Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.16s
Opposition Brief — Egwaoje v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2004
Moran, 509 U.S. 389, 399-400 (1993), the Court again reaffirmed Faretta. In Mar- tinez v. … App. 13a-15a.° 4 Petitioner contends (Pet. 24 & n.5) that permitting self- representation will undermine confidence in the criminal justice system, citing the prosecution of Zacarias Moussaoui as an
541 U.S. 958Amicus Curiae Brief — USX Corp. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1995
Norge Div. of Magic Chef, Inc., 486 U.S. 399 (1988); Fall River Dyeing & Finishing Corp. v. NLRB, 482 U.S. 27 (1987); Golden State Transit Corp. v. … Id. at 422-24. In sum, as the foregoing shows, the restrictive con- struction of Section 301(c)(1) by the court below is flawed. ...
514 U.S. 1003Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Swisher v. Virginia
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1999
Police arrested Petitioner shortly after the confrontation with the two witnesses, at about 12:05 a.m., Monday, February 24 (J.A. 526). … Louisiana, 399 U.S. 30, 34-35 (1970).
528 U.S. 812Brief for the Respondents in Opposition — B. F. Goodrich Co. v. Northwest Industries, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondents in Opposition · 1970
Pa, 1967), rev'd on other grounds, 399 FB. 2d 825 ¢3d Cir, 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1023 (1969). > : Most ‘v. … Industries and arguments from Goodrich, the Com- _mission issued an order dated April 24, 1969 (Ap- pendix, infra, p..11), which reopened the proceeding for the purpose of subjecting Industries to Section
400 U.S. 822Statement Opposing Jurisdiction — James Stewart & Co. v. Sadrakula
Supreme Court brief · Statement Opposing Jurisdiction · 1940
Y: 336, 162 U.S. 399 6,7 a ee tohinhoff v. Fischer, 210 N: Y. He. 4 id 8 Brinke rhoff- warts Tr ust, ete, V .. Mill, 281 U. … S. 399, upon the authority of the. oft cited ° ‘case of Chicago, Rock Is land & Pacific RR. Co. v. - McGinn, 114 U.S. 542. As was done in Barrett v.
309 U.S. 94Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Lenroy McLean, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 12, 2020
PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SECOND CIRCUIT (NAME OF COURT THAT LAST RULED ON MERITS OF YOUR CASE) PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI Lfi.nr_oy_Mclean-..J^J-5-24 … Pittsburg Paints Inc., 399 Fed. Appx 341, 2010 WL 4069430 at 1(10th cir 2010); Therefore, there is no statue of limitations.for bringing a fraud upon the court claim.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Dignity Health, dba Mercy San Juan Medical Center, Petitioner v. Evan Minton
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 16, 2020
City of Philadelphia, No. 19123 (cert. granted Feb. 24, 2020). … United States, 567 U.S. 387, 399 (2012) (citing U.S. Const., art. VI, cl. 2).
Reply Brief — Gerald Scott, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Sep 29, 2021
BIO at 19 (quoting Burris, 912 F.3d at 399). Yet the “without using physical force” part is what mattered. … Burris, 912 F.3d at 399.
Appendix — Steadman v. Securities & Exchange Commission
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1981
Talley Industries, Inc., 42/ 42/ 399 F.2d 396 (1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1015 (1969). … As the Court of 43/ 399 F.2d at 402. 44/ Sections 17(a) and 17(e) would probably be among those sections.
450 U.S. 91Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Charles Kenneth Foster, Petitioner v. Florida
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jun 8, 2018
Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 427-31 (1986) (O’Connor, J., concurring) (liberty interest in meaningful state competency proceedings); Ohio Adult Parole Auth. v. … State, 237 So. 3d 907 (Fla. 2018) 24. Lucas v. State, 234 So. 3d 647 (Fla. 2018) 25. Marquard v. State, 234 So. 3d 560 (Fla. Jan. 24, 2018) 26. Sweet v. State, 234 So. 3d 646 (Fla. 2018) 27.
