Documents

Opposition Brief — Lanham Ford, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2004

The petition for a writ of certiorari was filed on August 24, 2004. The jurisdiction of this court is invoked under 28 U.S.C. § 1254(1). . STATEMENT 1. … Kia Motors America, Inc., 357 F.3d 392, 398-399 (3d Cir. 2004). The next step is typically to examine the defendant’s petition for removal. Mehlenbacher, 216 F.3d at 296.

Opinion — Munsey v. Webb

Supreme Court brief · Opinion · 1913

A. 399. To the same effect are: Reeves vy. Wallace, 10 Wall. 176; Morrison vy. Davis, 20 Pa. St. 293; Cuff v. N. & M. Y. R. Co., 35 N. J. L. 18; Smith v. Kanawha County (West Va.), 8 L. R. … (Va.), 24 8. E. Rep. 467; Fowlks v. Southern Ry. Co. (Va.), 32 8. E. Rep. 464; Winfree v. Jones (Va.), 51 S. E. Rep. 153; S. C., 1 L. R. A. (N. S.), 201.

Reply Brief — Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Chittum

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1996

with evidence of Chit- tum’s likely future pay increases, R. 292A-292E, as well as his inability to increase the retirement pension annuity he would re- ceive after his disability annuity expired, R. 399 … Respondent’s tortured history of the Culver case, Opp. 23-24, does nothing to reduce the relevance of this issue under the LHWCA.

Opinion — Nadal v. May

Supreme Court brief · Opinion · 1914

The validating act of February 24, 1903, was not ef- fectual. … Eq. 394, 399; Houston & T. C. R. Co. v. Texas, 170 U. 8. 243, 261. See also Gunn v. Barry, 15 Wall. 610, 622; Ar- nett v. Reade, 220 U.S. 311, 320.

Oral argument — United States v. Ignacio Galvan-Benavides

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 9, 2010

If that's the case, then how do we get around the Supreme Court cases that have approved third-strike punishment for offenses as minor as stealing $399 worth of goods from a store? … So the district court did not abuse its discretion in deciding that something substantially more severe than 24 months was necessary to deter this defendant's illegal criminal conduct.

Petition for A Writ of Certiorari — Hostetter v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for A Writ of Certiorari · 1941

Herbert Hostetter, (Unre- ported opinion of the Orphans’ Court)..... 19 In re Estate of Miller, 184 Cal. 674.............. 11 In re Estate of Rath, 10 Cal. (2d) 399.......... 11 In re Heilbron Bros … A. 413........ 24 Lentz v. Commissioner, 21 B. T. A. 1336, 1342.. 24 Quinn v. Union Nat. Bk., 32 Fed. (2d) 762...... 13 United States v. Kombst, 286 U.S. 424......... 11 Washburn v.

Reply Brief — Carlos Javier Pedroza-Rocha, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Apr 22, 2020

BIO 21–24. This misinterprets Mendoza-Lopez. … Contrary to the government’s assertion, BIO 24–25, he meets the remaining § 1326(d) requirements.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Jonathan Carvalho, Petitioner v. Steven Kenneway, Superintendent, Massachusetts Correctional Institution at Shirley

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 18, 2022

Garabedian, 399 Mass. 304313 ' .(1987). … See id^. at 399.

Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to Specified Activities; Taking Marine Mammals Incidental to Seabird Research Activities in Central California

Federal Register · Notice · Jul 10, 2017

2,254 4,646 2  36,397 11,223 3  40,140 (47,620) Northern Elephant Seals 44 44 67 30 97 169 34 203 Harbor Seals 39 75 109 141 259 292 107 399 … Percentage of stock or population California sea lion U.S 296,750 40,140 13.5 Steller sea lion Eastern U.S 71,562 36 0.05 Harbor seal California 30,968 399

Opposition Brief — Frank B. Hall & Co. v. Buck

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1985

(Reply Brief for Appellants, at 24-25.) … Though Hall states this as a separate issue (Petition for Certiorari, at 23-24), it is essentially a restatement of Hall’s request for an “independent review.”

Opposition Brief — Stavropoulos v. Firestone

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2005

Norton, 350 F.3d 399 (3d Cir. 2003)......... 11, 12 Cole v. Me. Sch. Admin. Dist. No. 1, 350 F. Supp. 2d I eae lial alid adele saeedgtines 9 Coszalter v. City of Salem, 320 F.3d 968 (9th Cir. … (Record 123: 23-24). According to committee member Lanny Webb, Petitioner became very upset and hysterical. He “remem- ber[s] papers were in the air and her voice was raised.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Basey v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1973

Petitioner was tried before a jury on November 22-24, 1971. Decision on petitioner’s motion for judgment of ac- quittal at the close of the government’s case was reserved. … Bishop, 367 F.2d 806 (24 Cir. 1966). Some courts allocate the burdens but do not quantify them. United States vs, Prieto-Olivas, 419 F.2d 149 (5th Cir. 1969); Kivette vs.

