Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

Filters1994

10,000+ results

0.19s

  • Reply Brief — Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District, Petitioner v. Tesla Energy Operations, Inc., fka SolarCity Corporation

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Mar 2, 2018

    McKnight, 521 U.S. 399, 403 (1997); accord Cantor v. Detroit Edison Co., 428 U.S. 579, 600 (1976) (plurality). … Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800, 816 (1982). 24 D.

  • Brief Amicus Curiae — Jacob Siegel Co. v. Federal Trade Commission

    Supreme Court brief · Brief Amicus Curiae · 1946

    S. 399 (1913) . 13 U. S. v. Morgan,307 U. S. 183, 191 ', peer 14 Washington Market Co. v. Hoffman, 101 U. S. 112 | SE deehawssnes van besnaeen CAR PEE PRA? OP 13 Statutes . 7 “15 U.S. C. … Lexington Mill Co., 232 U.S. 399 (1913); Washington Market Co, v./ Hoffman, 101 U.

    327 U.S. 608
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Rice v. Collins

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006

    Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986) .........ccccesseseesseeeceeseenees 8 Foster v. Johnson, 293 F.3d 766 (5th Cir. 2002)...........ccccceceesees 11 Garcia v. Runnells, 2005 WL 1799417 (9th Cir. … Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 411 (1986). Nor did this Court hesitate in determining that a post-trial bail hearing was insufficient to provide a full hearing on a claim. Kimmelman v.

    546 U.S. 333
  • Brief for Appellee — Stanton v. Stanton

    Supreme Court brief · Brief for Appellee · 1975

    Union Carbide Corp., 399 F.2d 847 (7th Cir. 1968) 15 Moritz vs. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 469 F.2d 466 (10th Cir. 197277777 22 Morris vs. … Union Carbide Corp., 399 F.2d 847 (7th Cir. 1968); Robinson vs. Board of Regents of Eastern Kentucky University, 475 F.2d 707 (6th Cir. 1973); Morris vs.

    421 U.S. 7
  • Motion to Dismiss or Affirm — United Building & Constr. Trades Council of Camden Cty. v. Mayor and Council of Camden

    Supreme Court brief · Motion to Dismiss or Affirm · 1984

    Y. 2d 514, 399 N. E. 2d 909, 423 N. Y. S. 2d 878 (1979), cert. denied sub nom. Abrams m1 Belin, GORD. B GED CIEBB) nn oc cccccvccccsccsconss 14 Shapiro v. Thompson, 394 U. … App. 23-24. See K. S. B. Tech. Sales v. North Jersey Dist. Water Supply, 75 N. J. 272, 298, 381 A. 2d 774, 787 (1977). 23. See H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc. v. DuMond, 336 U. S. 525, 535 (1°29). 24.

    465 U.S. 208
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Mark Brnovich, Attorney General of Arizona, et al., Petitioners v. Democratic National Committee, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jun 1, 2020

    Virginia State Board of Elections, No. 6:20-cv-24 (W.D. … Perry, 548 U.S. 399, 446 (2009).

  • Reply Brief — Facebook, Inc., Petitioner v. Noah Duguid, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Nov 16, 2020

    Code § 24-5-14-1 (1988) ........................................... 10, 11 III Statutes and regulations—Continued: Page N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 399-p (McKinney 1988) ................... 11 Okla. … Code § 24-5-14-1 (1988) (same); N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 399-p (McKinney 1988) (same); Okla. Stat. tit. 15, § 752.10 (1991) (same). In the TCPA, Congress took a different approach.

  • Opposition Brief — Robert Angel Perez, Petitioner v. Colorado

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Sep 11, 2020

    State, 399 P.3d 625 (Wyo. 2017) ............... 20 Holmes v. South Carolina, 547 U.S. 319 (2006) ............ 13 Jaffee v. Redmond, 518 U.S. 1 (1996) ............................ 21 Pennsylvania v. … California, 386 U.S. 18, 24 (1967).

  • Brief for Petitioner — Gonzales v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Brief for Petitioner · 1955

    United States 9th Cir., 1953, 203 F. 2d 336, 346 U.S. 389, 392-393, 395, 396-397, 399 (1953) .... 20, 21, 22, 24, 32, 33, 38, 39, 42, 46, 48, 49 Estep v. United States ae UU. … United States, 346 U.S. 389, 396-397, 399 (1953) ; Jewell v. United States, 6th Cir., 1953, 208 F. 2d 770, 771.

