Time-Limited No-Action Relief for Swap Dealers from Certain Swap Data Reporting Requirements of Part 43, Part 45 and Part 46 of the Commission’s Regulations.

Summary: Time-Limited No-Action Relief for Swap Dealers from Certain Swap Data Reporting Requirements of Part 43, Part 45 and Part 46 of the Commission’s Regulations.

U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, NW, Washington, DC 20581

Telephone: (202) 418-5000

Facsimile: (202) 418-5521

www.cftc.gov

Division of Swap Dealer and

Intermediary Oversight

Division of Market Oversight

CFTC Letter No. 12-32

No-Action

November 19, 2012

Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight

Division of Market Oversight

Time-Limited No-Action Relief for Swap Dealers from Certain Swap Data Reporting

Requirements of Part 43, Part 45 and Part 46 of the Commission’s Regulations

Ladies and Gentlemen:

This letter responds to requests received from multiple parties, by the Division of Swap Dealer

and Intermediary Oversight (“DSIO”) of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission

(“Commission”), and by the Commission’s Division of Market Oversight (“DMO”), to provide

no-action relief from certain requirements of the Commission’s swap data reporting rules, in

order to allow for a common monthly compliance date for swap dealers newly falling within the

scope of those rules, and to extend the compliance date for reporting historical swap transaction

data pursuant to Part 46 of the Commission’s regulations.

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”)1

added to the Commodity Exchange Act (the “CEA”)2 provisions requiring the retention and

reporting of data relating to swap transactions. Section 727 of the Dodd-Frank Act added CEA

Section 2(a)(13), which establishes requirements for the real-time reporting and public

availability of swap transaction data, and requires that all swaps, both cleared and uncleared, be

reported to a registered swap data repository (“SDR”)

hange Act (the “CEA”)2 provisions requiring the retention and

reporting of data relating to swap transactions. Section 727 of the Dodd-Frank Act added CEA

Section 2(a)(13), which establishes requirements for the real-time reporting and public

availability of swap transaction data, and requires that all swaps, both cleared and uncleared, be

reported to a registered swap data repository (“SDR”). Section 728 of the Dodd-Frank Act

added CEA Section 21(b), which directs the Commission to prescribe standards for swap data

recordkeeping and reporting. Sections 723 and 729 of the Dodd-Frank Act added CEA Sections

2(h)(5) and 4r, respectively, which, among other things, establish reporting requirements for

swaps in effect as of the enactment of the Dodd-Frank Act, as well as swaps entered into after

such enactment but prior to the effective date for compliance with the Commission’s final swap

data recordkeeping and reporting rules.

Pursuant to these newly added provisions of the CEA, the Commission has added to its

regulations Part 43,3 which sets forth rules for the real-time public reporting of swap transaction

1 Pub. L. 111-203, 124 Stat. 1376 (2010).

2 7 U.S.C. 1, et seq.

3 77 Fed. Reg.1182 (January 9, 2012).

Page 2

data; Part 45,4 which establishes swap data recordkeeping and SDR reporting requirements; and

Part 46,5 which establishes swap data recordkeeping and SDR reporting requirements for pre-

enactment swaps6 and transition swaps7 (collectively, “historical swaps”). Swap dealers have

reporting obligations under each of Part 43, Part 45 and Part 46 (referred to collectively herein as

the “swap data reporting rules”)

which establishes swap data recordkeeping and SDR reporting requirements; and

Part 46,5 which establishes swap data recordkeeping and SDR reporting requirements for pre-

enactment swaps6 and transition swaps7 (collectively, “historical swaps”). Swap dealers have

reporting obligations under each of Part 43, Part 45 and Part 46 (referred to collectively herein as

the “swap data reporting rules”).

Recent Commission staff guidance has clarified the effect of Commission Regulation 1.3(ggg)(4)

(the “de minimis exception”)8 on when an entity must apply for registration as a swap dealer.9

Specifically, once an entity’s swap dealing activities have exceeded, in the aggregate, one of two

prescribed gross notional amount thresholds (the “notional thresholds”),10 the entity must apply

for registration as a swap dealer no later than the date that is two months after the end of the

month in which the notional threshold is exceeded (the “swap dealer registration deadline”). The

entity could elect, however, to apply for registration as a swap dealer at an earlier date.

