Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.28s
Proposed Rule To Implement the 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Oct 21, 2003
Areas placed under subpart 2 would be classified in accordance with table 1 in section 181 of the Clean Air Act (CAA) as modified by EPA to reflect the 8-hour NAAQS. … Elizabeth Craig, Acting Assistant Administrator for Air and Radiation. Table 1.
68 FR 60054Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jun 10, 2022
The public comment period for the NPRM closed on May 6, 2022. EPA received no public comments on the NPRM. 1 Both SIP submittals can be found in Docket ID No. … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
87 FR 35423Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Notice · May 9, 2013
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The CASAC was established pursuant to the Clean Air Act (CAA) Amendments of 1977, codified at 42 U.S.C. 7409D(d)(2), to provide advice, information, and recommendations to … Section 109(d)(1) of the CAA requires that the Agency periodically review and revise, as appropriate, the air quality criteria and the NAAQS for the six “criteria” air pollutants, including NO X .
78 FR 27234Environmental Protection AgencyAnnouncement of Availability for Lead National Ambient Air Quality Standard Review
Federal Register · Notice · Jun 17, 2008
• Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period deadline identified. B. … Background Under section 108(a) of the Clean Air Act (CAA), the Administrator identifies and lists certain pollutants which “cause or contribute to air pollution which may reasonably be anticipated to
73 FR 34294Environmental Protection AgencyAnnouncement of Data Availability for Lead National Ambient Air Quality Standard Review
Federal Register · Notice · Feb 29, 2008
• Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period deadline identified. B. … Background Under section 108(a) of the Clean Air Act (CAA), the Administrator identifies and lists certain pollutants which “cause or contribute to air pollution which may reasonably be anticipated to
73 FR 11110Environmental Protection AgencyRevisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Ventura County Air Pollution Control District
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jun 24, 2002
Our final action was a limited approval and limited disapproval because the rules contained deficiencies and were not fully consistent with the Clean Air Act (CAA) requirements. … Part 28.b defines creditable emission reductions for NSR offset purposes as the emission reduction that “exceeds the emission reduction otherwise required by the federal Clean Air Act.”
67 FR 42516Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jan 14, 2009
We are taking this action under section 110 and part D of the Federal Clean Air Act (the Act, or CAA). DATES: This rule will be effective on February 13, 2009. … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
74 FR 1927Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jun 17, 1999
Clean Air Act Visibility Requirements 2. EPA's Visibility Regulations 3. Federal Implementation Plans for Visibility Protection 4. … Clean Air Act Visibility Requirements Section 169A of the Clean Air Act (Act or CAA), 42 U.S.C. 7491, provides for a visibility protection program and sets forth as a national goal ``the prevention
64 FR 32458Environmental Protection AgencyProtection of Stratospheric Ozone: Proposal to Extend the Existing Reclamation Requirements
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Nov 1, 1996
. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: Through this action EPA is proposing to amend the Clean Air Act section 608 refrigerant recycling regulations to extend … If a public hearing is held, the comment period will be extended until December 16, 1996. ADDRESSES: Comments and materials supporting this rulemaking are contained in Public Docket No.
61 FR 56493Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Sep 12, 1995
ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to Susan Studlien, Acting Director, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. … Air Act.
60 FR 47285Environmental Protection AgencySupreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Sep 19, 2025
Air Car Service & Parking Branch Two, LLC (“Clean Air Two”), over the objection of Clean Air Car Service & Parking Branch Three (“Clean Air Three”). … between the Clean Air 2 Debtor and the Clean Air 2 Buyer.
Federal Register · Notice · Sep 8, 2021
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background: The CASAC was established pursuant to the Clean Air Act (CAA) Amendments of 1977, codified at 42 U.S.C. 7409(d)(2), to review air quality criteria and NAAQS … Section 109(d)(1) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) requires that EPA carry out a periodic review and revision, as appropriate, of the air quality criteria and the NAAQS for the six “criteria” air pollutants,
86 FR 50345Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Illinois
Federal Register · Rule · Mar 21, 1995
Docket: Pursuant to sections 307(d)(1) (B) and (N) of the Clean Air Act (Act), 42 U.S.C. 7607(d)(1) (B) and (N), this action is subject to the procedural requirements of section 307(d). … Under Section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by May 22, 1995.
60 FR 14899Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Mar 18, 2011
period. … Based on the air quality data cited above, EPA is also taking final action to determine, under section 181(b)(2)(A) of the Clean Air Act (CAA), that this area has attained the 1997 ozone NAAQS by its applicable
76 FR 14805Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jan 6, 1997
During the 30-day comment period, EPA received an adverse comment letter in response to the July 22, 1996, rulemaking. … Comments on the Correction Action Comment: The commenters challenge the authority of the Administrator under section 110(k)(6) of the Clean Air Act (the Act) to reclassify an ozone nonattainment area
62 FR 648Environmental Protection AgencyApproval of and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Louisiana
Federal Register · Rule · Feb 27, 1996
Clean Air Act section 176(c)(3)(A)(iii), which is the conformity provision requiring contributions to emission reductions before SIPs with emissions budgets can be approved, specifically references Clean … Air Act section 182(b)(1).
61 FR 7218Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Nov 20, 2009
These actions do not constitute redesignations to attainment under section 107(d)(3) of the Clean Air Act (CAA), because we do not yet have an approved maintenance plan for these areas as required under … Petitions for Judicial Review Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of these actions must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit
74 FR 60199Environmental Protection AgencyNational Emission Standards for Pharmaceuticals Production
Federal Register · Rule · May 13, 2005
The TTN provides information and technology exchange in various areas of air pollution control. Comments. … Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act (CAA), judicial review of the direct final rule amendments is available only by filing a petition for review in the U.S.
70 FR 25666Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Aug 8, 2005
The public comment period ended on June 22, 2005. In this rulemaking, we are taking action on only the vehicle I/M program revisions. … Clean Air Act.
70 FR 45542Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · May 31, 2011
period. … This action is being taken under the Clean Air Act (CAA). DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is effective on June 30, 2011.
76 FR 31237Environmental Protection Agency
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.