Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.41s
Brief for the Respondents in Opposition — B. F. Goodrich Co. v. Northwest Industries, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondents in Opposition · 1970
Pa, 1967), rev'd on other grounds, 399 FB. 2d 825 ¢3d Cir, 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1023 (1969). > : Most ‘v. … Industries and arguments from Goodrich, the Com- _mission issued an order dated April 24, 1969 (Ap- pendix, infra, p..11), which reopened the proceeding for the purpose of subjecting Industries to Section
400 U.S. 822Amicus Curiae Brief — Smalis v. Pennsylvania
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1986
Sisson, 399 U.S. 267, 285 (1970); Serfass v.United States, 420 U.S. 377, 392-93 (1975). Commonwealth and defense have rested their cases. … close of the evidence the trier of fact, be it the jury or the judge, makes an independent determination of whether the Commonwealth has presented enough evidence to establish the defendant's - 24
476 U.S. 140Opposition — New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance v. Motor Club Fire & Casualty Co.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1977
(L. 1952, C. 173, Section 24) N.J.S.A. 39 :6-48( b) provides: The policy, any written application therefor and any rider or endorsement which shall not conflict with the provisions of this act shall … Alabama, 399 U.S. 1, 9 (1970); Garner v. Louisiana, 368 U.S. 157, 166 (1961); Cramp v.
434 U.S. 923Brief in Opposition to Petition for A Writ of Certiorari — Thorpe v. Housing Authority of Durham
Supreme Court brief · Brief in Opposition to Petition for A Writ of Certiorari · 1967
. — of Education, 357 U.S. 399 (1958) . 4 Brand v. Chicago Housing Authority, (CCA 7), 120 F. el Se EE haces 5 ed haere vocoder eaeaie omnia 8,9 ' Cafeteria and Rest Workers Union v. … Alabama State Board of Edu- cation, 294 F. 24 150 (5th Cir. 1961), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 930; Woods v. Wright, 334 F. 2d-369 (5th Cir. 1964) ; Knight v. State Board of Education, 200 F..
386 U.S. 670Petition for a Writ Certiorari — Grieder Machine Tool & Die Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ Certiorari · 1944
(R. 399). … (R. 399). The court clearly misstated the facts.
323 U.S. 724Amicus Curiae Brief — USX Corp. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1995
Norge Div. of Magic Chef, Inc., 486 U.S. 399 (1988); Fall River Dyeing & Finishing Corp. v. NLRB, 482 U.S. 27 (1987); Golden State Transit Corp. v. … Id. at 422-24. In sum, as the foregoing shows, the restrictive con- struction of Section 301(c)(1) by the court below is flawed. ...
514 U.S. 1003Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Lenroy McLean, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 12, 2020
PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SECOND CIRCUIT (NAME OF COURT THAT LAST RULED ON MERITS OF YOUR CASE) PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI Lfi.nr_oy_Mclean-..J^J-5-24 … Pittsburg Paints Inc., 399 Fed. Appx 341, 2010 WL 4069430 at 1(10th cir 2010); Therefore, there is no statue of limitations.for bringing a fraud upon the court claim.
Opposition Brief — Egwaoje v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2004
Moran, 509 U.S. 389, 399-400 (1993), the Court again reaffirmed Faretta. In Mar- tinez v. … App. 13a-15a.° 4 Petitioner contends (Pet. 24 & n.5) that permitting self- representation will undermine confidence in the criminal justice system, citing the prosecution of Zacarias Moussaoui as an
541 U.S. 958Statement Opposing Jurisdiction — James Stewart & Co. v. Sadrakula
Supreme Court brief · Statement Opposing Jurisdiction · 1940
Y: 336, 162 U.S. 399 6,7 a ee tohinhoff v. Fischer, 210 N: Y. He. 4 id 8 Brinke rhoff- warts Tr ust, ete, V .. Mill, 281 U. … S. 399, upon the authority of the. oft cited ° ‘case of Chicago, Rock Is land & Pacific RR. Co. v. - McGinn, 114 U.S. 542. As was done in Barrett v.
