Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.12s
Petition — Cabbler v. Superintendent, Virginia State Penitentiary
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1976
Wa/ker, 185 Neb. 44, 173 N.W.2d 372, cert. denied, 399 U.S. 912 (1970). … California, 374 U.S. 23, 24 (1963); Sibron v. New York, 392 U.S. 40, 60-61 (1968).
429 U.S. 817Petition for A Writ of Certiorari — Booth v. Lemont Manufacturing Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for A Writ of Certiorari · 1971
Kolodziejski, 399 US 204, ‘210, 213 ieee 16 "Ex Parte Poresky, 290 US 30, 32 (1933)... 16 | P.U.C. v, Pollak, 343 US 451, 466, 467.22. a 15 "Ream v. … Dist. et al., filed October 24, 1963. Opinion - of Appellate Court, 79 Ill. App. 2d 310; 224 NE 2nd 591 (App. 24-29). Controlled in. part by Droste v.
404 U.S. 916Supreme Court brief · Opinion · 1925
See Hawkins, Pleas of the Crown, 6th ed. pub- lished in 1787, IT, 549, 553; Blackstone Comm., IV, 398, 399. … Sauvinet, 24 La. Ann. 119; Sharp v. State, 102 Tenn. 9.
267 U.S. 87Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 26, 2022
. § 30-399 ............................................ 24 Other Authorities Tabatha Abu El-Haj, Changing the People: Legal Regulation and American Democracy, 86 N.Y.U. L. … CODE ANN. § 30-399.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Ohl & Co. v. Smith Iron Works
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1933
Code, tit. 28, sec. 399). Act March 3, 1915, ec. 90. … Mass. 122 U.S. 24.
288 U.S. 170Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Luster v. California
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2004
Buffalo, 49 Cal.App.3d 838 ......... 24 People v. Clark, 201 Cal. 474 ............ 25, 26 People v. Elkins, 122 Cal. 654 ............-.. 24 People v. … Kubby, 97 Cal.App.4th 619 ......... 24 People v. Redinger, 55 Cal. PM + 2nicwed Rae 24 People v. Sitz, 21 Cal.App. 54 .........----- 24 State v.
540 U.S. 1162Amicus Brief — University of California Regents v. Bakke
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1978
Hall, 4 Cal. 399 (1854) ......... 0c cece ceeeees 6 Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896) ................ ll Porcelli v. … Hall, 4 Cal. 399 (1854). Article XIX of the California State Constitution of 1879 represented the highpoint of anti-Chinese legislation.
438 U.S. 265Amicus Curiae Brief — Batson v. Kentucky
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1986
TL. 24 135, 457 N.B.24 1202 rT 377 Mass. 461, 387 U.8. 1 881 (1979); + 612 P.24 716 (1980); +24 987 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. NP. ’ 7” A.D. 87, 435 . . Div. 1981); os v. … Plorida, 399 U.S. 78, 100 (1970).
476 U.S. 79Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Allen v. Montana (No. 09-239)
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2009
Box 1621 Havre, Mt, 59501 (406)-269-2614 (406)-399-0326 QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. … aue tsa vu teen ack tacasqine can ecaecsnn 9 OTHER AUTHORITIES Holy Bible, James 5:12, Matthew 5:33-5:37....App. 24 Holy Bible, Book of proverbs 27:12..............04 App. 24 PETITION FOR A WRIT OF
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jan 10, 2019
Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986). 17 Mr. … Id. at 23-24.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Apr 25, 2024
DOJ, No. 1:24-cv-00067 (D.D.C. … Phillips, 883 F.3d 399, 403 (4th Cir. 2018) (quotation marks omitted).
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Monte Silver, Ltd., Petitioner v. Internal Revenue Service, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 3, 2023
Agency, 711 F.3d 844 (8th Cir. 2013) ....................... 24, 26 Klein v. … Sisson, 399 U.S. 267 (1970) ........................................... 30 WildEarth Guardians v. U.S.
Appendix — Ernest Lee Miller v. Florida
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1983
State, 343 S$o.24 1266 iFla. 1977)}). … Johnson, 203 N.E.2d 399 (Ill. 1964) Shelby v. Sixth Judicial District Court, 414 P.2d 942 (Nev.), reh. denied, 418 P.2d 132 (1966) People v. Sola, 200 Cal.
459 U.S. 1158Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Ward v. Michigan (No. 07-90)
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2007
Alabama, 287 U.S. 45 (1932) 24 Rickman v Bell, 131 F3d 1150 (CA 6, 1997) 24 South Dakota v. … April 24, 2007 /S/ Corbin A.
Capital Punishment: A Legal Overview Including the Supreme Court Decisions of the 2004-2005 Term
Congressional research report · CRS Report · Jul 22, 2005
Roper, 112 S.W.3d 397, 399 (Mo. 2003). 44 125 S. … CRS-24 imprisonment.
RL33008Congressional Research ServiceRespondents Brief — Collins v. Virginia, 138 S. Ct. 53 (2017) (No. 16-1027)
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 2017
Chambers, 399 U.S. at 50-51. … Chambers, 399 U.S. at 52.
Jurisdictional Statement — Milk Transport, Inc. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 1961
Supp. 399, aff. 355 U.S. 6 (1957), L.C.C. vr. Kroblin, 113 F. … under Section Tie) of the 15S Transportation Aet, we need not determine whether ‘Such as the words involved in the Chenery case—“fair and equitable” or “detrimental to the interests of investors.” 24
368 U.S. 5Amicus Curiae Brief — Robert A. Rucho, et al., Appellants v. Common Cause, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 12, 2019
Perry, 548 U.S. 399 (2006) ............................................3, 4 League of Women Voters v. … Perry, 548 U.S. 399 (2006), urging that partisan gerrymanders are justiciable.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Edwards v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1976
Van Zandt, Tex. 1966, 399 §.W.2d 791: Bowles y. Bourdon. The record supports the district court’s finding that Edwards failed to bear that burden. … See also letters set out in the appendix at 417-24. See R.Vol. I at 66.
425 U.S. 972Supplemental Brief — Verniero v. Gibson (No. 05-779)
Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Brief · 2005
Cunigan, 182 F.3d 391, 399 (6th Cir. 1999) (explicitly rejecting suggestion that § 1983 illegal search claims accrue at the time of injury, since such a rule would “misdirect the criminal defendant … limitations principles, forging a lonely path, and creating more work for the Supreme Court, which now faces an intercircuit conflict on a recurrent issue, the panel has not explained what it might be. 24
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.