Documents

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Village of Lincolnshire, Illinois, et al., Petitioners v. International Union of Operating Engineers Local 399, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Feb 14, 2019

City of Eau Claire, 471 U.S. 34, 105 S.Ct. 1713, 85 L.Ed.2d 24 (1985), demonstrate, certain municipal legislation also qualifies (with a few tweaks not pertinent here). … Local 399 Lincolnshire concedes that Local 399 has standing to bring counts 1 and 3. Defs.’ Mem. in Supp. of Mot. for Summ. J. and Resp. in Opp’n to Pls.’ Mot. for Summ. J. (Defs.’

Opposition Brief — Arizona v. Lucas

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2001

ai y yop mshiyd sci : fs ae bd 3.43 ev ee 4s, P meee pds 24 No. 01-399 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES STATE OF ARIZONA Petitioner, VS. DeANDRE LAVAR LUCAS, Respondent. … Be No. 01-399 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES STATE OF ARIZONA, Petitioner, VS. DeANDRE LAVAR LUCAS, Respondent. PROOF OF SERVICE I, Garrett W.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Leon C. Baker P. C. v. Lynch

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2002

Ortho Diagnostic Systems, Inc., 207 F.3d1126 (0 Cir. 20000 / ů ce eee eee renee 24 Clements v. Central Railroad Co. of New Jersey, 399 F.2d 825 (3d Cir. 1968) ) ꝰqu! … Central Railroad Co. of New Jersey, 399 F.2d 825 (3d Cir.1968).

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Smith v. New Jersey

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1985

Louisiana, 399 U.S. 30, 90 S. Ct. 1969, 26 L. Ed. ee SF, . Spree ree 12 Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471, 83 S. … N.J.S. 24:21-19 (1) N.J.S. 24:21-19b(2) POSSESSION OF A CONTROLLED DANGEROUS SUBSTANCE (PURE FREE BASE) 24:21-20(a)(2) 20a Indictment THE GRAND JURORS of the State of New Jersey, for the County

Respondents Brief — Stephen C. Stanko, Petitioner v. Bryan P. Stirling, Director, South Carolina Department of Corrections, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Mar 31, 2025

Arkansas, 435 U.S. 475 (1978) ..................................................................................... 23, 24, 24 Martinez v. … McRae, 793 F.3d 392, 399 (4th Cir. 2015).

Opposition Brief — University of Pittsburgh v. Krynicky

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1985

Tit. 24, §2510-2. The statutory language with respect to Pitt s identical, Pa. Stat. Ann. Tit. 24, §2510-202. … Tit. 24, §2510-9 and §2510-209.

brief for appellee — Craig v. Boren

Supreme Court brief · brief for appellee · 1976

Shevin, 416 U.S. 351 (1974) 2, 24-25 Curtis Craic and CAROLYN WHITENER, Krauss v. Sacramento Inn, 317 F.Supp. 171 (E.D. d/b/a “The Honk and Holler,” Cal. 1970) ; 3 13 Appellants, Loper v. … —24— Both appellants and amicus curiae first complain that the arrest statistics in Exhibits I and II are of no signifi- cance because they did not show convictions for the respective offenses.

Brief in Opposition — Arnold Tours, Inc. v. Camp

Supreme Court brief · Brief in Opposition · 1970

Georgia Association of Independent Tnsur- _ance Agents, Inc., 399 F. 2d 1010 (1968) Psy pee Tennessee Electric Power Co. v. … BAL Wats prt vata ane the a ‘tonal Rogister, vol. 24, p.

Motion — Hill v. Stone

Supreme Court brief · Motion · 1975

Kolodziejski, 399 U. … Kolodziejski, 399 U.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Tommy Sharp, Interim Warden, Petitioner v. Patrick Dwayne Murphy

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 30, 2018

Utah, 510 U.S. 399, 421 (1994). … Mississippi Band of 24 Choctaw Indians, 136 S.

Jurisdictional Statement — Crist v. Bretz

Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 1978

Sisson, 399 U. … New York, 399 U.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Wes Allen, Alabama Secretary of State, et al., Appellants v. Evan Milligan, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 29, 2022

Perry, 548 U.S. 399, 416 (2006) (“LULAC”). … Code Ann. § 30-399.

Amicus Curiae Brief — David Lesh, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 15, 2025

No. 24-654 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States DAVID LESH, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES, Respondent. … New York, 399 U.S. 66, 74 (1970) (Black, J., concurring in the judgment).

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Case Corp. v. B & J Co.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2000

Upjohn, 449 U.S. at 399 (citing Hickman, 329 U.S. at 512-13). … (5128-010199) January 24, 2000 Order Entered at the Direction of the Court: Clerk, U.S.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Jesus Perez-Garcia and John Thomas Fencl, Petitioners v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 20, 2024

United States, No. 24-5453; Lindsey v. United States, No. 24-5328; Mayfield v. United States, No. 24-5488; Pierre v. United States, No. 24-37; Borne v. United States, No. 23-7293; Willis v. … In re Grand Jury, 399 F.3d at 528 n.1; Perez-Garcia, 96 F.4th at 1173.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Tommy Sharp, Interim Warden, Petitioner v. Patrick Dwayne Murphy

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 30, 2018

Utah, 510 U.S. 399 (1994) ...................... 2, 4, 7, 10, 24, 29 Heckman v. United States, 224 U.S. 413 (1912) ........................................ 15, 20 Jefferson v. … Treaty of March 24, 1832, 7 Stat. 366, Art. XIV.

Opposition Brief — Hanson v. Arrowsmith

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1989

P. 24 warrants reversal only where irregularity affects substantial rights). Hanson, 872 F.2d at 749 (emphasis added). … Florida, 399 U.S. 78 (1970), this Court stated: [T]he question comes down to whether jury reli- ability is a function of jury size.

Brief in Opposition to Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Ottawa Tribe v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Brief in Opposition to Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1964

O’ Mara, 122 Fed: Supp. 399 ene ks havea 10 Ww ornicke v. Scheuer, 11 M. 2d eo aies ee 9 Staetuies. - Charter of the City of. … ly, the Grand Jury issued a subpoena duces tecum to the petitioner, directing him to produce copies of his Federal - and State income tax returns for the years 1959, 1960, and 1961. : On September 24

Brief for the Respondents in Opposition — Mancusi v. Stubbs

Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondents in Opposition · 1972

Green; 399.U%. if Ch hambers. v. alifor, 399: U. g “42 ae ’ ¢ ete toldwasser \ _ Brows: “41T-F. Dd 1169, (D. ron Cir.) cert, a Be den. 897-U DIF ine cid ow ov dat leet.. 5 ohn LeBaron v. … S. 18, . 24). Bhi . ‘B. PREJUDICIAL EFFECT OF USING THE: PRIOR TESTIMONY. Whether constitutional error -can he, excused because harmless, is in essence a faetual inquiry.

Petitioners Reply Brief — Hobby v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Reply Brief · 1984

Musto, Nos. 83-681 and 83-690 (filed Oct. 24 and 26, 1983, respectively) . . . + s « United States v. Cross, 708 F. 2d 631 . . . . . . Williams v. Florida 399 U.S. 78 (1970). ...... … Florida, 399 U.S. 78, 100 (1970)" Cemphasis supplied). 3.