Documents

Amicus Curiae Brief — City of Sherrill v. Oneida Indian Nation of NY

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005

Boylan 256 F. at 482. Once Indian lands are alienated with the permission of Congress, even if the Indian tribe reaquires them, the protections of the Nonintercourse Act no longer apply. … Mayes, 163 U.S. 376 (1896), United States v. Winans, 198 U.S. 371 (1905), Winters v. United States, 207 U.S. 564 (1908).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Randall v. Sorrell

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006

A 2003 survey by the U.S. … Supp. 2d at 482-83.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Cellect, LLC, Petitioner v. Katherine K. Vidal, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 28, 2024

U.S. v. … NCAA, 584 U.S. 453, 482-83 (2018) (courts should not differ sharply from what Congress contemplated); see also A.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Dow Chemical Co. v. Stephenson

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2002

However, the Court also made clear that courts “may not grant preclusive effect . . . to a constitutionally infirm judgment.” 527 U.S. at 482. 8 The importance of trial by jury as a fundamental right … Amchem at 521 U.S. at 626.

Amicus Curiae Brief — SEC v. Edwards

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004

U.S. at 852. … Ralston Purina Co., 346 U.S. 119 (1953).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Murr v. Wisconsin, 136 S. Ct. 890 (2016) (No. 15-214)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2016

Palazzolo, 533 U.S. at 617-18; Tahoe-Sierra, 535 U.S. at 333-34, 342; Lingle, 544 U.S. at 537. And the Penn Central analysis itself should be “informed” by that purpose. … City of Homewood, 671 F.2d 482, 435, 438 (11th Cir. 1982) (finding a 52.6 percent diminution not to be a taking); Bernardsville Quarry, Inc. v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Davis v. Washington

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006

United Air Lines, 527 U.S. 471 (1999), and Murphy v. … utterances are nontestimo- nial); see also Brun, 2005 WL 1797451 (same); Key, 2005 WL 467167 (same); but see Stancil, 866 A.2d at 809°(some excited utterances are testimonial); Hembertt, 696 N.W.2d at 482

Amicus Curiae Brief — Regal Cinemas, Inc. v. Stewmon

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004

Robbins, 519 U.S. 482 (1997) ........ssccsccccscsscsessseees 14 Appalachian Power Co. v. … denied, 528 U.S. 1106 (2000).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Mathias v. WorldCom Technologies, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2002

See Atascadero, 473 U.S. at 239-40; Pennhurst 1, 451 U.S. at 17. 3. … Garden State Bar Ass'n, 457 U.S. 423, 432-34 (1982). State courts are, of course, required to apply federal law, see Testa, 330 U.S. at 394, and are fully able to do so. See Allen v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — LaRue v. DeWolff, Boberg & Associates, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2008

Admin., U.S. … PNC Bank., Ky., lne., 267 F.3d 477, 481-482 (6th Cir. 2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 928 (2002); see also Goeres v. Charles Schwab & Co., No. 05-15282, 2007 WL 495191 (9th Cir.

Amicus Curiae Brief — American Cyanamid Co. v. Geye

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2002

. at 482-483. … Yee, 503 U.S. at 538.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, Inc., 139 S. Ct. 1780 (2019) (No. 18-483)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2019

The Eighth Circuit held that the statute furthered the “legitimate interest in proper disposal of fetal remains” recognized by this Court in Akron. 910 F.2d at 482 (quoting Akron, 462 U.S. at 452 n … Rotary Club of Duarte, 481 U.S. 537, 549 (1987); Roberts v. U.S. Jaycees, 468 U.S. 609, 623 (1984); see, e.g., Wis. Stat. § 106.52.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Leegin Creative Leather Products v. PSKS, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007

See NCAA, 468 U.S. … Box 110300 Diamond Courthouse Juneau, AK 99811 (907) 465-3600 Dustin McDanieL Attorney General of Arkansas 200 Tower Bldg., 323 Center Street Little Rock, AR 72201 (800) 482-8982 RICHARD

Amicus Curiae Brief — Excel Corp. v. Estate of Kriefall

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004

EPA, 2004 WL 86284, *16 (U.S. … determining the admissibility of evidence in, the state proceedings still to come”; and (3) “a refusal immediately to review the state court decision might seriously erode federal policy.” 420 US. at 482

Amicus Curiae Brief — Hellenic Lines Ltd. v. Rhoditis

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1970

(U.S. at 590, L. ed. at 1272.) … Jarka Co., supra. 282 U.S; 234, 51 S. Ot. 111, - 75 L.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. Reilly

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001

See Edge Broadcasting, 509 U.S. at 423. While the government may not “burden substantially more speech than is necessary to further [its] legitimate interests,” Ward v. … Ohralik, 436 U.S. at 456; accord Florida Bar, 515 U.S. at 623; Fox, 492 U.S. at 481 (1989); Central Hudson, 447 U.S. at 562 n.5.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Brzonkala v. Morrison (Nos. 99-29, 99-5)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1999

Maryland, 17 U.S. 316, 423 (1819), that “where the law is not prohibited, and is really calculated to effect any of the objects entrusted to the government ... to inquire into the degree of [the law … Maryland, 17 U.S. at 423. Il. THE VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN ACT IS AN APPROPRIATE EXERCISE OF CONGRESS’ POWERS TO ENFORCE THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT. A.

Amicus Curiae Brief — NationsBank of North Carolina, N. A. v. Variable Annuity Life Insurance

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1994

Bank, 405 U.S. 394 |, ; | OM rn ET 23 First Nat'l Bank v. Converse, 200 U.S. 425 (1906) .. 18 First Nat'l Bank v. Hartford, 273 U.S. 548 (1927).. 17 First Nat’l Bank v. National Exch. Bank, 92 U.S … See Brief in Opposition to Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit at 11-16, Nos. 92-482, 92-645 (filed Nov. 12, 1992). 17 These regulations are

Amicus Curiae Brief — American Bankers Insurance Co. of Florida v. Alexander

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001

Ohio, 273 U.S. 510, 523 (1927); In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358, 361-362 (1970). … . at 482-483.

Amicus Curiae Brief — SEC v. Zandford

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2002

of 5 U.S. … McMahon, 482 U.S. 220, 238 (1987) (permitting pre-dispute broker-customer arbitration agreements to be enforced even where claims arise under Section 10(b)). 2 See Superintendent of Ins. v.