For the first year after the regulatory framework for swaps and swap dealers comes into effect,

the swap positions that will be relevant in determining whether an entity’s swap dealing activities

have exceeded one of the notional thresholds will be the swap positions entered into by the entity

– and by any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with the entity – after

October 12, 2012.11 As a result, the earliest date on which an entity could have exceeded one of

the notional thresholds was October 13, 2012. Such an entity will be required to apply for

registration as a swap dealer by December 31, 2012 – the entity’s swap dealer registration

deadline – although the entity could elect to apply for registration, and thereby become a swap

dealer, at an earlier date.

4 77 Fed. Reg. 2136 (January 13, 2012).

5 77 Fed. Reg. 35200 (June 12, 2012)

2012. Such an entity will be required to apply for

registration as a swap dealer by December 31, 2012 – the entity’s swap dealer registration

deadline – although the entity could elect to apply for registration, and thereby become a swap

dealer, at an earlier date.

4 77 Fed. Reg. 2136 (January 13, 2012).

5 77 Fed. Reg. 35200 (June 12, 2012).

6 A “pre-enactment swap” is a swap entered into prior to the enactment of the Dodd-Frank Act (July 21, 2010), the

terms of which have not expired as of the date of enactment of the Dodd-Frank Act. See also Commission

Regulation 46.1, id. at 35226.

7 A “transition swap” is a swap entered into on or after the enactment of the Dodd-Frank Act (July 21, 2010), and

prior to the compliance date for reporting historical swaps of the asset class to which the swap belongs, pursuant to

Part 46. See also Commission Regulation 46.1, supra note 5 at 35227.

8 77 Fed. Reg. 30596, 30744-45 (May 23, 2012).

9 “CFTC Staff Responds to Questions on Timing of Swap Dealer Registration Rules,” Commission Press Release

6348-12 (September 10, 2012).

10 As of October 12, 2012, the notional thresholds are: (1) $8 billion (which is a phase-in level that will subsequently

be adjusted in accordance with Commission Regulation 1.3(ggg)(4)); and (2) $25 million with regard to swaps in

which the counterparty is a “special entity” as defined in CEA Section 4s(h)(2)(C) and Commission Regulation

23.401(c). These thresholds consider all swap positions connected with the swap dealing activities of the entity, or

any other entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with such entity. See note 8, supra. With

regard to the “special entity” notional threshold, DSIO issued a staff no-action letter on October 12, 2012 that

provided relief from such notional threshold for certain transactions in utility commodity swaps by certain non-

financial entities. See CFTC Letter No. 12-18 (October 12, 2012).

11 See note 8, supra.

ntrolled by or under common control with such entity. See note 8, supra. With

regard to the “special entity” notional threshold, DSIO issued a staff no-action letter on October 12, 2012 that

provided relief from such notional threshold for certain transactions in utility commodity swaps by certain non-

financial entities. See CFTC Letter No. 12-18 (October 12, 2012).

11 See note 8, supra.

Page 3

In an October, 2012, release entitled “Q & A – On Start of Swap Data Reporting,”12 DMO staff

confirmed that the date upon which an entity is required to be in compliance with the reporting

obligations of a swap dealer under Part 45 and Part 46 is the earlier of: (i) the date upon which

the entity applies to be registered as a swap dealer, or (ii) the entity’s swap dealer registration

deadline. The date for compliance with the reporting obligations of a swap dealer under Part 43

would be determined in the same manner.

