEA Section 2(a)(1)(D).5 CEA section 2(a)(1)(C)(ii) grants

the CFTC “exclusive jurisdiction with respect to accounts, agreements . . . and transactions

involving . . . [futures] contracts [on] a group or index of securities (or any interest therein or based

upon the value thereof) . . .” subject to three conditions. Specifically, Congress authorized the

CFTC to regulate a futures contract on a security index upon a finding by the CFTC that:

grants

the CFTC “exclusive jurisdiction with respect to accounts, agreements . . . and transactions

involving . . . [futures] contracts [on] a group or index of securities (or any interest therein or based

upon the value thereof) . . .” subject to three conditions. Specifically, Congress authorized the

CFTC to regulate a futures contract on a security index upon a finding by the CFTC that:

(1) the contract contains a cash settlement;

(2) trading of the contract is not readily susceptible to manipulation; and

(3) such group or index of securities does not constitute a narrow-based security index.6

Commission Regulation 41.1(c) defines a broad-based security index as any index of securities

that does not meet the definition of a narrow-based security index.7 CEA Section 1a(35)(A)

defines a narrow-based security index as an index:

• That has 9 or fewer component securities;

• In which a component security comprises more than 30% of the index’s weighting;

• In which the five highest weighted securities in aggregate comprise more than 60

percent of the index’s weighting; or

4 KRX is an exempt derivative clearing organization for the purpose of clearing certain swap transactions. See In

the Matter of the Petition of Korea Exchange, Inc. For Exemption from Registration as a Derivatives Clearing

Organization, Order Of Exemption From Registration (Oct. 26, 2015), available at

https://www.cftc.gov/sites/default/files/idc/groups/public/ @otherif/documents/ifdocs/krxdcoexemptorder10-26-

15.pdf.

5 7 U.S.C. § 2(a)(1)(C)(iv). CEA Section 2(a)(1)(D) governs the offer and sale of security futures products, which

are defined by CEA Section 1a(44) as based on a “single security or narrow-based security index,” and is not

applicable to the extent the Contracts involve a broad-based security index. 7 U.S.C. § 2(a)(1)(D); 7 U.S.C. §

1a(44)

if/documents/ifdocs/krxdcoexemptorder10-26-

15.pdf.

5 7 U.S.C. § 2(a)(1)(C)(iv). CEA Section 2(a)(1)(D) governs the offer and sale of security futures products, which

are defined by CEA Section 1a(44) as based on a “single security or narrow-based security index,” and is not

applicable to the extent the Contracts involve a broad-based security index. 7 U.S.C. § 2(a)(1)(D); 7 U.S.C. §

1a(44). By its terms, Section 2(a)(1)(C)(iv) applies to security index futures contracts traded on both domestic and

foreign boards of trade.

6 7 U.S.C. § 2(a)(1)(C)(ii).

7 17 C.F.R. § 41.1(c) (“[b]road-based security index means a group or index of securities that does not constitute a

narrow-based security index”); 17 C.F.R. § 41.1(e) (“[n]arrow-based security index has the same meaning as in

section 1a(35) of the Commodity Exchange Act”).

3

• In which the lowest weighted component securities comprising, in the aggregate,

25% of the index’s weighting have an aggregate dollar value of average daily

trading volume of less than $50,000,000 (or in the case of an index with 15 or more

component securities, $30,000,000). . ..8

Upon request, the Commission may certify that a futures contract on a broad-based security index

trading on a foreign board of trade conforms with CEA section 2(a)(1)(C)(ii).9 Commission

Regulation 30.13 sets forth the process to seek certification.10 Such submission must include data,

information, facts, and statements confirming that the subject contract conforms with section

2(a)(1)(C)(ii) of the Act.11

Commission Regulation 30.13 places no time limit on the Commission’s standard certification

review procedure

ade conforms with CEA section 2(a)(1)(C)(ii).9 Commission

Regulation 30.13 sets forth the process to seek certification.10 Such submission must include data,

information, facts, and statements confirming that the subject contract conforms with section

2(a)(1)(C)(ii) of the Act.11

Commission Regulation 30.13 places no time limit on the Commission’s standard certification

review procedure. Under certain circumstances, a contract may be eligible for expedited review

pursuant to Commission Regulation 30.13(e)-(f).12 The expedited review procedure takes place

over 45 days unless the Commission elects to extend its review for an additional 45 days if the

request raises novel or complex issues that require additional time for review.13 The foreign board

of trade may also request an extension of the review period.14

Indexes do not necessarily remain broad or narrow-based permanently – they may transition from

narrow-based to broad-based and then back to narrow-based. Pursuant to Commission Regulation

