Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
1.97s
Outer Continental Shelf Air Regulations Consistency Update for Alaska
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Aug 22, 2006
”), as mandated by section 328(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act (“the Act”). … As required by section 328 of the Clean Air Act, this rule simply updates the existing OCS rules to make them consistent with current COA requirements.
71 FR 48879Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Mar 26, 1999
Background On March 3, 1978, EPA promulgated a list of ozone nonattainment areas under the provisions of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1977 (1977 Act or pre-amended Act), that included Santa Barbara … All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this rule.
64 FR 14624Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jul 21, 2003
The intended effect of this rulemaking is to approve source-specific emission limitations required by the Clean Air Act. … What Are the Clean Air Act Requirements for NO X RACT?
68 FR 42981Environmental Protection AgencyAmicus Curiae Brief — American Trucking Assns., Inc. v. Browner
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000
Boyden Gray, The Clean Air Act Under Regulatory Reform, \1 Tul. Env. L. … Air Act].”
530 U.S. 1202Outer Continental Shelf Air Regulations Update To Include New York State Requirements
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · May 20, 2022
), as mandated by section 328(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act (CAA). … application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act.
87 FR 30849Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Apr 3, 2018
Clean Air Act section 304(b)(2) requires a 60-day notice of a civil action against the Administrator for an alleged failure to perform a non-discretionary duty to the Administrator. … of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; and • Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate
83 FR 14179Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Texas; Locally Enforced Idling Prohibition Rule
Federal Register · Rule · Apr 11, 2005
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. … Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by June 10, 2005.
70 FR 18308Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Aug 19, 1999
Background On March 3, 1978, EPA promulgated a list of ozone nonattainment areas under the provisions of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1977 (1977 Act or pre-amended Act), that included the San … All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period.
64 FR 45178Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Feb 28, 2003
C and D of title I of the Clean Air Act (CAA). … In that document, EPA proposed revisions to the regulations governing the NSR programs mandated by parts C and D of title I of the Clean Air Act (CAA).
68 FR 9614Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 24, 2025
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Clean Air Act and applicable Federal regulations … of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act.
90 FR 34790Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plan; Minnesota
Federal Register · Rule · Aug 16, 1999
After review of the SIP revision request, EPA finds that Amendment Four meets the applicable requirements of Clean Air Act section 110(a) and that the revisions in Amendment Four have been shown to be … The Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds. Union Electric Co., v. U.S. EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255-66 (1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2). F.
64 FR 44408Environmental Protection AgencyOuter Continental Shelf Air Regulations Consistency Update for California
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jan 10, 2011
”), as mandated by section 328(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (“the Act”). … Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to establish requirements to control air pollution from OCS sources located within 25 miles
76 FR 1389Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jun 1, 2009
Wegman to Air Division Directors, Maintenance Plan Guidance Document for Certain 8-hour Ozone Areas Under Section 110(a)(1) of Clean Air Act , May 20, 2005—hereafter referred to as “ Wegman Memorandum … Section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by July 31, 2009.
74 FR 26099Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; Missouri; Removal of Control of Emissions From Bakery Ovens
Federal Register · Rule · Jul 20, 2020
This removal does not have an adverse effect on air quality. The EPA's approval of this rule revision is in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA). … The NSR rules are contained in a separate portion of the Clean Air Act and work together with RACT rules, such as this one, to ensure the air quality goals of the Clean Air Act are met. IV.
85 FR 43695Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans and Operating Permits Program; State of Kansas
Federal Register · Rule · Feb 8, 2008
EPA's review of the material submitted indicates the state has amended the air quality rules in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act. … EPA's review of the material submitted indicates the state has amended the air quality rules in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act.
73 FR 7468Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Apr 25, 2017
This action is being taken under the Clean Air Act (CAA). DATES: Written comments must be received on or before May 25, 2017. … Ambient air quality monitoring data for the three-year period must meet a data completeness requirement.
82 FR 19011Environmental Protection AgencyNational Environmental Justice Advisory Council; Notification of Virtual Public Meeting
Federal Register · Notice · Aug 9, 2022
quality monitoring that provides greater protection, and clean and healthy air to environmental justice communities. … substances) Strategic Roadmap, and recommendations on community air quality monitoring that provides greater protection, and clean and healthy air to environmental justice communities.
87 FR 48478Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jun 3, 1997
Clean Air Act Opt-in Provision B. EPA Procedures and Arizona Opt-in Request II. Action III. Response to Comments A. EPA Interpretation of section 211(k)(6) of the Clean Air Act B. … Clean Air Act Opt-in Provision As part of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, Congress added a new subsection (k) to section 211 of the Act.
62 FR 30260Environmental Protection AgencyOpposition Brief — E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Environmental Protection Agency
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1976
Air Act. 1. … Naty ee Ow Ey ere oer 27 comment period (Min.
426 U.S. 941Federal Register · Rule · Jul 25, 1996
Background On March 3, 1978, EPA promulgated a list of ozone nonattainment areas under the provisions of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1977 (1977 Act or pre-amended Act), that included the San … All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this action serving as a proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action.
61 FR 38571Environmental Protection Agency
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.