Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.25s
Opposition Brief — National Ass'n of Broadcasters v. Quincy Cable TV, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1986
Sent. 24, 1966) (No. 85-390) ................................ 16, 17 Tele-Communications of Key West, Inc. v. … Sept. 24, 1985) (No. 85-390). The Ninth Circuit’s current view of cable’s First Amendment status echoes that of the D.C.
476 U.S. 1169Opposition Brief — National Credit Union Admin. v. First Nat. Bank & Trust Co.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1998
Jd. at 399-400. … In stating that it was overruling these cases, the Clarke Court said: “The [zone of interests] test is not meant to be especially demanding.” 479 U.S. at 399.
522 U.S. 479Motion to Dismiss — Chupka v. Lorenz-Schneider Co.
Supreme Court brief · Motion to Dismiss · 1963
Y. 24397, 399, 165 N. … Hodge, 334 U.S. 24-(1948) (concurring opinion of Frankfurter, J) See also Harrisonrille ¥ Dickey Clay €4., 289 Ul. 334 ta eee f.)
372 U.S. 227Petition — Rado v. Connecticut
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1980
Green, 399 U.S. 149 Le ee Gasca bea oe one eb bee derceess Oca Douglas v. Alabama, 380 U.S. 415 Ob} Parr rrr T TT rrrererrrrnr fare 14,16, 25 Draper v. … Green, 399 U.S. 149, 163 [1970]).
447 U.S. 920Motion to Affirm — Nader v. Schaffer
Supreme Court brief · Motion to Affirm · 1976
Supp. 399, 137 BE Gee Gee anh 0600 che sbseensabssnse: 12 iii PAGE Seay v. Latham, 143 Tex. 1, 182 S.W.2d 251 (1944) 8 Smith v. … 16 1967— 39 3 1968— 7 7 1969— 170 30 1970 — 24 None 1971— 212 30 1972— 23 9 1973— 192 24 4974— 29 15 1975— 249 13 Total 969 147 May include some candidacies subsequently withdrawn * Including
429 U.S. 989Petitioners Brief — Edmonds v. Compagnie Generale Transatlantique
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1979
Johnson, BGS Gels 77S CaBeere « «& 6 24 Jackson v. Lykes Brothers Steam- ship Co., 386 U.S. 371 (1967) 30 Landon v. … A., 399 F. Supp. 712 (W.D. iis. Bere vas: 6.6. % 6 2 2 48 United States v. Reliable Transfer Geiss Sana Ge Be. FOr taser -« 35 Voris v. Eikel, 346 U.
443 U.S. 256Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Ohio v. Arthur Andersen & Co.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1974
Ill. 1967), rev d on other grounds, 399 F.2d 711 (7th Cir. 1968), and Fischer v. Kletz, 41 F.R.D. 377, 382 (S.D.N.Y. 1966). 14 3. … United States, 406 24 O71, 675 (16h Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 US. 966 (1972). See 11 C. waer & A.
419 U.S. 1034Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Brian Gonzales, Petitioner v. California
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jul 7, 2022
Rev. 399 (2000) ............................................. 20 Nancy Pennington & Reid Hastie, A Cognitive Model of Juror Decision Making: The Story Model, 13 Cardozo L. … Rev. 399, 402 nn.10 & 18 (2000) (citing 20 studies).4 Indeed, jurors “impose a whole claim condition . . . on themselves unless expressly instructed not to.” David S.
Opposition Brief — Lynn Hamlet, Petitioner v. Officer Hoxie
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Oct 27, 2023
Pet. 23–24. … McKnight, 521 U.S. 399, 415 (1997) (Scalia, J., dissenting, joined by Rehnquist, C.J., Thomas, and Kennedy, JJ.) (citing Williams v. Adams, 85 Mass. 171 (1861)).
