Documents

Appellees Brief — Nashville, C. & St. LR Co. v. Walters

Supreme Court brief · Appellees Brief · 1935

Co., 128 Tenn., 399.... 12 Chicago & A. R. Co. v. Tranbarger, 238 U. S., 67.. 25 Chicago B. & Q. R. Co. v. IIL, 200 U. S., 561 ... .25, 27, 28 Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co. v. McGuire. 219 U. … S., 24, 73 L. ed., 161, this Court sustained an order requiring a railroad to eliminate two grade crossings at a cost of $324,000.00.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Aalgaard v. Merchants National Bank, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1991

City of El Centro (1980) 109 Cal.App.3d 399, 405 [internal punctuation & citations deleted ].) … (1986) 155 Mich.App 237 [399 N.W.2d 484]; see St. Yves v.

Respondents Brief — Costanzo v. Tillinghast

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1932

.------ 2 General Laws of Rhode Island, 1923, c. 399, Sec. 6. _---- 21 Miscellaneous: Senate Report No. 352 (64th Cong., Ist sess.).....------- 11 House Report No. 95 (64th Cong., Ist sess.)_.... … (R. 6, 8, 14-15, 21, 24-25.)

Opposition Brief — Reebok Internationale Ltd. v. Banque Internationale A. Luxembourg S. A.

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1995

HERTZ MARKS & MURASE L.L.P. 399 Park Avenue New York, New York 10022 (212) 318-7700 Counsel for Respondent Banque Internationale a Luxembourg S.A. … HERTZ MARKS & MURASE L.L.P. 399 Park Avenue New York, New York 10022 (212) 318-7700 Counsel for Respondent Banque Internationale a Luxembourg S.A.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Bowen v. Johnston

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1939

Foster Federal Practice (6th Ed., 1921), Vol. 3, p. 2578 13 Hughes on Federal Procedure (24 Ed.), pp. 32, 33 14 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OCTOBER » seit 1938 ov No¥359 HUGH ALLEN BOWEN, … S. 399, 44 Sup. Ct. 360, 68 L. Ed. 759. The petitioner was convicted along with John E.

Opposition Brief — Aquatherm Industries, Inc. v. Florida Power & Light Co.

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1999

Ford Motor Co., 399 F. Supp. raphe MS Sy) ee ears 12 Statutes: _sepeom Aot § 4. 15 UDA. © ID 6 ccc cee wesseees 2 Fla. Admin. Code r. 25-17.051(10) .............. 3 Fla. Admin. … Pet. 24. In fact, the Eleventh Circuit graciously gave it more attention than Aquatherm had ever given it, in its complaint or its briefs.

Opinion — United States v. Patten

Supreme Court brief · Opinion · 1913

Argued November 9, 10, 1911; reargued October 23, 24, 1912.—Decided January 6, 1913. … Bitty, 208 U. 5. 393, 399; United States v. Keitel, 211 U.S. 870, 308; United States v. Biggs, 211 U.S. 507, 518; United States v. Mason, 213 U.S. 115, 122; United States v.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Basey v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1973

Petitioner was tried before a jury on November 22-24, 1971. Decision on petitioner’s motion for judgment of ac- quittal at the close of the government’s case was reserved. … Rev. 399 (1959); Cowen, The Entrapment Doctrine in the Fed- eral Courts, and Some State Comparisons, 49 J. Crim.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Walton v. Throgmorton

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1996

Rev. 399-427 (1986) David Simmons, 36 ABAJ 711. … Rev. 399-427 (1986)]. Yet it is the trial court's final judgment [App. B] that we must’ consider here.

