Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.12s
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Paul Curtis Pemberton, Petitioner v. Michael Miller, Warden
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 27, 2025
[Doc. 24](3/21/24). H. … Utah, 510 U.S. 399, 412 (1994).
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2006
Super. 120, 518 A. 2d 808 (1986). 24. … YEAPLE, 485 PA. 399, 402 A.2pD 1022 (1979)? 2.
Federal Register · Rule · Jun 12, 2008
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Office of the Secretary 14 CFR Parts 201, 204, 205, 211, 212, 213, 217, 241, 243, 291, 298, 325, 330, 331, and 382 49 CFR Parts 1, 7, 10, 24, 26, 31, 37, and 40 [Docket … In Title 14, Chapter II, Parts 200-399, remove text specified in the “Remove” column and add in its place the text in the “Add” column in the sections indicated below: Section Remove Add
73 FR 33326Transportation DepartmentOffice of the SecretarySupreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1987
Columbia Gas & Electric Corp., 186 F.2d 464, cert. denied, 341 U.S. 921 (1951) ........ 6 Bankruptcy Court Rules ee 10 Treatises Restatement (Second) of Judgments (1982) § 24.... 4,6 No. 87-479 … Moitie, 452 U.S. 394, 398- 399 (1981): Nor are the res judicata consequences of a final unappealed judgment on the merits altered by the fact that the judgment may have been wrong or rested on a legal
Opposition — Brown v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1978
National was the second largest producer of gypsum board, with a 24 percent share of the market between 1960 and 1974 (App. S0ex). ’ 2. … Wurzbach, 280 U.S. 396, 399. See also United States v. Powell, 423 U.S. 87, 93. Petitioners knowingly came close to. and indeed overstepped. the line separating the legal from the illegal.
438 U.S. 915Appendix — De Filippo v. Ford Motor Co.
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1975
PA. 19107 (215) 561-4050 Petitioners’ Supplemental Brief under Rule 24(5) Petitioners fiie this supplemental Brief, under Rule 24(5), to call the Court’s attention to an unreported deci- sion of the … Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc., 399 F.2d 902, 905 (9th Cir. 1968). I. SHERMAN ACT CLAIM.
423 U.S. 912Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Slack v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1973
Ragsdale, 470 F.2d 24 (Sth Cir., Nov. 10, 1972, 12 Criminal Law Reporter 2218) ...... … Cir. 1968) 399 F.2d 559.) We do not think that the photographic display was impermissibly suggestive or that the in-court identifica- tions were tainted.
414 U.S. 1065Brief for the United States — Lemonakis v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United States · 1974
App. 26a-27a, n. 24). It was hardly comparable to the hearsay deemed admissi- ble in Chambers v. … California, 386 U.S. 18, 24; Brown v. United States, 411 U.S. 223, 230- 7 See Pet. App. 26a, n. 24. 14 232; Harrington v. California, 395 U.S. 250. It there- fore found the error harmless.
415 U.S. 989Reply Brief — South Dakota v. SDDS, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2001
Tennessee-Missouri Bridge Comm'n, 399 US. 279 RS i eke ee ss 8 Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corp. v. Feeney, GIS US. BFP 6 kad an eek eee eek aes 9 Saahir v. … SDDS’s remaining argument — that § 3-21-10 is preempted by 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (see Br. in Opp. 22-24) — is frivolous.
532 U.S. 1007Reply Brief — David D'Addario, et al., Petitioners v. Virginia A. D'Addario
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Feb 22, 2019
Co., 576 F.3d 392, 399 (7th Cir. 2009); Dahlgren v. First Nat. Bank of Holdrege, 533 F.3d 681, 690 (8th Cir. 2008). … Br. at 24). That holding is directly contrary to the binding precedent of this Court set forth in Reves v. Ernst & Young, as well as the holdings of the Third, Seventh, and Eighth Circuits.
Brief for the United States — Gendelman v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United States · 1952
pany, a retail store, until April, 1943 (R. 397-399) ) when it was sold to Standard Furniture Company. -, Its operations were reflected on the books of Mod- - ern Furniture and Upholstering Company, … (R. 70-71, 487-438, Ex. 24.)
342 U.S. 909Brief for Petitioner — New Hampshire Fire Insurance v. Scanlon
Supreme Court brief · Brief for Petitioner · 1960
Ss. 344 (1931) Goldman V. meric av Dealers Serv tee, 135 °F. 2d 398 ae . (24 Cir, 1943) : & 2.5 Ae Se Oe eS Oe. 6. 6 66 264 6. … Cpage 399). The ¢ Court st fe Appeals atiirmed, saying : & “Consequently, Ter purposes cor construing the nin statute, we are required to. aspunic that appellants.
362 U.S. 404Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2009
SYL, Inc., 825 A.2d 399, 415 (Md. 2003) (concluding that intangible holding companies “had no real economic substance as separate business entities” for tax purposes). … Respondent invokes the waiver doctrine (Opp. 24-25) to answer the argument that the economic- nexus approach may have significant and disruptive ramifications for foreign relations.
Opposition Brief — Ralph Kevin Tovar, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Apr 7, 2026
Ct. 2791 (2025) (No. 24-735) (Internet communications in interstate 8 commerce); Koech v. United States, 142 S. … Gjurashaj, 706 F.2d 395, 399 (2d Cir. 1983); United States v. Wesley, 417 F.3d 612, 617 (6th Cir. 2005); United States v.
Opposition — Pennsylvania v. Lovette
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1983
Ramirez, 418 U.S. 24, 94 S.Ct. 2655 (1974). … Commonweait> 1 Sadusir 44 Pa SRE. 399 Ad 347 (1979) ung Com- tw monweaith v.
459 U.S. 1178Amicus Curiae Brief — Linda H. Lamone, et al., Appellants v. O. John Benisek, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 8, 2019
Perry, 548 U.S. 399 (2006) ............................... 23 Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803) ................ 31 Matal v. Tam, 137 S. … The Civil Rights Cases, 109 U.S. 3, 24 (1883).
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Nathan D. Knuth, Petitioner v. Colorado
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jul 18, 2020
Rickman, 155 P.3d 399(Colo.App.2006)(reversing trial court's denial of motion for judgment of aquittal). … Sincerely Nathan Knuth 24
Opposition Brief — Workman v. Jordan
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1995
(Jd. at 23-24, {J 66.a-d). … Lacke, 885 F.2d 399, 410 (7th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1029 (1990); 14 Smith v.
514 U.S. 1015Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Francisco Jose Lopez, Petitioner v. California
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Sep 3, 2024
Scott, 28 F.3d. 1411 (5th Cir. 1994) ............................... 24 California v. Green, 399 US 149 (1970) .... ............................... 22 Crandell v. … Green, 399 US 149, 168-69 fn.18 (1970)) and can only be cured if the trial witness nad been cross-examined at the preliminary hearing (People v.
Brief for the Respondent — Libson Shops, Inc., v. Koehler, District Director of Internal Revenue
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent · 1957
Commissioner, 24 Bo OT. A. : L1gs sae 26 Brandon Corp. V. Commissiqner, 71 F. 2d ee. -<~-2 24 Burnet v. Harmel, 287 U.S. 103 : ed osee tel 30 Burnet y. … S. 399, 402-403; Helvering v. Stuart, 317 U. S. 154,161; United States v. Gilbert . “Associates, 345 U.S. 361, 364. .
353 U.S. 382
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.