Documents

Petitioners Reply Brief — Arizona v. Ash Grove Cement Co.

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Reply Brief · 1982

As the Ninth Circuit still had r.ot ruled on the mandamus petition by July 24, 1982, petitioners requested an additional extension of twenty-eight days (thus totaling the sixty days permitted by this … Gressman, Supreme Court Practice, § 6.3 at 399 (Sth ed. 1978): 5 If rehearing is sought in the court below, there is no absolute certainty that the judgment below will not be altered.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Jefferson Standard Life Insurance v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1969

United Stutes, 399 F. 2d 757° (7th Cir. 1968), cert. denied 89 S. Ct. 989 (1969)).. That case involved ' some of the same issues as this case. . … No. 81 (February 24, 1969) ).

Opinion — Phillip Wagner, Inc. v. Leser

Supreme Court brief · Opinion · 1915

Tacoma, 24 Washington, 591; Annie Wright Seminary v. Tacoma, 23 Washington, 109.” … Parker, 399; Wormley v. District, 402; Shumate v. Heman, 402; Farrell v. Commissioners, 404. French v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co., supra, was referred to with approval in Hibben v. Smith, 191 U.

Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Epstein v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1946

Cohen told petitioner that he could not discount notes made by petitioner and Sussman with fac- tors unless he could produce evidence of the pur- pose for which the notes were taken (R. 24, 25). … express company, and he dis- played to the factors express company checks pro- cured by sending ‘‘dummy”’ packages by express c. o. d. and paying therefor at the point of deliv- ery (R. 392-394, 399

Appendix — Keys v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1942

association, or corporation, any money or other thing of value, shall transmit in interstate commerce by any means whatsoever any communica- : x 3 a 4 ‘s 2 & DT Rs SSO aS oe ba RE Ee SSG ROS eae 24 … Comp~ting Seale Co., 261 U.S. 399, 417 418; Hartford Accident Co. v. Bunn, 285 U.S. 169, 178. U S GOVERNMENT PRIM TING Seerce 8 hia ee

Opposition Brief — New York State Bd. of Elections v. López Torres

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2008

MORSE 399 Park Avenue JENNER & BLOCK LIP New York, NY 10022 330 N. … THE SECOND CIRCUIT’S DECISION DOES Ee EE I TPE occnccnscccasisscvndeesseuboneseoiete 24 V.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Michigan v. Lucas

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991

VI ......... a 8, 9, 10, 12, 23, 24, 27 Compulsory Process Clause ..........._.12, 22, 24 Confrontation Clause 8, 11, 15, 24, 25, 27 Amend. … Rev. 567 (1978) ais 24 23 C. Wright & K.

Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Democratic National Committee

Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1973

A, p. 37a. 24 Red Lion, supra at 388. 25 National Broadcasting Co. v. … West Haven Housing Authority, 399 U.S. 510 (1970), rehear- ing denied, 400 U.S. 856 (1970).

Petitioners Brief — Evans v. Newton

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1966

S. 399 sedge 13 Barrows v. Jackson, 346 U. S. 249 .................... 13 Bell v. Maryland, 378 U. S. 226 24 Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U. S. 483 _.............. 23 Burbank v. … Martin, 375 U. 8. 399; Barrows v. Jack- son, 346 U. S. 249, 254. See also Gantt v.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Libby Haines-Marchel, Petitioner v. Washington State Liquor and Cannabis Board

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Nov 2, 2018

App. 293, 300, 165 P.3d 399 (2007). … Wedges/Ledages, 24 F.3d at 63 (quoting former PCC § 7-28(c)(1) (1986- 1987)).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Facebook, Inc., Petitioner v. Noah Duguid, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 11, 2020

Law § 399-z(9) ....................................29 vi TABLE OF AUTHORITIES—Continued Page Pallone-Thune Telephone Robocall Abuse Criminal Enforcement and Deterrence Act, Pub. L. … Law § 399-z(9) (requiring telemarketers to inform recipients that they may request to be added to the caller’s do not call list).

