Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

Filters2003

10,000+ results

0.20s

  • Reply Brief — Michigan Gambling Opposition v. Kempthorne (No. 08-554)

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2008

    Ass’n, 479 U.S. 388, 399-400 (1987). … Clarke, 479 U.S. at 399.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Hill v. Stone

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1975

    Kolodziejski, 399 U.S. 204, 26 L.Ed. 24.523, 90 SSC, VOD, occ cccvevevchecssvedeseseictee-4ssssebasctesvessesevenusenesbavanesstuvnsesestens 2 Reynolds v. … Midland County, 390 U.S. 474, 20 L.Ed.2d 45, 88 S:Ct. 1114 (1968); Williams v.- Rhodes, 393 U.S. 28, 21 L.Ed.2d 24, 89 S.Ct. 5(1968); Hadley v.

    421 U.S. 289
  • Reply Brief — Abbott v. Perez, 138 S. Ct. 735 (2018) (No. 17-586)

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2018

    Indeed, the only factual finding the plain- tiffs cite—that “more than 200,000 Latinos in Nueces County ‘who had been in an opportunity district were no longer in such a district,” Mot. 24 (quoting … Perry, 548 U.S. 399, 430 (2006) (quot- 10 ing Johnson v. De Grandy, 512 U.S. 997, 1008 (1994)).

  • Brief for the Respondents in Opposition — Healy v. Illinois

    Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondents in Opposition · 1971

    Ohio, 399 U.S. 505 (1986) ............. 3 Gaddis v. State, 447 P. 2d 42 (Okla. Crim. 1968) ... 8 Gallimore v. State, 116 S.W. 2d 1001 (Tenn. 1938) .. 9 Gonzales v. … De Schoatz, 157 N.W. 2d 517, 522-24 (Minn. 1968).

    402 U.S. 905
  • Appellees Brief — Hill v. Stone

    Supreme Court brief · Appellees Brief · 1975

    Phoenix, supra, 399 U.S. at 210 [Emphasis added]. … Kolodziejski, supra, 399 U.S. at pages 210, 211.

    421 U.S. 289
  • Amendment to Emergency Relief Exemptions Pursuant to the Reliable Home Heating (RHH) Act

    Federal Register · Rule · Oct 22, 2014

    This final rule amends the emergency relief provision in the FMCSRs so that the safety requirements in 49 CFR parts 390-399 will not apply if a Governor: Declares a state of emergency caused by a shortage … The on-line Federal document management system is available 24 hours each day, 365 days each year.

    79 FR 63057Transportation DepartmentFederal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
  • Exceptions to the Report of the Special Master — Arizona v. California

    Supreme Court brief · Exceptions to the Report of the Special Master · 1962

    Ex. 38 (Water Delivery Contract: United States and MWD, April 24, 1930) Tr. 251) ; Ariz. Ex. 39 (Amended Water Contract: United States and MWD, September 28, 1931, Tr: 252); Ariz. … Ex. 32 (Water Delivery Contract between United States and Arizona, Feb. 9, 1944, Tr.-248) ; Report, p. 399, Appx. 5. 39See note 6, supra. "Report, pp. 221-37.

    370 U.S. 930
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — South Dakota v. Yankton Sioux Tribe

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000

    Transcript of Oral Argument at 9-24, Erickson v. Feather decided with DeCoteau v. … at 427 n.2, 446-447, Rosebud, 430 U.S. at 586, 601 n.24, 613-615 n.47, 615-616 n.48. 15 in common.” Yankton I, 522 U.S. at 358.

