Documents

Amicus Curiae Brief — Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Union Oil Co. of California

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001

The Clean Air Act allows the federal government to regulate the composition of gasoline, in order to contro! ozone, the primary constituent of smog across the Nation. … The Clean Air Act also allows California to set more stringent tuel specification standards, and it has done so. See 42 U.S.C. § 7545(c)(4)(B); Cal. Health & Satety Code §§ 43013, 43018; 13 Cal.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Aviall Services, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004

parties liable for the costs of these clean-ups.” … Indeed, many com- prehensive federal statutes lack an express limitations period. See, e.g., id. at 266 (42 U.S.C. § 1983); Agency Holding Corp. v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Duke Bradford, et al., Petitioners v. Department of Labor, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 27, 2024

That 2014 executive order was controversial, and commentators warned that he just crossed a significant line. … Amalgamated Bank, 566 U.S. 639, 645 (2012) (cleaned up). Here, Congress has enacted minimum-wage laws—just not in the Procurement Act.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Department of Education, et al., Petitioners v. Myra Brown, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 2, 2023

Id. at 2609 (cleaned up). … Id. at 2608 (cleaned up).

Amicus Curiae Brief — D. A., a Minor, By and Through his Mother, B. A., et al., Petitioners v. Tri County Area Schools, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 1, 2026

Tinker, 393 U.S. at 513 (cleaned up). … Id. at 407 (cleaned up).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Michael Pung, Personal Representative of the Estate of Timothy Scott Pung, Petitioner v. Isabella County, Michigan

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 8, 2025

Myriad other federal laws—the False Claims Act, the Federal Trade Commission Act, the Clean Air Act, the Occupational Safety and Health Act, the Bank Secrecy Act, and the Health Insurance Portability and … Under the federal Clean Water Act, for instance, violators of certain requirements can be subject to a maximum fine of $68,445 “per day for each violation.”

Amicus Curiae Brief — Weyerhaeuser Company, Petitioner v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 30, 2018

As one commentator has noted, “[t]he most likely source of a federal nexus for a private development project is Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, which requires private parties to obtain permits from … Federal regulatory programs, like the Clean Water Act, are expanding.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Alaska, et al., Applicants v. Department of Education, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 17, 2024

Plaintiffs assert that a 60-day comment period is the minimum time for comment for a rule of this importance. … Defendants argue that there is no specific requirement under the APA for a 60-day comment period.

Amicus Curiae Brief — O'Neill v. City of New York, 105 S. Ct. 2110 (1985) (No. 84-805)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1985

West Virginia Water Pollu- tion Control Act, W. Va. Code § 20-5A-1 et seq., 1981, 1984 Supp. (Water Pollution); West Virginia Air Pollution Control Act, W. Va. … Its judgments should be con- firmed. 6 See, e.g., the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. § 6901 et seq.; the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq.; the Water Pollution Control Act,

Amicus Curiae Brief — Weyerhaeuser Co. v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Serv., 139 S. Ct. 45 (2018) (No. 17-71)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018

As one commentator has noted, “(t]he most likely source of a federal nexus for a private development project is Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, which requires private parties to obtain permits … Federal regulatory programs, like the Clean Water Act, are expanding.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Michael Sackett, et ux., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 18, 2022

This guidance applies to all approved jurisdictional determinations for waters of the United States made pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and for navigable waters of the United States made … Due to Department of Army and Department of Agriculture withdrawal from the 1994 Memorandum of Agreement Concerning the Delineation of Wetlands for Purposes of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and Subtitle

Amicus Curiae Brief — Joseph R. Biden, President of the United States, et al., Petitioners v. Nebraska, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 2, 2023

Id. at 2609 (cleaned up). … Id. at 2608 (cleaned up).

Amicus Curiae Brief — City of Auburn v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1999

As Auburn suggests, railroads would therefore not be subject to the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. § 1251), the Endangered Species Act (16 U.S.C. § 1531), the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C … . § 4321) or the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. § 7401).

Amicus Curiae Brief — BP p.l.c., et al., Petitioners v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 23, 2020

The Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq., for example, assigns States a significant role in tailoring and enforcing the statute’s requirements, with state officials, subject to review by federal officials … Congress identified the Clean Air Act’s purpose as promoting both the country’s “public health and welfare and the productive capacity of its population.” 42 U.S.C. § 7401(b)(1) (emphasis added).

Amicus Curiae Brief — BP p.l.c., et al., Petitioners v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 23, 2020

Air Act." … Cheswick Generating Station, 734 F.3d 188, 197 (3d Cir. 2013) (holding that "the Clean Air Act does not preempt state common law claims").

Amicus Curiae Brief — Shell PLC, fka Royal Dutch Shell PLC, et al., Petitioners v. City and County of Honolulu, Hawaii, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 1, 2024

Besides interstate water compacts, Congress also enacted the Clean Water Act. … City of New York, 993 F.3d at 95 (“[T]he Clean Air Act does not regulate foreign emissions. So the City’s claims concerning those emissions still require us to apply federal common law.”).

Amicus Curiae Brief — D. A., a Minor, By and Through his Mother, B. A., et al., Petitioners v. Tri County Area Schools, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 1, 2026

AFSCME, 585 U.S. 878, 914 (2018) (cleaned up); accord, e.g., Snyder v. … Id. at 584-85 (cleaned up).

Amicus Curiae Brief — National Ass'n v. Defenders of Wildlife

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007

Subcomm. on Air and Water Pollution of the Comm. on Public Works, 92nd Cong. 4356 (1971) ..... 11, 12 Robert V. … Another example of a statute that could be affected by the Ninth Circuit's ruling is the federal Clean Air Act (“CAA”) (42 U.S.C. §§ 7401, et seq.).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Environmental Protection Agency v. Defenders of Wildlife

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007

Subcomm. on Air and Water Pollution of the Comm. on Public Works, 92nd Cong. 4356 (1971) ..... 11, 12 Robert V. … Another example of a statute that could be affected by the Ninth Circuit's ruling is the federal Clean Air Act (“CAA”) (42 U.S.C. $$ 7401, et seg.).

Amicus Curiae Brief — City of Los Angeles v. Kern County

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2010

Water Act … In 1987, Congress amended the Clean Water Act to require USEPA to develop comprehensive rules for land application. 33 U.S.C. § 1345.