Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.28s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Kendra Espinoza, et al., Petitioners v. Montana Department of Revenue, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 11, 2019
Ct. 2012 (2017) .......................................... 22-24, 31-32 United States v. … ,” id., at 399, determined which schools would benefit from the deductions.
Brief for the Civil Aeronautics Board — CAB v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Civil Aeronautics Board · 1961
. °1371(d) ___-- 21 18 19 18 17 17 13 24 Section 401(f), 49 U.S.C. 1371(f)_2, 9, 12, 14,15 Section 401(g), 49 U.S.C. 1371(g)______- a, « - 9, 12, 15, 16, 19, 24, 26 Section 1001, 49 US.C. … Federal Com- " munications Commission, 182 F. 2d 397, 399 (C.A.D.C.). The Board’s pow€ér also derives from .
367 U.S. 316Prologue — Clark v. California
Supreme Court brief · Prologue · 1954
City of Chicago, et al., Supreme Court of Illinois, 399 Ill. 551, 78 N.E. 2d 285 (1948) People ex rel. William J. Tuohy v. … City of Chicago, et al., Supreme Court of Illinois, 399 Tl. 551, 78 N.E. 2d 285 (1948) ; Chicago Land Clearance Commission v.
348 U.S. 847Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Dana Albrecht, Petitioner v. Katherine Albrecht
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 23, 2020
Nebraska, 262 US 390, 399, 401 (1923) 12 Parham v. J.R., 442 US 584, 602 (1979) 13 Pierce v. Society of Sisters, 268 US 510, 534-535 (1925) 12 Prince v. … Nebraska, 262 US 390, 399, 401 (1923), we held that the ‘liberty’ protected by the Due Process Clause includes the right of parents to ‘establish a home and bring up children’ and ‘to control the education
Reply Brief — United States, Petitioner v. Helaman Hansen
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Mar 17, 2023
Br. 24-25. But respondent fails to rebut two historical points from the government’s opening brief (at 26). … Br. 24 (citation omitted).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Petitioner v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 12, 2022
Cir. 2019) ............................ 24 Caraco Pharm. Labs., Ltd. v. Novo Nordisk A/S, 566 U.S. 399 (2012) .............................................. 20 Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. … Research Serv., Drug Pricing and Pharmaceutical Patenting Practices 16, 24 (2020), https://bit.ly/3Qsi1EY (Patenting Practices); see also Sen. P. Leahy Ltr. to Hon. K.
Amicus Curiae Brief — United States, Petitioner v. Zackey Rahimi
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 21, 2023
.................................. 25 Lynnmarie Sardinha, et al., Global, Regional, and National Prevalence Estimates of Physical or Sexual, or Both, Intimate Partner Violence Against Women in 2018, 399 … Lynnmarie Sardinha, et al., Global, Regional, and National Prevalence Estimates of Physical or Sexual, or Both, Intimate Partner Violence Against Women in 2018, 399 Lancet 803, 808 (2022).
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Mar 23, 2026
Bridgestone Corp., 399 F.3d 651, 667 (6th Cir. 2005). … Pet.App.41a (quoting Pet.App.55a). 24 CONCLUSION The petition for a writ of certiorari should be denied. Respectfully submitted, Robert J.
Appellees Brief — Crane Neck Ass'n v. NYC/Long Island County Services Group
Supreme Court brief · Appellees Brief · 1984
See text supra at 24-29. … Com'r, State of N.Y¥., 78 A.D. 2d 677, 678, 432 N.Y.S. 2d 399 (2d Dept. 1980); Town of Greenburgh v.
469 U.S. 804Amicus Curiae Brief — Aetna Health Inc. v. Davila
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004
Norge Div. of Magic Chef, Inc., 486 U.S. 399 (1988) .............0eeeee 17, 24, 27 Livadas v. Bradshaw, ee ee eees 24-25 Local 174, Teamsters v. Lucas Flour Ca., Nees cc eecoees 23 Maurer v. … Norge Div. of Magic Chef, Inc., 486 U.S. 399 (1988), an LMRA preemption case.
