Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.18s
Opposition Brief — Gniotek v. City of Philadelphia
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1987
After receipt of Briefs by Petitioners, the City, and the ACLF as amicus curiae and oral argument, the Third Circuit issued an Opinion on December 24, 1986 affirming the Dis- trict Court's grant of … Florida, 399 U.S. 78, 26 L.Ed.2d 446 (1970).
481 U.S. 1050motion to dismiss — Cable-Vision, Inc. v. Freeman
Supreme Court brief · motion to dismiss · 1977
State of Florida, 399 U.S. 78, 90 S. … one of the attorneys for THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF MONROE COUNTY, et al., appellees herein, and a member of the Bar of the Supreme Court of the United States, hereby certify that on the 24
429 U.S. 1032Amicus Curiae Brief — Ohio Adult Parole Authority v. Woodard
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1998
Arzona State Board of Pardons, 629 P.24 1035, 1037-1038 (Ariz. App. 1981); Arnold v. Board of Pardons & Paroles, 805 P.2d 388, 391 (Ariz. App. 1990); Williams v. … Bowen, 399 N.E.2d 835, 838-840 (Ind. App. 1980); Whitington v. Stevens, 73 S.2d 137, 139-140 (Miss. 1954); State v. Hunter, 477 A2d 797, 802-803 (Me. 1982); Whitaker v.
523 U.S. 272Opposition Brief — MeadWestvaco Corp. v. Illinois Department of Revenue
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2008
Dep't of Revenue, 447 U.S. 207, 223-24 (1980). 10 weighed against finding that out-of-state affiliate’s income was apportionable). … OSG Bulk Ships, Inc., 961 P.2d 399, 413 (Alaska 1998); see also Citicorp N. Am., Inc. v. Franchise Tax Bd., Inc., 100 Cal. Rptr. 2d 509, 532 (Ct.
553 U.S. 16Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Samuel Alex Gann, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Apr 5, 2020
Ct. 399 (2018) ................................................................................................. 6 United States v. … Ct. 399 (2018). See Brumbach, 929 F.3d at 794 (“Nance’s holding . . . is once again the law of this circuit.”).
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 19, 2019
Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986)............................................................................................ 17 Garcia v. … The claim was also raised in Busby’s first amended petition filed on May 24, 2010. ROA.809. Respondent filed her initial answer on October 1, 2010. ROA.1388.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Georgia, et al., Petitioners v. Public.Resource.Org, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 4, 2019
Ct. 399 (2018) ...............18 Veeck v. So. Bldg. Code Congress Int’l, Inc., 293 F.3d 791 (5th Cir. 2002) (en banc)...........................15 Wheaton v. … South Carolina), TX0008625275 (Aug. 7, 2018) (South Dakota), TX0008588806 (Mar. 19, 2018) (Tennessee), TX0008530993 (Nov. 23, 2017) (Vermont), TX0008613009 (May 10, 2018) (Virginia), TX0008475282 (May 24
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Reeley v. Pennsylvania Railroad
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1941
E. 399, cert. A SM Rs nian Sheen ce det CIN sonatas as sew ba eee eee; 35 Grigsby vy. Southern Ruy. Co., 3 F. (2) 988 (C. C. … Zachary, 232 U.S. 24S. cece eee eee 33, 36, 41 Osborne Vv. Gray, 241 U. S. 16..... cece cece cece scree ese cesen voces 5 ee Painter v. Balto, & O. R, Co., (Pa. 140), 13 A. (2) 396, cert. den.
312 U.S. 706Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Jarvis v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1986
UNITED STATES, 365 U.S. 399, (1961) BRENTON v. MARYLAND, ir. 1976) UNITED STATES v. ACOSTA- (oth Cir. 1971) 18 22 16 15 12. 3; 14, AD. 16. FB 18. 19, 20. … United States, 81 S.Ct. 567, 365 U.S. 399, 5 L.Ed.2d 633 (1961).
479 U.S. 852Opposition Brief — George v. Louisiana
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2011
New York, 399 U.S. 66 (1970). … New York, 399 U.S. 66 (1970).
