Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
1.10s
Federal Register · Rule · Feb 9, 1999
Background On March 3, 1978, EPA promulgated a list of nonattainment areas under the provisions of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1977 (1977 Act or pre-amended Act), that listed NCUAQMD and NSCAPCD … All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action.
64 FR 6223Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; Connecticut; Open Burning and Portable Fuel Containers
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Sep 1, 2016
We also propose to approve a definition of “brush,” which was included in a December 15, 2015 SIP submittal by Connecticut to meet infrastructure requirements of the Clean Air Act for the 2012 fine particle … This action is being taken in accordance with the Clean Air Act. DATES: Written comments must be received on or before October 3, 2016.
81 FR 60329Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plan; Illinois
Federal Register · Rule · May 7, 1996
Air Act (Act) amendments of 1990. … At the conclusion of this additional public comment period, USEPA will publish a final rule responding to the public comments received and announcing final action.
61 FR 20455Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Dec 17, 2002
EPA is proposing to approve the SIP revisions under provisions of the Clean Air Act (CAA) regarding EPA action on SIP submittals, SIPs for national primary and secondary ambient air quality standards, … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
67 FR 77204Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jun 15, 2011
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to determine pursuant to the Clean Air Act (CAA), that the bi-state Louisville, Kentucky-Indiana, fine particulate (PM 2.5 ) nonattainment area (hereafter referred to as … More detailed information on the monitoring data for the Louisville Area during the 2007-2009 design period is provided in EPA's March 9, 2011, final rulemaking to approve the clean data determination
76 FR 34935Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jan 17, 1997
EPA is also approving under section 112(l) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) the same source-categories of the submitted regulations for limiting PTE of hazardous air pollutants (HAP) to less than title V permitting … Air Act (Act)'' dated January 25, 1995, from John Seitz to the EPA Regional Air Division Directors.
62 FR 2587Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jun 17, 1999
EPA is fully approving these revisions in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act. … EPA will address all public comments in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action.
64 FR 32415Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Uncategorized Document · Jul 25, 1994
micrometers (PM-10) and to fulfill other Clean Air Act (Act) requirements for the Follansbee, West Virginia area. … The General Preamble to Title I of the Clean Air Act Amendments established a November 15, 1993 deadline for state submittal of contingency plans (57 FR 13498).
Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Sep 15, 1998
. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: Under section 211(k)(6) of the Clean Air Act, as amended (Act), the Administrator of EPA shall require the sale of reformulated … Background Opt-in Provision/Process As part of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, Congress added a new subsection (k) to section 211 of the Act.
63 FR 49317Environmental Protection AgencyReview of National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Oct 23, 1997
The schedule for this review is consistent with the requirements of the Clean Air Act (Act) for periodic review of the criteria and standards, including review by the Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee … Public Comment Period on September to November 2001. Proposal (90 days). CASAC meeting on Proposal.... November 2001. Review Public/CASAC Comments December 2001 to April 2002.
62 FR 55201Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Nov 23, 2009
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R03-OAR-2009-0599; FRL-8982-5] Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Virginia; Revision to Clean Air Interstate Rule Sulfur … Virginia's approved Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) regulations.
74 FR 61037Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of State Plans For Designated Facilities and Pollutants: Tennessee
Federal Register · Rule · Sep 30, 1999
Background Under section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act (Act), EPA has established procedures whereby States submit plans to control certain existing sources of ``designated pollutants.'' … All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period.
64 FR 52660Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Mar 1, 2022
vehicle programs (CFVP), and the enhanced monitoring of ozone and ozone precursors (EMP) requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA). … The public comment period for this proposed rule ended on January 6, 2022. EPA received no comments on the proposal. II.
87 FR 11310Environmental Protection AgencyRevision of Air Quality Implementation Plan; Nevada; Clark County; Stationary Source Permits
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 23, 2014
Air Act. … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
79 FR 42752Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Feb 7, 2012
EPA is proposing to approve the State Implementation Plan (SIP) submittal from the State of Oregon to demonstrate that the SIP meets the requirements of section 110(a)(1) and (2) of the Clean Air Act ( … Oregon's submittal: Oregon's SIP submittal refers to OAR 340-200 “General Air Pollution Procedures and Definitions: -0040 State of Oregon Clean Air Act Implementation Plan” which provides for revisions
77 FR 6044Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plan; Indiana
Federal Register · Rule · Jul 5, 2000
Our approval makes the Indiana sinter plant rule part of the federally enforceable SIP under the Clean Air Act (Act). II. Why Did Indiana Submit a Sinter Plant SIP Revision Request? … Air Act.
65 FR 41350Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Aug 17, 1998
Background On March 3, 1978, EPA promulgated a list of ozone nonattainment areas under the provisions of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1977 (1977 Act or pre-amended Act), that included the San … All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period.
63 FR 43881Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Apr 1, 2020
This revision addresses the infrastructure requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act)—including the interstate transport provisions—for the 2015 ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) … This action is being taken under the Clean Air Act. DATES: Written comments must be received on or before May 1, 2020. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No.
85 FR 18160Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Apr 8, 2010
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
75 FR 17865Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jul 11, 2001
Under authority of the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act), this action simultaneously approves local rules that regulate these emission sources and directs California to correct rule deficiencies … Public Comments and EPA Responses EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. During this period, we received comments on SJVUAPCD Rules 4201 and 4901.
66 FR 36170Environmental Protection Agency
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.