Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
7,792 results
0.26s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004
Sabbatino, 376 U.S. at 423 (“the public law of nations can hardly dictate to a country which is in theory wronged how to treat that wrong within its domestic borders”). … See Erie, 304 U.S.
542 U.S. 692Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 17, 2025
MSPB, 582 U.S. 420, 423 (2017). The Board lacks authority to enforce its own decisions.2 The Merit Systems Protection Board’s history confirms its purely adjudicatory purpose. … Wiener, 357 U.S. at 353 (quoting Humphrey’s Executor, 295 U.S. at 629).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Bush v. Gore
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000
Gore, U.S. Sup. … Williams, 482 U. S. 386, 392, 107 S. Ct. 2425, 96 L. Ed.2d 318 (1987)).
531 U.S. 98Amicus Curiae Brief — Chicago v. Environmental Defense Fund
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1994
Bell Aerospace, Co., 416 U.S. 267, 275 (1974)). … Philadelphia Gear Corp., 476 U.S. 426, 439 (1986); EEOC v. Commercial Office Products, 486 U.S. 107, 115 (1988).
511 U.S. 328Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 7, 2025
United States, 316 U.S. 447 (1942); CBS v. United States, 316 U.S. 407 (1942). … United States, 316 U.S. 407 (1942), and rev’d, 316 U.S. 447 (1942); Decree Granting Temporary Restraining Order, Transcript of Record at 482, Columbia Broad. Sys. v.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Troxel v. Granville
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000
Goff, 92 F.3d 419, 423 (6th Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1104 (1997) (stating that “rational basis review, not strict scrutiny,” governs “wholly secular limitations on private school education … Hurley, 515 U.S.
530 U.S. 57Amicus Curiae Brief — Rubin v. Islamic Republic Iran, 137 S. Ct. 708 (2017) (No. 16-534)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2017
Altmann, 541 U.S. 677 (2004)........ 20 Roberts v. Sea-Land Servs., lc., 566 U.S. 93 (2012) ......... 19 Taylor v. Standard Gas Co., 306 U.S. 307 (1939)... 4 Walter Fuller Aircraft Sales, Inc. v. … Islamic Republic of Iran, 831 F.3d 470, 482-484 (2016), the D.C. Circuit treated subsection (g) as a standalone exception, but without analysis.
Amicus Curiae Brief — FTC v. Ticor Title Ins. Co.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992
Patrick, 486 U.S. at 105; Midcal, 445 U.S. at 106. … City of Wauwatosa, 37 Wis. 2d 466, 482, 155 N.W.2d 17, 25-26 (1967).
504 U.S. 621Amicus Curiae Brief — Arthur Andersen LLP v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005
Bass, 404 U.S. at 348 (quoting McBoyle, 283 U.S. at 27). … /d. at 423.
544 U.S. 696Amicus Curiae Brief — Eddie Lee Shular, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 2, 2019
See, e.g., Taylor, 495 U.S. at 602; see Descamps, 570 U.S. at 257-58. … Adkins, 96 So.3d 412, 423 n.1 (Fla. 2012) (Pariente, J., concurring), lacks a mens rea and thus sweeps far broader than the generic crime for possession with intent to sell.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Herrera v. Wyoming, 138 S. Ct. 720 (2018) (No. 17-532)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018
United States, 318 U.S. 423, 432 (1943) (trea- ties “cannot be rewritten or expanded beyond their clear terms”); accord Nebraska v. Parker, 136 S. … Bowlby, 152 U.S. 1 (1894). Winans, 198 U.S. at 383.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 1, 2021
Morse, 551 U.S. at 409. … Cf. id. at 423 (Alito, J., concurring). There may be a risk, for example, that such authority could be exercised disproportionately against students of color or other identified student populations.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Francis V. Lorenzo, Petitioner v. Securities and Exchange Commission
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 27, 2018
Ct. 420, 423 (2016); Dirks, 463 U.S. at 653–55, 657–59. 12 misstatements, omissions by one who has a duty to disclose, and manipulative trading practices (where ‘manipulative’ is a term of art).” 552 … Bank, 511 U.S. at 177.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Brown v. Legal Foundation of Wash.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003
See Penn Central, 438 U.S. at 124-25; Lucas, 505 U.S. at 1015- 16; Loretto, 458 U.S. at 434-35. … In Loretto, a New York statute required landlords to permit a cable television company to install its facilities on the landlord’s property. 458 U.S. at 423-24.
538 U.S. 216Amicus Curiae Brief — United States, Petitioner v. Zackey Rahimi
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 4, 2023
Texas, 441 U.S. 418, 423 (1979) (citation omitted). Civil proceedings at the federal level and in Texas generally have a preponderance of the evidence standard. Id.; Roper v. … Addington, 441 U.S. at 424.
Amicus Curiae Brief — 303 Creative LLC, et al., Petitioners v. Aubrey Elenis, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 19, 2022
Free Speech L. 377, 423-25 (2021). … See Duarte, 481 U.S. at 541; Jaycees, 468 U.S. at 613.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Whole Woman's Health v. Cole, 136 S. Ct. 499 (2015) (No. 15-274)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015
Lawrence, 539 U.S. at 575. … Cleburne Living Ctr., Inc., 473 U.S. 482, 440 (1985) (elevated scrutiny is appropriate in some circumstances at least in part because laws targeting groups for discriminatory treatment using these
Amicus Curiae Brief — Wilder v. Virginia Hospital Assn.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1990
Bacon, 457 U.S. 182 (1982) 12 Bowen v. Gilliard, 483 U.S. 587 (1987) 4 14 Cannon v. University of Chicago, 441 U.S. 677 11 —— 10 Case v. … Roanoke ment & Howsing Authority, 479 U.S. 418, 423 (1987) (reading Smith v.
496 U.S. 498Amicus Curiae Brief — Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1974
Conoco Plastics, 423 F.2d 57 (5th Cir. me’ 1970) cert. denied, 400 U.S. 951 (1970)............. 2 Columbia Nastic & Carter Claibone v. Columbia R. & C. Mfg. … (U.S.) 94, 98 (1867).
419 U.S. 1068Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2016
Fourco, 353 U.S. at 226. … Brunette, 406 U.S. at 711- 13.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.