Respondent Supplemental Brief — United States v. Atkinson
Supreme Court brief · Respondent Supplemental Brief · 1936
Public No. 47,.67th Congress, 42 Stat. 147, 148, Section 404 Public No. 90, 65th Congress, 40 Stat. 398, 399, Section 13 Public 242, 68th Congress, 43 Stat. 607, 38 U. S. … Section 307 of the World War Veterans’ Act, as amended by Section 24 of Public 522, approved July 3, 1930 (46 Stat. 991) provides: .
297 U.S. 157Supreme Court brief · Motion to affirm · Oct 20, 2025
Perry, 548 U.S. 399 (2006) ........................................ 23 Thornburg v. … Perry, 548 U.S. 399, 441 (2006) (“[T]he problem here is entirely of the State’s own making.
Opposition Brief — AstraZeneca UK Limited, et al., Petitioners v. Joshua Atchley, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Aug 23, 2023
Hainline involved students throwing erasers at one another in a classroom. 331 P.2d 397, 399 (Okla. 1958). … In Keel, the defendant had no “intent to injure” the plaintiff. 331 P.2d at 399.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Cutter v. Wilkinson
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005
League of Women Voters (“LWV”), 468 U.S. 364, 399-401 (1984), and Rust v. … Ct.) at 24 n.40.
544 U.S. 709Amicus Brief — Kremens v. Bartley
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1977
Indeed, studies con- tinue to suggest that one of the fundamental problems ® See p. 24 and n. 21, infra. … See p. 24 & n. 21, supra.
431 U.S. 119Petitioners Brief — McGautha v. California
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1971
Pennsylvania, 382 US.399 ............. 20, 21, 24 Goldman v. Knecht, 295 F. Supp. 897 ................ 24, 25 Hawthorne v. State, 135 Ark. 247, 204 S.W. 841.......... 32 puommom ©. Lammy, SB UB. … S. 399, 403 (1966).
402 U.S. 183Petition — Washington v. Chrisman
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1982
Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 26 L.Ed.2d 419, 90 S.Ct. 1975 (1970); and Carroll v. United States, 267 U.S. 132, 69 L.Ed. 543, 45 S.Ct. 280 (1925). … Chrisman, 24 Wn. App. 385, 600 P.2d 1316 (1979). They then petitioned this court for review.
455 U.S. 1Petition — Clark Oil & Refining Corp. v. Alderson
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1983
Bellotti, (1978) 435 U.S. 765 17, 21, 24 Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., (1974) 418 U.S. 323 ....17, 20, 21 Giaccio v. Pennsylvania, (1966) 382 U.S. 399 ............ 12, 14, 15 Givhan v. … Co., (Mo. 1972) 489 S.W.2d 197 adi 13, 16, 20, 24 Prudential Insurance Co. v. Cheek, (1922) 259 USS. 530 ENCE RD a thegk COMER 24 Vv Rimmer v. Colt Industries, (C.A.
459 U.S. 1205Respondents Brief — Turner v. New York
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1967
October Terr 4 ° ene ee eee eee ANS 5 ~ No. 399 . e ~ . … South Carolina, 372 U.S. 229 (1963) ........24, 25 Feiner v: New York, 340 U. S. 315 (1951) ...c..0. 20, 21, 24 Hague v. CIO, "307 U.
386 U.S. 773Opposition — National Labor Relations Board v. Alpers' Jobbing Co.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1977
Co., 474 F. 2d 1064, I Cen i eee ek 24 Palm Container Corp., 117 N.L.R.B. 434, 436 (1957) 24 Papanikolaou v. … App. 24-25). In fact, no such blanket rule exists.
434 U.S. 877Brief for the United States — Independent Coal Co. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United States · 1927
Thomas, 18 How, 253. 262; Thompson vy, Marwell, 95 US. 391, 399; Story’s Equity Plead- ings, 10th ed., Sees. SOS, 339, S45, B51cb), BO, 420, W220 Cooper on Equity Pleading, pp. 74, 75. … Statutes when it has been urged to apply them to har the rights of the Cievernment,”’ referring to Northern Pacific Railway Company vo United States, 27 US Court went on te st but oa restrietive, 399
274 U.S. 640
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.