Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.17s
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Johnson v. Commissioner
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1987
Court of Appeals ........ 24 Appendix E - Order From the U.S. … Ratcliff - (1975, Ed Wis) 399 F Supp 760 .. 1-28 . Marbury v. Madison - U.S. (1 Craunch) 137 (1803) ... 1-28 Miranda v. State of Arizona - 86 S.
484 U.S. 830Supreme Court brief · Statement as to jurisdiction · Aug 15, 2019
(McMaster Dep. at 88:15—24.) … (McMaster Dep. at 63:18—24.)
Amicus Curiae Brief — Geraldine Tyler, Petitioner v. Hennepin County, Minnesota, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 5, 2023
Br. 24. … Br. 24-27.
Reply Brief — Amgen Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Sanofi, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Mar 6, 2023
(i) Page 1 3 3 6 6 9 11 15 21 24 ii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page(s) CASES Amgen Inc. v. Sanofi, 143 S. Ct. 399 (2022) ........................................... 3 Amgen Inc. v. … Sherkow, The Antibody Patent Paradox, 132 Yale L.J. 994 (2023).................................................................... 24 24 22 5 v TABLE OF AUTHORITIES—Continued Page(s) A.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 9, 2020
Harcleroad, 104 F.3d 1522 (9th Cir. 1997) ............................. 24 O’Bryan v. Bureau of Prisons, 349 F.3d 399 (7th Cir. 2003) ................................. 3 Roberts v. … Bureau of Prisons, 349 F.3d 399, 401 (7th Cir. 2003). Time and again, this Court has held that Congress’s weighted balance in favor of religious freedom is constitutional.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Estate of Duval v. Commissioner
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1946
Ct. 178, at Se, Ce ac EE MOD wckik scce deen korea ds Seen 24, 26, 41 Foy v. Rothensies (CCA 3rd, 1940), 115 F. (2d) 42 at 44... 24 Gammons v. … Pelzer (1940), 312 U.S. 399, 61 S. Ct. 659, Re LE Ch ccctsacs Fi chlkea lens cciaeawamwenes 25 United States v. Seattle First National Bank (1944), 321 U.S. 583, 64 S. Ct. 713, 88 L.
328 U.S. 838Federal Register · Notice · Jul 10, 2017
2,254 4,646 2 36,397 11,223 3 40,140 (47,620) Northern Elephant Seals 44 44 67 30 97 169 34 203 Harbor Seals 39 75 109 141 259 292 107 399 … Percentage of stock or population California sea lion U.S 296,750 40,140 13.5 Steller sea lion Eastern U.S 71,562 36 0.05 Harbor seal California 30,968 399
82 FR 31759Commerce DepartmentNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationMotion to Affirm — Maintenance Employes v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Motion to Affirm · 1963
United States, 399 U.S. 142 8 « St. Joe Paper Co. v. Atl. Coast Line R. Co., 347 US. 298 = 17 Schwabacher v. United States, 334 US. 182........... 17 Spokane International R. Co. … United States, supra, at 287 U.S. 24-25. wv VU S GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE ises 710763 3¢: oe -
375 U.S. 216Opposition — Mobil Oil Corp. v. Higginbotham
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1978
SIS, Saeed 20 The Four Sisters, 75 F.Supp. 399 , . 10 The Hamilton, 207 U.S. 398, 52 L.Ed. D ² ˙ Ddn!nUd——A. „ 39.14 The Harrisburg, 119 U.S. 199, 30 L. Ed. e 4,8 White v. … The Four Sisters, 75 F.Supp. 399 (O. Mass. 1947).
436 U.S. 618Opposition Brief — Haddle v. Garrison
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1998
Breckenridge, 403 U.S. 88 (1971) ..... 15 In re New Haven Inclusion Cases, 399 U.S. 392, Re ee ee 5 Irizarry v. Quiros, 722 F.2d 869 SE Nc 6 GhSd kek cerecepa’e 10, 11, 12, 21,22 Keating v. … Ga. 1986), aff'd, 807 F.2d 926 i Pt cine dec gudshcasws el sat 23, 24 Morast v. Lance, 807 F.2d 926 Mei ciscecsdubsdeceusiwows passim Portman v.
525 U.S. 121Opposition Brief — Frank B. Hall & Co. v. Buck
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1985
(Reply Brief for Appellants, at 24-25.) … Though Hall states this as a separate issue (Petition for Certiorari, at 23-24), it is essentially a restatement of Hall’s request for an “independent review.”
