Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.49s
Federal Register · Rule · Jul 18, 2008
General Requirements Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410( … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
73 FR 41272Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jul 21, 2008
General Requirements Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410( … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
73 FR 42263Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jun 24, 2003
Final Action EPA is approving the aforementioned changes to the SIP because the revisions are consistent with Clean Air Act and EPA regulatory requirements. … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
68 FR 37418Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Mar 15, 2018
Air Act. … Air Act.
83 FR 11418Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; Texas; Reasonably Available Control Technology
Federal Register · Rule · Feb 22, 2019
We are taking this action in accordance with the Clean Air Act (CAA, the Act). DATES: The final rule is effective on March 25, 2019. … The public comment period closed on December 14, 2018, and we received no adverse comments. We received two comments, including one from TCEQ, that were supportive of our action.
84 FR 5601Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Aug 8, 2017
Quality (KDAQ), to demonstrate that the State meets the infrastructure requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) for the 2012 Annual Fine Particulate Matter (PM 2.5 ) national ambient air quality … Comments on the proposed rulemaking were due on or before June 9, 2017. EPA did not receive any comments, adverse or otherwise. II.
82 FR 37012Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Sep 25, 1996
On August 21, 1995, Washington submitted SIP revision requests to the EPA to satisfy the requirements of sections 182(b)(4) and 182(c)(3) of the Clean Air Act, (1990) and Federal I/M rule 40 CFR part 51 … Clean Air Act Requirements The Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (CAA or Act), requires States to make changes to improve existing I/M programs or implement new ones.
61 FR 50235Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; Oregon; Removal of Obsolete Regulations
Federal Register · Rule · Dec 11, 2018
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by February 11, 2019. … (a) This section identified the original “State of Oregon Clean Air Act Implementation Plan” and all revisions submitted by Oregon that were federally approved prior to July 1, 2013.
83 FR 63579Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Feb 18, 2003
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. … Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by April 21, 2003.
68 FR 7704Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Nov 7, 2001
EPA is approving Alabama's fuel requirement into the SIP because these fuel requirements are in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act (the Act), and are necessary for the Birmingham nonattainment … The public comment period for this action ended on October 11, 2001. No comments, adverse or otherwise, were received on EPA's proposal.
66 FR 56218Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; North Carolina; Volatile Organic Compound Regulations
Federal Register · Rule · Aug 4, 2023
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jane Spann, Air Regulatory Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air and Radiation Division, U.S. … Comments on the June 13, 2023, NPRM were due on or before July 13, 2023. No comments were received on the June 13, 2023, NPRM. II.
88 FR 51713Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Mar 19, 2008
act under the policy on a grandfathering rationale for a short time period. … This action merely makes a determination based on air quality data and does not alter the relationship or the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act.
73 FR 14687Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Sep 15, 2008
In response to a request from the public, MSHA extended the comment period for the proposed rule from November 9, 2007, to November 16, 2007, to allow additional time for public review of transcripts. … MSHA received no comments on this proposal. 2. § 49.6(a)(2) The final rule, like the proposal, requires that mine rescue stations maintain supplies of liquid air, liquid oxygen, pressurized oxygen, or
73 FR 53116Labor DepartmentMine Safety and Health AdministrationNational Oil and Hazardous Substance Pollution Contingency Plan; National Priorities List
Federal Register · Rule · May 2, 2005
Section V discusses EPA's action to delete the Site from the NPL unless adverse comments are received during the public comment period. II. … The public comment period ran from February 28, 2001 until March 29, 2001. No comments were received from the general public nor from the City of Wyandotte, the property owner.
70 FR 22606Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · May 18, 2004
Conclusion After careful review of the available data, including the comments noted above, we have determined that air safety and the public interest require the adoption of the AD with the changes described … Surface cleaning and elaborate access procedures may be required.”
69 FR 28044Transportation DepartmentFederal Aviation AdministrationFederal Register · Rule · Apr 20, 2012
Analysis of SIP Revision for the Adjusted Standard EPA's approval is based on consideration of whether the adjusted standard meets the requirements of section 1l0(l) of the Clean Air Act (CAA), 42 U.S.C … All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed action. EPA will not institute a second comment period.
77 FR 23622Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Aug 4, 1997
. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: On December 19, 1995, the EPA promulgated Clean Air Act (CAA) section 111(d)/129 emission guidelines for existing Municipal … All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this action serving as a proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action.
62 FR 41872Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Nov 22, 2002
This action merely approves a state rule implementing a Federal standard, and does not alter the relationship or the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act. … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
67 FR 70315Environmental Protection AgencyAirworthiness Directives; Safran Helicopter Engines, S.A., Turboshaft Engines
Federal Register · Rule · Jul 5, 2018
Conclusion We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received, and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting this AD with the changes described previously. … for safety in air commerce.
83 FR 31325Transportation DepartmentFederal Aviation AdministrationAirworthiness Directives; Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation Helicopters
Federal Register · Rule · Jul 17, 2012
We will file in the docket all comments that we receive, as well as a report summarizing each substantive public contact with FAA personnel concerning this rulemaking during the comment period. … for safety in air commerce.
77 FR 41889Transportation DepartmentFederal Aviation Administration
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.