Documents

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Scott Solomon, Petitioner v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, District Council 37, AFL-CIO

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 6, 2021

Solomon v AFSCME, Council 37, No. 19-cv-6823, Mot. to Dismiss, Dkts. #23–24 (filed May 26, 2020). On October 13, 2020, the district court granted AFSCME Council 37’s Motion to Dismiss. App. 3. … CONCLUSION For the reasons stated above, this Court should grant the petition for writ of certiorari. 24 Respectfully submitted, William W.

Appendix — Evans v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 2002

Howbert, 231 U.S. 399 (1913) Let us now return to the Nether Court’s decision as it relates to the instant case. … Lexington Mill & Elevator Co., 232 U.S. 399 at 409 (1914).

Petition — Stevens v. New Jersey

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1980

Schleis, 582 F.2d 1166 (8th Cir. 1978) ................ 24 United States v. Tucker, 610 F.2d 1007 (2d Cir. 1979) ................. 24 United States ex rel. Petillo v. … Green, 399 U.S. 149, 176, 26 L.Ed.2d 489, 90 S. Ct. 1930 (Harlan J., concurring). 422 U.S. at 818, 45 L.Ed.2d at 572.

Reply Brief for the Petitioner — Papachristou v. Jacksonville

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief for the Petitioner · 1972

Pennsylvania, 83 U.S. 399 ( 1966) robes ebtaceus 24 Goldblatt v. Town of Hempstead, 369 U.S. 590 (1962) ..... 15° Goldman v. Knecht, 295 Supp. 897 (D. Colo. 1969) ....... 14 Griswold v. … Selkowitz, 171 So.2d 368 (Fla. 1968) ......... 24 Herndon v. Lowry, 301 U.S. 242 (1937) pavousedebteges 24 ~ Johnson v. State, 216 So.2d 7 (Fla. 1968) ..... eee ... 12,31 Jones v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Department of the Air Force, et al., Petitioners v. Prutehi Guahan, fka Prutehi Litekyan

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 27, 2026

United States, 399 F.3d 1057 (9th Cir. 2005) ............................... 30 Puerto Rico v. Sanchez Valle, 579 U.S. 59 (2016) ................................................. 22 Robertson v. … United States, 399 F.3d 1057, 1066 (9th Cir. 2005).

Jurisdictional Statement — Heller v. Hancock County Children Services Board

Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 1981

Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 399-401 (1923) ..- + + es 8 ‘ Moore v. City of East Cleveland, 431 U.S. 494 (1977)... . a ; Morales v. Turman, 364 F. Supp. 166, 175 (E.D. … Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 399-401 (1923) and Pierce v.

Petitioners Brief — A. J. T., By and Through Her Parents, A. T. & G. T., Petitioner v. Osseo Area Schools, Independent School District No. 279, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · Feb 27, 2025

JA21, 24-25; see also JA496. … JA2, 24, 28; see also Gaona v.

T.C. Summary Opinion 2015-44

Agency decision · Agency decision

On June 24, 2006, petitioner married Gerald Butler. Petitioner and Mr. Butler jointly filed their 2007 Federal income tax return, which was prepared by Jules Simeon at Simeon Quick Tax Service. … Proc. 2013-34, sec. 4.01(7), 2013-43 I.R.B. at 399-400. We consider these factors in the light of the particular facts and circumstances, but we are not bound by them. See Molinet v.

Opposition — Hostrop v. Board of Junior College District No. 515

Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1976

The opinion of the District Court is reported of- ficially at 399 F. Supp. 609 (1974). QUESTIONS PRESENTED Petitioners have briefed two questions in their Petition for Writ of Certiorari: 1. … He was also told that the Board desired that his employment problem be determined by July 24, 1970.

Brief of Amicus Curiae — Arrowsmith v. Commissioner

Supreme Court brief · Brief of Amicus Curiae · 1952

Commissioner, 184 Fed. 2d 399 . A. 3d,”.- - Ne. 1980) «0.0.0... ee aN Gaase ss) sa sceataireys's as gesecen i 5 ; ae | - Syatures |. … A petition _ Sor rehearing wag denied on February: 11, 1952 (R., p. 24).

Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Hostrop v. Board of Junior College District No. 515

Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1976

Court of the United States: Respondents pray that the requested Writ of Certiorari not issue to review the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit entered on September 24 … The opinion of the District Court is reported officially at 399 F. Supp. 609 (1974), and is reproduced as Appendix “B” to the Petition.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Federal Housing Administration, Region No. 4 v. Burr

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1940

Rep. 1007, p. 24, 74th Cong., Ist Sess. ; A. ?- 1822, _p, 5%, 74th Cong. … Supp. 399, it was held that the Home Owners’ Loan Corporation was not subject» — to third* party orders in supplementary proceed- ; ings.

Appellants Brief — A Book Named "John Cleland's Memoirs of a Woman of Pleasure" v. Attorney General of Massachusetts

Supreme Court brief · Appellants Brief · 1966

Y. 2d 399, 200 N. E. 2d 760; for earlier views, see Zeitlin v. Arnebergh, 59 Cal. 2d 901, 920, 383 P. 2d 152, 165; State v. Hudson County News Co., 41 N. J. 247, 265, 196 A. 2d 225, 235.) … CDI: deals with the right to jury trial as though the Sixth Amendment spoke not of the right of ‘‘the accused’’, but of a right of the prosecution (23-24; also footnote 7 on p. 8).

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Office of Communication of the United Church of Christ v. Federal Communications Commission

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1988

FCC, 399 F.2d 65 (8th CAPs HU iiiniiciiviccssesacchdementabaneisilosancdnininibienidscaaia 5,14 CATV, BD. … FCC, 399 F.2d 65 (8th Cir. 1968) (‘Black Hills’’).

Record and brief — Henry Douglass, Appellant, vs. William W. Corcoran and George, W. Riggs

Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 1871

[SEAL] 24. Summons to answer supplemental bill. In supreme court of the District of Columbia, June 11th, 1869, ove Docket 9. WILLIAM W. CORCORAN ET AL., COMPLAINANT, No. 1673. Equity. … REc. 399—2 ae apices 18. HENRY DOUGLASS VS. CORCORAN AND RIGGS.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — New York v. Burger

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1987

Rptr. at 399 (automo- bile dismantling industry is “fraught with public danger” of criminal activity); Moore v. State, 442 So.2d at 216 (Fla.) … Auth., 24 NY2d 647; United States v Chicago R. R. Co., 282 US 311.) Il.

Adoption of Statement

Federal Register · Notice · Oct 7, 2015

Vilsach , 707 F.3d 394, 399 (D.C. … • The issue was addressed by the agency on its own initiative in the rulemaking. 24 24   Id.

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ PHLX LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Price Improvement XL Pricing

Federal Register · Notice · Jul 28, 2016

Initiating Order Fee for Professional, Firm, Broker-Dealer, Specialist and Market Maker orders that are contra to a Customer PIXL Order will be reduced to $0.00 if the Customer PIXL Order is greater than 399 … Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act. 24 24  15

Ohio Edison Company, et al.; Electric Rate and Corporate Regulation Filings

Federal Register · Notice · Nov 22, 2000

ER01-399-000] Take notice that on November 9, 2000, Jersey Central Power & Light Company, Metropolitan Edison Company and Pennsylvania Electric Company (individually doing business as GPU Energy), tendered … Comment date: November 30, 2000, in accordance with Standard Paragraph E at the end of this notice. 24.

Initial Decision Release No. 1349

Agency decision · Agency decision

White, 408 F.3d 399, 402–03 (8th Cir. 2005) (finding that a defendant’s guilty plea did not constitute an admission to facts that the defendant disavowed during his plea hearing); Valansi v. … Ex. 1 at 1–2 23 Id. at 2. 24 Id. 25 Id. OIP at 2; Div. Ex. 1 at 1–2; see 15 U.S.C. §§ 78j(b); 18 U.S.C. §§ 1014, 1341; 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5. 26 27 Div.