Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.16s
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Snyder v. Hickel
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1969
he will in fact develop a profitable Mine.” 399 F,2d at 622. ane Here is a direct conflict. … {Tr. 24-25) After referring to the guides ‘established by the U. s.
396 U.S. 819Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Devin M. Kugler, Petitioner v. Gregg Scott, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 12, 2025
App'x 399, 401, 402 (7th Cir. 2019), directly on point. … Page 7 of 10 4:19-cv-04168-CSB #184 Filed: 08/16/24 Page 8 of 10 Bailey, 766 F.
Supreme Court brief · Emergency Application · Oct 31, 2022
Supp. 3d 419 (D.D.C. 2018) .................. 24 Rostker v. … United States, 365 U.S. 399, 410 (1961) (consulting “[a] number of ... sources,” including statements of committee chair and staff).
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 20, 2021
Br. at 24 (citing Frank v. Walker, 768 F.3d 744, 753 (7th Cir. 2014)); see also United States Amicus Br. in Supp. of Pet’rs at 21–24 (“U.S. Br.”); Ariz. … Br. at 21–24; ARP Br. at 29–30. Petitioners are wrong for three main reasons.
Supreme Court brief · Motion to Dismiss or Affirm · Dec 22, 2023
Id. at 2323-24. … See Jurisdictional Statement at 23-24. For example, Moore v.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Christopher Collings, Petitioner v. David Vandergriff, Warden
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 18, 2024
Collings, 450 S.W.3d 741 (Mo. banc 2014) .................... 5, 8, 9, 14, 16, 17, 24 State v. … Himmelman, 399 S.W.2d 58 (Mo. 1966) ...................................................... 23 State v. Mitchell, 659 S.W.2d 4 (Mo.
Petition — Hostrop v. Board of Junior College District No. 515
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1976
Stat. ch. 122, § 24-11 (1969). … (Opinion No. 72 C 771, October 24, 1972). Dr.
425 U.S. 963Petition for Writ of Certiorari — American Steamship Co. v. Musleh
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1989
Illinois, 399 U.S. 235, 90 S.Ct. 2018 SE nbs ska hk FER SA SEE RAO 13 Wyborski v. Bristo! City Line of Steamship Ltd., 191 ESupp. 884 (D. … Illinois, 399 U.S. 235, 239-40 (1970).
493 U.S. 919Record and brief — California v. Winson
Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 1982
(CT 24.) Respondents probation revo- cation hearing began April 13, 1979. (CT 21.) … Green (1970) 399 U.S. 149, and Ohio v.
455 U.S. 975Appellants Reply Brief — Mutual of Omaha Insurance v. Egan
Supreme Court brief · Appellants Reply Brief · 1980
Everybody = has said it was wrong’’ (RT 901, lines 22-24, 900). And Mr. … National Fire Insurance Company, 25 Cal.2d 399, 154 P.2d 399, 406 squarely nd Se cP LPF EA = PINGTS ‘ec. placed the burden of a fiduciary duty upon insurance com- panies as to its insureds.
445 U.S. 912Supplemental Brief — United States v. City of New Britain
Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Brief · 1954
Supp. 399, 400 (S. D. N. Y. 1934) .. N-7 [2] BLEED THROUGH— POOR COPY [3] Cases :—Continucd Glenn v. … Co., In re, 24 }°. 2d 156 (7th TD hw a V0 0G oh ec bbE Nak act ensececcees Mansfield v. Excelsior Refining Ce., 135 U. S. ae “ais heey Ee + Mellon v.
347 U.S. 81Supreme Court brief · Emergency Application · May 27, 2026
Elizabeth B. 399) Presidential Coalition 400) Price, Savannah 401) Price, Shannon 402) Pringle, Rep. … C-24 of 30 App. 360 USCA11 Case: 26-11828 Document: 5-1 Date Filed: 05/27/2026 Page: 26 of 57 Caster v.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Apr 15, 2019
Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986) ............................................... 31 Glossip v. Trammell, 530 F. App’x 708 (10th Cir. 2013) ........................ 20 Harrington v. … Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 427 (1986) (Powell, J., concurring) (concluding, in a competency-to-beexecuted scenario, that due process required “an impartial officer or board that can receive evidence and
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Martinez Orlando Black, Petitioner v. North Carolina
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jan 30, 2018
|"Fun. 04CRS61936 51 | POSSESSION OF FIREARM BY FELON 07/24/2004 14-415.1 Fi/a]ec 04CRS61837 51 | HABITUAL FELON 07/24/2004 14-7.1 Fic “NOTE: Enter punishment class # different from underlying felony class … [tum 04CRS5239042 51. | VOLUNTARY MANSLAUGHTER 07/24/2004 14-18 F Dic 04CRS61837 51 | HABITUAL FELON Pra Aegean 07/24/2004 14-7.1 Fic : ie 2 ia ae FEB 19 2004 “NOTE: Enter punishment class if different
Opposition — National Boiler Marketing Assn. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1978
No. 24, 67th Cong., Ist Sess. | (1921)) from the Act’s coverage. … No. 24, 67th Cong.. Ist Sess. 2 (1921); 62 Cong.
436 U.S. 816Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1994
Opp. 21-24. Respondents’ analysis is ill-conceived, both factually and legally. … such overwhelming mining rights that the mineral owner in fact has the right to use the surface of the land, part or all of it, in recovering the coal acquired by the deeds”); Martin, 429 S.W.2d at 399
510 U.S. 1177Opposition Brief — Baker Commodities, Inc. v. Commissioner
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1970
United States, 399 F. 2d 194, on ‘rehearing, 402 F. 2d 1000. ae The Kimbell-Diamond doctrine, which was devel- ‘oped judicially under the 1939 Code, permitted a tax- * Kimbell-Diamond Milling Co. … App. 80, n. 30), and petitioner cites no author- ity for its assertion (Pet- 24) that Congress did not mean precisely what it said.’ 3.
397 U.S. 988Motion to Dismiss — Home Telephone & Telegraph Co. of Spokane v. Kuykendall
Supreme Court brief · Motion to Dismiss · 1924
Stokes, 256 U.S.399..... 11 Mills v. Green, 159 U.S. 651........... 11 Shaffer v. Carter, 252 U, 8S. 87, 64 L. Ed. … This motion was noted for argument for March 24, 1924.
265 U.S. 206Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Neeman v. Commissioner
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1958
Cong., 24 Sess:, p. 84 (1942-2 Cum. … C. at p. 399.) ~ CHARLEs K. nee) | . Assistant Attorhey General. -@ 10 - APPENDIX Internal Revenue Code of 1939:: - SEc..22. nancies INCOME. * 6 “ *. b) Exclusions from Gross Income.
358 U.S. 841Opposition Brief — Lockard v. Los Angeles
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1949
The complaint [Record pp. 1 to 24] is in two counts. … Ed.) 396, in sustaining a traffic regulation of New York City, seems equally applicable to the case at bar, it being there stated (at pages 398, 399): “* * * We do not sit to weigh evidence on the
337 U.S. 939
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.