Opposition Brief — Adams ex rel. Ridgell v. Children's Mercy Hospital
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1992
Jeter, 486 U.S. 456 (1988).............22- 0 24 Craig v. Boren, 429 U.S. 190 (1976) .......-- +e eee eeee 24 Davis v. Omitowoju, 833 F.2d 1155 (3rd Cir. 1989) .21, 25 Duke Power Co. v. … State Board of Medicine, 555 P.2d 399 (Idaho 1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 914 (1977); Fein v.
506 U.S. 991Federal Register · Notice · Mar 16, 2016
The on-line FDMS is available 24 hours each day, 365 days each year. … The carriers and drivers must comply with all other applicable requirements of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (49 CFR parts 350-399) and Hazardous Materials Regulations (49 CFR parts 105-
81 FR 14208Transportation DepartmentFederal Motor Carrier Safety AdministrationSafety Zone; San Francisco Bay, CA
Federal Register · Rule · Oct 6, 2004
(2) Persons desiring to transit the area of the safety zone may contact the Captain of the Port at telephone number 415-399-3547 or on VHF-FM channel 16 (156.8 Mhz) to seek permission to transit the … Dated: September 24, 2004. Gordon A. Loebl, Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Captain of the Port, San Francisco Bay, California.
69 FR 59803Homeland Security DepartmentCoast GuardAgency decision · Agency decision
Commissioner, 114 T.C. 399 (2000), affd. 259 F.3d 881 (7th Cir. 2001). … R.R., supra at 24-25, and the provisions held constitutional therein (for example, upholding the constitutionality of the corporate income tax, and observing that “the due process clause of the 5th Amendment
United States Tax CourtMotion to Affirm — Louisiana Financial Assistance Commission v. Poindexter
Supreme Court brief · Motion to Affirm · 1968
A10), On October 19, 1966, the United States filed-its motion, ° for leave to intervene as a party plaintiff pursuant to © Section 902 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.0. 2000h-2) and Rule 24 … Aaron, supra; Andersonv: ~ ~° | Martin, 375 U.S. 399; Lombard v. Louisiana, 373 U.S. | 267 ; ‘NAACP. v. Alabama, 357 U.S. 449; Hamm v. Virginia State Board of Elections, 230 F.
389 U.S. 571Appendix — Franco-Gomez v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1982
Fulton, 549 F.24 1325, 1327 (9th Cir. 1977); United States v. McLaughlin, $25 F.2d $17, 520-21 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 427 U.S. 904 (1976); United States v. … Louisiana, 399 U.S. 30, 34 (1970), and United States v. Matlock, 415 U.S. 164, 177-78, n. 14 (1074). Because the : © government failed to meet its burden in this case, we reverse.”
459 U.S. 1018Reply Brief — RODGERS v. UNITED STATES (Nos. 79-1030, 79-1028, 1029)
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1979
Local 50, 294 F.2d 399 (2d Cir. 1961), aff’d on other grounds, 370 U.S. 254 (1962), when the equally-divided en banc court, by a 4-2 vote, affirmed the district court rather than the panel, and his … United States, No. 78-1202, 48 L.W. 4250 (March 18, 1980). 7 failure to include a bribery instruction in connection with the mail fraud counts is of no material conse- quence (Brief in Opp., at pp. 24
Petitioners Brief — Graham & Foster v. Goodcell
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1931
On February 24, 1921 the petitioner filed a claim for abatement covering this additional assess- ment and also the additional assessment of $13,299.62, for 1918. … S. 399). Wiborg v. United States, (163 U. S. 632). Every word of a statute is to be given effect. Wil- mot vy. Mudge, (103, U. S., 217); Early v.
282 U.S. 409Opinion — Tutun v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opinion · 1926
United States, 94 U.S. 397, 399. Or it may provide only a legal remedy. Compare Turner v. United States, 248 U. 8. 354. … No. 4984, pp. 18-24. The section makes no reference to appellate proceedings.
270 U.S. 568Prologue — Dentsply International, Inc. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Prologue · 2006
OPINIONS BELOW The Third Circuit’s opinion is reported at 399 F.3d 181. (Pet. App. la-26a). The district court’s opinion is reported at 2/7 F. Supp. 2d 387. (Pet. App. 27a-145a). … JURISDICTION The Third Circuit issued its judgment on February 24, 2005, and denied a timely petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc on May 17, 2005. (Pet. App. 146a-47a).
546 U.S. 1089
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.