Documents

Emergency Application — Richard Gerald Jordan, Petitioner v. Mississippi

Supreme Court brief · Emergency Application · Jun 20, 2025

a writ of certiorari to the United States Supreme Court has been denied or the time for filing such petition has expired, the court shall set an 4 execution date…”); See also Pet. for Cert. in No. 24 … Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 411 (1986). Additionally, a stay of execution is necessary to facilitate a thorough and meaningful review, protecting that same due process right.

Reply Brief — Lindh v. Murphy

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1997

RB 20-24; CJLF 3-16; WLF 2-11. … CJLF 23-24.

Opposition Brief — In re Albert

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1986

PAGE 15 21 16 18 24 COUNTERSTATEMENT OF THE CASE I. … (R:376- 378, 398-399, 403, 405; JA:204, 254-258, 262, 278) The fourth witness called by the Helminskis was Dr. Thomas Corbett. Dr.

Opposition Brief — Pauly v. McCarthy

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1947

Ed. 189, r Ken 15, 22, 24 Bruner v. McCarthy, 105 Utah 399, 142 P. (2d) 649. 3 Cawman v. Pennsylvania-Reading Seashore Lines, 110 II. 20 Ehalt v. … S. 469, at page 475, 24 L.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Robert A. Rucho, et al., Appellants v. Common Cause, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 8, 2019

Perry, 548 U.S. 399, 448 (2006) (“LULAC”) (Stevens, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part) (emphasis added). … Ct. 24 1916 (2018).

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Ricky Ray Malone, Petitioner v. Tommy Sharp, Interim Warden

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jul 15, 2019

Mississippi, 410 U.S. 284 (1973) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22, 24 Ford v. Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Knowles v. … Royal, 886 F.3d 874 (10th Cir. 2018) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24, 25 Grant (John) v. Trammell, 727 F.3d 1006 (10th Cir. 2013) .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 Hanson v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Donald J. Trump, Petitioner v. Norma Anderson, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 18, 2024

New York, 399 U.S. 66 (1970) .................................................. 25 Barnhart v. … Va. 1869) ....................... 23, 24 Hamling v.

Application — Orlando Cordia Hall, Applicant v. T.J. Watson, Warden

Supreme Court brief · Application · Nov 19, 2020

Nov. 6, 2020), Dkt. #24; see also Mem. Op., Hall v. Barr et al., No. 20-cv03184 (D.D.C. Nov. 16, 2020), Dkt. #23. … Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 411 (1986) (plurality op.). Failure to stay the mandate also risks the “irreparable harm” of “foreclos[ing] * * * certiorari review by this Court.” Garrison v.

Respondents Brief — Advance Colorado, et al., Petitioners v. Jena Griswold, Colorado Secretary of State

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Jan 3, 2025

NO. 24-216 In the Supreme Court of the United States _______________________ ADVANCE COLORADO, ET AL., Petitioners, v. … Martin, 375 U.S. 399 (1964) ................................................ 17 Bierman v. Dayton, 817 F.3d 1070 (8th Cir. 2016) ................................ 20 Buckley v. Am.

New Animal Drugs; Approval of New Animal Drug Applications; Withdrawal of Approval of New Animal Drug Applications; Changes of Sponsorship; Change of Sponsor's Name and Address; Change of Sponsor's Address

Federal Register · Rule · Aug 29, 2016

Broomhill Rd., Tallaght, Dublin 24, Ireland FERROFORTE (gleptoferron injection) Piglets Original approval as a generic copy of NADA 110-399 FOI Summary. 1  The Agency has carefully considered … In the “Sponsor” column, numerically add “016952”. 24.

Revised Filing Requirements

Federal Register · Rule · Jan 25, 2002

L. 99-399, 100 Stat. 876 (42 U.S.C. 2169). § 73.26 [Amended] 22. … § 73.67 [Amended] 24.

Brief for the United States in Opposition — Klapprott v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United States in Opposition · 1949

): The court said (RR. 24-2 * = 6 It is our opinion that the de fe nel- ant’s. initiation of this actionat this late date - The district court denied the motion Ch. 26). … , ‘the order of the district court Wis” _afirmed: (R. 41),-one judge relying primarily on the absence of jurisdiction, although also noting the lack of equity in petitioner's applic ation (R. 32-399¢

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Eastern Air Lines, Inc. v. Winbourne

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1985

Judgment limiting Eastern’s liability to $225,000.00, plus interest, was entered on January 24, 1983. (Appendix A.) … Wiser, 555 F.2d 1079, 1089 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 922, 98 S.Ct. 399, 54 L.Ed.2d 279 (1977). Domangue v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc., 542 F.Supp. 643, 653 (E.D. La. 1982).

Respondents Brief — Wolfson v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1984

JURISDICTION The judgment of the court of appeals was entered on April 24, 1984. A petition for rehearing was denied on May 29, 1984. … called for a response by the attorneys.” 461 4&8. at 399.

Petition — Wright v. Georgia

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1980

Within time provided by law, the Petitioner filed a Mo- tion for Rehearing in the Court of Appeals of Georgia, said Motion being overruled and denied by the Court of Appeals on April 24, 1980. … marijuana was discovered in plain view on top of a dresser in the master bedroom along 2a with a metric scale, some ziplock plastic bags, several small brown “coin” envelopes, a tin can containing $1,- 399

Appendix — United States ex rel. Potts v. Rabb

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1944

Pothier, 264 U. 8. 399, 402- 403; Johnson v. Hoy, 227 U. S. 245, 247; Glasgow v. Moyer, 225 U. S. 420, 428-430; cf. Roche v. Evaporated Milk Assn., 319 U. S. 21, 25. … United States, 24 F. (2d) 405, 407-408 (C. C. A. 8); Nanfito v. United States, 20 F. (2d) 376, 378 (C. C. A. 8); United States v. Rubin, 218 Fed. 245, 247-249 (D.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Lalako Jonathan Jose, Petitioner v. Arizona

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Feb 3, 2025

Florida, 399 U.S. 78, 86 (1970) (“hold[ing] that the 12-man panel is not a necessary ingredient of ‘trial by jury’”); see also State v. … CR-24-0136-PR Court of Appeals, Division Two No. 2 CA-CR 23-0224 Pima County Superior Court No.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al., Petitioners v. Barbara, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 25, 2026

Hall, 4 Cal. 399 (1854)................................................ 18 Quock Ting v. United States, 140 U. S. 417 (1891) .................................... 21, 22 Tape v. … Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898) ................. 7, 8, 9, 11, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 27 Yick Wo v.

Fraud and Identity Theft Complaints Received (2005)

Agency decision · Agency decision

No. of Complaints 2003 1,350 458 321 2,127 2004 1,819 623 529 2,964 2005 1,918 604 556 3,064 Indiana Calendar Year 50 - 59 60 - 69 70 and Over No. of Complaints 2003 673 224 219 1,113 2004 954 399 … Over No. of Complaints 2003 208 109 78 395 2004 300 122 98 520 2005 369 170 102 641 2003 28 11 5 44 Calendar Year 2004 60 23 12 95 2005 69 18 11 98 2003 697 364 221 1,282 Calendar Year 2004 801 399

DRAFT: June 24, 2026

Court rules · Court rule

CJA. 4-202.02 DRAFT: June 24, 2026 1 2 3 Rule 4-202.02. … investigation; CJA. 4-202.02 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399