309 U.S. 94Supreme Court brief · Motion to Dismiss or Affirm · Dec 8, 2017
Perry, 548 U.S. 399 (2006) ..................................................... 3, 4 United States v. … Perry, 548 U.S. 399 (2006)], identified a reliable standard by which to measure the redistricting plan’s alleged burden on their representational rights.” J.S. App. 299.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Dignity Health, dba Mercy San Juan Medical Center, Petitioner v. Evan Minton
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 16, 2020
City of Philadelphia, No. 19123 (cert. granted Feb. 24, 2020). … United States, 567 U.S. 387, 399 (2012) (citing U.S. Const., art. VI, cl. 2).
Reply Brief — Gerald Scott, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Sep 29, 2021
BIO at 19 (quoting Burris, 912 F.3d at 399). Yet the “without using physical force” part is what mattered. … Burris, 912 F.3d at 399.
Joint Appendix — Edgardo Esteras, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Joint Appendix · Dec 10, 2024
Lewis, 498 F.3d 393, 399-400 (6th Cir. 2007). Esteras contends that Lewis was wrongly decided. … Id. at 399–400.
Safety Zone; Fireworks Extravaganza, City of Antioch, San Francisco Bay, CA
Federal Register · Rule · Jun 20, 2007
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ensign Sheral Richardson United States Coast Guard Sector San Francisco, at (415) 556-2950 extension 136, or the 24-hour Command Center at (415) 399-3547.
72 FR 33888Homeland Security DepartmentCoast GuardAgency decision · Agency decision
Commissioner, 13 T.C. 397, 399 (1949), affd. 200 F.2d 560 (2d Cir. 1952); Humbert v. Commissioner, 24 B.T.A. 828, 829 (1931).
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
Commissioner, 13 T.C. 397, 399 (1949), affd. 200 F.2d 560 (2d Cir. 1952); Humbert v. Commissioner, 24 B.T.A. 828, 829 (1931).
United States Tax CourtPetitioners Brief — Killam v. Floresville
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1942
R. 399, 261 S. W. 1050; Real Silk Hosiery Mills v. Richmond (Calif.), 298 F. 126; Jewel Tea Co. v. Town of Bel Air, 172 Md. 536, 192 A. 417; White v. Town of Culpeper, 172 Va. 630, 1 S. … Myers (one of Jehovah’s witnesses), Opinion by Centre County Court of Quarter Sessions, Jan. 24, 1940; Chisholm v. Shook (one of Jehovah’s witnesses), — by Minnesota lith Judicial Dist. Court, St.
317 U.S. 668Opposition Brief — Holtzman v. Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1991
State Bar, 28 Cal.3d 402, 411, 619 P.2d 399, 404, 169 Cal. Rptr. 206, 211 (1980); Committee on Legal Ethics v. Douglas, 270 S.E.2d 325, 332. (8.Ve.: 19686), cert... denied, Division v. … The court recognized that the harm here affected a different societal interest than that addressed in defamation actions 24 legal precision, every offense for which an attorney can be removed".
502 U.S. 1009petitioners supplemantal brief — Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. Lewis
Supreme Court brief · petitioners supplemantal brief · 1979
Chris-Craft Industries, Inc., 430 U.S. 1, 24-25 (1977). In Amtrak, the plaintiffs sought to imply a private right of action under Section 404(a) of the Rail Passenger Service Act of 1970. … Warner-Holding Co., 327 U.S. 395, 399 (1946).
444 U.S. 11Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Oriolo v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1945
.”’ ‘*399: Any person who shall knowingly persuade, in- duce, entice or coerce * * * any woman or girl to go from one place to another in interstate or foreign commerce, * * * for the purpose of prostitution … Title 28, Par. 347, (a)] and under the same act, ch. 229, Par. 8, 24 Stat. 940 (U. S.C. A., Title 28, Par. 350). 2. The Date of the Judgment to be Reviewed.
324 U.S. 824
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.