563 U.S. 987Opposition Brief — Shriner v. Minnesota (No. 08-506)
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2008
Bohling, 173 Wis. 2d 529, 494 N.W.2d 399 CWis. 1993), COTE BORIE. 2.0 occ cescecccccscccccscevess 15 iV State v. Chase Securities, Inc., 188 W. Va. 356, 424 S.E.2d 591 (W. … 3 470 US. 753: 105 S.Ct. 1611: 84 L.Ed.2d 662 (1985). 10 tests do not constitute an unduly extensive imposition on an individual's personal privacy and _ bodily integrity."24 In discussing the balancing
Petitioners Brief — Sheridan v. Rothensies
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1942
claimant had proved his case and therefore the debtor was obliged to rebut it, but also necessarily held, in effect, that because of the Master’s TE ob: hy “ 6 (- ie S etek a Tp ts PONS ORE OLE Ie rag 24 … Moreover, Judge Bard’s findings as to amount are predi- cated on the theory that appellants do not deny the testi- 33 mony of Glanzberg, Goldstein and Waldman (R. 390, 394, 397, 398, 399, 400, 404
315 U.S. 815Petition for A Writ of Certiorari — Papanikolaou v. Atlantic Freighters, Ltd.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for A Writ of Certiorari · 1956
Computing Scale Co, (1923), 261 U.S. 399 43 S.Ct. 458, 67 L.Ed, 719 2 Traux v. Raich (1915), 239 U.S. 33, 36 S.Ct. 7, 60 LEd, BI 13 United States v. … Computing Scale Co. (1923), 261 U.S. 399, 43 S.Ct. 458, 67 L.Ed. 719; Rust Sand & Lumber Co. v. Jackson, et al (1919), 250 U.S, 71, 39 S.Ct. 424, 63 L.Ed. 850.
352 U.S. 828Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Polk v. Dixie Insurance
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1991
Appellants’ Brief, pp. 24-32. 5 On April 11, 1990, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed. … Cornett, 463 So. 2d 399 (FL App. 1985) ; 7 and California, Holley v. J. & S Weeping Co., 192 Cal. Rep.74 (1983).
501 U.S. 1201Petition for Writ of Certiorari — French Line v. New Zealand Insurance
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1963
Commissioner, 248 F. 2d 399.» 45 Gregory v. Helvering, 293 U.S. 465 '& } 9,15 . Heller, Walter S. vy. Commissioner, 2 T.C. 371.......4.. 10 _ Higgins v. Smith, 308 U.S. i, aes ref _ Knetsch v. … facilities, $ $ 12.4, 124A, and charitable deduction for gifts of appreciated prop- erty) ard to discourage them (¢.x., surtax on unreasonable accumulation of surpluses, ® 102, and provisions in $ $ 24
373 U.S. 912Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Anders v. Commissioner
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1969
United States, 381 F.2d 399 (Ct. Cl. 1967) -....-.--------------------ee eee 15 Citizens Federal Savings and Loan Association of Cleve- land v. United States, 290 F.2d 932 (Ct. … United States, 381 F.2d 399, 402 (Ct. Cl. 1967) or Lloyd H. Faidley, 8 T.C. 1170 (1947). Monday v.
396 U.S. 958Appellants Brief — Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. Wis. Tel. Co.
Supreme Court brief · Appellants Brief · 1933
American Casting Cor- poration, 46 F. (24) BOD, B11... 6. ei cies eee 13 Mitchell v. Penny Stores, 284 U. S. 576................ 9 Panama v. Vargas, 281 U. … City of Detroit, 44 F. (2d) 395, 399........ 13 Prendergast v. New York Telephone Company, 262 Sr A eed cases ns 6 Ra eee Cl eree eas 2] Queen Insurance Company v.
289 U.S. 67Respondents Brief — Colorado v. Symes
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1932
STATUTE INVOLVED Section 33 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of August 23, 1916, ¢. 399, 39 Stat. 532 (U. 8. … ¥, : ‘ RE TET REET LT STON FE COLE LIN RR FY IS Um TH 24 Neither the Federal nor the state government is absolutely supreme.
286 U.S. 510Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1993
Computing Scale Co., 261 U.S. 399, 43 S.Ct. 458, 62 L.Ed. 719 (1923)..... eet eaks 12 Tucker v. Commonwealth Land Title Ins. … Eventually, Bankers First agreed to loan over $600,000 more than the Colony Place Company originally projected was needed to build and sell 120 condominium units (H-24).
Opposition Brief — Lazarenko v. United States (No. 09-49)
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2009
Caldwell, 302 F.3d 399 (Sth Cir. EE kk awd eee eee ae ee 12 (111) IV Cases—Continued: Page United States v. … Caldwell, 302 F.3d 399, 413 (5th Cir. 2002); United States v. McGauley, 279 F.3d 62, 70-71 (1st Cir. 2002); United States v.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.