41.14(b), “an index that is a narrow-based security index that becomes a broad-based security

index for more than 45 business days over 3 consecutive calendar months shall continue to be a

narrow-based index for the following 3 calendar months,” providing market participants with time

to adjust to applicable CFTC regulations.15 Following this 3-month transition period, the index

becomes broad-based, and “a national securities exchange may continue to trade only in those

months in the security futures product that had open interest on the date the transition period

ended.”16 As noted above, pursuant to Commission Regulation 30.13, products based on a broad-

based security index trading on a foreign board of trade may receive Commission certification

when offered to persons located within the United States.17

8 7 U.S.C. § 1a(35)(A)

es product that had open interest on the date the transition period

ended.”16 As noted above, pursuant to Commission Regulation 30.13, products based on a broad-

based security index trading on a foreign board of trade may receive Commission certification

when offered to persons located within the United States.17

8 7 U.S.C. § 1a(35)(A). CEA Section 1a(35)(B) sets forth several exclusions from the definition of narrow-based

security index, none of which are relevant here. 7 U.S.C. § 1a(35)(B).

9 17 C.F.R. § 30.13(a).

10 17 C.F.R. § 30.13.

11 17 C.F.R. § 30.13(a)(2).

12 17 C.F.R. § 30.13(e)-(f).

13 17 C.F.R. § 30.13(g)-(h).

14 17 C.F.R. § 30.13(h)(2).

15 17 C.F.R. § 41.14(b)

16 Id.

17 17 C.F.R. § 30.13(a).

4

III.

The KOSPI 200 Index

Staff granted KRX a no-action letter on November 26, 2008, with respect to the offer and sale of

KOSPI 200 index futures contracts to persons in the United States.18 The Commission certified

the Mini KOSPI 200 futures contract under Commission Regulation 30.13(m) on August 1, 2017.19

At the time that staff issued such no-action letter, as well as at the time that the Commission made

such certification, the KOSPI 200 was a broad-based security index.

The KOSPI 200 became a narrow-based security index on April 1, 2020. As a result, staff

withdrew its no-action letter and the Commission withdrew its certification. Products based on

the KOSPI 200 became subject to joint regulation by the CFTC and the Securities and Exchange

Commission (“SEC”) as foreign security futures products. Pursuant to an SEC Order20 and related

CFTC Advisory,21 the only persons located within the United States permitted to trade the

Contracts as foreign security futures products are QIBs.

KRX has represented to DMO staff that the KOSPI 200 became broad-based for more than 45

days between June and August of 2021

Securities and Exchange

Commission (“SEC”) as foreign security futures products. Pursuant to an SEC Order20 and related

CFTC Advisory,21 the only persons located within the United States permitted to trade the

Contracts as foreign security futures products are QIBs.

KRX has represented to DMO staff that the KOSPI 200 became broad-based for more than 45

days between June and August of 2021. Therefore, the index’s transition period under

Commission Regulation 41.14(b) began on September 1, 2021 and is set to end on November 30,

2021. As a result, as of December 1, 2021, the index will be broad-based pursuant to 41.14(b).22

IV.

Requested No-Action Letter

KRX has noted that a lag may exist between expiration of the requisite transition period on

December 1, 2021, when the KOSPI 200 index fully-transitions to a broad-based security index,

and when KRX secures certification of the Contracts pursuant to Commission Regulation 30.13.

KRX has submitted this request for no-action to cover the period after December 1, 2021 until the

Commission issues the certification.

KRX has requested a no-action letter as follows:

18 CFTC Staff Letter No. 08-20 (November 26, 2008), available at https://www.cftc.gov/LawRegulation/

CFTCStaffLetters/letters.htm.

19 Prior to the adoption of Commission Regulation 30.13, Commission staff provided foreign boards of trade a staff

no-action letter confirming that the contract complied with CEA section 2(a)(1)(C)(ii). The substantive review

under Commission Regulation 30.13 is the same as the prior no-action process. Foreign Futures and Options

Contracts on a Non-Narrow-Based Security Index; Commission Certification Procedures, 76 Fed.Reg. 59241, 59242

(September 26, 2011), available at https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2011/09/26/2011-24609/foreign-

futures-and-options-contracts-on-a-non-narrow-based-security-index-commission-certification

egulation 30.13 is the same as the prior no-action process. Foreign Futures and Options

Contracts on a Non-Narrow-Based Security Index; Commission Certification Procedures, 76 Fed.Reg. 59241, 59242

(September 26, 2011), available at https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2011/09/26/2011-24609/foreign-

futures-and-options-contracts-on-a-non-narrow-based-security-index-commission-certification.

20 Order under Section 36 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Granting an Exemption from Exchange Act

Section 6(h)(1) for Certain Persons Effecting Transactions in Foreign Security Futures and under Exchange Act

Section 15(a)(2) and Section 36 Granting Exemptions from Exchange Act Section 15(a)(1) and Certain Other

Requirements, (Release No. 34-60194; International Series Release No. 1311) (June 30, 2009), available at

https://www.sec.gov/rules/exorders/2009/34-60194.pdf.