Concerns have been expressed, by market participants and other interested parties, regarding the

potential for differing compliance dates for swap dealer reporting under the swap data reporting

rules, in the event that one or more entities apply to register as swap dealers before their swap

dealer registration deadline. With respect to those entities whose swap dealing activities

exceeded one of the notional thresholds in the month of October, 2012, and that will therefore be

among the initial group of swap dealers required to comply with the swap data reporting rules, it

has been noted that the first such entity to apply to register as a swap dealer will also be the first

– and potentially, for some period of time, the only – entity to have its swap transaction and

pricing data publicly disseminated pursuant to Part 43

of October, 2012, and that will therefore be

among the initial group of swap dealers required to comply with the swap data reporting rules, it

has been noted that the first such entity to apply to register as a swap dealer will also be the first

– and potentially, for some period of time, the only – entity to have its swap transaction and

pricing data publicly disseminated pursuant to Part 43. The public dissemination of data

reported by one, or even a few, early registrants may facilitate the identification of parties to the

swaps for which data has been reported, raising concerns under Commission Regulation

43.4(d)(1).13

In addition, DSIO and DMO have been advised that, in at least some instances, market

participants have designed their swap data reporting infrastructure on the understanding that all

swap dealers would be required to begin reporting on the same day. DSIO and DMO have been

advised that, in order to accommodate differing compliance dates, costly last-minute

modifications to such infrastructure would be required in order to avoid reporting errors.

In light of the foregoing concerns, multiple parties have requested that a common monthly

compliance date be established for swap dealers newly falling within the scope of the swap data

reporting rules.

Separately, and on behalf of those of its members that will be subject to the swap data reporting

rules, the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. (“ISDA”) has expressed concern

that reporting obligations with respect to historical swaps, under Part 46, will become effective at

the same time as reporting obligations under Part 43 and Part 45. ISDA has highlighted the large

volume of historical swaps data that will need to be reported by its members pursuant to Part 46,

12 “Q & A – On Start of Swap Data Reporting” (October 9, 2012), issued by DMO staff

espect to historical swaps, under Part 46, will become effective at

the same time as reporting obligations under Part 43 and Part 45. ISDA has highlighted the large

volume of historical swaps data that will need to be reported by its members pursuant to Part 46,

12 “Q & A – On Start of Swap Data Reporting” (October 9, 2012), issued by DMO staff. See

http://www.cftc.gov/ucm/groups/public/@newsroom/documents/file/startreporting_qa_final.pdf

13 Commission Regulation 43.4(d)(1) provides that swap transaction and pricing data that is publicly disseminated in

real time shall not disclose the identities of the parties to the swap or otherwise facilitate the identification of a party

to a swap, and that a registered SDR that accepts and publicly disseminates swap transaction and pricing data in real

time shall not publicly disseminate such data in a manner that discloses or otherwise facilitates the identification of a

party to a swap. See note 3, supra at 1246.

Page 4

and submits that it will be a significant technological and operational challenge to ensure that all

of this data is reported by the same date on which compliant daily reporting must begin under

Part 43 and Part 45. ISDA has therefore requested, on behalf of its members, a period of

transitional relief from the reporting requirements of Part 46, running from the date on which

reporting obligations under Part 43 and Part 45 become effective. ISDA submits that such a

transitional relief period will enable its members to gradually report historical swaps data over

the course of the relief period, thereby reducing the potential impact of Part 46 reporting on

members’ ability to come into compliance with their daily reporting obligations under Part 43

and Part 45.

DSIO and DMO believe that, to address all of the foregoing concerns, limited relief for swap

dealers from the compliance timeline contemplated by the swap data reporting rules is warranted

er

the course of the relief period, thereby reducing the potential impact of Part 46 reporting on

members’ ability to come into compliance with their daily reporting obligations under Part 43

and Part 45.

DSIO and DMO believe that, to address all of the foregoing concerns, limited relief for swap

dealers from the compliance timeline contemplated by the swap data reporting rules is warranted.

Accordingly, for any swap asset class in respect of which swap dealer reporting obligations are

then in effect under the swap data reporting rules, DSIO and DMO will not recommend that the

Commission take enforcement action against a swap dealer for failing to report swap transaction

data pursuant to Part 43 or Part 45 of the Commission’s regulations, until the earlier of: (i) 12:01

a.m. eastern time on the swap dealer registration deadline applicable to that swap dealer,

notwithstanding that the swap dealer may have applied to register as a swap dealer before its

applicable swap dealer registration deadline, or (ii) 12:01 a.m. eastern time on April 10, 2013.