542 U.S. 200Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 1, 2022
Higher Educ. 399 (2022) .............................................................16 Tiffany N. … Higher Educ. 399 (2022); Ivuoma N.
Reply Brief — Wes Allen, Alabama Secretary of State, et al., Petitioners v. Marcus Caster, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Feb 2, 2022
App.349 (Tr. 644:17-24). … Milligan Resp. 5, 24, 35; Caster Resp. 5, 7, 25.
Federal Register · Notice · Dec 16, 2014
Public Participation: The Federal eRulemaking Portal is available 24 hours each day, 365 days each year. … The regulations discussing this collection are outlined in the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSRs) at 49 CFR 390-399.
79 FR 74804Transportation DepartmentFederal Motor Carrier Safety AdministrationFederal Register · Notice · Jun 8, 2018
The on-line FDMS is available 24 hours each day, 365 days each year. … The carriers and drivers must comply with all other requirements of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (49 CFR parts 350-399) and Hazardous Materials Regulations (49 CFR parts 105-180).
83 FR 26742Transportation DepartmentFederal Motor Carrier Safety AdministrationSafety Zone; BART Transbay Tube Seismic Upgrade, San Francisco, CA
Federal Register · Rule · Sep 25, 2006
Coast Guard Sector San Francisco, at (415) 556-2950 or Sector San Francisco 24 hour Command Center at (415) 399-3547.
71 FR 55737Homeland Security DepartmentCoast GuardJerusalem: Legislation to Move the U.S. Embassy
Congressional research report · CRS Report · Apr 13, 1998
Res 290, passed by the House of Representatives on April 24, 1990, and S. Con. Res 106, passed by the Senate on March 22, 1990, stated that “. . . … A Summary of P.L. 104-45 2 P.L. 99-399 (H.R. 4151)August 27, 1986. 100 Stat.868, 22 USC 4862 3 P.L. 100-204 (H.R. 1777) December 22, 1987. 101 Stat.1344. 4 P.L. 100-459 (H.R. 4782) October 1, 1988
98-360FCongressional Research ServiceOpposition Brief — Seaboard System Railroad v. Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1985
The filing of the Brotherhood’s enforcement petition was a result of the failure of the carrier to comply with the terms of the Award issued by the Board on January 24, 1978, and the Interpretation … Sheehan, 439 U.S. 89, 93, 99 S.Ct. 399, 401, 58 L.Ed.2d 354 (1978) (narrow scope of review applies to both questions of fact and questions of law).
469 U.S. 1213Appendix — Noble v. Oklahoma City
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1936
D., 399), the. practice as indicated and the distinction between rights-of-way under general and special acts was preserved and reannounced. … It will be borne in mind that the excepting or reservation dause involved ‘was not an exclusion or elimination of an arce of land but was a clause stating that the patent or con- 24 ’_.
297 U.S. 481Opposition Brief — May v. Shuttle, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1998
RIL E D > wae 24 996 No. 97-1674 i ice : IN THE Supreme Court of the Untied States OcTOBER TERM, 1997 JAMES May, et ai., = Petitioners, SHUTTLE, INC., et al., Respondents. … Norge Div. of Magic Chef, Inc., 486 U.S. 399, 409 n.8 (1988).
524 U.S. 927Prologue — Uberoi v. City of Boulder
Supreme Court brief · Prologue · 2005
Stricland, 792 F.24 1069 (11"™ Cir. 1986)......... 13 Scot v. United States, 559 A.2d 745 (D.C. App. 1989)...... 11 Smith v. Sikorsky Aircraft, 420 F. … Computing Scale Co., 261 U.S. 399, 418 NGF hncsccticcnoveddevicicsesdinahintiabh dete piteetntger tceons + United States v. Conforte, 624 F.2d 869, 881 Pe a ac ne de 10 United States v.
546 U.S. 874
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.