21 Division of Clearing and Intermediary Oversight Advisory Concerning the Offer and Sale of Foreign Security

Futures Products to Customers Located in the U.S. (June 8, 2010), available at

https://www.cftc.gov/sites/default/files/idc/groups/public/@internationalaffairs/documents/ssproject/fsfpadvisory.pd

f.

22 See 17 C.F.R. § 41.14(b).

5

• Effective December 1, 2021 (Korea time), all KOSPI 200 futures contracts and Mini

KOSPI 200 futures contracts (regardless of contract month, including all contract

months listed before or after December 1, 2021) may be offered or sold to persons

located within the United States that are QIBs while the certification is pending at the

Commission. 23

As a condition of receiving the letter, KRX represented that it:

• would submit its request for expedited review and certification to the CFTC pursuant

to CFTC Regulation 30.13(e) on December 1, 2021.

KRX requested that the no-action letter expire upon the CFTC issuing a notice of certification of

the KOSPI 200 futures contracts and Mini KOSPI 200 futures contracts pursuant to Commission

Regulation 30.13.

V

iving the letter, KRX represented that it:

• would submit its request for expedited review and certification to the CFTC pursuant

to CFTC Regulation 30.13(e) on December 1, 2021.

KRX requested that the no-action letter expire upon the CFTC issuing a notice of certification of

the KOSPI 200 futures contracts and Mini KOSPI 200 futures contracts pursuant to Commission

Regulation 30.13.

V.

No-Action Letter

Based on the representations presented by KRX to DMO as discussed above, DMO will not

recommend that the Commission take enforcement action against KRX with respect to the offer

or sale of the Contracts to persons located within the United States while the Commission’s review

of KRX’s forthcoming request for certification of the Contracts pursuant to Commission

Regulation 30.13 is pending. This no-action letter is subject to the following conditions:

• KRX must submit a materially complete request for certification under Commission

Regulation 30.13 for the Contracts on December 1, 2021.

• KRX must promptly respond to DMO or Commission requests for additional information

regarding the Contracts.

• KRX will abide by all provisions of Commission Regulation 30.13 during the pendency of

its requests for certification, including, but not limited to, informing DMO staff of any

changes in the material facts and representations provided in the request for certification

pursuant to Commission Regulation 30.13(l).24

This letter will become effective on December 1, 2021

garding the Contracts.

• KRX will abide by all provisions of Commission Regulation 30.13 during the pendency of

its requests for certification, including, but not limited to, informing DMO staff of any

changes in the material facts and representations provided in the request for certification

pursuant to Commission Regulation 30.13(l).24

This letter will become effective on December 1, 2021.

This letter will remain in effect with respect to the Contracts during the pendency of certification

procedures under Commission Regulation 30.13, including any extensions of review under

Commission Regulation 30.13(h), until the earliest of the following events:

• The Contracts are certified pursuant to Commission Regulation 30.13(d) or (g);

• The Commission terminates its review of the request for certification of the Contracts

pursuant to Commission Regulation 30.13(b) or (i);

23 For avoidance of doubt, DMO understands this relief to include continued trading in contract months that had

open interest before December 1, 2021.

24 17 C.F.R. §30.13(l).

6

•

The Commission denies the request for certification of the Contracts pursuant to

Commission Regulation 30.13(j); or

•

December 31, 2022 (Korea time).

VI.

Conclusion

This letter, and the positions taken herein, represent only the views of DMO staff, and do not

necessarily represent the positions or views of the Commission or of any other office or division

of the Commission. This letter and the no-action positions taken herein are not binding on the

Commission.25 The positions provided in this letter do not excuse persons relying on it from

compliance with any other applicable requirements contained in the CEA, Commission

regulations, or any other applicable laws (i.e., securities laws). Further, this letter, and the positions

taken herein, are based upon the facts and circumstances presented to DMO staff

n herein are not binding on the

Commission.25 The positions provided in this letter do not excuse persons relying on it from

compliance with any other applicable requirements contained in the CEA, Commission

regulations, or any other applicable laws (i.e., securities laws). Further, this letter, and the positions

taken herein, are based upon the facts and circumstances presented to DMO staff. Any different,

changed, or omitted material facts or circumstances might render this letter void.

Finally, as with all staff letters, DMO retains the authority to condition further, modify, suspend,

terminate, or otherwise restrict the terms provided herein, in its discretion.

If you have any questions concerning this correspondence, please contact, Grey Tanzi, Assistant

Chief Counsel, DMO, at (312) 596-0635 or gtanzi@cftc.gov; or Rachel Kaplan Reicher, Chief

Counsel and Deputy Director, DMO, at (202) 418-6233 or rreicher@cftc.gov.

Sincerely,

____________________

Meghan Tente

Acting Director

Division of Market Oversight

25 See 17 CFR § 140.99(a)(2) (“A no-action letter binds only the issuing Division… and not the Commission or

other Commission staff.”).