Opposition Brief — Teamsters Brewery & Soft Drink Workers Local Union 896, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1998

Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc., 486 U.S. 399, 108 S.Ct. 1877, Bad Le A EE hs 6 Re ee 10 Livadas v. Bradshaw, 512 U.S. 107, 114 S.Ct. 2068, 20 LE Se CEO a 6 Oi 12,43 Majors v. U.S. … The May 24, 1996 judgment for Respondents and the District Court’s May 13, 1996 “Decision, Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order Granting Summary Judgment for Defendants” (i.e., Respondents

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Ramirez v. Pacific Maritime Ass'n

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1994

CR. 24 page 5. V. STATEMENT OF THE CASE. Petitioner's deregistration/firing was no’ litigated in the NLRB. … Co. 384 U.S. 394, 399 (1965). VI. Reasons For Granting Petition A.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Hansen v. Westerville City School District

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1995

Gruber, 950 F.2d 399, 401 (7th Cir. 1991); Sullivan v. Carrick, 888 F.2d 1, 4 (Ist Cir. 1989). 18 judgment”; self-serving, unsupported allegations are insufficient. Anderson v. … continued handing out all of her leaflets on April 27 and 28, 1988, (McIntyre Dep. at 1-97-98); (2) she continued campaigning vigorously in opposition to the tax levies, (id. at I-120-22, 131, III-24

Opposition Brief — Super Duper, Inc. v. Mattel, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2011

MARTINEZ GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W Washington, D.C. 20036 (202) 955-8500 TDupree@pgibsondunn.com 7 24 ', , ry Counsel Jor Respondent QUESTIONS PRESENTED l Whether … Are y ( 198 U.S. 144 (1970 Banjo Buddi ; Ini i ad rLOS# 399 F.3d 168 (3d Cir. 2005 Conopco, Inc. v. May Dep’t Stores ¢ 16 F.3d 1556 (Fed. Cir. 1994 Duncan Walke?

Amicus Curiae Brief — Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1989

Approximately 24 percent of the private collectively- bargained severance pay plans in this country deny sever- ance benefits to employees if they are eligible for pensions. … Co., 399 F.2d 825, R28 (3d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1028 (1969), Roberts v. Lehigh & New England Ry.

Opposition Brief — Duffy v. Wetzler

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1993

See, Foss v City of Rochester, 65 N.Y.2d 247, 260, 491 N.Y.S.2d 128, 135, 480 N.E.2d 717, 724 (1985); Matter of Hellerstein v Town of Islip, 37 N.Y.2d 1, 13-14, 371 N.Y.S.2d 388, 399, 332 N.E.2d 279, … Lastly, petitioners argue (Pet, pp 23-24) that the Appel- late Division’s rationale for denying their application for class certification conflicts with this Court’s decision in Felder v Casey, 487

Opposition Brief — Hembree v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2005

Indiana, 211 F.3d 399, 406 (7th Cir.) (finding arguments not raised in initial brief waived), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 880 (2000); Sweat v. City of Ft. … United States, 507 U.S. 234, 251 n.24 (1993).

Opposition — Mercer v. Missouri

Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1981

West Haven Housing Authority, 399 U.S. 510, 90 S.Ct. 1960, 26 L.Ed.2d 764 (1970). ...eeeeeeeeenees 14 Sprinkellink v. … Mabry, 483 F.Supp. 1372, 1385 (E.D.Ark. 1980), rev'd on other grounds, 637 P.24 525 (8th Cir. 1980), interpreting Witherspoon v.

Opposition Brief — National Steel Corp. v. White

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1991

In management you are subject to call 24 hours a day. … Norge Division, Magic Chef, 486 U.S. 399 (1988).

Opposition Brief — GROSSGOLDT, IN RE (No. 74-1082)

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1974

D.C. 399 8 Gypsy Oil Co. v. … His Petition for Certiorari should have been filed with this Court within ninety days of that date, or by February 24, 1975. U.S.C.A., Title 28, Sec. 2101(c).

Amicus Brief — Dann v. Johnston

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1976

Convertible Top Replacement Co., Inc., Be Ok he ee CED Snccacdcccncssacanedcoeseseres 15 In re Aufhauser, 399 F. 2d 275 (C. C. P. A. 1968) ........ 9 Brulotte v. Thys Co., 379 U. … Br. 24). The third situation, totally ignored in the Covern- ment's brief, is where the idea relates to the useful arts 5. See also, Trio Process 7" v. L.