472 U.S. 1009Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1980
First National Bank 96 Md. 399, 54 A.68 €1903). . . 9 Burton Builders, Inc., v. L& S&S Construction Co. 260 Md. 66, 271 A.2d. 534 (1970) .10 DiGiorgio Importing & S.S. Co. v. Penn. R.R. … In this instance, the admission of the letter(without proper foundation) seriously impinged on that right. 3+ (COREG) 2eag5 Was 2ee Ohl A. 24. 397 (1966).
446 U.S. 966Amicus Brief — United States v. Rutherford
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1979
THE USE BY A TERMINALLY ILL CANCER PATIENT OF LAETRILE UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF A PHYSICIAN INVADES THE PATIENT'S RIGHT OF PRIVACY ............eceeees CT 5 ha Gees coeabeeaevenens I¥0 ee neas 16 24 … United States, 399 F.Supp. 1208, 1211 (W.D. Okla. 1979), 424 F.Supp. 105106 (W.D. Okla. 1977).
442 U.S. 544Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Basey v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1973
Petitioner was tried before a jury on November 22-24, 1971. Decision on petitioner’s motion for judgment of ac- quittal at the close of the government’s case was reserved. … Bishop, 367 F.2d 806 (24 Cir. 1966). Some courts allocate the burdens but do not quantify them. United States vs, Prieto-Olivas, 419 F.2d 149 (5th Cir. 1969); Kivette vs.
411 U.S. 964Opposition Brief — Camerarts Publishing Co. v. Prather
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1973
Supp. 399 (S.D.N.Y. 1939) . ih eicadaitieiaaies 4 Douglas v. Cunningham, 294 U.S. 207 (1935) Freudenthal v, Hebrew Pub. Co., 44 F.Supp. 754 (S.D.N.Y. 1942) _....... sisi ‘ai . 19 F.W. … Bruns Publications, Inc., 28 F.Supp. 399 (S.D.N.Y. 1939), it is not clear from the reported decision whether the court awarded actual profits and damages or damages under the 5 ‘tin lieu of’’ clause
414 U.S. 1112Opposition Brief — Stavropoulos v. Firestone
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2005
Norton, 350 F.3d 399 (3d Cir. 2003)......... 11, 12 Cole v. Me. Sch. Admin. Dist. No. 1, 350 F. Supp. 2d I eae lial alid adele saeedgtines 9 Coszalter v. City of Salem, 320 F.3d 968 (9th Cir. … (Record 123: 23-24). According to committee member Lanny Webb, Petitioner became very upset and hysterical. He “remem- ber[s] papers were in the air and her voice was raised.
544 U.S. 976Motion Amicus Curiae Brief — Pipefitters v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Motion Amicus Curiae Brief · 1972
Pent isy wania, 38 382 US. 399 (1966) Oe ona a 3 +) ; af os nt EN rae » rae ‘. we eee: vi “¢ L O., 30% U. S. 496 (1939) vane ; 10 : - -“Hertidon v. … Smith, - - 390 U.S. 17, 24 (1968) ; Elfbrandt v.
407 U.S. 385Supreme Court brief · Opinion · 1973
Kolodziejski, 399 U. S. 204 (1970) ; or to the validity of elections for local officials held under possibly discriminatory voting laws, Allen v. State Board of Elections, 393 U. S. 544 (1969). … Kolodziejski, 399 U. S. 204, 213-215. _ Retroactivity of the decision in Lemon I goes to the very core of the integrity of the judicial process.
411 U.S. 192Respondents Brief — Madeirense do Brasil, S/A v. Stulman-Emrick Lumber Co.
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1945
Div. 399: Aetna Life Insurance Co. Vv. National Drydock and Repair Co.. Tnc., 230 App. Div. 486, Plaut v. Plaut, 255 App. … Y. 19, 24.
325 U.S. 861Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Zaryl G. Bush, Petitioner v. Ohio
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 26, 2020
Perkins, 569 U.S. 383, 399, 133 S.Ct. 1924, 185 L. Ed. 2d 1019 (2013)... 11, 12, 13, 14 Moonv. Robinson, N.D. Ohio 1:12CV1396, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108799....... 8 Murray v. … Perkins, 569 U.S. 383, 399, 133 S. Ct. 1924, 185 L. Ed. 2d 1019 (2013) (quoting Schlup v. Delo, 513 U.S. 298, 327, llSS.Ct. 851, 130 L. Ed. 2d 808 (1995)). Cradic v. Hutchinson, 2019 U.S. App.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.