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — William J. Wise, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jan 27, 2025

Wainwright 477 U.S. 399 (1986) 20 Gage v. Chappell 793 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 2015) 21 Hill v. Lockhart 474 U.S. 52 (1985) 17, 23 Lambert v. Blodgett 393 F.3d 943 (9th Cir. 2004) 22 Panetti v. … CHEN United States District Judge 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Jean Dominique Morancy, Individually and on Behalf His Minor Child, L. M., Petitioner v. Sabrina Alex Salomon, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Sep 21, 2025

Znosko, 399 So.3d 1270 (Fla. 4th DCA Nov. 14, 2024) e Morancy v. Department of Revenue Circuit 17, Broward Unit DOR, (4D2025-0239) e Morancy v. … Salomon, No. 24-12505 (11th Cir. May 8, 2025). 13 Morancy v. Salomon, No. 6D2023-3456 ...........ccsscseseeceseseeseenseseeeeeees 24 Munaf v.

Respondents Brief — Continental Wall Paper Co. v. Louis Voight & Sons Co.

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1909

R., 24. The state courts have with great unanimity held com- binations like that under discussion to be illegal. … The first of the above mentioned under- takings was equivalent to an agreement by the jobber or 24 wholesaler not to buy from any other person than the manufacturer.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Patti v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2005

United States, 399 F.3d 1266 (10th Cir. 2005) (sentence became final before this Court’s decision in Apprendi), Green v. … See, e.g., 24 United States v. Thomas, 274 F.3d 655 (2d Cir. 2001) (en banc).

Brief for Respondents in Opposition — NLRB v. Dant

Supreme Court brief · Brief for Respondents in Opposition · 1953

pany, 341 U.S. 399, 95 1@ ed. 969 has effectively settied the question sought to be raised by the Board's petition herein. _ Decisions of other Cirenit Courts of Appeal fully sa to this view. … Nina Dye Works, Inc., July 24, 1952, — F 24 —, 30 LRRM 2456. . In the Nina Dye case, the Court.of Appeals ea to enforce an NLRB order because the C, I.

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Shelton v. Tennessee

Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1972

State, 217 Tenn. 544, 399 S.W. 2d 507; Harris v. State, 217 Tenn. 582, 399 S.W. 2d 749; Brown v. State, Tenn. Crim. App., 441 S.W. 2d 485. … a 24 Q Now, did you and Mr. Munsey have any conver- sation concerning this car, but don’t tell what it was? A Yes, sir, we did. Q Asa result of the conversation you had with Mr.

Brief for the United States — United States v. Diamond Coal & Coke Co.

Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United States · 1921

Opinion of District Court, R. 22 to 24; Circuit Court of Appeals, R. 26 to 31; 254 Fed. 266. ASSIGNMENT OF ERRORS. … United States, 240 U. 8. 399, 402. Nor is this a case where the United States sues for the benefit of « private party and is itself merely « formal party.

Opposition Brief — Kia P. v. City of New York

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2001

Sparks, 449 U.S. 24 (1980) ........... 11 Evans v. Newton, 382 U.S. 296 (1966) .......... 7,11 F.D.1.C. v. Mallen, 486 U.S. 230 (1988) ......... 22 Flagg Bros. v. … Southern Maryland Health Systems Agency, 737 F.2d 399, 402 n.3 (4th Cir. 1984) (quoting Howerton v. Gabica, 708 F.2d 380, 383 (9th Cir. 1983)); see also Lugar v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Ayers v. Clark (No. 06-287)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006

Rptr. 399 (1990) (Clark) by extending the Bouie’ doctrine to special circumstance findings and the ex post facto prohibition to judicial] decisions. … Mendoza, 24 Cal. 4th 130, 6 P.3d 150, 99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 485 (2000); People v.