Opposition Brief — Camerarts Publishing Co. v. Prather

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1973

Supp. 399 (S.D.N.Y. 1939) . ih eicadaitieiaaies 4 Douglas v. Cunningham, 294 U.S. 207 (1935) Freudenthal v, Hebrew Pub. Co., 44 F.Supp. 754 (S.D.N.Y. 1942) _....... sisi ‘ai . 19 F.W. … Bruns Publications, Inc., 28 F.Supp. 399 (S.D.N.Y. 1939), it is not clear from the reported decision whether the court awarded actual profits and damages or damages under the 5 ‘tin lieu of’’ clause

Amicus Brief — United States v. Rutherford

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1979

THE USE BY A TERMINALLY ILL CANCER PATIENT OF LAETRILE UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF A PHYSICIAN INVADES THE PATIENT'S RIGHT OF PRIVACY ............eceeees CT 5 ha Gees coeabeeaevenens I¥0 ee neas 16 24 … United States, 399 F.Supp. 1208, 1211 (W.D. Okla. 1979), 424 F.Supp. 105106 (W.D. Okla. 1977).

Petition — Nolan v. Maryland

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1980

First National Bank 96 Md. 399, 54 A.68 €1903). . . 9 Burton Builders, Inc., v. L& S&S Construction Co. 260 Md. 66, 271 A.2d. 534 (1970) .10 DiGiorgio Importing & S.S. Co. v. Penn. R.R. … In this instance, the admission of the letter(without proper foundation) seriously impinged on that right. 3+ (COREG) 2eag5 Was 2ee Ohl A. 24. 397 (1966).

Opposition — Mobil Oil Corp. v. Higginbotham

Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1978

SIS, Saeed 20 The Four Sisters, 75 F.Supp. 399 , . 10 The Hamilton, 207 U.S. 398, 52 L.Ed. D ² ˙ Ddn!nUd——A. „ 39.14 The Harrisburg, 119 U.S. 199, 30 L. Ed. e 4,8 White v. … The Four Sisters, 75 F.Supp. 399 (O. Mass. 1947).

Opposition Brief — Haddle v. Garrison

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1998

Breckenridge, 403 U.S. 88 (1971) ..... 15 In re New Haven Inclusion Cases, 399 U.S. 392, Re ee ee 5 Irizarry v. Quiros, 722 F.2d 869 SE Nc 6 GhSd kek cerecepa’e 10, 11, 12, 21,22 Keating v. … Ga. 1986), aff'd, 807 F.2d 926 i Pt cine dec gudshcasws el sat 23, 24 Morast v. Lance, 807 F.2d 926 Mei ciscecsdubsdeceusiwows passim Portman v.

Motion to Affirm — Maintenance Employes v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Motion to Affirm · 1963

United States, 399 U.S. 142 8 « St. Joe Paper Co. v. Atl. Coast Line R. Co., 347 US. 298 = 17 Schwabacher v. United States, 334 US. 182........... 17 Spokane International R. Co. … United States, supra, at 287 U.S. 24-25. wv VU S GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE ises 710763 3¢: oe -

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Zaryl G. Bush, Petitioner v. Ohio

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 26, 2020

Perkins, 569 U.S. 383, 399, 133 S.Ct. 1924, 185 L. Ed. 2d 1019 (2013)... 11, 12, 13, 14 Moonv. Robinson, N.D. Ohio 1:12CV1396, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108799....... 8 Murray v. … Perkins, 569 U.S. 383, 399, 133 S. Ct. 1924, 185 L. Ed. 2d 1019 (2013) (quoting Schlup v. Delo, 513 U.S. 298, 327, llSS.Ct. 851, 130 L. Ed. 2d 808 (1995)). Cradic v. Hutchinson, 2019 U.S. App.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Lonnie Kade Welsh, Petitioner v. Texas

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jun 23, 2020

S. 399, 405 (emphasis added) The founders understood that punishment is deserved by a wrong doer only when his acts was a conscious choice unimpaired and unlabored free-will. … (a madman is punished by his madness alone). 2 William Blackstone commentary of the laws of England 24. (1803).