Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.21s
Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Farrell v. Piedmont Aviation, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1969
Ct. 399, 73 L. Kd. ia (1929) ictus cease epeeoy se Farrell V.. Wyatt, 408 F. 2d 662 (2d Cir. 1969) . ey oer - Fidelity Union Trust of v. Field, 311 U. S. 169, 61 S.Ct. 176, 85 L. … S. 389, 399.
396 U.S. 840Jurisdictional Statementc — Edwards v. Healy
Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statementc · 1975
Martin, 375 U.S. 399 (1964) ; ee ee ets ee eS 3 (c) Palmetto Fire Insurance Company v. Connec- ticut, 272 U.S. 295 (1926). … oO RE COE | ee Se eee ES 24 V.
421 U.S. 772Motion to Dismiss or Affirm — Jeremiah Stamler and Yolanda F. Hall v. Edwin E. Willis
Supreme Court brief · Motion to Dismiss or Affirm · 1969
United States, 365 U.S. 399. ___ 14 Yellin v. United States, 374 U.S. 109_/____ 17 Young, Ex parte, 209 U.S. … The three-judge court has no. jurisdiction to grant mere declaratory relief,” ie Id., p, 24.
393 U.S. 407Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Proner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1969
This covered a 24 day trip to Japan: This covered a short trip to Yugoslavia, and it also covered trips within the United States to Boston, Massachusetts, to Houston, Texas. Q. Mr. … Mary- _land, Docket No. 201, this Court ordered reargument on March 24, 1969, on.the question, ‘‘ Does the concurrent sen- tence doctrine, enunciated in Hirabayashi v. United States, 320 U.
395 U.S. 823Amicus Curiae Brief — Witters v. Washington Department of Services for the Blind
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1986
Supp. 399 (S.D. Ohio), aff'd, 409 U.S. 808 ts + 6.4 + hoe 6 6 ee ewe we oe GB Wolman v. Walter, 433 U.S. 229 (1977). ° ° * . ° . « . ° ° ° . ° o 8, Zorach v. … Supp. 399, 412-413 (S.D. Ohio), aff'd, 409 U.S. 808 (1972).
474 U.S. 481Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Aktieselskabet Cuzco v. the Sucarseco
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1935
dé ’ yi 6,17 Irrawaddy, The, 171 U.S. 187.5, 8, 9, 13, 14, 15, 16, 22, 23, 24 dieoe, The, Geet). … C.), 86 Fed. (2d) 399, p. 401 Williamson vs. Barrett, 13 How. [54 U.S.) 101, p. 110 17 1s Is 17 be *?) Supreme Court of the United States No. Ocropen Tenm, 1954.
294 U.S. 394Petition for Writ of Certiorari — De La Rama Steamship Co. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1953
Supp. 815; supplemental ‘ decision 92 F. ade 785; affirmed 191 F. 2d 26 (24 Cir. 1951) ° cert. den. 342 U. S. 941]. … No. 399 and H. R. Rep. No. 799—R0th Cong., Ist Sess. [1947]).
344 U.S. 386Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1957
S. 399 (1956). Careful review is-also warranted in this case because of the Court’s special responsibility in supervising the administration of justice in the lower federal courts. … It was denied without ‘opinion on December 24, 1955.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — B & G Electric Co. v. G. E. Bass & Co. (No. 1008)
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1957
Inman, 157 Miss. 810, 126 So. 399 10 United States v. C. A. Riffle Co., 247 F. 374 ......... 12 U.S. F. & G. v. Vermont Marble Co., 16 F. 2d 83 ..... 12 Wicker v. … Inman 157 Miss. 810—126 So. 399 { Commercial Cas. Ins. Co. v. Skinner 19% Miss. 533—1 So. 2d 225 3.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Porter v. Lee
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1946
Coninetinn ‘Scale Co., 261 U.S. 399. alae 12 Walling v. Helmerich & Payne, 323.U.S.37...-.-. -.. _ 10 Yakus v. … Computing Bs) _ 13 ~ "Seal (Co.. 261 UL S. 399, 418: Mamilton-Brown ‘Shoe Co. v. Wolf Brothers & Co., 240 UL So251,: 258; Panama RoR. Cooly. Napicr Shipping Co., 166 U.S. 280, 284.
328 U.S. 246Amicus Curiae Brief — O'Brien v. Skinner
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1974
Ba. of Elections, 30 N Y 24 3 36, 49-50). … Kolodztejski, 399 U. S. 204, 26 L. Ed. 2d 523).
414 U.S. 524Amicus Curiae Brief — Brett Jones, Petitioner v. Mississippi
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 21, 2020
Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 Gates v. Discovery Comms., Inc., 101 P.3d 552 (Cal. 2004). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 Glossip v. … Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 410 (1986). But this Court has not imposed a precise test on the states for determining whether a defendant qualifies for those protected categories. Kahler v.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Yusufu Danmola, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 3, 2018
Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 399, 400 ...................17 Page 1-2 Minor v. … Wechler, 263 U.S. 22, 24; Stromberb v. 449. U.S. 375 Alabama, v.
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Jul 16, 2021
Alternatively, Buntion’s Question Two Is without Merit. ..................... 23 CONCLUSION ................................................................................................... 24 iii … Illinois, 399 U.S. 235 (1970) .......................................................... 23 Statutes 28 U.S.C. § 1254 ..................................................................................
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jun 28, 2022
McKnight, 521 U.S. 399, 408 (1997). … Yet “[a]t some point a pattern of Court decisions becomes a 24 drumbeat, leaving one to wonder how long it will take for the Court's message to break through.” Harris v.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Tavaris Betts, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 12, 2022
Paulk, 46 F.4th 399 (6th Cir. 2022) ................................ 15, 16 United States v. Pena, 952 F.3d 503 (4th Cir. 2020)...................................... 16 United States v. … Mar. 24, 2005). But see United States v. Wallace, 964 F.3d 386, 388 (5th Cir.)
Amicus Curiae Brief — Thomas Perttu, Petitioner v. Kyle Brandon Richards
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 9, 2024
Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 411 (1986) (plurality op.). Any violation of the Constitution’s protections is undoubtedly serious. … ROKITA Indiana Attorney General BRENNA BIRD Iowa Attorney General KRIS KOBACH Kansas Attorney General RUSSELL COLEMAN Kentucky Attorney General 24 ELIZABETH B.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Hamed Kian, Petitioner v. Florida
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 13, 2026
Florida, 399 U.S. 78 (1970) .................................................. 3 Wolfe v. Martin, 2 Miss. 30 (1834) .................................................. 15 Work v. … Florida, 399 U.S. 78 (1970), is demonstrably inconsistent with the original meaning of the Sixth Amendment.
Brief for Respondents in Opposition — Epton v. Nenna
Supreme Court brief · Brief for Respondents in Opposition · 1971
doctrines and philosophy expressed in a prospective draft of the movement's program (Exh. 13) [see pp. 69, su- pra], but he did not think that P.I..M. was a revolutionary organization (1182, 1207-12, 1410-24 … Petitioner did not believe or advocate that the State of New York should be brought down by the as- sassination of public officials (1184-5). 24 Vivian Anderson, convicted of contempt ia a grand jury
404 U.S. 948Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 26, 2022
Ct.) ............................... 24, 28 League of Women Voters of Wis. Educ. Network, Inc. v. … Zimmerman, 249 Wis. 237, 24 N.W.2d 504 (1946).............................................24 State ex rel. Wood v. Baker, 38 Wis. 71 (1875) ...........7 State ex rel. Zignego v. Wis.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.