The Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight confirmed the availability of Staff Letter 00-10, which provided CPO registration relief to a universitys cooperative extension service, its agents and employees,...
FederalAgency guidance
Ask Donna
How this section applies to your facts.
CFTC Staff Letters (2008-present) › The Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight confirmed the availability of Staff Letter 00-10, which provided CPO registration relief to a universitys cooperative extension service, its agents and employees,...
Text
Summary: The Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight confirmed the availability of Staff Letter 00-10, which provided CPO registration relief to a universitys cooperative extension service, its agents and employees, permitting them to offer courses that would allow certain students to trade commodity interests through participation in a trading club, notwithstanding certain amendments to the course and trading club criteria.
Division of Swap Dealer and
Gary Barnett
Intermediary Oversight
Director
U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW, Washington, DC 20581
Telephone: (202) 418-6700
Facsimile: (202) 418-5528
gbarnett@cftc.gov
CFTC Letter No. 14-29
No-Action
March 18, 2014
Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight
Re: CFTC Staff Letter No. 00-10 – Request for Confirmation of Relief
Dear :
This is in response to your letter dated May 20, 2013 (“Correspondence”), to the Division
of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight (“Division”) of the Commodity Futures Trading
Commission (“Commission” or “CFTC”), by which you sought confirmation that the relief
Commission staff previously had provided by CFTC Staff Letter No. 00-10 (“Prior Letter”)
would continue to obtain if certain changes were made to the criteria upon which staff had issued
the Prior Letter (“Amendments”).1
Specifically, by the Prior Letter, Commission staff stated that it would not recommend
that the Commission commence an enforcement action for failure to register as a commodity
pool operator (“CPO”) under Section 4m(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act (“Act”)2 against
the “A” (“University”), or any of its agents and employees, if the University offered, as part of
its curriculum, a course that would allow University students to trade commodity interests
through participation in a trading club (“Trading Club”) offered in conjunction with enrollment
in a University course (“Course”)
or (“CPO”) under Section 4m(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act (“Act”)2 against
the “A” (“University”), or any of its agents and employees, if the University offered, as part of
its curriculum, a course that would allow University students to trade commodity interests
through participation in a trading club (“Trading Club”) offered in conjunction with enrollment
in a University course (“Course”). In taking this position, Commission staff stated:
[G]ranting your request would not be contrary to the public interest
or the purposes of Section 4m(1) of the Act. In this regard, we
note the educational purpose of the Trading Club and your
representations that: (1) the Trading Club will be promoted and
sponsored by the University and the [Cooperative Extension
Service]; (2) losses in excess of the pooled funds will be the
responsibility of the [Social Sciences Unit]; (3) enrollment in the
1
CFTC Staff Letters are available on the Commission’s Web site, www.cftc.gov.
2
7 U.S.C. §6m(1) (2012). The Act is accessible through the Commission’s Web site.
Page 2
Course is voluntary and is not a mandatory prerequisite for
graduation or obtaining a degree; and (4) operation of the Trading
Club is consistent with the mission and objectives of the
[Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service of
the United States Department of Agriculture].3
The no-action position was, however, subject to compliance with certain conditions concerning
the operation of the Trading Club
mandatory prerequisite for
graduation or obtaining a degree; and (4) operation of the Trading
Club is consistent with the mission and objectives of the
[Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service of
the United States Department of Agriculture].3
The no-action position was, however, subject to compliance with certain conditions concerning
the operation of the Trading Club.
By the Correspondence, you explain that “[o]ver the past 12 years, the University has
operated the Trading Club, resulting in significant benefit to its students, and there is interest in
expanding the Trading Club in an effort to celebrate broadened interest in this educational
learning experience.” You accordingly have written to confirm that the CPO registration no-
action position taken in the Prior Letter will continue to apply if the University amends certain
conditions applicable to the operations of the Trading Club, as detailed in the Correspondence.