    530 U.S. 1261
  • CFR PARTS AFFECTED IN THIS ISSUE

    Federal Register · Uncategorized Document · Aug 10, 1994

    40802 Proposed Rules: 13................................................ 41192 16................................................ 41192 257............................................... 40836 399 … .............................................. 40805 436............................................... 40805 455............................................... 40805 24

  • Petition — Daniel v. Pettway

    Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1984

    As early as February 24, 1983, the class attorney noted “dissention in class and distribution formula.” … Therefore, petitioners are unable to see that any distinction can be found to justify the split of the circuits in the case within the case, Pettway III; Pettway IV; and Pettway VI (the instant case). 24

    467 U.S. 1243
  • Petitioners Brief — Apodaca v. Oregon

    Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1972

    New York, 399 U.S. 66 (1970), that the Sixth Amendment jury trial right is fully applicable in state criminal cases, by virtue of the Fourteenth Amendment. 399 U.S. at 86-90, "Id, at 90-92. … Dated: December 24, 1970

    406 U.S. 404
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Carpenter v. Murphy, 139 S. Ct. 626 (2018) (No. 17-1107)

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018

    Utah, 510 U.S. 399, 421 (1994). … Mississippi Band of 24 Choctaw Indians, 136 S.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Edward Allyn Hudacko, Petitioner v. Regents of the University of California, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 26, 2026

    Society of Sisters, 268 U.S. 510, 534-535 (1925); Meyer, 262 U.S. at 399-400. … Hecox, Docket No. 24-38, 104 F.4th 1061 (9th Cir. 2023); West Virginia v. B.P.J., Docket No. 24-43, 98 F.4th 542 (4th Cir. 2024).

  • Notice of OFAC Sanctions Actions

    Federal Register · Notice · Dec 16, 2021

    CAPRIKAT LIMITED, Akara Building, 24 Castro Street, Wickhams Cay 1, P.O. … ALBERTINE DRC S.A.S.U), Akara Building, 24 Castro Street, Wickhams Cay 1, P.O.

    86 FR 71546Treasury DepartmentForeign Assets Control Office
  • Interim Decision 4E1396

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    Decision *1396 October 24, 1962. … Dec. 399. That case involved false statements in an application for a United States passport.

    Executive Office for Immigration Review
  • Prologue — Sisson v. Preister

    Supreme Court brief · Prologue · 2006

    Barriteau, 399 A.2d 563 UR UP cde ed eT or ar de ae 12 Doe v. Binker, 492 A.2d 857 (D.C. 1985) Edmund J. Flynn Co. v. LaVay, 431 A.2d 543 a i EEG Gs he ha GAs ede a 26 Fitzgerald v. … Pennsylvania, 382 U.S. 399 (1966)............ 30 Hackney v. Morelite Construction, D.C. Corp., 418 A.2d 1062 (D.C. 1980) Lloward Univ. v. Lacy, 828 A.2d 733 (D.C. 2003)......... 27 Huyhes v.

    546 U.S. 1215
  • Reply Brief — Save Palisade Fruitlands v. Todd

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2002

    NLRB, No. 01-518, 2002 WL 1357297, at *6 (U.S., June 24, 2002) (the right to petition is one of the most precious of the liberties safeguarded by the Bill of Rights). … Kolodziejski, 399 U.S. 204 (1970) (persons who are not owners of property may not be barred from voting in a bond referendum); Cipriano v.

    537 U.S. 814
  • Brief for Appellant — Robert W. Blanchette et al., v. Connecticut General Insurance Corp.

    Supreme Court brief · Brief for Appellant · 1974

    Supp. 2d 24, cert. denied sub nom. Port Authority Trans-Hudson v. … New Haven Inclusion Cases, 399 U.S. 992, 428 (1970).

    419 U.S. 102
  • Jurisdictional Statement — Mandel v. Bradley

    Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 1977

    Reeves, 275 Md. 599 (1975) ...........00.. 24 Rosario v. Rockefeller, 410 U.S. 752 (1973) ........ 19 Salera v. Tucker, 399 F. Supp. 1258 (E.D. Pa. 1975), aff'd summarily sub nom., Tucker v. … Tucker, 399 FS. 1258 (E.D. Pa. 1975), aff'd summarily sub nom. Tucker v. Salera, _..

    432 U.S. 173
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Naftali Dominguez Zenon, Petitioner v. Florida

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 26, 2024

    Florida, 399 U.S. 78 (1970), is impossible to square with the ruling in Ramos v. Louisiana, 140 S. … New York, 399 U.S. 117, 122-123 (1970) (citation omitted) (Harlan, J., concurring in the result in Williams).

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.