Further, DSIO and DMO will not recommend that the Commission take enforcement action

against a swap dealer for failing to report historical swaps data pursuant to Part 46 of the

Commission’s regulations, until the earlier of: (i) 12:01 a.m. eastern time on the date that is 30

days after the date (as extended by the no-action relief provided herein) on which the swap dealer

is required to begin reporting swap transaction data pursuant to Part 43 and Part 45 for the asset

class to which the historical swap belongs, or (ii) 12:01 a.m. eastern time on April 10, 2013.

DSIO and DMO believe that a 30 day relief period makes available an adequate amount of time,

after a swap dealer is required to come into compliance with its reporting obligations under Part

43 and Part 45, for the swap dealer to complete its reporting of historical swaps data pursuant to

Part 46

t

class to which the historical swap belongs, or (ii) 12:01 a.m. eastern time on April 10, 2013.

DSIO and DMO believe that a 30 day relief period makes available an adequate amount of time,

after a swap dealer is required to come into compliance with its reporting obligations under Part

43 and Part 45, for the swap dealer to complete its reporting of historical swaps data pursuant to

Part 46. DSIO and DMO note that any swap dealer that anticipates needing more than 30 days to

complete its reporting of historical swaps data has the option of starting to report such data

before the 30 day relief period begins.

The no-action relief provided herein is time-limited, and ends in all respects at 12:01 a.m. eastern

time on April 10, 2013 – which is the date by which any swap counterparty that is not a swap

dealer or a major swap participant is required to be in full compliance with the swap data

reporting rules.14 Since all swap counterparties are required to be in full compliance with the

swap data reporting rules by April 10, 2013, regardless of whether they fall within the definition

of a swap dealer, DSIO and DMO do not believe that it is appropriate to extend the no-action

relief provided herein beyond that date. On and after April 10, 2013, all swap counterparties –

14 With respect to Part 43, see note 3, supra at 1228; with respect to Part 45, see note 4, supra at 2197; and with

respect to Part 46, see note 5, supra at 35226.

p dealer, DSIO and DMO do not believe that it is appropriate to extend the no-action

relief provided herein beyond that date. On and after April 10, 2013, all swap counterparties –

14 With respect to Part 43, see note 3, supra at 1228; with respect to Part 45, see note 4, supra at 2197; and with

respect to Part 46, see note 5, supra at 35226.

Page 5

including entities that anticipate falling within the definition of a swap dealer, but have not yet

fallen within such definition – must be in full compliance with all of their reporting obligations

under the swap data reporting rules.

Thus, for example, any entity whose swap dealing activities exceeded either of the notional

thresholds during the month of October, 2012, will be required to begin reporting swap

transaction data for the interest rate swaps and credit swaps to which it is a counterparty,

pursuant to Part 43 and Part 45, by 12:01 a.m. eastern time on December 31, 2012 – the swap

dealer registration deadline for that entity – regardless of whether such entity applied to register

as a swap dealer prior to December 31, 2012. Such entity will be required to report historical

swaps data for the interest rate swaps and credit swaps to which it is (or was) a counterparty,

pursuant to Part 46, by 12:01 a.m. eastern time on January 30, 2013 – the date that is 30 days

after the date (as extended by the no-action relief provided herein) on which the entity was

required to begin reporting data for interest rate swaps and credit swaps pursuant to Part 43 and

Part 45. Any interest rate swap or credit swap entered into by such entity after 12:01 a.m.

eastern time on December 31, 2012 would be reportable pursuant to Part 43 and Part 45, and

would not be reportable as a historical swap pursuant to Part 46

n relief provided herein) on which the entity was

required to begin reporting data for interest rate swaps and credit swaps pursuant to Part 43 and

Part 45. Any interest rate swap or credit swap entered into by such entity after 12:01 a.m.

eastern time on December 31, 2012 would be reportable pursuant to Part 43 and Part 45, and

would not be reportable as a historical swap pursuant to Part 46.

