Documents

Amicus Curiae Brief — Facebook, Inc., Petitioner v. Noah Duguid, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 11, 2020

Law § 399-z(9) ....................................29 vi TABLE OF AUTHORITIES—Continued Page Pallone-Thune Telephone Robocall Abuse Criminal Enforcement and Deterrence Act, Pub. L. … Law § 399-z(9) (requiring telemarketers to inform recipients that they may request to be added to the caller’s do not call list).

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — William J. Wise, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jan 27, 2025

Wainwright 477 U.S. 399 (1986) 20 Gage v. Chappell 793 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 2015) 21 Hill v. Lockhart 474 U.S. 52 (1985) 17, 23 Lambert v. Blodgett 393 F.3d 943 (9th Cir. 2004) 22 Panetti v. … CHEN United States District Judge 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4

Petition — New York City Transit Authority v. Beazer

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1979

Beazer, supra, 399 F. Supp. at p. 1058. … L. 92-261, § 2, Mar. 24, 1972, 86 Stat. 193. § 2000e-1.

Appellees Brief — United States v. Reidel

Supreme Court brief · Appellees Brief · 1971

Mass. 1969), probable jurisdiction noted, 397 U.S. 985 (1970), restored to calendar for reargument 399 US. 922 (1970). … Minne- sota, 399 U.S. 524 (1970). The circumstances in which obscenity is distributed and circulated now determine whether it is protected or unprotected by the First Amendment.

Petition — Williams v. King

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1983

Pulley” 692 ¥.24 pers (ou clés 1982). ‘On March a, 1983, the = » — +. … Sg © 2» BS 103 s.ct. 3383, “Bs 4, 7 L.Ed. 24 1090, 1104 n. 4 (1983).

Petitioners Brief — Correctional Services Corp. v. Malesko

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 2001

McKnight, 521 U.S. 399 (1997)..... 10, 23 Schowengerdt v. General Dynamics Corp., 823 Pe ee 8 Schweiker v. Chilicky, 487 U.S. 412 (1988).......... 6, 8 Shaw v. … McKnight, 521 U.S. 399, 412 (1997).

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Collier v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1974

Connally v General Construction Co, 269 US 385 RE. eas oewdisascndasiee pap buancbukes 7, 8,9, 12 Giacca v Pennsylvania 382 US 399, 15 L Ed 2d SGT, OB Ce BRB CRIED noc kwncc ccceccccesces 9 Lanzetta … It is true that in Giaccio v Pennsylvania, 382 US 399 (1966), the court viewed a statute on its face which did not involve First Amendment problems.

Petitioners Brief — James K. Kahler, Petitioner v. Kansas

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · May 31, 2019

Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 406 (1986). … Code Ann. § 17-24-10(A).

Respondents Brief — Broad River Power Co. v. South Carolina Ex Rel. Daniel

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1930

S., 399; 63 L. Ed., 669, and cases cited. Sportanburg v. Spartanburg Gas & Elec. Co., 130 S. C., 125. … S., 399; 63 L. Ed., 669), is in principle, we sub- mit, on all fours with the case at bar.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Colorado v. Corr

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1984

Ch. 267, sec. 2, 24-3!-105, 1983 Colo. Sess. Laws 901, 903. … Section 24-31-101(3), C.R.S. 1973; see also section 24-31-104, C.R.S. 1973.

Brief for the United States — United States v. Waddill, Holland & Flinn, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United States · 1945

Orleans, City of v. es 134 F. (2d) 399» ee : oe ‘New York v. Maelay, 288 U. S. 290. _.. ° 6, he 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 21, 22, 24, 25 - New York Terminal Co, v: Gaus, 204.N. … (See also fi. 14, supra; p. 24.)

Registration of Food Facilities Under the Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act of 2002

Federal Register · Rule · Oct 3, 2005

The technical amendment to the interim final rule published at 69 FR 29428 was effective May 24, 2004. … Based on the requirements in the proposed rule, the lowest fee quoted was $399 for representation by a U.S. agent for 1 year; other U.S. agents charged initial fees between $599 and $1,400.

T. C. Memo. 1997-479

Agency decision · Agency decision

Thus, the termination of the 1990 tax year on March 24, 1990, conclusively resolved, for purposes of the closing agreement, only the issues for that period. … Commissioner, 399 F.2d 744, 749 (4th Cir. 1968), affg. T.C. Memo. 1967-67, and taxpayers bear the burden of proving that such deficiencies are erroneous, Rule 142 (a) ; Parks v.

Opposition Brief — Thoele v. City of Chicago

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1986

Stat., ch. 24, §10-1-13. These elements are “distinct”. Lenert, supra, 56 Ill. App. 2d at 330. … Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 399 (1923). The liberty interest to pursue a chosen trade must be distinguished from an employee’s wishes for a certain job.

Opposition — Machine Tool & Gear, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1981

By November 24, they had collected signed cards froma major- ity of the shop’s employees (Pet. App. 2c, 20c; GCX 12-21, 24-26, 28-37). … Porta Systems Corp., 625 F. 2d 399 (2d Cir. 1980); NLRB v. Publishers Printing Co., 625 F. 2d 746 (6th Cir. 1980); NLRB v. Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc.,558 F. 2d 205 (4th Cir. 1977); NLRB v.

Self-Regulatory Organizations; American Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing and Order Granting Accelerated Approval to a Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendments No. 1 and 2, To Establish a Directed Order Program

Federal Register · Notice · Aug 22, 2007

Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”), 1 and Rule 19b-4 thereunder, 2 notice is hereby given that on July 24, 2007, the American Stock Exchange LLC (“Amex … SEC , 444 F.2d 399 (2d Cir. 1971); Arleen Hughes , 27 SEC 629, 636 (1948), aff'd sub nom. Hughes v. SEC , 174 F.2d 969 (D.C. Cir. 1949)).

Opposition — Marsh v. City of Oakland

Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1983

Pierce County, 399 F.28 1142 (9th Cir. 1977) 9 United States v. United States Gypsum Co., 333 U.S. 364 (1948) 13 Young v. … App. 24 226, 42 P.2d 522 (1935), an action involving the taking of riparian rights; and Podesta v. Linden Irrigation District, 141 Cal.

Brief of Respondent in Opposition to Petition for Certiorari — Citizens Utilities Co. v. Superior Court

Supreme Court brief · Brief of Respondent in Opposition to Petition for Certiorari · 1962

'8This is implicit in the Trial’ Court’s Findings, particularly Find- _ings Nos. 14, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 and 27: Appendix tg see also ee III: Appendix “A”. ve ae : ; 24 7 . & , ' “In so doing … Jr., ‘Agency, See. = p. 276 and Sec. 399, p. 313. a’ & 19 V.

Reply Brief — Sidali v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1998

an 7 34; 2 2D (9) JAN 7 1998 , eg No. 97-399 CLERK med In The - Supreme Court of the United States October Term, 1997 S MEHMET SEMIH SIDALI, Petitioner, IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE … Indeed, in those cases, just as in | Robinson, no further review could be had at that point. | See, e.g., Joint School District 24 v.

Reply Brief — Canadian Pacific Pacific Railway Railway Co. Co. v. Lundeen (No. 08-871)

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2008

Computing Scale Co., 261 U.S. 399, 418 (1923) (when a final judgment is denied review on certiorari, this Court is “expressly denied power to review” that earliei judgment if another aspect of the … Br. 24-25; U.S.