Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
7,792 results
0.24s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Pilot Life Ins. Co. v. Dedeaux
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1987
Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co., 780 F.2d 419, 423 (4th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 106 S. … Pireno, 458 U.S. at 129.
481 U.S. 41Amicus Curiae Brief — DeFunis v. Odegaard
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1974
Sharpe, 347 U.S. 497 (1954) ............-.-.00- 56 Bridgeport Guardians v. Bridgeport Civil Service Commis- sion, 482 F.2d 1333 (2nd Cir. 1973) .............0ee000- 47 Brooks v. … Bridgeport Civil Service Commission, 482 F.2d 1333 (2d Cir. 1973); Vulcan Society v.
416 U.S. 312Amicus Curiae Brief — Danco Laboratories, LLC, Applicant v. Louisiana, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 6, 2026
A U.S. … MED. 57 (2022). 33 “App.” refers to the Appendix to the Application by Danco to Stay or Vacate the Fifth Circuit's Stay Pending Appeal. 34 U.S.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Meredith v. Jefferson County Board of Education
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006
Pitts, 503 U.S. 467, 489-90 (1992); Wash v. Seattle Sch. Dist. No. 1, 458 U.S. 457, 482 (1982); Milliken v. Bradley, 418 U.S. 717, 741 (1974). … Grutter, 593 U.S. at 333.
548 U.S. 938Amicus Curiae Brief — Randall v. Sorrell
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006
See Buckley, 424 U.S. at 30; see also Nixon, 528 U.S. at 395. … Buckley, 424 U.S. at 55.
546 U.S. 1148Amicus Curiae Brief — Tamer Mahmoud, et al., Petitioners v. Thomas W. Taylor, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 9, 2025
Connecticut, 382 U.S. 479, 482 (1965) (discussing this “principle” of Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390 (1923) and Pierce v. Society of Sisters, 268 U.S. 510 (1925)). … Dist., 141 U.S. at 189.
Amicus Curiae Brief — GenBioPro, Inc., Applicant v. Louisiana, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 6, 2026
A U.S. … MED. 57 (2022). 33 “App.” refers to the Appendix to the Application by Danco to Stay or Vacate the Fifth Circuit's Stay Pending Appeal. 34 U.S.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Cuozzo Speed Techs., LLC v. Lee, 136 S. Ct. 890 (2016) (No. 15-446)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2016
of Cal., 449 U.S. 232, 239 (1980); see generally Bennett v. Spear 520 U.S. 154, 177-78 (1997). … Vigil, 508 U.S. 182 (1993); Heckler v. Chaney, 470 U.S. 821 (1985); Citizens to Pres. Overton Park v. Volpe, 401 U.S. 402 (1971).
Amicus Curiae Brief — South Carolina v. Catawba Tribe, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1986
App. 477-478, 482, 493. 4 After Congress was assured that the Tribe desired termination (see Hearings, supra note 4, at 9, 18, 84-85; C.A. … U.S. 371, 375 (1917).
476 U.S. 498Amicus Curiae Brief — State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Campbell
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004
Campbell, 538 U.S. 408 (2003). … Danaher, 238 U.S. 482, 490 (1915).
543 U.S. 874Amicus Curiae Brief — Darrell Patterson, Petitioner v. Walgreen Co.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 17, 2018
Cloer, 569 U.S. 369 (2013) ........................16 State Oil Co. v. Khan, 522 U.S. 3 (1997) .....................19 Toledo v. … App’x 482 (5th Cir. 2002) 9. Bolden v. Caravan Facilities Mgmt., LLC, 112 F. Supp. 3d 785 (N.D. Ind. 2015) 10. Davis v. Fort Bend Cty., 765 F.3d 480 (5th Cir. 2014) 11. Andrews v.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jun 13, 2025
For example, a study using the U.S. … Brunetti, 588 U.S. 388, 393 (2019); accord Minn. Voters Alliance v. Mansky, 585 U.S. 1, 11(“prohibited”); Matal v. Tam, 582 U.S. 218, 243 (2017) (“forbidden”).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Ring v. Arizona
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2002
State, 41 Ga. 482, 483 (Ga. 1871) (Georgia arson statute provided for judicial sentencing discretion within a prescribed range); Jones v. … Apprendi, 530 U.S. at 495 (quoting McMillan, 477 U.S. at 88).
536 U.S. 584Amicus Curiae Brief — Ford Motor Co. v. Estate of Smith
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003
BMW, 517 U.S. at 575. … Danaher, 238 U.S. 482, 490 (1915), this Court set forth the basic prin- ciple that where a corporate defendant is justified in believing that a certain course of business conduct is reasonable, the
538 U.S. 1028Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 28, 2024
Continental Bank Corp., 494 U.S. 472, 482–483 (1990)). Instead, it ordinarily permits a plaintiff on remand to “amend their pleadings or develop the record more fully.” … U.S. at 109.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Marytza Golden, Petitioner v. Indianapolis Housing Agency
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 8, 2018
See, e.g., U.S. Airways, Inc. v. Barnett, 535 U.S. 391, 405-06 (2002). … Germain, 503 U.S. 249, 253 (1992).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Johnson v. Jones
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1995
Mitchell, 472 U.S. at 526 (quoting Harlow, 457 U.S. at 818). … determinative, whether the cause or exigent circumstances”—in other words, whether qualified immunity is available—‘“will often require examination of the information possessed by the searching officials.” 482
515 U.S. 304Amicus Curiae Brief — Dahda v. United States, 138 S. Ct. 940 (2018) (No. 17-43)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018
Berger, 388 U.S. at 46; Nardone v. … Jones, 565 U.S. 400 (2012), and City of Ontario v. Quon, 560 U.S. 746 (2010).
Amicus Curiae Brief — J. E. B. v. Alabama ex rel. T. B. (No. 92-1239)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1993
Illinois, 83 U.S. (16 Wall.) 130 LE . Caban v. Mohammed, 441 U.S. 380 (1979)... Carter \ Jury Comm’n, 396 U.S. 320 (1970)... Clark Vv. Jeter, 486 U.S. 456 (1988) Cleburne Vv. … Cleburne Liv- ing Center, Inc., 473 U.S. 482, 441 (1985) (differ- ential treatment of the sexes “very likely reflect[s] outmoded notions of the relative capabilities of men and women’); Caban v.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Air & Liquid Systems Corp. v. DeVries, 139 S. Ct. 986 (2019) (No. 17-1104)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2019
Trane U.S., Inc., 2016 WL 916435, at *1 (W.D. Wis. … Forms Corp., 571 A.2d 420, 423 (Pa. Super.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.