Reporting obligations under the swap data reporting rules with respect to equity swaps, foreign

exchange swaps and other commodity swaps are not yet in effect; pursuant to the compliance

timeline set forth in the swap data reporting rules, such reporting obligations come into effect for

swap dealers on January 10, 2013.15 For purposes of Part 43 and Part 45, the no-action position

taken herein does not affect this compliance date. Any entity whose swap dealing activities

exceeded either of the notional thresholds during the month of October, 2012, will be required to

begin reporting swap transaction data for the equity swaps, foreign exchange swaps and other

commodity swaps to which it is a counterparty, pursuant to Part 43 and Part 45, by 12:01 a.m.

eastern time on January 10, 2013. Such entity will be required to report historical swaps data for

the equity swaps, foreign exchange swaps and other commodity swaps to which it is (or was) a

counterparty, pursuant to Part 46, by 12:01 a.m. eastern time on February 9, 2013. Any equity

swap, foreign exchange swap or other commodity swap entered into by such entity after 12:01

a.m. eastern time on January 10, 2013 would be reportable pursuant to Part 43 and Part 45, and

would not be reportable as a historical swap pursuant to Part 46.

As further examples, any entity whose swap dealing activities exceed either of the notional

thresholds during the month of November, 2012, will be required to begin reporting swap

transaction data for all categories of swaps to which it is a counterparty, pursuant to Part 43 and

Part 45, by 12:01 a.m

art 43 and Part 45, and

would not be reportable as a historical swap pursuant to Part 46.

As further examples, any entity whose swap dealing activities exceed either of the notional

thresholds during the month of November, 2012, will be required to begin reporting swap

transaction data for all categories of swaps to which it is a counterparty, pursuant to Part 43 and

Part 45, by 12:01 a.m. eastern time on January 31, 2013, and will be required to report historical

swaps data for all categories of swaps to which it is (or was) a counterparty, pursuant to Part 46,

by 12:01 a.m. eastern time on March 2, 2013. Any entity whose swap dealing activities exceed

either of the notional thresholds during the month of January, 2013, will be required to begin

reporting swap transaction data for all categories of swaps to which it is a counterparty, pursuant

15 Id.

Page 6

to Part 43 and Part 45, by 12:01 a.m. eastern time on March 31, 2013. Since the no-action relief

provided herein ends in all respects at 12:01 a.m. eastern time on April 10, 2013, such entity will

be required to report historical swaps data for all categories of swaps to which it is (or was) a

counterparty, pursuant to Part 46, by 12:01 a.m. eastern time on April 10, 2013. Any entity

whose swap dealing activities exceed either of the notional thresholds during the month of

February, 2013, will be required to begin reporting swap transaction data for all categories of

swaps to which is a counterparty, pursuant to Part 43 and Part 45, and will also be required to

report historical swaps data for all categories of swaps to which it is (or was) a counterparty,

pursuant to Part 46, by 12:01 a.m. eastern time on April 10, 2013.

This letter, and the no-action position taken herein, represent the views of DSIO and DMO only,

and do not necessarily represent the position or views of the Commission or of any other division

or office of the Commission’s staff

report historical swaps data for all categories of swaps to which it is (or was) a counterparty,

pursuant to Part 46, by 12:01 a.m. eastern time on April 10, 2013.

This letter, and the no-action position taken herein, represent the views of DSIO and DMO only,

and do not necessarily represent the position or views of the Commission or of any other division

or office of the Commission’s staff. The no-action position taken herein does not excuse

affected persons from compliance with any other applicable requirements of the CEA or the

regulations thereunder. As with all no-action letters, DSIO and DMO retain the authority to

condition further, modify, suspend, terminate or otherwise restrict the terms of the no-action

relief provided herein, in their discretion.

If you have any questions concerning this correspondence, please contact Ward Griffin,

Associate Chief Counsel, DSIO, at (202) 418-5425, or Nora Flood, Attorney Advisor, DMO, at

(202) 418-5354.

Very truly yours,

Gary Barnett

Rick Shilts

Director, DSIO

Acting Director, DMO