Briefly stated, the Amendments would: (1) increase the number and maximum size of Trading
Clubs offered each semester; (2) expand student eligibility for enrollment in a Course, subject to
instructor consent; (3) expand to three hours from two the number of credits a Course is worth;
(4) increase the reserve loss fund in recognition of the Trading Club’s expansion;4 (5) establish
minimum instructor criteria (e.g., a minimum of five years prior experience with commodity
futures and/or option markets and employment by the University)5 and a protocol should some
change in employment status occur with a particular instructor; and (6) to increase to $600.00
from $300.00 the maximum amount that each participant who elects to participate in a Trading
Club may contribute.6 In support of your request, you represent that no Trading Club has
previously traded or in the future will trade in swaps or forex contracts
the University)5 and a protocol should some
change in employment status occur with a particular instructor; and (6) to increase to $600.00
from $300.00 the maximum amount that each participant who elects to participate in a Trading
Club may contribute.6 In support of your request, you represent that no Trading Club has
previously traded or in the future will trade in swaps or forex contracts.
3
In support of the registration no-action position provided by the Prior Letter, you
represent that inasmuch as the objective of the Trading Club was –
to promote ‘informed decision-making by producers, families,
communities and other customers’ through the advancement of
knowledge and education about the futures markets, the operation
of the Trading Club meets the objectives and mission of the
[Cooperative Extension Service].
4
In this regard, you represent that “There has never been a draw on this reserve,” and you
explain that, inasmuch as the University no longer has a Social Sciences Unit as referred to in the
Prior Letter, the University itself would be responsible for losses in excess of pooled funds.
5
You further represent that “[t]he University is responsible for all employee activities.”
Page 3
Based upon the foregoing, the Division believes that the Amendments would be
consistent with the Prior Letter and should not affect or otherwise disturb the position taken
therein. Accordingly, the Division will not recommend that the Commission commence an
enforcement action against the University, or any of its agents and employees, for failure to
register as a CPO under Section 4m(1) of the Act if the University adopts and puts into place the
Amendments as discussed above and as detailed in the Correspondence
ot affect or otherwise disturb the position taken
therein. Accordingly, the Division will not recommend that the Commission commence an
enforcement action against the University, or any of its agents and employees, for failure to
register as a CPO under Section 4m(1) of the Act if the University adopts and puts into place the
Amendments as discussed above and as detailed in the Correspondence.
This letter, and the confirmation the Division is providing herein, does not excuse the
University, its agents and employees from compliance with any otherwise applicable
requirements contained in the Act or in the Commission’s regulations issued thereunder. For
example, each remains subject to all applicable antifraud provisions and reporting requirements
for traders, and to all provisions of Part 4 applicable to persons who are CPOs, regardless of
registration status.7 Moreover, this letter is applicable to the University and its agents and
employees solely in connection with the operation of a Trading Club.
This letter, and the no-action position provided herein, are based upon the representations
you have made to us. Any different, changed or omitted material facts or circumstances might
render this letter void. You must notify us immediately in the event the activities of the
University or its agents or employees change in any material way from those represented to us.
If you have any questions concerning this correspondence, please contact Barbara S.
Gold, Associate Director, at (202) 418-6700
to us. Any different, changed or omitted material facts or circumstances might
render this letter void. You must notify us immediately in the event the activities of the
University or its agents or employees change in any material way from those represented to us.
If you have any questions concerning this correspondence, please contact Barbara S.
Gold, Associate Director, at (202) 418-6700.
Very truly yours,
Gary Barnett
Director
Division of Swap Dealer and
Intermediary Oversight
6
You explain that this increase is necessary given the contemplated reduction of
participants in a Trading Club and the need to account for general inflation and changes in
margin requirements subsequent to the issuance of the Prior Letter.
7
See Regulations 4.20 and 4.41, which respectively concern certain operational and
advertising requirements applicable to all persons who come within the CPO definition.
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.