Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.40s
Opposition — Girard v. Schweitzer
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1979
Hodges, 423 U.S. 19 (1975) ........0.000e. 7 State ex rel. Girard, et al. v. Percich, 557 S.W. 2d 25 MC tsa shave cies oer iceseeceeeee 2 Taylor v. … Hayes, 418 U.S. 488 (1974)?
440 U.S. 917Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Nassau County, New York v. Shain
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2002
See Turner, 482 U.S. at 86. … See Turner, 482 U.S. at 90.
537 U.S. 1083Opinion — United States v. Hale
Supreme Court brief · Opinion · 1975
S., at 422-423. . 8 UNITED STATES v. HALE in the presence of an attorney, or in open court. … Shepherd y. vies States, 290 U.S. 96, 104 (1930).
422 U.S. 171Federal Register · Notice · Mar 16, 2018
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Yasmin Bordas at (202) 482-3813 and Davina Friedmann at (202) 482-0698 (China); Trisha Tran at (202) 482-4852 and Eli Lovely at (202) 482-1593 (India); AD/CVD Operations … , Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S.
83 FR 11681Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade AdministrationOpposition Brief — Ohio v. Am. Express Co., 138 S. Ct. 355 (2017) (No. 16-1454)
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2017
Lewistown Hosp., 423 ¥.3d 184 (3d Cir. 2005), cert. denied, 547 ey UIT ncicsinnitnninbisnsadnbeesendndacorseecesenupenionll 22 Grappone, Inc. v. … Servs., Inc., 504 U.S. 451, 482 (1992).
Federal Register · Rule · Jan 29, 2007
Please submit your report to: (i) E-mail: rpd2@bis.doc.gov ; (ii) Fax: (202) 482-3355; or (iii) Mail or Hand Delivery/Courier: Regulatory Policy Division, U.S. … U.S.
72 FR 3943Commerce DepartmentIndustry and Security BureauPetitioners Brief — Wallace v. Kato
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 2007
Blackshere, 281 P.2d 423 (ORD. EDIE). anivicncerciinashvstsubsiodiiaitipdeiaaiiinnie aman 25 Berringer v. … Dixon, 253 Va. 275, 282, 482 S.E.2d 797, 801 (1997); Washington: Owens vy. Harrison, 120 Wash.App. 909, 913, 86 P.3d 1266, 1268 (2004); Wisconsin: Hicks v.
549 U.S. 384Reply Brief — Payton v. New York
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1980
Peltier, 422 U.S. 531 (1975) 6, 9-10 United States v. Watson, 423 U.S. 411 (1976) 6 Warden v. Hayden, 387 U.S. 294 (1967) 13 Wood v. Strickland, 420 U.S. 308 (1975) 9 Statutes: N.Y. Crim. Proce. … Watson, 423 U.S. 411, 423-24 (1976); see also United States v. Peltier, 422 U.S. 531, 542-543 n.13 (1975).
445 U.S. 573Agency decision · Agency decision
U.S. … Helvering, 292 U.S. at 440.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
U.S. … Helvering, 292 U.S. at 440.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
U.S. … Helvering, 292 U.S. at 440.
United States Tax CourtSpecial Access/Special Regime Export Declaration; Proposed Information Collection
Federal Register · Notice · Mar 10, 1998
Phone number: (202) 482-3272. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Request for additional information or copies of the information collection instrument and instructions should be directed to: Lori E. … Mennitt, Office of Textiles and Apparel, U.S. Department of Commerce, Room 3009, 14th & Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; Phone number: (202) 482-3400, and fax number: (202) 482-0858.
63 FR 11653Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade AdministrationReply Brief — At&t Corp. v. Allen Et Ux., on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2004
Thomas, 482 U.S. 483 (1987) ............00 8,9, 10 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Shutts, 472 U.S. 797 CDI) 0x eincnesnstivisictpssciiseniiicdabaramancammuadamadmaaia 7 Serna v. H.E. … See, e.g., Perry, 482 U.S. at 488-89; Southland Corp. v. Keating, 465 U.S. 1, 6-8 (1984); Local No. 438 Constr. & Gen. Laborers’ Union v. Curry, 371 U.S. 542, 546-50 (1963).
541 U.S. 1027Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Singh v. Drexel Burnham Lambert Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1989
McMahon, 482 U.S. , 107 S.Ct. 2332, 96 L.Ed.2d 185 (1987), the Supreme Court had effectively overruled Wilko v. … McMahon, 482 U.S. , 107 S.Ct. 2332, 96 L. Ed.2d 185 (1987); Kavouras v. Visual Products Systems, Inc., 680 F.Supp. 205, 207-08 (W.D. Pa. 1988); Aronson v.
490 U.S. 1080Jacobo Dreszer, M.D., Decision and Order
Federal Register · Notice · Apr 7, 2011
Merrill, 513 F.3d 1293, 1306 (11th Cir. 2008) (quoting Moore, 423 U.S. at 139)). … Stodola, 74 FR at 20731; Shyngle, 74 FR at 6057-58 (citing Moore, 423 U.S. at 141-43). The CSA looks to state law to determine whether a bonafide doctor-patient relationship existed.
76 FR 19386Justice DepartmentDrug Enforcement AdministrationOpposition Brief — Pour v. Mississippi Medical Licensure Board
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1990
Bradford, 423 U.S. 147, 149 (1975). This case clearly does not satisfy the second element. Dr. … Texas, 441 U.S. 418, 423 (1979).
498 U.S. 999Federal Register · Notice · Jul 11, 2024
SUMMARY: Based on affirmative final determinations by the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) and the U.S. … Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4161, (202) 482-4567, (202) 482-6172, (202) 482-4948, (202) 482-6458, (202) 482-0223, or (202) 482-1058,
89 FR 56851Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade AdministrationSupreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Nov 19, 2018
Id. at 423. … Id. at 423-24 (emphases added) (quoting directed-verdict order).
Opposition Brief — Barrios-Moriera v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1989
Watson, 423 U.S. 411 (1976) .. 4 Constitution and statutes: ee cee eesecs en ewe e hus ecb abn 2 21 U.S.C. 841(b)(1)(B) (1982 & Supp. … Watson, 423 U.S. 411 (1976) (the warrantless arrest of a person in a public place is lawful if it is supported by probable cause).
493 U.S. 953Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Apr 16, 2018
Estate of Shabazz, 482 U.S. 342, 349 (1987) (some quotation marks omitted))). … Safley, 482 U.S. 78 (1987), and [O’Lone].” Id. (parallel citations omitted).
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.