Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.12s
Federal Register · Rule · Oct 16, 2001
Under the Clean Air Act—A Menu of Options” (September 1993) and “Controlling Nitrogen Oxides Under the Clean Air Act—A Menu of Options” (July 1994). … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
66 FR 52511Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jul 11, 2017
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving, under the Clean Air Act (CAA), revisions to the Ohio Administrative Code (OAC) rule as part of Ohio's State Implementation Plan (SIP). … Also, for article, machine, equipment or other contrivance located within an ozone nonattainment area, the best available technology determination must comply with Section 193 of the Clean Air Act amendments
82 FR 31916Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jan 21, 2025
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is making an interim final determination that the California Air Resources Board (CARB) has submitted a Clean Air Act (CAA or “Act”) state implementation … of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act.
90 FR 6809Environmental Protection AgencyAirworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300, A310, and A300-600 Series Airplanes
Federal Register · Rule · Oct 28, 1997
Revision of Descriptive Language One commenter points out that throughout the proposed AD it references ram air turbine (RAT) uplock assembly and lever assembly as if these assemblies are the same … Conclusion After careful review of the available data, including the comments noted above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the public interest require the adoption of the rule with the
62 FR 55726Transportation DepartmentFederal Aviation AdministrationFederal Register · Rule · Mar 17, 2006
This action is being taken under the Clean Air Act (CAA). DATES: This rule will become effective on April 17, 2006. … Air Act.
71 FR 13767Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Aug 22, 2011
Conclusion We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received, and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting the AD with the changes described previously. … for safety in air commerce.
76 FR 52213Transportation DepartmentFederal Aviation AdministrationApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans and Operating Permits Program; State of Nebraska
Federal Register · Rule · Sep 5, 2003
Section 110 of the Clean Air Act (CAA) requires states to develop air pollution regulations and control strategies to ensure that state air quality meets the national ambient air quality standards established … Please ensure that your comments are submitted within the specified comment period. Comments received after the close of the comment period will be marked “late.”
68 FR 52691Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Nov 8, 2000
of the EPA with respect to those provisions of the proposed program amendment that relate to air or water quality standards promulgated under the authority of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et … seq. ) or the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. ).
65 FR 66929Interior DepartmentSurface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement OfficeFederal Register · Rule · Nov 17, 2010
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
75 FR 70140Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jun 3, 1999
The intention of this action is to regulate SO2 emissions in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (the Act). … All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed action. The EPA will not institute a second comment period.
64 FR 29793Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Aug 28, 2008
Meeting these goals will help clean Delaware's air. … Comment: The commenter states that Regulation No. 1146 overwrites the carefully-balanced provisions of the Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR).
73 FR 50723Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Oct 15, 2001
Under the Clean Air Act—A Menu of Options” (September 1993) and “Controlling Nitrogen Oxides Under the Clean Air Act—A Menu of Options” (July 1994). … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
66 FR 52322Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jan 9, 2008
We will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting must do so at this time. … Judicial Review Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act (CAA), judicial review of this direct final rule is available only by filing a petition for review in the U.S.
73 FR 1497Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan and Operating Permit Program Approval; TN; Electronic Notice (e-Notice) Provisions
Federal Register · Rule · Sep 30, 2022
These changes address the public notice rule provisions for the New Source Review (NSR) and title V programs of the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) by providing for electronic notice (e-notice) and removing … When e-notice is provided, EPA's rule requires electronic access (e-access) to the draft permit for the duration of the public comment period.
87 FR 59322Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jun 29, 2016
Public notice and comment for this action are unnecessary because the underlying rule for which this correcting amendment has been prepared was already subject to a 30-day comment period and because the … Air Act.
81 FR 42263Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jan 26, 1996
During the 30-day public comment period, the EPA received two letters commenting on the proposal. Both expressed opposition to the exemption. … Response: The EPA does not believe that this comment is applicable to the Baton Rouge action because the area has not based its section 182(f) petition on ``clean'' air monitoring data.
61 FR 2438Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Oct 28, 1999
We will address all public comments in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. We will not institute a second comment period on this action. … The rule affects only one State, and does not alter the relationship or the distribution of power and responsibilities established in Federal Clean Air Act (the Act). C.
64 FR 57983Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Apr 24, 2009
Under section 107(d)(1)(C) of the Clean Air Act (CAA), the Milwaukee-Racine, WI area was designated nonattainment for the 1-hour ozone NAAQS by operation of law upon enactment of the 1990 CAA amendments … All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed action. The EPA will not institute a second comment period.
74 FR 18641Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; Maine and New Hampshire; 2015 Ozone NAAQS Interstate Transport Requirements
Federal Register · Rule · Aug 17, 2021
This action is being taken in accordance with the Clean Air Act. DATES: This rule is effective on August 17, 2021. … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
86 FR 45870Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of Missouri
Federal Register · Rule · Mar 18, 2003
Section 110 of the Clean Air Act (CAA) requires states to develop air pollution regulations and control strategies to ensure that state air quality meets the national ambient air quality standards established … This process generally includes a public notice, public hearing, public comment period, and a formal adoption by a state-authorized rulemaking body.
68 FR 12829Environmental Protection Agency
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.