    348 U.S. 407
  • Marking of Commercial Motor Vehicles; Application for an Exemption-Adirondack Trailways, Pine Hill Trailways, and New York Trailways

    Federal Register · Notice · Jun 1, 2020

    The on-line Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) is available 24 hours each day, 365 days each year. … The carrier and drivers must comply with all other requirements of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (49 CFR parts 350-399) and Hazardous Materials Regulations (49 CFR parts 105-180).

    85 FR 33272Transportation DepartmentFederal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
  • Hours of Service of Drivers: Extreme Logistics, LLC, Application for Exemption

    Federal Register · Notice · May 18, 2020

    The on-line Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) is available 24 hours each day, 365 days each year. … The carrier and drivers must comply with all other applicable requirements of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (49 CFR parts 350-399) and Hazardous Materials Regulations (49 CFR parts 105-180

    85 FR 29782Transportation DepartmentFederal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
  • Changes to Nuclear Power Plant Security Requirements Associated with Containment Access Control

    Federal Register · Proposed Rule · May 10, 1995

    wage of approximately $30 per hour (loaded) for security personnel, the total savings per reactor per year would be: 2 guards/reactor x 50 days/outage x 2/3 outages/year x $30/ hr-guard x 24 … L. 99-399, 100 Stat. 876 (42 U.S.C. 2169). Sec. 73.55 [Amended] 2. In Sec. 73.55, paragraph (d)(8) is removed and paragraph (d)(9) is redesignated as (d)(8).

    60 FR 24803Nuclear Regulatory Commission
  • Preliminary assessment of efficiency initiatives announced by Secretary of Defense Gates on August 9, 2010

    Congressional research report · CRS Report · Aug 12, 2010

    • DW J-book also shows $413 million for services & studies in FY2010; $544 in million FY2011; amount for “other contracts” = $124 million FY2010, $399 million FY2011. … Assume $120 K per person, cost = from $24 million to no more than $84 million for contractors to prepare reports. Additional amounts for reports prepared internally not available.

    ZZZ752FD86E62F2A649Congressional Research Service
  • Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 131 / Monday, July 10, 2006 / Notices

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    ER06–24–001, EL06–79–000] California Independent System Operator Corporation; Notice of Institution of Proceeding and Refund Effective Date June 30, 2006. … RP06–399–000] Kern River Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Petition for Waiver of Tariff Provisions and Request for Expedited Action June 30, 2006.

    Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
  • UNITED STATES TAX COURT

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    Rul. 74-611, 1974-2 C.B. 399. 2. Shelley Since the overpayment was attributable entirely to taxes withheld from Shelley's income, she alone has any interest in the refund of the overpayment. … --For purposes of section 6511 or 6512-(1) Any tax actually deducted and withheld at the source during any calendar year under chapter 24 shall, in respect of the recipient of the income, be deemed to

    United States Tax Court
  • Answer to Respondents Brief in Opposition — Jiffy Enterprises, Inc. v. Sears Roebuck & Co.

    Supreme Court brief · Answer to Respondents Brief in Opposition · 1962

    C om- missioner, 248 F. 2d 399 (C. A. 2d).” Moreover, there i is nothing inthe argument (or,cases 1 re- . lied upon therein) set forth in the Petition (10-17). that. … Par. 4(c) & 4 (e)). om 22- 24). a 5.

    371 U.S. 922
  • Opposition — Howard v. Des Moines Register & Tribune Co.

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1980

    R. 24 and pray that the Petition for Writ of Certiorari be denied. ra’ — REASONS WHY PETITION SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED I. … Ed. 2d 399 (1979). + II. Petitioner has failed to meet the requirements set by statute and Supreme Court Rules for a grant of cer- tiorari.

    445 U.S. 904
  • Reply Brief — George W. Mathias, Applicant v. United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Dec 1, 2017

    See Stay Application 23-24 & n.9 (collecting cases). … In re Howmedica Osteonics Corp., 867 F.3d 390, 399-400 (3d Cir. 2017) (“[W]e do not indefinitely possess mandamus jurisdiction, and, once the transferee court proceeds with the transferred case, the decision

  • Reply Brief — George W. Mathias, Petitioner v. United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Dec 1, 2017

    See Stay Application 23-24 & n.9 (collecting cases). … In re Howmedica Osteonics Corp., 867 F.3d 390, 399-400 (3d Cir. 2017) (“[W]e do not indefinitely possess mandamus jurisdiction, and, once the transferee court proceeds with the transferred case, the decision

  • Reply Brief — Mission Oaks Mobile Home Park v. City of Hollister

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1994

    Ed. 2d 388, 399 (1993). … Mission Oaks has explained this, Petition at 5, 24, and respondent itself notes the law behind the reason, Opposition at 20 n.19: in California, claims that could have been brought are merged into

    510 U.S. 1110

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.